# History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2016 Memo (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 memorandum from the Eastern Cape Mock Exam 2016 (English), 17 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr12-hist-p2-s16-memo-f-eng/d527c026-c62f-41ca-846e-9a29634b8386
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2016
- Exam period: Eastern Cape Mock Exam
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 17

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2016 Memo (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr12-hist-p2-s16-memo-f-eng/d527c026-c62f-41ca-846e-9a29634b8386)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · Eastern Cape Mock Exam · 2016. Memorandum, 17 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

NATIONAL
                 SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                       GRADE 12

                  SEPTEMBER 2016

                     HISTORY P2
                    MEMORANDUM

MARKS:   150

               This memorandum consists of 17 pages.

### Page 2

2                                      HISTORY P2                         (EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)

 1.     SOURCE BASED QUESTIONS

 1.1    The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based questions:

                                                                         WEIGHTING
        COGNITVE
                     HISTORICAL SKILLS                                      OF
         LEVELS
                                                                         QUESTIONS
                         Extract evidence from sources
          LEVEL 1        Selection and organisation of relevant               30%
            (L1)         information from sources                            (15)
                         Define historical concepts/terms
                         Interpretation of evidence from sources
          LEVEL 2                                                            40%
                         Explain information gathered from sources
            (L2)                                                             (20)
                         Analyse evidence from sources
                         Interpret and evaluate evidence from the
                         sources
                         Engage with sources to determine its
          LEVEL 3                                                             30%
                         usefulness, reliability, bias and limitations
            (L3)                                                             (15)
                         Compare and contrast interpretations and
                         perspectives presented in sources and draw
                         independent conclusions

 1.2    The following information below indicates how to source-based
        questions are assessed:

            In the marking of source-based questions, credit needs to be given to
            any other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or
            examples.
            In the allocation of marks, emphasis should be placed on how the
            requirements of the question have been addressed.
            In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that
            need to be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated
            in italics.

 1.3    Assessment procedures for source-based questions
           Use a tick ( ) for each correct answer
           Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2 x 2) which translates to two
           reasons and is given two marks each (          ); (1 x 2) which translates
           to one reason and is given two marks (      )
           If a question carries 4 marks then indicate by placing 4 ticks

        Paragraph question
        Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the content and
        structure of the paragraph must be taken into account when awarding a
        mark. The following steps must be used when assessing a response to a
        paragraph question:
               Read the paragraph and place a bullet ( . ) at each point within the
               text where the candidate has used relevant evidence to address the
               question
               Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate
               has been able to use relevant evidence to write a paragraph.

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 3

(EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)                     HISTORY P2                                           3

               At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (√) that the candidate
               has been awarded for the paragraph; as well as the level (1, 2 or 3)
               as indicated in the holistic rubric and a brief comment e.g.
            ___________ . __________________________ . __________________
            _________________ . ____________________________ . __________

        Level 2
        Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph

                Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the
                mark on the right hand bottom margin e.g.       32
                                                                50

                Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back
                cover of the answer script.

 2.     ESSAY QUESTIONS

 2.1    The essay questions require candidates to:

            Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner.
            They need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so
            that they are able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an
            effective argument to answer the question posed. It is essential that an
            essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of evidence
            and a conclusion.

 2.2    Marking of essays questions

            Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by
            the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
            Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion
            than those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific
            essay.
            When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should
            be credited for any other relevant answer

 2.3    Global assessment of the essay

        The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires
        the teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the
        component parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer
        an individual opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an
        argument. The learners will not be required to simply regurgitate ‘facts’ in
        order to achieve a high mark. This approach discourages learners from
        preparing ‘model’ answers and reproducing them without taking into account
        the specific requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the essay
        credits learners’ opinion supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike
        content-based marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the
        emphasis is on the following:

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 4

4                                        HISTORY P2                          (EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)

                The construction of argument
                The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such
                argument
                The learner’s interpretation of the question

 2.4    Assessment procedures of the essay

        2.4.1 Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing essays.

        2.4.2 During the first reading of the extended writing, ticks need to be
              awarded for a relevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in
              memorandum) each of the main points/aspects that is properly
              contextualised (also indicated by bullets in the memorandum) and a
              relevant conclusion (indicated by a bullet in the memorandum) e.g. in
              an answer where there are 5 main points there will be 7 ticks.

