# History Grade 12 Paper 2 North West June 2024 Memo (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 memorandum from the North West June Exam 2024 (English), 21 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-history-2024-north-west-june-exam-question-paper-paper-2-english/64ac406f-6c2e-4c86-9b0b-6a11f5066220
- Updated: 2026-10-29
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Language: English
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2024
- Exam period: North West June Exam
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 21

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 Paper 2 North West June 2024 Memo (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-history-2024-north-west-june-exam-question-paper-paper-2-english/64ac406f-6c2e-4c86-9b0b-6a11f5066220)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · North West June Exam · 2024 · English. Memorandum. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

PROVINCIAL ASSESSMENT

                                  GRADE 12

                                   HISTORY P2
                                    JUNE 2024
                            MARKING GUIDELINES

                                                                       MARKS: 150

       This marking guideline consists of 19 pages and a cognitive grid.

Copyright reserved                                                Please turn over

### Page 2

History/P2                                  2                              NW/June 2024
                                      Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

1.     SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

     1.1    The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based questions:

           Cognitive                                                              Weighting of
                                           Historical skills
            Levels                                                                 questions
                          •   Extract evidence from sources
           LEVEL 1        •   Selection and organisation of relevant                   30%
                              information from sources                                 (15)
                          •   Define historical concepts/terms
                          •   Interpretation of evidence from sources
           LEVEL 2                                                                     40%
                          •   Explain information gathered from sources
                                                                                       (20)
                          •   Analyse evidence from sources
                          •   Interpret and evaluate evidence from sources
                          •   Engage with sources to determine its
           LEVEL 3            usefulness, reliability, bias and limitations            30%
                          •   Compare and contrast interpretations and                 (15)
                              perspectives presented in sources and draw
                              independent conclusions

     1.2    The information below indicates how source-based questions are assessed:
             • In the marking of source-based questions, credit needs to be given to any
                 other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or examples.
             • In the allocation of marks, emphasis should be placed on how the
                 requirements of the question have been addressed.
             • In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that need to
                 be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated in italics.

     1.3    Assessment procedures for source-based questions
            • Use a tick (✓) for each correct answer
            • Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2 x 2) which translates to two reasons
               and is given two marks each (✓✓✓✓); (1 x 2) which translates to one reason
               and is given two marks (✓✓)
            • If a question carries 4 marks, then indicate by placing 4 ticks (✓✓✓✓)

            Paragraph question
            Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the content and
            structure of the paragraph must be taken into account when awarding a mark. The
            following steps must be used when assessing a response to a paragraph question:
            • Read the paragraph and place a bullet (•) at each point within the text where
                 the candidate has used relevant evidence to address the question.
            • Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate has been
                 able to use relevant evidence to write a paragraph.

     Copyright reserved                                                       Please turn over

### Page 3

History/P2                                 3                                NW/June 2024
                                   Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

          •
       At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (✓) that the candidate has been
       awarded for the paragraph; as well as the level (1, 2 or 3) as indicated in the
       holistic rubric and a brief comment e.g.
    _______________________________ • ________________________________
    _________________ • ____________________________ • _________________
                                                                         Level 2
✓✓✓✓✓
    Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph

•     Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the mark on the right-
      hand bottom margin, e.g.        32
                                      50

•     Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back cover of the
      answer script.

2.       ESSAY QUESTIONS

2.1      The essay questions require candidates to:
         Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner. They need to
         select, organise and connect the relevant information so that they are able to present
         a reasonable sequence of facts or an effective argument to answer the question
         posed. It is essential that an essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced
         body of evidence and a conclusion.

2.2      Marking of essay questions
         Candidates may have any other relevant introductions and/or conclusions than those
         included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific essay.

2.3      Global assessment of the essay
         The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the teacher
         to assess the essay as a whole, rather than assessing the main points of the essay
         separately. This approach encourages the learner to write an original argument by
         using relevant evidence to support the line of argument. The learner will not be
         required to simply regurgitate content (facts) in order to achieve a level 7 (high mark).
         This approach discourages learners from preparing essays and reproducing them
         without taking the specific requirements of the question into account. Holistic
         marking of the essay credits learners' opinions that are supported by evidence.
         Holistic assessment, unlike content-based marking, does not penalise language
         inadequacies as the emphasis is on the following:

         •    The learner's interpretation of the question
         •    The appropriate selection of factual evidence (relevant content selection)
         •    The construction of argument (planned, structured and has an independent line
              of argument).

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 4

History/P2                                      4                              NW/June 2024
                                     Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

2.4    Assessment procedures of the essay

       2.4.1 Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing the essay.

