# History Grade 12 P2 NSC November 2025 Addendum (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 addendum from the NSC November Exam 2025 (English), 14 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-history-2025-nsc-november-exam-addendum-paper-2/8832ad4f-aa9b-41b3-b410-e5539357c3c0
- Updated: 2026-09-28
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Document type: Addendum
- Year: 2025
- Exam period: NSC November Exam
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 14

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 P2 NSC November 2025 Addendum (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-history-2025-nsc-november-exam-addendum-paper-2/8832ad4f-aa9b-41b3-b410-e5539357c3c0)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · NSC November Exam · 2025. Addendum, 14 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Confidential

                              NATIONAL
                         SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                               GRADE 12

                               HISTORY P2

                             NOVEMBER 2025

                                ADDENDUM

                     This addendum consists of 14 pages.
                     .

Copyright reserved                                         Please turn over

### Page 2

History/P2                                    2                            DBE/November 2025
                                  NSC – Addendum Confidential

  QUESTION 1:        WHAT WERE THE DIFFERENT RESPONSES TO THE
                     ATTEMPTS OF THE CONGRESS OF SOUTH AFRICAN TRADE
                     UNIONS (COSATU) TO MOBILISE SOUTH AFRICAN WORKERS
                     IN THE 1980s?

  SOURCE 1A

  The extract below was taken from an article titled, 'The Struggle: Power and Politics in
  South Africa's Black Trade Unions', written by A Cowell, a journalist, and appeared in
  The New York Times magazine on 15 June 1986. It sheds light on the formation of
  COSATU in 1985.

  In November 1985, more than 33 unions joined together to form the Congress of South
  African Trade Unions (COSATU), the largest federation (grouping) of black workers in
  South African history, with a total membership of some 500 000 workers.

  Far from being tamed (obedient), COSATU and other black labour groups have sought
  (wanted) the political high ground in what unionists' call 'the struggle' against white
  rule, desperately seeking to catch up with the protests of the youthful and violent black
  radicals of the townships. COSATU has forged (established) important links with the
  United Democratic Front, the largest non-parliamentary opposition group in the
  country, and has allied itself to the aims, if not formally to the structures, of the banned
  and exiled African National Congress, which is dedicated to overthrowing the white
  government by force.

  In a country that is Africa's most industrialised nation, the challenge now posed by the
  black unions is profound (overpowering); holding out the possibility of a large-scale
  withdrawal of labour from a modern economy that is increasingly dependent on black
  skills. Farm and domestic workers are not protected under South Africa's new labour
  laws. In other areas, from the country's textile mills to its steelworks, the unions are
  strong and growing. And, in the critical mining industries, labour leaders claim the
  support of almost half the 600 000-man black work force.

                                              [From The New York Times magazine, 15 June 1986]

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 3

History/P2                                3                                  DBE/November 2025
                              NSC – Addendum Confidential

 SOURCE 1B      2025

 The photograph below was taken during a rally organised by the Congress of South
 African Trade Unions (COSATU) in the Western Cape on 1 May 1986. It shows
 workers participating in a protest under the banner of the Commercial, Catering and
 Allied Workers Union of South Africa (CCAWUSA), which was an affiliate of COSATU.

                                [From History of Trade Unionism in South Africa by L Gentle, et al.]

         CLENCHED FISTS                                      FORWARD WITH THE
                                                            WORKERS' STRUGGLE

             CCAWUSA

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 4

History/P2                                      4                                 DBE/November 2025
                                    NSC – Addendum Confidential

 SOURCE 1C

 The extract below was taken from a *memoir, War in Peace: The Truth about the
 South African Police's East Rand Riot Unit 1986–1994, written by N Howarth, a former
 East Rand Riot Squad member. It explains how the crowd control riot unit clashed with
 COSATU members who were conducting a living wage campaign at the Germiston
 railway station in March 1987.

