# History Grade 12 P2 North West June 2024 QP (Eng)

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 question paper from the North West June Exam 2024 (English), 9 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-history-2024-north-west-june-exam-question-paper-paper-2-english/c5cc393f-d04f-442d-bb1b-0e08c65b3102
- Updated: 2026-09-28
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Language: English
- Document type: Question paper
- Year: 2024
- Exam period: North West June Exam
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 9

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 P2 North West June 2024 QP (Eng)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-history-2024-north-west-june-exam-question-paper-paper-2-english/c5cc393f-d04f-442d-bb1b-0e08c65b3102)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · North West June Exam · 2024 · English. Question paper, 9 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

PROVINCIAL ASSESSMENT

                               GRADE 12

                              HISTORY P2

                               JUNE 2024
                               ADDENDUM

                     This addendum consists of 9 pages.

Copyright reserved                                        Please turn over

### Page 2

History/P2                                  2                              NW/June 2024
                                  Grade 12 – Addendum

QUESTION 1:          HOW DID THE UNITED DEMOCRATIC FRONT (UDF) RESPOND
                     TO THE APARTHEID REFORMS INTRODUCED BY PW BOTHA IN
                     1983?
SOURCE 1A
The source below explains how the United Democratic Movement (UDF) resisted PW
Botha’s reforms in the 1980s.

During the 1980s, the apartheid government came under increasing internal pressure. The
National Party attempted a political solution to the crisis it faced by creating the cosmetic
Tricameral Parliament which included limited representation of South Africans classified
'Coloured' and 'Indian' but excluded Blacks. The principal effect of the Tricameral
Parliament was to further entrench the political power of the White section of the South
African population, specifically that of the ruling National Party,
The reforms had the opposite affect to what the apartheid regime intended. Reforms
provided renewed impetus for the resistance movements, and the 1980s was a decade
which became a turning point in South African history. Popular protest by masses of
ordinary South Africans against the apartheid regime reached its height in the 1980s.
The newly formed Liberation Movement, the United Democratic Front (UDF), launched a
massive nationwide campaign to dissuade Coloured and Indian voters from participating in
the elections for the Houses of Representatives and Delegates. Civil society protest against
the Tricameral Parliament showed that the majority of South Africans were opposed to the
new structure. Coloured and Indian voter turnout was extremely low. In reaction to these
political developments, mass action campaigns swept through the country. These included
strikes, mass protests, school boycott, rent and consumer boycotts. Violence erupted on
many occasions, and the Government responded by declaring a State of Emergency that
lasted for much of the 1980s.
                                                          [From SAHO@21-south African History]

Copyright reserved                                                       Please turn over

### Page 3

History/P2                                     3                                    NW/June 2024
                                     Grade 12 – Addendum

SOURCE 1B
The extract below is taken from a speech delivered by Dr Allan Boesak, keynote speaker,
at the launching meeting of the United Democratic Front (UDF) held on 20 August 1983 in
the Rocklands Community Hall, Mitchells Plain, near Cape Town.

We are here to say that the government’s constitutional proposals are inadequate, and that
they do not express the will of the vast majority of South Africa’s people. But more than
that, what we are working towards (aims), is an undivided South Africa which shall belong
to all its people, an open democracy from which no single South African shall be excluded
and a society in which the human dignity of all its people shall be respected.
We are here to say that there are rights that are neither conferred (granted) by, nor derived
from the state; you have to go back beyond the dimmest (faintest) of eternity to understand
their origin: they are God-given. And so, we are here to claim this.
In a sense, the formation of the United Democratic Front (UDF) both highlights and
symbolises the crisis of apartheid and what its supporters have created for themselves.
After a history of some 331 years of slavery, racial discrimination, dehumanisation (not
concerned about human beings) and economic exploitation, what they expected was
acceptance of the status quo (position remaining the same). Docility and subservience.
Instead they are finding a people, refusing to accept racial injustice and ready to face the
challenges of the moment. After more than three decades of apartheid they expected
humble submission to the harsh rule of totalitarianism and racial supremacy. Instead they
find people ready at every level of society to fight this evil system.
       [From:https://www.sahistory.org.za/archive/united-democratic-front-national-launch-august-20-1983.
                                                                          Accessed on 13 February 2024.]