       2.4.2 During the reading of the essay, ticks need to be awarded for a relevant
             introduction (which is indicated by a bullet in the marking guideline), the main
             aspects/body of the essay that sustains /defends the line of argument (which
             is indicated by bullets in the marking guideline) and a relevant conclusion
             (which is indicated by a bullet in the marking guideline). For example, in an
             essay where there are five (5) main points there could be about seven (7)
             ticks.

       2.4.3 Keep the PEEL structure in mind in assessing an essay.

                     P Point: The candidate introduces the essay by taking a line of
                       argument/making a major point.
                       Each paragraph should include a point that sustains the major point (line
                       of argument) that was made in the introduction.
                     E Explanation: The candidate should explain in more detail what the main
                       point is about and how it relates to the question posed (line of argument).
                     E Example: Candidates should answer the question by selecting content
                       that is relevant to the line of argument. Relevant examples should be
                       given to sustain the line of argument.
                     L Link: Candidates should ensure that the line of argument is sustained
                       throughout and is written coherently.

       2.4.4 The following symbols MUST be used when assessing an essay:

               • Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly contextualised

                                                      ^
               • Wrong statement                      _________________

               • Irrelevant statement                 |
                                                      |
                                                      |

               • Repetition                           R

               • Analysis                             A✓

               • Interpretation                       I✓

               • Line of argument                         LOA

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 5

History/P2                                     5                               NW/June 2024
                                    Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

2.5    The matrix

       2.5.1 Use the matrix in the marking of essays

       In the marking of essays, the criteria as provided in the matrix should be used. When
       assessing the essay note both the content and presentation. At the point of
       intersection of the content and presentation based on the seven competency levels,
       a mark should be awarded.

         (a)         The first reading of essay will be to determine to what extent the main
                     aspects have been covered and to allocate the content level (on the
                     matrix).

                                                               C       LEVEL 4

         (b)         The second reading of essays will relate to the level (on the matrix) of
                     presentation.

                                                               C       LEVEL 4
                                                               P       LEVEL 3

         (c)         Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.

                                                               C      LEVEL 4
                                                               P      LEVEL 3
                                                                                    }26–27

                COMMENT
                Some omissions in content coverage.
                Attempts to sustain a line of argument.

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 6

History/P2                                                   6                                                         NW/June 2024
                                                            Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

          GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF ESSAYS: TOTAL MARKS: 50
                                  LEVEL 7             LEVEL 6             LEVEL 5             LEVEL 4            LEVEL 3              LEVEL 2           LEVEL 1*
        PRESENTATION            Very well           Very well           Well planned and    Planned and        Shows some           Attempts to         Little or no
                                planned and         planned and         structured essay.   constructed an     evidence of a        structure an        attempt to
                                structured essay.   structured essay.   Attempts to         argument.          planned and          answer.             structure the
                                Good synthesis      Developed a         develop a clear     Evidence used to   constructed          Largely             essay.
                                of information.     relevant line of    argument.           some extent to     argument.            descriptive or
                                Developed an        argument.           Conclusion          support the line   Attempts to          some attempt at
                                original, well-     Evidence used to    drawn from the      of argument.       sustain a line of    developing a line
                                balanced and        defend the          evidence to         Conclusions        argument.            of argument. No
          CONTENT               independent line    argument.           support the line    reached based      Conclusions not      attempt to draw a
                                of argument with    Attempts to draw    of argument.        on evidence.       clearly supported    conclusion.
                                the use of          an independent                                             by evidence.
                                evidence,           conclusion from
                                sustained, and      the evidence to
                                defended the        support the line
                                argument            of argument.
                                throughout.
                                Independent
                                conclusion is
                                drawn from
                                evidence to
                                support the line
                                of argument.

LEVEL 7
Question has been fully
answered. Content selection        47–50               43–46
fully relevant to line of
argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has been
answered.                          43–46               40–42               38–39
Content selection relevant to
the line of argument.
LEVEL 5
Question answered to a
great extent. Content              38–39               36–37               34–35               30–33              28–29
adequately covered and
relevant.
LEVEL 4
Question recognisable in
answer.                                                                    30–33               28–29              26–27
Some omissions or irrelevant
content selection.
LEVEL 3
Content selection does relate
to the question, but does not
answer it, or does not always                                                                  26–27              24–25                20–23
relate to the question.
Omissions in coverage.
LEVEL 2
Question inadequately
addressed. Sparse content.                                                                                        20–23                18–19             14–17

LEVEL 1*
Question inadequately
addressed or not at all.
Inadequate or irrelevant
                                                                                                                                       14–17              0–13
content.

         Guidelines for allocating a mark for Level 1:

    •     Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content no attempt to structure the essay               =0
    •     Content selection includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt to structure the essay = 1-6
    •     Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay                      7-13

         Copyright reserved                                                                                                Please turn over

### Page 7

History/P2                                      7                                    NW/June 2024
                                     Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

QUESTION 1:          HOW DID THE UNITED DEMOCRATIC FRONT (UDF) RESPOND TO
                     THE APARTHEID REFORMS INTRODUCED BY PW BOTHA IN 1983?