 COSATU members had been out on strike for several weeks in March 1987 over
 grievances that none of us either understood or cared about. It turned out they were
 conducting a 'living wage' campaign heavily backed by the African National Congress
 (ANC). There was a security clampdown on all such activities but this didn't bother
 COSATU, which was busy organising and mobilising union members to take part in the
 campaign. This added to the number of strikes and stoppages around the country that
 were already crippling (weakening) the South African economy. A large percentage of
 the strikers, some 18 000, belonged to South African Transport (SAT).

 I was part of a group of 14 young recruits, none older than myself, who had formed a
 line at the top of the stairs that led up to the station platform from an underground
 tunnel. The thunder of political jingles (struggle songs) being sung in the deep angry
 voices of 300 strikers resonated (echoed) down the tunnel and up the stairway towards
 us. At first, we could not see them, but the sound almost scared the life out of me.
 Then they appeared at the bottom of the stairs and swung in our directions. It was a
 terrifying sight. They were armed with knobkerries, whips, knives and a whole variety
 of vicious (dangerous) weapons.

 We clashed with the mob in hand-to-hand fighting. I was stabbed in the arm without
 even knowing it and there was blood all over me. Nevertheless, the physical damage
 was minor. I punched, kicked and fought with everything I had. Fortunately, the crowd
 began to disperse (go away) as we got the better of them. The next day COSATU held
 a meeting at the World Centre in Germiston, which was about 500 metres down the
 road from the railway station.

         [From War in Peace: The Truth about the South African Police's East Rand Riot Unit 1986–1994
                                                                                        by N Howarth]

 *memoir:      a book written by a person about their past experiences

Copyright reserved                                                                    Please turn over

### Page 5

History/P2                                   5                             DBE/November 2025
                                 NSC – Addendum Confidential

 SOURCE 1D

 The source below was extracted from a book titled Confessions of a *STRATCOM
 Hitman, by P Erasmus, former Security Branch policeman. It explains how the Security
 Branch officers raided and destroyed COSATU House in 1987.

 On 23 April 1987, after a shooting incident involving members of the Riot Unit,
 COSATU HOUSE was raided by a throng (crowd) of policemen who, having secured
 the building, handed it over to the Security Branch. What followed was the demolition
 (destruction) job, the likes of which were unprecedented (extraordinary) and
 unparalleled (unmatched). It was as if the accumulated (increased) rage (anger) and
 frustration of the police, caught as usual in the middle of the ongoing political conflict,
 were vented (expressed) on the building and its contents.

 Doors were promptly closed, and then filing cabinets filled with documents and records
 rained (fell) down like confetti (scatterings of pieces of paper) from balconies of the ten-
 storey building, office equipment was smashed, personal computers were tossed
 (thrown) out of the windows and over the balconies into the courtyard, video monitors
 and an expensive security system were destroyed, and what wasn't smashed or
 broken was stolen. ... I found COSATU's printing machine in the basement and I
 smashed the plates and control panel.

 Some hours later I returned to the basement to find that the printing machine had been
 completely destroyed, and cars in the basement had likewise been seriously damaged.
 Security Branch members started a fire on the eighth floor and, when the
 Johannesburg Fire Department arrived, fire-fighters ended up running from floor to
 floor, they were told [by Security Branch members] that the blaze was upstairs, then
 downstairs, then out and so on.

                                        [From Confessions of a STRATCOM Hitman by P Erasmus]

 *STRATCOM (STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION): a secret apartheid-era unit that
 engaged in propaganda, disinformation and violence against anti-apartheid activists and
 organisations

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 6

History/P2                                   6                              DBE/November 2025
                                 NSC – Addendum Confidential

 QUESTION 2:         WHY DID THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION
                     (TRC) REJECT THE AMNESTY APPLICATIONS OF THE
                     PERPETRATORS WHO TORTURED REVEREND TSHENUWANI
                     FARISANI?

 SOURCE 2A

 The extract below was taken from the funeral programme of Reverend Tshenuwani
 Farisani. The funeral took place on 7 June 2025. It focuses on Farisani's political activism
 against the apartheid government which led to his imprisonment in the 1980s.