        2.4.3 The following additional symbols can also be used:
                Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly
                contextualised
                Wrong statement
                Irrelevant statement

                     Repetition                                                   R
                     Analysis                                                     A√
                     Interpretation                                               I√

 2.5    The Matrix

        2.5.1     Use of analytical matrix in the marking of essay

                  In the marking of essays, with reference to page 5, the given criteria
                  shown in the matrix should be used. In assessing the extended
                  writing note should be taken of both the content and presentation.
                  At the point of intersection of the content and presentation based on
                  the seven competency levels, a mark should be awarded.

        (a)       The first reading of essay will be to determine to what extent the
                  main aspects have been
                  covered and to allocate the          C       LEVEL 4
                  content level (on the matrix).

        (b)       The second reading of essay will relate to the level (on the matrix) of
                  presentation.                      C        LEVEL 4
                                                     P        LEVEL 3

        (c)       Allocate an overall mark with       C       LEVEL 4
                  the use of the matrix.                                        26–27
                                                      P       LEVEL 3

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 5

(EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)                                               HISTORY P2                                                                      5

MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY: TOTAL: 50
                             LEVEL 7                LEVEL 6            LEVEL 5         LEVEL 4         LEVEL 3         LEVEL 2         LEVEL 1
                        Very well planned and    Very well planned     Well planned   Planned and    Shows some       Attempts to      Little or no
                        structured essay.        and structured        and            constructed    evidence of a    structure an     attempt to
PRESENTATION            Good synthesis of        essay. Developed      structured     an argument.   planned and      answer.          structure
                        information.             a relevant line of    essay.         Evidence       constructed      Largely          the essay.
                        Developed an original,   argument.             Attempts to    used to some   argument.        descriptive or
                        well balanced and        Evidence used to      develop a      extent to      Attempts to      some attempt
                        independent line of      defend the            clear          support the    sustain a line   at developing
                        argument with the use    argument. Attempts    argument.      line of        of argument.     a line of
                        of evidence and          to draw an            Conclusion     argument.      Conclusions      argument. No
                        sustained and            independent           drawn from     Conclusions    not clearly      attempt to
CONTENT                 defended the             conclusion from the   the evidence   reached        supported by     draw a
                        argument throughout.     evidence to support   to support     based on       evidence.        conclusion.
                        Independent              the line of           the line of    evidence.
                        conclusion is drawn      argument.             argument.
                        from evidence to
                        support the line of
                        argument.
LEVEL 7
Question has been
fully answered.
Content selection
                             47–50                   43–46
fully relevant to
line of argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has been
answered.
Content selection
                             43–46                   40–42              38–39
relevant to a line of
argument
LEVEL 5
Question
answered to a
great extent.
Content
                             38–39                   36–37              34–35          30–33           28–29
adequately
covered and
relevant.
LEVEL 4
Question
recognisable in
answer. Some                                                            30–33          28–29           26–27
omissions or
irrelevant content
selection.
LEVEL 3
Content selection
does not relate to
the question, but
does not answer it,
or does not always
                                                                                       26–27           24–25            20–23
relate to the
question.
Omissions in
coverage.
LEVEL 2
Question
inadequately                                                                                           20–23            18–19           14–17
addressed.
Sparse content.
LEVEL 1
Question
inadequately
addressed or not                                                                                                        14–17            0–13
at all. Inadequate
or irrelevant
content.

*     Guidelines for allocating a mark for Level 1:
      Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content; no attempt to structure the essay                                             =0
      Question includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt to structure the essay                                       = 1–6
      Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay                                                     = 7–13

Copyright reserved                                                                                                             Please turn over

### Page 6

6                                       HISTORY P2                        (EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)

 SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

 QUESTION 1:         WHAT IMPACT DID THE PHILOSOPHY OF BLACK
                     CONSCIOUSNESS (BC) HAVE ON SOUTH AFRICAN
                     STUDENTS IN THE 1970s?