   1.1
   1.1.1       [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A - L1]
               • 'Coloured
               • 'Indian                                                                             (2 x 1)   (2)

   1.1.2       [Definition of a historical term from Source 1A – L1]
               • The Tricameral Parliament was a three-chamber parliament for white,
                  Coloured and Indian representatives while Africans were excluded
               • The Tricameral Parliament had three separate chambers where Coloured
                  and Indian representatives were made to believe they could oversee their
                  own affairs, while whites dealt with the affairs of 'all'
               • Any other relevant response                                      (any 1 x 2) (2)

   1.1.3       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
               • The United Democratic Front (UDF) which comprised of more than 400 public
                   organizations was established in 1983 to to oppose the introduction of the Tricameral
                   Parliament by the white-dominated National Party government,
               •   Masses protested against the apartheid regime and PW Botha’s reforms in
                   the 1980s.
               •   Led to resistance movements which included students, workers and
                   activists demanding an end to the racist and oppressive system of
                   apartheid.
               •   Any other relevant response                                    (any 1 x 2)                  (2)

   1.1.4       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
               • To protect white privileges
               • Africans would not be able to fight for their rights
               • To weaken resistance against apartheid
               • Any other relevant response                                                  (any 2 x 2)      (4)

   1.1.5       •   [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D –L2]
               •   Majority of black communities were in solidarity and against formation of the
                   Tricameral Parliament.
               •   Black communities supported the strikes, boycotts and mass action
                   campaigns of the United Democratic Front
               •   Any other relevant response                                       (any 2 x 2 )              (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 8

History/P2                                      8                                 NW/June 2024
                                     Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

   1.2.1       [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
               • ‘is an undivided South Africa which shall belong to all its people’
               • ‘an open democracy from which no single South African shall be
                   excluded’
               • ’ a society in which the human dignity of all its people shall be respected’
                                                                                    (any 2 x 1)          (2)

   1.2.2       [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
               • ‘…They do not express the will of the vast majority of South Africa’s people
                                                                                      (any 1 x 2)        (2)

 1.2.3         [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
               • UDF will not accept any rights given by the state
               • The state does not have the right to determine these rights
               • It is God given right to all human beings irrespective of colour
               • Any other relevant response                                               (any 2 x 2)   (4)

   1.2.4       [Determining the reliability of Source 1B – L3]
               The source is reliable because:
               • The speech was delivered by Allan Boesak who was one of the leaders of
                  the UDF
               • The speech was delivered on 20 August 1983 which was the actual date
                  of the launch of the UDF
               • It highlights the reasons for the launch of the UDF which was in response to
                  the introduction of apartheid reforms and the establishment of the
                  Tricameral Parliament
               • The information in the source can be corroborated with other sources
               • Any other relevant response                                         (any 2 x 2)         (4)

   1.3
   1.3.1       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
               • To show:
               • oppressive measures the state took to weaken the UDF
               • the UDF’s sufferings so that it could win sympathy and support from South
                  Africans in general
               • that the UDF would break Botha’s reforms – the hand
               • the UDF’s commitment in resisting oppressive measures of the state
               • that the state’s repressive measures will not discourage them
               • Any other relevant response                                        (any 2 x 2)          (4)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 9

History/P2                                       9                                 NW/June 2024
                                      Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

   1.3.2       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C - L2]
               • The UDF committed itself to resist being silenced by the state repression
               • The UDF would through protest actions achieve freedom against all odds.
               • The UDF would mobilize and unite people in strength to resist oppressive
                   measures
               • Any other relevant response                                             (any 1 x 2)      (2)

   1.4         [Comparison of evidence from Sources 1B and 1C to ascertain how they
               support each other – L3]
               • Source 1B speaks to the unity of undivided South Africans and Source 1C
                  shows the unity of people from all walks of life on the poster regarding
                  resistance against apartheid
               • Source 1B mentions how the UDF is refusing to accept racial injustice
                  of the apartheid government and 1C shows the UDF commitment to
                  resisting oppressive measures of the state.
               • Source 1B states that the UDF was established to oppose apartheid and
                  Source 1C shows that South Africans are opposing apartheid
               • Any other relevant response                                        (any 2 x 2)           (4)

   1.5
   1.5.1       [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
               • 8700 strong Indian community stayed away from the pols                      (any1 x 2)   (2)

   1.5.2       [Explanation of a historical term from Source 1D – L1]
                • Legislature of South Africa which gave limited Political voice to the country’s
                  Coloureds and Indian population, it excluded the majority of the African
                  population group.
                • Any other relevant response                                         (any 1 x 2)         (2)