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 4

History/P2                                4                                    NW/June 2024
                                Grade 12 – Addendum

SOURCE 1C

The poster below was published by the United Democratic Front (UDF) in the
1980s. It depicts its commitment to resisting oppressive measures of the state.

                                                                                  REFORMS
      BOTHA'S
                                    HARASSMENT!!!

                             [From Images of Defiance: South African Resistance Posters of the 1980s]

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 5

History/P2                                  5                                NW/June 2024
                                  Grade 12 – Addendum

SOURCE 1D
The source below, taken from a newspaper article titled 'Indian Turnout about 20% in
South African Elections', was written by Allister Sparks for the Washington Post on
29 August 1984. It explains why there was a low turn-out from both Indians and
Coloureds in the tricameral elections in 1984.

About 20 per cent of the registered voters in South Africa's Indian community appeared
to have voted today in elections for a new parliament that were marked by sporadic
violence between boycotters and police in several cities.

The results available tonight indicated that members of the 870 000-strong Indian
community stayed away from the polls in even larger numbers than the mixed-race
Coloured electorate did in last week's voting for representatives in the racially
compartmentalised (classified) tricameral parliament.

There was a 30 per cent turnout at the elections for the larger Coloured community.
The government declared that figure adequate for pressing ahead with plans to
implement its new constitution, but other observers labelled it a rebuff (refusal).

Since many people who were eligible to vote did not register, particularly among the
Coloureds, leaders of the boycott movement were claiming tonight that the effective
vote in the two elections was about 18 per cent out of a joint population of 3, 5 million.
The movement said this represented a 'massive rejection' of the white minority
government's new constitution, which offers the Coloured and Indian minority groups a
form of parliamentary representation for the first time, but continues to exclude the black
African majority.

White voters endorsed the constitution by a two-thirds majority at a referendum last
November, and the United States State Department joined in praising the government
of President PW Botha for taking 'a step in the right direction.'
                                                      [From Washington Post, 29 August 1984]

Copyright reserved                                                         Please turn over

### Page 6

History/P2                                   6                                 NW/June 2024
                                   Grade 12 – Addendum

QUESTION 2:          WAS THE TRUTH AND RECONCILLIATION COMMISSION (TRC)
                     SUCCESSFUL IN RECONCILING SOUTH AFRICA FROM ITS
                     DIVIDED PAST?

SOURCE 2A

The extract below focuses on the reasons for the establishment of the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in 1995.

 The TRC was set up by the post-apartheid government as a way to deal with the past
 and to see that people’s human rights are not abused again. The Interim Constitution
 of 1993 spoke of “a need for understanding, but not for vengeance, a need for
 reparation, but not for retaliation, a need for Ubuntu but not for victimisation.” It also
 said, “The pursuit of national unity, the well-being of all South African citizens and peace
 require reconciliation between the people of South Africa and the reconstitution
 (rebuilding) of society.” Therefore, the first democratic parliament approved legislation
 that set up the TRC.

 The TRC was founded with the aims of establishing a restorative, rather than a punitive
 justice, hear testimony from victims and perpetrators, and to promote national unity and
 reconciliation. The goal of the TRC was not to prosecute and impose punishment on
 the perpetrators, but rather to bring closure to the many victims and their families in the
 form of full disclosure of the truth. The amnesty hearings undertaken by the TRC
 represents these aims, by offering full amnesty to those who came forward and
 confessed their crimes.

                                             [From history and society –Accessed on 21 February]

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 7

History/P2                                     7                                   NW/June 2024
                                     Grade 12 – Addendum

SOURCE 2B

The poster below was produced by the TRC. It invites both perpetrators and victims to
appear before the TRC and testify about human rights abuses that were committed
between 1960 and 1994.

             [From https://www.saha.org.za/udf/don't_vote_in_apartheid_elections_forward_to_freedom.htm.
                                                                          Accessed on 19 February 2024.]