 1.1    1.1.1    [Definition of historical concepts Source 1A–L1]
                     Black people should be proud of themselves
                     Black people should do things on their own without the help of
                     white people
                     Aimed to conscientise many black South Africans about their
                     political, economic and cultural rights
                     Any other relevant response                         (Any 1 x 2)       (2)

        1.1.2    [Extraction of historical evidence Source 1A–L1]
                      SASM
                      BPC
                      SASO                                                 (Any 2 x 1)     (2)

        1.1.3    [Interpretation of historical concepts Source 1A–L2]
                      The book was biased because it shows blacks in an inferior light
                      Frustrating and humiliating
                      Whites exploiting Blacks
                      Any other relevant answer                        (Any 1 x 2)         (2)

        1.1.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A–L2]
                      They became aware of the philosophy of Black Consciousness
                      They stood up for their rights and demanded equal education
                      Defied the imposition of Bantu Education
                      Coloured pupils boycotted the exams on the Swart Pelgrim
                      Influenced them to be self-reliant
                      Any other relevant response                        (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

        1.1.5    [Engage with Source 1A to ascertain the usefulness of the source–
                 L3]
                     It shows the influence of Black Consciousness on the students
                     It highlights the emergence of organisations that promoted
                     Black Consciousness’
                     Any other relevant response                          (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

 1.2    1.2.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B–L1]
                     boldness
                     dedication
                     sense of purpose
                     clarity of analysis of the situation                  (Any 4 x 1)     (4)

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 7

(EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)                     HISTORY P2                                            7

        1.2.2    [Interpretation of evidence in Source 1B–L2]
                      Inferior education
                      Cost of living was high
                      Wanted some aim/direction in life
                      Increased in rent
                      High unemployment
                      Any other relevant response                          (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

 1.3    1.3.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C–L1]
                      The forced use of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction in all
                      subjects                                                  (1 x 2)      (2)

        1.3.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C–L2]
                      Shows that students were dissatisfied with Afrikaans as a
                      medium of instruction
                      Shows learners embarking on a march
                      Shows that students were united in their fight for better
                      education
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 1 x 2)      (2)

        1.3.3    [Engage with the information to ascertain the reliability of
                 Source 1C–L3]
                     Reliable – primary source
                     That information can be corroborated
                     The photo captures the event as it happened
                     True reflection of the attitude of the students
                     Any other relevant response                            (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

 1.4    1.4.1    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D–L2]
                      All people will be equal
                      Country concerned about the humanity and welfare of its people
                      No one race more superior than the other
                      End of apartheid
                      Any other relevant response                      (Any 2 x 2)           (4)

        1.4.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D–L2]
                      Threat to the apartheid regime
                      Influenced black people to revolt against apartheid
                      Unified Blacks, Indians and coloureds
                      He fulfilled the role of the ANC in exile
                      Any other relevant response                         (Any 2 x 2)        (4)

        1.4.3    [Extraction of evidence from the Source 1D–L1]
                      the explosion of pride among the victims of apartheid       (1 x 2)    (2)

        1.4.4    [Extraction of evidence from the Source 1D–L1]
                      unveiling a statue
                      renaming the bridge
                      declaring his Ginsberg house a national monument        (Any 2 x 1)    (2)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 8

8                                     HISTORY P2                        (EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)

 1.5    [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from relevant sources–L3]
        Candidates must focus on the following:
             BCM gave hope and impetus to the liberation struggle
             Restored the confidence of the youth (Source 1A)
             Promoted black pride (Source 1B)
             BCM educated students to stand up for their rights (Source 1A)
             Promoted unity in challenging the apartheid government
             Through the BCM they were united to break the shackles of apartheid
             and oppression (Source 1C)
             Any other relevant response

        Use the following rubric to allocate a mark:
                     Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g. shows
                     no or little understanding of the impact of the
        LEVEL        philosophy of Black Consciousness on South             MARKS
           1         African Black students in the 1970s                     0–2
                     Uses evidence partially to report on topic or cannot
                     report on topic
                     Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                     extent to the topic e.g. shows an understanding of
        LEVEL        the impact of the philosophy of Black                  MARKS
           2         Consciousness on South African Black students           3–5
                     in the 1970s
                     Uses evidence in a basic manner
                     Uses relevant evidence e.g. demonstrates a
                     thorough understanding the impact of the
                     philosophy of Black Consciousness on South
        LEVEL                                                               MARKS
                     African Black students in the 1970s
           3                                                                 6–8
                     Evidence relates well to the topic
                     Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                     paragraph that shows an understanding of the topic                   (8)
                                                                                         [50]

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 9

(EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)                     HISTORY P2                                          9

 QUESTION 2:          HOW DID THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION
                      (TRC) DEAL WITH THE PAST?