 Farisani was a founding member of the Black People's Convention (BPC) and served as
 its president from 1973 to 1975. He worked closely with Stephen Bantu Biko and other
 leaders of the Black Consciousness Movement (BCM). He co-founded the Black
 Evangelical Youth Organisation (BEYO) in the 1970s with current South African
 President Matamela Cyril Ramaphosa, Tshifhiwa Muofhe and Lawrence Khorombi. This
 initiative evolved into the Bold Evangelical Christian Organisation (BECO) and later the
 Evangelical Christian Outreach (ECHO).

 Between 1977 and 1987, Farisani was detained without trial on four separate occasions
 as a result of his outspoken opposition to apartheid. During these incarcerations
 (imprisonment), he was subjected to brutal torture, including beatings, electric shocks
 and prolonged isolation. His 1982 detention, one of the most widely documented cases
 of political abuse under apartheid, drew international condemnation (criticism). Amnesty
 International*, having declared him a prisoner of conscience, spearheaded (organised)
 a global campaign demanding his release, which ultimately succeeded.

 His suffering became emblematic (symbolic) of the regime's cruelty and helped expose
 the extent of state-sponsored violence. In 1986, Farisani testified before
 US congressional committees, recounting his experiences in chilling detail; a testimony
 that led to formal resolutions in both the Senate and House of Representatives urging
 the South African government to end its persecution of him and other activists.

                        [Source: Funeral Programme of Reverend Tshenuwani Farisani, 7 June 2025]

 *Amnesty International: a global human rights organisation that works to protect and
 promote human rights around the world

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 7

History/P2                                   7                              DBE/November 2025
                                 NSC – Addendum Confidential

 SOURCE 2B

 The source below is part of a testimony given by Farisani at the Truth and Reconciliation
 Commission's Human Rights Violation Committee hearing held in Venda on
 4 October 1996. It is a recollection of Farisani's experiences at the hands of the Venda
 Security Branch policemen during his period of detention.

 … I was interrogated every day. There where I was tortured. I was interrogated because
 the first thing which was said was the letter which was written by Mr JAM Silimela and
 Mr Magwaba, Venda Security Branch policemen. I don't hate them, they must tell the
 truth.

 They put a bag on me, they poured some glue-like things, you know they were just sticky.
 In my imagination when they were shocking, I couldn't feel the electricity in the substance,
 properly. Well they tied those electrical devices on my ears, they poured water, some
 water just on the floor. My whole body was just feeling pain. I fell in the water and I was
 just falling down, rising and taking off the bag, asking me a lot of questions. The electric
 devices were taken from the head to the toes and the thighs and even in my private parts.
 My intestines were jumping. As it was happening, Ramaligela (member of the Venda
 Security Branch police) started a song, 'Hallelujah. Call on your God. He'll come and help
 you.' I am not lying about Ramaligela. Why should I lie about him, he knows very well
 that is true?

 I was made to do press-ups, to stand on my head, how can I stand on my top, you know
 I was very stout (short and heavy)? They took me and made me stand on my head and
 then they kicked me. Could I just say one final thing? One reason I bring the family here,
 one reason I want to support is that many of these evil people, and I don't use the word
 'evil' easy as a pastor, but we should dwell over (speak about) evil and brutal men
 and women, because unless they come out and confess, sooner or later they will come
 back ...

                                              [From TRC Final Report, Volume 5, Chapter 2, 1998]

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 8

History/P2                                    8                                DBE/November 2025
                                  NSC – Addendum Confidential

 SOURCE 2C

 The source below is an extract from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Special
 Report of Case No. AC/99/0238, dated 5 May 1999. It highlights why the TRC's
 Amnesty Committee rejected the application of three Venda Security Branch
 policemen, T Nesamari, P Managa and M Ramaligela who assaulted and tortured
 Reverend Farisani and other victims.

 … The TRC Amnesty Committee is satisfied that the applications comply with the formal
 requirements of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 1995 (Act 34 of
 1995) hereinafter referred to as 'The Act', and finds that all the acts in respect of which
 amnesty is sought by the applicants were committed with a political objective as required
 by the Act.