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 8

History/P2                                     8                                  NW/June 2024
                                     Grade 12 – Addendum

SOURCE 2C

The following focuses on the evaluation of the work of the Truth and Reconciliation
Commission (TRC) in 1998.
 One of the greatest limitations to restoring victims’ dignity – and which was largely
 beyond the control of the commission – was the political tension that prevailed
 (existed) during its operations. This stemmed from the reluctance of the National
 Party and some extreme right-wing groups to see the TRC investigating aspects of
 the past that might damage their political credibility. These parties accused the TRC
 of being a (witch-hunt) rather than a genuine tool for national reconciliation, and
 frustrated the Commission’s work [bringing about] frequent legal actions against the
 TRC.

 The Commission’s biggest political blunder was the tendency to [give in] to these
 political groupings in an attempt to keep them committed to the process, ...[the]
 politically delicate (fragile) task of the TRC worsened its relations with victims who
 were justifiably frustrated by the lack of proper justice that the position implied. For
 restorative justice to succeed, victims need to see offenders’ express remorse
 (regret). That this was not forthcoming from the political party that governed the
 country under apartheid (National Party), dealt a blow to the process.

                 [From The Truth and Reconciliation Commission as a Model of Restorative Justice
                                                                              by T Maepa,2005]

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 9

History/P2                                 9                                 NW/June 2024
                                 Grade 12 – Addendum

SOURCE 2D

This extract focuses on the Assessment of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
(TRC).
 Despite these challenges and limitations, the TRC was internationally regarded as
 successful and showed the importance of public participation in such processes,
 including the initial decision-making process leading up to the establishment of
 a truth commission. The hearings of the TRC attracted global attention, as it was the
 first commission to hold public hearings in which both victims and perpetrators were
 heard. While amnesties are generally considered inconsistent with international law,
 the South African TRC provided some basis for considering conditional amnesties
 as a useful compromise, particularly if they help to secure perpetrator confessions.

 The South African TRC represented a major departure from the approach taken at
 the Nurnberg trials. It was hailed as an innovative model for building peace
 and justice and for holding accountable those guilty of human rights violations. At
 the same time, it laid the foundation for building reconciliation among all South
 Africans. Many other countries dealing with post conflict issues have instituted
 similar methodologies for such commissions, although not always with the
 same mandate. The South African TRC has provided the world with another tool in
 the struggle against impunity and the search for justice and peace.

                                       [From history and society – Accessed on 21 February]

Copyright reserved

## Related documents

- [History P2 Add June 2021 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-add-june-2021-english/4b70309f-2760-4254-8778-f8fe061ab26d) — History · QP · 2021 · Eng
- [Grade 12 NSC History P2 (English) X05 2019 Preparatory Examination Question Paper](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-nsc-history-p2-english-x05-2019-preparatory-examination-question-paper/b86194b9-4818-4f56-b6a6-1f8188552349) — History · QP · 2019 · Eng
- [Grade 12 NSC History P2 (English) X10 2019 Preparatory Examination Question Paper](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-nsc-history-p2-english-x10-2019-preparatory-examination-question-paper/823f960e-4e82-4df5-9636-7331aa167ec2) — History · QP · 2019 · Eng
- [History P2 (HG) (English) June 2014 QP](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-hg-english-june-2014-qp/50718c3c-2599-4d0c-91fe-dbc300d11e58) — History · QP · 2014 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2023-english/7ebc175c-3acc-4751-b898-2a770db59777) — History · Addendum · 2023 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2022-english/e5d10556-c154-433f-8fd2-98646e28994c) — History · Addendum · 2022 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [History Grade 12 NSC P2 MEMO September 2025 North West](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-grade-12-nsc-p2-memo-september-2025-north-west/3d9bf167-1e97-42c1-826a-bf344c0e964e) — Memo · 2025
- [History P1 May-June 2025 MG Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-may-june-2025-mg-eng/9e0f813e-e888-4061-a259-20b4dbe98907) — Memo · 2025 · Eng
- [History P1 Nov 2024 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-nov-2024-addendum-eng/df93fb24-73e0-435a-8d91-bce9f456ba2c) — Addendum · 2024 · Eng
- [History P1 (English) Memo](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-english-memo/4fe0001f-11e9-414e-be30-45108ea0ae86) — Memo · 2023 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2023 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2023-addendum-eng/115e775e-ffa7-4295-a812-c3f541a7b7bb) — Addendum · 2023 · Eng

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