   1.5.3 •         [Selection and organisation of relevant information from sources Source 1D-L1]
               • To maintain their ruling power
               • To maintain their white privileges
               • To maintain their white dominance
               • The tricameral constitution protected their privileges
               • The whites were against equality between blacks and whites
               • To avoid South Africa being described as a pariah state/To be accepted
                 back into the international arena
               • Any other relevant response                                   (any 1 x 2)                (2)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 10

History/P2                                   10                              NW/June 2024
                                   Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

   1.6         [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis from relevant sources – L3]

               Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:

               •   The newly formed Liberation Movement, the United Democratic Front
                   (UDF), launched a massive nationwide campaign to dissuade Coloured and
                   Indian voters from participating in the elections (Source 1A)
               •   The UDF was launched on 20 August 1983 to oppose the introduction of the
                   Tricameral parliament (Source 1B)
               •   The launch of the UDF was a pivotal event in the history of the struggle for
                   freedom and democracy in South Africa (own knowledge)
               •   In his speech, Dr Allan Boesak highlighted the aims of an undivided South
                   Africa which shall belong to all its people (Source 1B)
               •   At the launch Dr Allan Boesak calls for an open democracy from which no
                   single South African shall be excluded and a society in which the human
                   dignity of all its people shall be respected. (Source 1B)
               •   The UDF started a 'WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED' campaign that
                   demonstrated its commitment to resisting oppressive measures of the
                   state (Source 1C)
               •   The UDF provided a platform and voice to the ordinary people (own
                   knowledge)
               •   Indian and Coloured communities boycotted the Tricameral Parliament
                   elections which resulted in a poor voter turnout (Source 1D)
               •   Allister Sparks regarded the poor turnout a massive rejection of the
                   government's new constitution (Source 1D)
               •   The UDF launched ‘million signature’ campaign – a petition to create
                   awareness and reject the tricameral system (own knowledge)
               •   Any other relevant response

Copyright reserved                                                         Please turn over

### Page 11

History/P2                                 11                             NW/June 2024
                                 Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

Use the following rubric to allocate marks:

                 •   Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g. shows no
                     or little understanding of how the United Democratic
                                                                                    MARKS
   LEVEL 1           Front (UDF) responded to the apartheid reforms
                                                                                     0–2
                     introduced by PW Botha in 1983
                 •   Uses evidence partially or cannot write a paragraph.
                 •   Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great extent
                     on the topic, e.g. shows some understanding of how
                     the United Democratic Front (UDF) responded to the             MARKS
   LEVEL 2
                     apartheid reforms introduced by PW Botha in 1983                3–5
                 •   Uses evidence in a very basic manner to write a
                     paragraph.
                 •   Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a thorough
                     understanding of how the United Democratic Front
                     (UDF) responded to the apartheid reforms introduced            MARKS
   LEVEL 3
                     by PW Botha in 1983                                             6–8
                 •   Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                     paragraph that shows an understanding of the topic.

                                                                                           (8)
                                                                                           [50]

Copyright reserved                                                      Please turn over

### Page 12

History/P2                                    12                              NW/June 2024
                                    Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

 QUESTION 2:          WAS THE TRUTH AND RECONCILLIATION COMMISSION (TRC)
                      SUCCESSFUL IN RECONCILING SOUTH AFRICA FROM ITS
                      DIVIDED PAST?

 2.1
 2.1                  [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
                      •     To deal with the past and to see that people’s human rights
                            are not abused again’                              (Any 1x 2) (2)

 2.1.2                [Definition of historical concepts from Source 2A – L1]
                      •     Bringing together victims and perpetrators to establish the
                            truth in order to promote forgiveness.
                      •     Bring about healing of political crimes that were committed
                            after 1960
                      •     Any other relevant response                         (Any 1 x 2) (2)

 2.1.3               [Interpretation of evidence Source 2A – L2]
                       •    South Africans should forgive each other for past atrocities
                       •    To promote peace amongst South Africans
                       •    To promote unity amongst South Africans
                       •    Any other relevant response                        (Any 2 x 2) (4)

 2.1.4               [Interpretation of evidence Source 2A – L2]
                       •    It outlines the aims of the TRC.
                       •    It outlines how the TRC dealt with gross human rights
                            violations.
                       •    It gives information on why the TRC favoured Restorative
                            Justice
                       •    Any other relevant response                       (Any 2 x 2) (4)

 2.2
 2.2.1               [Interpretation of evidence in Source 2B – L2]
                       •    To invite both perpetrators and victims to appear before the
                            TRC and testify about human rights abuses
                       •    To inform the public about the crimes that were committed
                            during apartheid
                       •    To encourage people to speak the truth about their
                            involvement in political killing
                       •    To inform the public that there were TRC hearings taking
                            place throughout the country
                       •    To highlight the purpose of the TRC - truth telling and
                            reconciliation
                       •    Any other relevant response                             (1 x 2) (2)