 All three of the applicants (T Nesamari, P Managa and M Ramaligela) testified at the
 hearing. Both in their written applications and in their oral testimonies, it became clear to
 the TRC Amnesty Committee that these three applicants were constantly playing down
 their role and involvement in the assault and torture of the victims who were tortured
 separately, but from whose evidence a picture of consistency in the methods employed
 became apparent (obvious).

 The use of a bag filled with water over their heads, the application of electric shocks to
 their ear lobes and private parts, the pulling of hair from various body parts, the
 instructions to do strenuous (tiring) exercises and vicious assaults by the applicants by
 using their bare hands, emerged during the evidence of the victims so consistently that
 the Committee could not accept the truth of their testimonies.

 The Committee is not satisfied that the above three applicants have made a full
 disclosure of all relevant facts as required by section 20(1) of the Act and their
 applications must consequently FAIL.

                     [From The Truth and Reconciliation Commission Special Report, Decisions, 1998]

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 9

History/P2                                     9                              DBE/November 2025
                                   NSC – Addendum Confidential

 SOURCE 2D

 The cartoon below is by J Shapiro, taken from the book Truths Drawn in Jest: Commentary
 on the TRC Through Cartoons, edited by W Verwoerd and M Mabizela. It depicts
 Dullah Omar, the former Minister of Justice, who was responsible for the TRC, revealing
 the truth about human rights violations of political activists during the apartheid era.

 The information in both frames (FRAME A and FRAME B) have been re-typed below the
 cartoon for clarity.

                                                FRAME A              FRAME B

      [From Truths Drawn in Jest: Commentary on the TRC Through Cartoons, edited by W Verwoerd and
                                                                                       M Mabizela]

    TOP DULLAH

                                                                          FRAME B
         FRAME A
                                                                 HIT HIM ON HIS
    he prisone                                                   PUT A BAG OVER
    slipped on t                                                 OULDN'T BREATHE
    soap, hit his                                                ATTACHED THE BATTERY
    head and lat                                                 TESTICLES. HE SCREAMED
    died.                                                        OULD NOT STOP SHAKING.
                                                                 STILL WOULDN'T TALK
                                                                 WITH AN IRON BAR, BUT
                                                                 REMOVED THE BAG, I
                                                                 BLOOD COMING
                                                                 HE WAS DEAD.
Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 10

History/P2                                        10                                 DBE/November 2025
                                      NSC – Addendum Confidential

 QUESTION 3:         HOW MIGHT THE EXPANSION OF BRICS COUNTRIES BE SEEN
                     AS A THREAT TO THE BALANCE OF POWER BETWEEN THE
                     GLOBAL NORTH (WESTERN COUNTRIES) AND THE GLOBAL
                     SOUTH (BRICS COUNTRIES)?

 SOURCE 3A

 The source below is an article titled 'BRICS Intergovernmental Organization', taken
 from records of the BRICS summit held in Kazan in Russia in October 2024. It focuses
 on the reasons for the formation of BRICS and its history since 2006.

 The first meeting in the BRIC format took place on 20 September 2006 on the
 side-lines of the 61st session of the UN (United Nations) General Assembly in
 New York. The meeting was attended by the ministers of foreign affairs of Russia,
 Brazil and China and the minister of defence of India, who all agreed to develop
 multifaceted (multi-sided) cooperation between the four countries.

 The BRIC summit took place on 16 June 2009 in Yekaterinburg in Russia. The final
 Joint Statement stated the desire of BRIC countries to develop 'an incremental (slowly
 increasing), proactive (hands-on), pragmatic (practical), open and transparent
 dialogue and cooperation' that is 'conducive (suited) not only to serving common
 interests of emerging market economies and developing countries, but also to building
 a harmonious (friendly) world of lasting peace and common prosperity'.