 2.1    2.1.1    [Extraction of evidence Source 2A–L1]
                      terrors
                      the pains
                      miseries
                      vexations (worries)
                      lassitudes (state of physical or mental weariness)
                                                                            (Any 2 x 1)    (2)

        2.1.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A–L1]
                      They wanted to help the society move forward              (1 x 1)    (1)

        2.1.3    [Interpretation of information from Source 2A–L1]
                      Wanting for others what you want for yourself
                      To foster national unity
                      To be human
                      We cannot live in isolation
                      I am who I am because of who we all are
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

        2.1.4    [Explanation of concepts from Source 2A–L1]
                     Provide help to victims so that they could move on
                     Help through grants, bursaries, social pension, housing
                     An amount of R30 000 for the victims of human rights violations
                     Compensation for the loss of their loved ones
                     Any other relevant response                          (Any 1 x 2)      (2)

 2.2    2.2.1    [Interpretation of evidence Source 2B–L2]
                      She wanted to hear the truth about her son’s death
                      She wanted to see the perpetrators
                      She wanted closure
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

        2.2.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B–L2]
                      She did not have his body to bury but only the hair
                      Only remembrance she had of her son
                      She needed to know who did this to her son
                      The hair would be used as proof if needed
                      Any other relevant answer                             (Any 1 x 2)    (2)

 2.3    2.3.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C–L1]
                      Shot at the back of the head/
                      Put on the pyre to burn                               (Any 1 x 1)    (1)

        2.3.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C–L1]
                      Col. du Plessis
                      Gen. van Rensburg                                         (2 x 1)    (2)

        2.3.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C–L2]
Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 10

10                                      HISTORY P2                          (EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)

                     Harms commission was appointed by the National Party
                     government
                     He felt what he did was right
                     He did not expect to give evidence before the TRC
                     He wanted to get amnesty
                     He lied to the Commission because he knew that they would not
                     pursue the matter further/not going to jail
                     Any other relevant response                       (Any 2 x 2)           (4)

        2.3.4    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C–L1]
                      Admitted to the abduction and shooting of Mr Madaka and
                      Mr Mtimkulu on April 14, 1982                           (1 x 2)        (2)

        2.3.5    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C–L2]
                      When her son died her hair was black
                      After 20 years her hair turned grey/white
                      It shows that it took 20 years to find some closure
                      Any other relevant answer                             (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

 2.4    [Comparison of evidence of from sources 2A and 2C–L3]
           2A – talks about pains, terror miseries that victims suffered
           2C – supported when Mrs Mtimkulu collapsed at the hearing as a result
           of re-living the pain at the hearing
           2A – perpetrators asking for amnesty by showing remorse
           2C – this is supported by Gen. van Rensburg when he admits before the
           amnesty committee to the killing of Siphiwo
            Any other relevant response                                  (Any 2 x 2)         (4)

 2.5    2.5.1    [Extracting evidence from Source 2D–L1]
                      South African Security Branch bomb hidden in the earphones of
                      Walkman tape player exploded                           (1 x 2)         (2)

        2.5.2    [Interpretation of evidence from the Source 2D–L2]
                      He is the bread winner, and when he died their hopes also died
                      They cannot continue with their lives without him, even though
                      he is dead
                      Any other relevant response                          (Any 1 x 2)       (2)

        2.5.3    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2D–L1]
                      “What can they do for me now”                               (1 x 2)    (2)

        2.5.4    [Evaluation of evidence to determine justification from the
                 Source 2D–L3]

                 Useful
                    Shows the impact on the lives of family who survived
                    It shows how and why activists were killed during apartheid
                    It reveals that survivors needed some form of compensation
                    Any other relevant response                          (Any 2 x 2)         (4)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 11

(EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)                    HISTORY P2                                       11

 2.6    [Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of evidence from sources and using
        own knowledge to construct own argument–L3]

        Learners are expected to evaluate the TRC process and say that it was
        successful, unsuccessful or both in obtaining their outcomes.

        The TRC process was successful in dealing with the past.

             Improved race relations between black and white South Africans
             (Source 2A)
             Some victims received reparations as compensation for their loss
             Helped with the process of nation building (Source 2B)
             Helped with reconciliation
             Granting of amnesty (Source 2C)
             Both sides of the conflict came to testify
             Many unaccounted victims were identified, graves located and exhumed
             and given to families for reburial
             Victims came to know what really happened during the apartheid years
             (Source 2C)
             Any other relevant response

        The TRC process was less successful in dealing with the past.