 2.2.2               The TRC encouraged:
                      •    Perpetrators to tell the truth/full disclosure
                      •    Apartheid agents/Security police to come forward and tell
                           victims about the whereabouts of their loved ones
                      •    Healing and reconciliation
                      •    Any other relevant response                       (Any 2 x 2) (4)

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 13

History/P2                                    13                               NW/June 2024
                                    Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

 2.3
 2.3.1                •      Form of justice that rejects the exclusive focus on
                            punishment and encourages perpetrators to take
                            responsibility and assist the victims to deal with the aftermath (2)
                            of the offence and its                (1 x 2)

 2.3.2               [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
                      •     They thought the TRC will damage their political credibility
                      •     They accused the TRC of being a “witch-hunt” rather than a
                            genuine tool for reconciliation                        (2 x 1) (2)

 2.3.3               [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
                      •     The tendency to give in to these political groupings in an
                            attempt to keep them Committed to the process.           (1 x 2) (2)

 2.3.4               [Interpretation of evidence in Source 2C – L2]
                       •    Political groupings frustrated the work of the TRC by
                            challenging and rejecting its findings, through legal action.
                       •    Victims were frustrated by lack of proper justice as they
                            demanded perpetrators to make full disclosure and express
                            remorse.
                       •    Any other relevant response.                        (Any 2 x 2) (4)

 2.4
 2.4.1               [Selection and organisation of relevant information from sources
                     Source 2C – L1]
                      •     TRC created a platform for both victims and perpetrators to
                            be heard and find closure.
                      •     Public hearings were conducted to take testimony from those
                            who had suffered human rights abuses and gather
                            information about the atrocities that had been committed.
                      •     TRC acknowledged the victim’s pain publicly and their
                            stories was the beginning of a process of healing and
                            closure.
                      •     Any other relevant response.                           (1 x 2) (2)

 2.4.2               [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D –L2]
                       •    TRC promoted national unity and reconciliation.
                       •    TRC provided reparations and rehabilitation to heal the
                            wounds.
                       •    It also brought closure to families who had lost loved ones.
                                                                                    (1 x 2) (2)

 2.4.3               [Extraction of evidence from Source 2D –L1]
                      •     It was the first commission to hold public hearings in which
                            both victims and perpetrators were heard.
                                                                                    (1 x 2) (2)

 2.4.4               [Interpretation of evidence Source 2A – L2]
                      •     At Nuremburg Justice was sought and used as a means of
                            punishment, while the TRC sought the truth and used it to
                            heal as a means of Nation building.
Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 14

History/P2                                   14                              NW/June 2024
                                   Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

                      •    The TRC was focused more on the promotion of National
                           Unity, while the Nuremburg focused more on bringing those
                           individuals in the Nazi regime responsible for the terrible
                           atrocities perpetrated during the Second World War.
                      •    Any other relevant response                           (2 x 2) (4)

 2.5                 [Comparison of evidence from Source 2C and 2D – L3]
                      •   Source 2C highlights and focuses more on the weaknesses
                          and failures of the TRC whereas Source 2D is more about
                          the success and achievements of the TRC.
                      •   Source 2C indicates that the TRC was accused of being a
                          (witch-hunt) and not promoting national reconciliation while
                          Source 2D indicates how the TRC was hailed as an
                          innovative model for building peace and justice.
                      •   Source 2C indicates how Victims were frustrated by lack of
                          proper justice whereas Source 2D highlights how the TRC
                          held those who were guilty of human rights violations
                          accountable.
                      •   Any other relevant response                             (2 x 2) (4)

 2.6                 [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis from relevant sources – L3]

                     Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:
                      •    The TRC was established to deal with the past and to see
                           that people’s human rights are not abused again
                           (Source 2A)
                      •    The TRC promoted national unity, the well-being of all South
                           African citizens and peace (Source 2A)
                      •    The TRC identified torture, murder and abduction as some of
                           human rightsabuses (Source 2B)
                      •    The TRC encouraged victims to come forward and speak out
                           in order to facilitate reconciliation (Source 2B)
                      •    National Party accused the TRC of being a (witch-hunt)
                           rather than a genuine tool for national reconciliation
                           (Source 2C)
                      •    Political tension prevailed during the proceedings of the TRC
                           (Source 2C)
                      •    TRC created a platform for both victims and perpetrators to
                           be heard (Source2D)
                      •    TRC provided reparations and rehabilitation to heal the
                           wounds. (Source 2D)
                      •    TRC has provided the world with another tool in the struggle
                           against impunity and the search for justice and peace.
                           Source 2D)
                      •    Any other relevant response

Copyright reserved                                                         Please turn over

### Page 15

History/P2                                 15                             NW/June 2024
                                 Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

Use the following rubric to allocate marks:

                 •   Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g. shows no
                     or little understanding of how the United Democratic
                                                                                    MARKS
   LEVEL 1           Front (UDF) responded to the apartheid reforms
                                                                                     0–2
                     introduced by PW Botha in 1983
                 •   Uses evidence partially or cannot write a paragraph.
                 •   Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great extent
                     on the topic, e.g. shows some understanding of how
                     the United Democratic Front (UDF) responded to the             MARKS
   LEVEL 2
                     apartheid reforms introduced by PW Botha in 1983                3–5
                 •   Uses evidence in a very basic manner to write a
                     paragraph.
                 •   Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a thorough
                     understanding of how the United Democratic Front
                     (UDF) responded to the apartheid reforms introduced            MARKS
   LEVEL 3
                     by PW Botha in 1983                                             6–8
                 •   Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                     paragraph that shows an understanding of the topic.

                                                                                           (8)
                                                                                           [50]

Copyright reserved                                                      Please turn over

### Page 16

History/P2                               16                             NW/June 2024
                               Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

SECTION B: ESSAY

QUESTIONSQUESTION 3

   [Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using
   analyticaland interpretative skills]

SYNOPSIS
   Candidates need to critically discuss how philosophy of Black
   Consciousness and Steve Biko played an important role in organising black
   South Africans against the apartheid regime in the 1960s and 1970s

MAIN ASPECTS
   Candidates could include the following aspects in their essays:
   • Introduction: Candidates need to critically discuss how Philosophy of
      Black Consciousness and Steve Biko played an important role in
      organising black South Africans against the apartheid regime in the
      1960s and 1970s They should also indicate how they will support
      their line of argument.

ELABORATION
   •   Political vacuum (Background information)
       ➢ Created after ANC and PAC political leaders and parties were
         banned orimprisoned in 1960
   •   Mobilisation as blacks
       ➢ Infused blacks with sense of pride
       ➢ To accept themselves/have self-confidence/self –reliance/sense of identity
       ➢ Empowered blacks to reject the spirit of self-pity; inferiority
         complex; self-alienation and domination by external forces
       ➢ The formation of BC was welcomed by the apartheid government
         as anextension of separate development
   •   Political mobilisation
       ➢ Black students started to organise themselves to resist white
         domination bybreaking away from NUSAS and formed SASO
         (1968)
       ➢ Black students adopted the philosophy of Black Consciousness
         (Role ofBiko/SASO)
       ➢ SASO was for university students and SASM for schools
       ➢ BC led to the formation of the Black Peoples Convention (BPC) in
         1972 whichinvolved students, churches, communities and trade
         unions
       ➢ Unions aligned to the BC philosophy included Black Parents'
         Association and Black Allied Workers Union (BAWU)
       ➢ South African Students Movement formed in 1972 which exposed
         Blacks to the ideals of BC
       ➢ Expulsion of OnkgopotseTiro which led to student protests
Copyright reserved                                                    Please turn over

### Page 17

History/P2                               17                            NW/June 2024
                               Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

       ➢ BCM and SASO organised FRELIMO Rallies (1974)
       ➢ Expulsion of students from universities
       ➢ The arrests of BC leaders heightened political activism
   •   Student mobilisation
       ➢ Bantu Education introduced Afrikaans as a medium of
          instruction in schools (1975)
       ➢ SASO and SASM influenced the formation of Soweto Students
          RepresentativeCouncil (SSRC)
       ➢ Both black teachers and students rejected Afrikaans - as the language of
          theoppressor
       ➢ Some teachers and learners were already exposed to the ideas of Biko and
          theBC philosophy through SASO student teachers from universities
       ➢ The departmental circular on Afrikaans (50/50) was the trigger for the Soweto
          uprising
       ➢ 16 of June 1976 students protested peacefully against the implementation of the
          circular
       ➢ Police response to student protests (Hector Petersen, a 13-year-old boy was
          one of the first casualties of this uprising)
   •   Mobilisation through Community Programmes
       ➢ Biko's banishment to King Williams Town led to diverted focus to community
          programmes
       ➢ Mamphele Ramphele’s banishment to Tzaneen
       ➢ BC promoted independence from whites through Black Community Programmes
          to support blacks without white assistance. (Zanempilo Health Clinic/Ginsburg
          Educational      Trust/Zimele      Trust    Fund/Solempilo Community   Health
          Centre/Ithuseng Community Health Programme and Winter School Projects)
   •   Mobilisation through Labour
       ➢ Mobilised workers to form trade unions
       ➢ BC led to the formation of the Black Allied Workers Union (BAWU) – worker's
          strikes in Durban in 1973)
   •   Killing of Biko (1977) in police custody
   •   19 October 1977 banning of 19 organisations aligned to BC
   •   mobilisation through Media
       ➢ Role of media that was sympathetic to the BC philosophy, e.g. The World and
          The Weekend World newspapers were closed
   •   Any other relevant response