             Some perpetrators did not appear before the TRC (Source 2D)
             Some victims wanted the perpetrators to face prosecution
             Some regarded the TRC as a witch hunt (Source 2A)
             Amnesty was controversial (Source 2D)
             Reopened painful wounds (Source 2B)
             Any other relevant response

        Use the following rubric to allocate a mark:
                     Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g.
                     shows no or little understanding on how the
        LEVEL                                                               MARKS
                     TRC was able to deal with the past
          1                                                                  0–2
                     Uses evidence partially to report on topic or cannot
                     report on topic
                     Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
        LEVEL        extent to the topic e.g. shows an understanding        MARKS
          2          on how the TRC was able to deal with the past           3–5
                     Uses evidence in a basic manner
                     Uses relevant evidence e.g. shows a thorough
                     understanding on how the TRC was able to deal
        LEVEL        with the past                                          MARKS
          3          Evidence relates well to the topic                      6–8
                     Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                     paragraph that shows understanding of the topic                      (8)
                                                                                         [50]

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 12

12                                      HISTORY P2                         (EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)

 QUESTION 3:         WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF GLOBALISATION ON THE
                     LIVES OF ORDINARY PEOPLE IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER?

 3.1    3.1.1    [Explanation of concepts from Source 3A–L1]
                     Operating at an international level with regard to trade, economy
                     and technology of national and cultural resources
                     Processes that promote world-wide exchanges
                     Any relevant response                                  (Any 1 x 2)     (2)

        3.1.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A–L1]
                      Gain from trade
                      Grow economically
                      Grow socially
                      Higher income
                      Higher GDP
                      Any relevant response                                 (Any 3 x 1)     (3)

        3.1.3    [Usefulness of evidence from Source 3A–L3]

                      Every country can gain from trade
                      Countries will expand and achieve higher incomes
                      Raise the GDP
                      Both rich and poor globalised countries will show increase
                      Any relevant response                                 (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

        3.1.4    [Interpretation of Source 3A–L2]
                      Incomes of the rich increased compared to the poor
                      The rich remained richer and the poor remained poorer
                      The industrialised countries benefit more because they sell the
                      finished product and the poor countries extract the raw materials
                      Any relevant response                                 (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

 3.2    3.2.1    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3B–L2]
                      Provided financial aid to poor or underdeveloped countries
                      Provided economic aid to poor or underdeveloped countries
                      These countries will be able to survive and compete
                      Any other relevant answer                           (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

        3.2.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3B–L2]
                      Aid/help would not solve the problems of the poor
                      The IMF/World Bank should make aid available to all poor
                      countries
                      The IMF/World Bank should not have any rules/restrictions for
                      poor countries to apply for loans
                      When loans are given to poor countries they cannot pay the
                      loan amount, but rich countries when receiving loans become
                      richer
                      Any other relevant response                          (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 13

(EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)                     HISTORY P2                                        13

 3.3    3.3.1    [Extraction of the evidence from the source 3C–L1]
                      IMF
                      World Bank
                      WTO                                                       (3 x 1)    (3)

        3.3.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3C–L1]
                      To carry the plan of privatisation
                      Deregulation
                      Free trade                                            (Any 2 x 1)    (2)

        3.3.3    [Interpretation of the evidence from the Source 3C–L2]
                      If you export, generate more income to pay off your loan and no
                      money for your own use
                      Cultivate luxury crops for export
                      Protection of their own people were compromised to attract
                      foreign investment
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

        3.3.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C–L2]
                      The countries were in debt
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 1 x 2)    (2)

        3.3.5    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3C–L1]
                      To attract foreign investment                             (1 x 2)    (2)

 3.4    3.4.1    [Extraction of information in the Source 3D–L1]
                      lack of shelter
                      poor clothing
                      poor living conditions
                      Any other relevant answer                            (Any 2 x 1)     (2)

        3.4.2    [Interpretation of relevant information from Source 3D–L2]
                      Global economy dominated by the rich
                      The world economy is dominated by industrial nations
                      Created debts among the poor countries
                      Cannot compete with rich countries
                      Exported unprocessed material to rich countries which in turn
                      sold it as finished products
                      Any other relevant response                         (Any 1 x 2)      (2)

 3.5    [Comparison of information in Sources 3C and 3D–L3]
            3C – countries were not producing for local consumption
            3D – supports this because it shows people are underfed
            3C – poor countries were paying their loans
            3D – evidence of poor clothing and inadequate housing
             Any other relevant response                                   (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 14

14                                    HISTORY P2                         (EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)

 3.6    [Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of evidence from all sources and own
        knowledge to construct own original argument]

        Candidates should either take a stance or focus on both positive and
        negative aspects of globalisation.