   •    Conclusion: Candidates should sum up their argument with a relevant conclusion.    [50]

Copyright reserved                                                   Please turn over

### Page 18

History/P2                                 18                              NW/June 2024
                                 Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

QUESTION 4

   [Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using
   analyticaland interpretative skills]

SYNOPSIS
   Candidates need to indicate whether they agree or disagree with the
   statement. If they agree with the statement, they need to explain how South
   Africa’s road to democracy was beset (affected) with various challenges,
   dilemmas (problems) and obstacles. It was the spirit of intense negotiations,
   resolute (firm) leadership and commitment to democracy that eventually led
   to the birth of a democratic dispensation in 1994. If they disagree with the
   statement, they need to substantiate their argument with relevant historical
   evidence.

MAIN ASPECTS
   Candidates should include the following aspects in their essay:
   • Introduction: Candidates should agree or disagree that ‘South Africa’s
     road to democracy was beset (affected) with various challenges,
     dilemmas (problems) and obstacles. It was the spirit of intense
     negotiations, resolute (firm) leadership and commitment to democracy
     that eventually led to the birth of a democratic dispensation in 1994.’ They
     should also indicate how they will support their line of argument.

ELABORATION
   • Release of Nelson Mandela on the 11 February 1990 and other banned
     political leaders in 1990 (commitment and compromise)
   • Unbanning of the ANC, the PAC and the SACP and other banned
     organisations (commitment)
   • Groote Schuur Minute, 2 May 1990 - NP released political prisoners and
     both parties committed themselves to end violence and to negotiate
     (commitment by leaders from both sides)
   • Violence in the Vaal Triangle (Role of various political organisations) (a
     test of commitment and compromise)
   • Pretoria Minute in August 1990 – ANC stopped armed struggle and
     NP stopped state of emergency (commitment and compromise)
   • The National Peace Accord signed by 27 political organisations - provided
     safety netfor negotiations (commitment)
   • CODESA 1 (20 December 1991) - 19 political parties except for CP and PAC
   • Parties could not agree on power-sharing and constituent
     assembly – meetingended
   • The Declaration of Intent – parties agreed to draw up a new
     constitution and interim government (commitment and compromise)
   • Whites-only referendum – De Klerk tested white opinion after
     losing three by-elections to CP (testing commitment from whites)

Copyright reserved                                                       Please turn over

### Page 19

History/P2                                19                              NW/June 2024
                                Grade 12 – Marking Guidelines

   • Result – landslide Yes (indication of commitment from whites) –
     negotiationscontinued
   • CODESA 2 (2 May 1992) – did not last because of violence and
     inability of partiesto agree on power-sharing
   • Boipatong massacre and influence of Third Force (17 June 1992)
   • Bisho massacre (September 1992) – ANC supporters who wanted
     to be part ofnegotiation process (another test of commitment)
   • ANC called for rolling mass action against the National Party
     (pushing the NP to commitment)
   • Record of Understanding (September 1992) – Meyer and
     Ramaphosa committed themselves to peace and to negotiations
     (commitment and compromise)
   • Meyer and Ramaphosa agreed on Joe Slovo's Sunset Clause
     (commitment and compromise)
   • Parties winning more that 5% of vote will form a government of national unity to govern
     the new SA and whites could retain their jobs for 5 years (commitment and
     compromise)
   • Multi-party negotiations resumed at the World Trade Centre but did not last
     (commitment)
   • The AWB interrupted the negotiations on 15 June 1993, when they stormed the World
     Trade Centre with armoured vehicle (a test of commitment)
   • Assassination of Chris Hani (10 April 1993) – Janusz Waluś (a test of commitment)
   • Mandela addresses nation on TV (commitment)
   • St James massacre (25 July 1993)
   • Heidelberg Tavern shooting (30 December 1993) (test of commitment)
   • Shell House massacre (28 March 1994) (test of commitment)
   • Date for the first democratic elections set (27–29 April 1994) (commitment)
   • Continued violence throughout elections – car bomb outside ANC head offices
     - Car bomb exploded at Jan Smuts Airport (last efforts to test commitment)
   • Elections held due to commitment and compromise
   • Results of election: ANC 62,7%, NP 20,4% and IFP 10,5%
   • ANC, NP and IFP formed the Government of National Unity as agreed upon in
     theSunset Clause (commitment and compromise)
   • Mandela became first black State President of the new democratic Republic of
     South Africa with Thabo Mbeki and FW de Klerk as his deputies
   • Any other relevant response

   • Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.
                                                                                               [50]

                                                                                 TOTAL:        150

Copyright reserved

### Page 20

1.5.1          1.3.1   1.2.1        1.1.1
                                                                                  1.1.2
                                              1.5.2                  1.2.2        1.1.3
                                        1.6           1.4.   1.3.2   1.2.3        1.1.4
                                              1.5.3                  1.2.4        1.1.5

                                                                          ✓
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   History/P2
                                                  ✓          ✓            ✓                  ✓                                          EXTRACT EVIDENCE FROM SOURCES
                                                                                 
                                              ✓                                                                                          SELECTION OF RELEVANT INFORMATION
Copyright reserved

                                                                                          ✓                                              EXPLANATIONS OF HISTORICAL CONCEPTS
                     QUESTION 1 TOTAL

                                              
                                               ✓
                                                                                                                                        EXPLAIN INFORMATION GATHERED FROM SOURCES
                                                                              
                                                                                      ✓                                                  INTERPRETATION
                                        
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             COGNITIVE ANALYSIS GRID

                                                                                                                                                                                              SKILLS
                                                                                                                                         ANALYSE EVIDENCE FROM SOURCES

                                                                 ✓        ✓       ✓
                                                                                  ✓                                                      INTERPRETATION AND EVALUATION

                                                                                                                                         EVALUATE USEFULNESS; BIAS AND RELIABILITY
                                                                     ✓
                                                      ✓                                                                                  COMPARE AND CONTRAST DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS
                                                                                                  TICKS INDICATE APPLICATION OF SKILLS

                                        ✓                                                                                                ORGANISE EVIDENCE TO SUBSTANTIATE ARGUMENT

                     14                       2
                                              2
                                              2                               2
                                                                              2           2
                                                                                          2                                              LEVEL 1
                                                                                                                                                                                          COGNITIVE
                                                             4                    2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Grade 12 – Cognitive Grid

                     20                                     2            4       4
                                                                                  4                                                      LEVEL 2
                                             
                                                                                                 MARKS
                                                                                                                                                                                           LEVELS
                     16                 8             4             4                                                                   LEVEL 3
                                                                                                                                                                                                           HISTORY PAPER 2 – CAPS GRADE 12

                                        8     2
                                              2
                                              2       4      4
                                                             2       2
                                                                     2
                                                                     4
                                                                     4            2
                                                                                  2
                                                                                  2
                                                                                  4
                                                                                  4                                                      TOTAL
                     50
                                              ✓
                                              ✓                                           ✓
                                              ✓                           ✓               ✓                                              EASY
                                                                                    ✓
                                                             ✓            ✓       ✓
                                              
                                                            ✓                                                                           MEDIUM
                                                                          ✓       ✓
                                         ✓
                                                      ✓              ✓
                                                                                                                                                                                              CHALLENGES
                                                                                                                                         DIFFICULT

                     28                                                                           L1                                     PERCENTAGE
Please turn over
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   NW/June 2024
                     40                                                                           L2                                     PERCENTAGE

                     32                                                                           L3                                     PERCENTAGE

Text truncated here. Open the document page to read the rest.

## Related documents

- [History P2 (SG) (English) June 2014 Possible Answer](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-sg-english-june-2014-possible-answer/b6322558-818f-4c67-b34d-309f2eecce06) — History · Memo · 2014 · Eng
- [Gr 12 History P1 (English) 2024 Question Paper X05](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-12-history-p1-english-2024-question-paper-x05/7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5) — History · QP · 2024 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP JUNE 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-june-2023-english/8444f2f9-4c71-46a1-972c-8b0f923e9927) — History · QP · 2023 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2023-english/7ebc175c-3acc-4751-b898-2a770db59777) — History · Addendum · 2023 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2022-english/e5d10556-c154-433f-8fd2-98646e28994c) — History · Addendum · 2022 · Eng
- [Gr12 History P2 (English) SEP 2022 Question Paper](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr12-history-p2-english-sep-2022-question-paper/4ecf07fc-c5be-4181-868c-5e74b2676b7a) — History · QP · 2022 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [History P1 Nov 2024 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-nov-2024-addendum-eng/df93fb24-73e0-435a-8d91-bce9f456ba2c) — Addendum · 2024 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2023 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2023-addendum-eng/115e775e-ffa7-4295-a812-c3f541a7b7bb) — Addendum · 2023 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2023 Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2023-afr/1406231f-0475-4c85-8862-7a120bee5f2e) — QP · 2023 · Afr
- [HISTORY P1 GR12 ADDEN SEPT 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr12-adden-sept-2022-english/f45ccdc0-4084-4c3d-b1b8-1a30ab014473) — Addendum · 2022 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR12 QP SEPT 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr12-qp-sept-2022-english/7d70aa79-8b7f-4051-9c8d-9f24785f3b0d) — QP · 2022 · Eng

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