        Candidates should focus on the following aspects in their response.

        Positive
           Brought advancement in fast food chains (Source 3A)
           Advancement in communication, transport and infrastructure
           Exchange of culture made possible (Source 3D)
           Produce more export, bring in more money. etc. (Source 3C)
           Global market much more developed than previously. (Source 3C)
           Through IMF and WTO managed to standardised international economic
           policies (Source 3C)
           Any other relevant response

        Negative
           Domination of economies of the world by big companies (Source 3D)
           Poor countries have no access to shelter, dress and living conditions
           (Source 3D)
           Indigenous culture suffer due to universal culture(Source 3C)
           Exploitation of natural resources/Prices of raw material kept low/do not
           benefit from company profits (Source 3A)
           Exploitation of labour (Source 3D)
           Accumulation of debts by poor countries (Source 3A)
           Any other relevant response

        Use the following rubric to allocate a mark:
                     Uses evidence in a very elementary manner e.g.
                     shows little or no understanding of the impact of
        LEVEL        globalisation on the lives of ordinary people in        MARKS
          1          the New World Order                                      0–2
                     Use evidence partially to report on topic or cannot
                     write a paragraph on the topic
                     Extract evidence from the sources that is mostly
                     relevant and relates to a great extent to the topic
        LEVEL        e.g. show some understanding of the impact of           MARKS
          2          globalisation on the lives of ordinary people in         3–5
                     the New World Order
                     Use evidence from sources in a very basic manner
                     Uses relevant evidence from the sources e.g.
                     demonstrate a thorough understanding of the
                     impact of globalisation on the lives of ordinary
        LEVEL                                                                MARKS
                     people in the New World Order
          3                                                                   6–8
                     Use evidence from sources very effectively in an
                     organised paragraph that shows a thorough
                     understanding of the topic                                            (8)
                                                                                          [50]

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 15

(EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)                        HISTORY P2                                        15

 SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

 QUESTION 4:           CIVIL RESISTANCE, 1970s TO 1980s: SOUTH AFRICA THE CRISIS
                       OF APARTHEID IN THE 1980s

 SYNOPSIS
 Candidates need to take focus on the adaptation of the apartheid policy; the measures
 Botha introduced to further divide and rule the non-white people. They need to show that
 this had the opposite effect and led to massive internal resistance that will ultimately lead to
 the destruction of apartheid.

 MAIN ASPECTS
 Candidates should include the following aspects in their essays:

 Introduction:        Candidates should indicate the extent to which internal resistance
                      movements challenged the apartheid regime in the 1980s.

 Elaboration:
 To a large extent
     Botha’s policy of Total Onslaught/Total Strategy
     Reform measures (1983 Constitution, Tricameral Parliament 1984)
     Formation and role of the UDF (‘Don’t vote’ campaign, ‘Million Signature’ campaign
     Mass protests in Black South African townships in 1984/5
     Protest marches (e.g. Langa township in the Western Cape)
     School boycotts led mainly by COSAS in 1983 and 1985
     Communities embarked on rent boycotts e.g. Vaal Triangle and Soweto in 1984
     Formation and impact of COSATU and other unions in workers struggles
     Stay-away campaigns in May Day 1986 and NUM strike in 1987
     Declaration of the State of Emergency 1985 to1986 by the PW Botha government
     Emergence of the Mass Democratic Movement in1989 and the Defiance campaign
     The role of the Black Sash
     SACC
     End Conscription Campaign
     Any other relevant response

 Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.

 If candidates should indicate to a lesser extent, they need to substantiate their
 argument with relevant examples.                                                              [50]

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 16

16                                       HISTORY P2                        (EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)

 QUESTION 5:         THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY TO SOUTH AFRICA AND COMING
                     TO TERMS WITH THE PAST

 SYNOPSIS
 Candidates need to focus on the roles of the NP and the ANC as the key role players but
 should also take into account the roles played by Inkhata, AWB, CP and the Communist
 Party.

 MAIN ASPECTS
 Candidates should include the following aspects in their essays:

 Introduction:       Candidates should indicate whether they agree with the statement or not
                     and elaborate.

 Elaboration:
 Candidates should include:
     The process of negotiations (i.e. Groote Schuur Minute, Pretoria Minute)
     Commitment of the ANC to review the armed struggle
     CODESA I – signing the Declaration of Intent aimed at the creation of a non-racial,
     non-discriminatory South Africa
     Whites only referendum gives a clear mandate for De Klerk to continue negotiations
     CODESA II collapses
     Increased violence (i.e. Boipatong, Bhisho, etc.)
     Record of Understanding restarted the negotiation process/Role of Ramaphosa and
     Meyer
     Death of Hani but Mandela asks for calmness
     Sunset Clause
     Storming of the World Trade Centre by right wingers
     Final agreement reached
     1994 election
     Any other relevant point

 Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.            [50]

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 17

(EC/SEPTEMBER 2016)                       HISTORY P2                                     17

 QUESTION 6:          THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND A NEW WORLD ORDER:
                      THE EVENTS OF 1989

 SYNOPSIS
 Candidates need to agree or disagree with the statement and elaborate on how the
 collapse of communism forced both the ANC and National Party to negotiate for a better
 future for all South Africans.

 MAIN ASPECTS
 Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:

 Introduction:        Candidates must focus on the collapse of communism, the impact on the
                      ANC, impact on the National party, the independence of Namibia and
                      independence of Angola.

 Elaboration:
 In agreeing with the assertion, candidates should have the following points in their
 elaboration:
     Policy of Glasnost and Perestroika paved the way for both the ANC and NP to reform
     There was pressure from major powers to work towards a peaceful settlement
     The ANC had to redefine its position and began to seek recognition from western
     countries
     Disappearance of Marxist-Leninist states and the fall of the Berlin Wall affected the
     ANC
     De Klerk desired reform
     USSR economy unable to support/sustain aid to Africa and the ANC
     South Africa’s economy took a downturn in 1989
     The ANC struggle for self-determination began
     The ANC and the apartheid government had to find a peaceful and workable solution
     The apartheid government took the opportunity to negotiate with the ANC because
     there was no longer a threat from the Soviet Union
     Both the NP and the ANC took cognisance of internal factors to save the country’s
     future
     Independence of Namibia and Angola
     Any other response

 Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.          [50]

                                                                             TOTAL:       150

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

## Related documents

- [Gr12 HIST P2 S16 QP Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr12-hist-p2-s16-qp-eng/f7730ddc-8b15-401a-a609-87d42709fe80) — History · QP · 2016 · Eng
- [History P2 May June 2016 Memo Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-may-june-2016-memo-eng/c024dbbf-42d2-40d0-9d26-7bf3628ad5d3) — History · Memo · 2016 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 SEPT2015 MEMO (Afr)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-sept2015-memo-afr/9b4b0c56-0d1c-480b-8ab5-b260d75b5222) — History · Memo · 2015 · Afr
- [Hist P2 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p2-addendum-eng/b2bcc326-318a-41a5-b678-9d4ff222da43) — History · Addendum · 2016 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2016 Addendum Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2016-addendum-afr/809cfc97-bcdd-427e-b688-04a75940b593) — History · Addendum · 2016 · Afr
- [History P2 Nov 2016 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2016-addendum-eng/f3a2388d-32ff-4021-9e42-89049df3585a) — History · Addendum · 2016 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [HISTORY P1 ADDEN GR12 SEP 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-adden-gr12-sep-2024-afrikaans/4faf89db-d19f-40cf-891f-e87e004b0bc5) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2024-afrikaans/b61f3bc2-3524-48c9-af60-f3348133d582) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-sept-2024-afrikaans/8367f672-7028-4e67-a52a-705b946b5122) — QP · 2024 · Afr
- [Gr 12 History P1 (English) 2024 Question Paper X05](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-12-history-p1-english-2024-question-paper-x05/7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5) — QP · 2024 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM JUNE 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-june-2024-afrikaans/e7a9d6cf-de1b-4007-b7b2-b4d762b2fa10) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