 With the accession (joining) of the Republic of South Africa (the first summit with
 South Africa took place on 14 April 2011 in Sanya, China), the abbreviation 'BRICS'
 was established as the name of the association. One of the priorities of BRICS
 activities is to promote the formation of a multi-polar (many-centred) democratic world
 and strengthen global security and stability around the world. The association
 consistently advocates (encourages) for compliance (agreement) with the principles of
 international law with the UN in the central role, and the rejection of unilateral coercive
 (forceful) measures. On 1 January 2024, Egypt, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi
 Arabia, and Ethiopia joined BRICS.

                     [From 'BRICS Intergovernmental Organization', the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
                                                                            Russian Federation, 2024]

 GLOBAL NORTH: broadly refers to wealthier, more developed nations in Western
 Europe, North America, parts of Asia and Oceania (Western countries)

 GLOBAL SOUTH: broadly encompasses the rest of the world, often
 characterised by lower incomes and developing economies (including BRICS countries)

Copyright reserved                                                                        Please turn over

### Page 11

History/P2                                      11                               DBE/November 2025
                                    NSC – Addendum Confidential

 SOURCE 3B

 The source below is from an article titled, 'The BRICS Challenge to the G7 Established
 International Order' by MG Mooradian, published by the Foreign Policy Research
 Institute on 20 September 2024. It highlights the strategies adopted by BRICS to
 challenge the Global North.

 BRICS is launching (starting) three strategic initiatives that aim to challenge the
 established international order: an *artificial intelligence (AI) governance framework, an
 independent economic system and regional security coalitions (alliances). BRICS's
 current goal is to reshape the international order to allow nations to act independently,
 without involvement or enforcement from Western countries.

 One of BRICS's primary objectives is to establish an independent payment system
 using member currencies to promote de-dollarisation (replace the US dollar in
 international trade), thereby diminishing (reducing) the impact of Western sanctions.
 The first step of this process is the attempt to influence specific vital international
 markets to gain economic leverage (advantage). One example of this new strategy is
 BRICS's involvement in the energy market, with the organisation aiming to create an
 energy partnership between its members. With the recent inclusion of energy-rich
 nations such as Saudi Arabia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates, BRICS could
 achieve a level of influence in the global energy market comparable to that of OPEC
 (Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries), potentially altering the dynamics
 by controlling a significant portion of the world's oil and gas supplies.

 Another critical market BRICS is attempting to influence is the agricultural sector,
 whose first objective is to create an independent grain trading system that was
 introduced by Russia. This initiative would increase the organisation's negotiating
 power in grain prices and combat sanctions by the United States and its **G7 partners
 (other wealthy Western nations). BRICS seeks to alter (change) the existing global
 power structure which could result in diminished (reduced) US influence and the
 destabilisation of the international order.

              [From 'The BRICS Challenge to the G7 Established International Order' by MG Mooradian]

 *Artificial intelligence governance framework: a government information system to
 manage the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in a responsible manner

 **G7: refers to an intergovernmental political and economic forum of seven of the world's
 most powerful economies. Its members are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the
 United Kingdom and the United States.

Copyright reserved                                                                   Please turn over

### Page 12

History/P2                                        12                                DBE/November 2025
                                      NSC – Addendum Confidential

 SOURCE 3C

 The graph below, titled 'The Rise of the BRICS', was produced by STATISTA, an
 online market research company that provides data and reports on global markets,
 from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) world economic outlook figures. It shows a
 comparative analysis of the growth of GDP (gross domestic product) between the G7
 and BRICS countries covering the period from 1995 to 2023.

  G7 COUNTRIES
                                                                                      BRICS COUNTRIES
                             44,9%
               CANADA
   BRITAIN

               FRANCE
                                               34,3%                        32,1%     SOUTH AFRICA
    ITALY
                                                                    29,6%
                                                                                      BRAZIL
             GERMANY                                   26,6%
                                                                                      RUSSIA
    JAPAN

                                     16,9%                                            INDIA

                     USA
                                                                                      CHINA

      [From https://www.statista.com/chart/30638/brics-and-g7-share-of-global-gdp/. Accessed on 5 March 2025.]

 Gross domestic product (GDP): total value (worth) of all goods within a country

 'share of global GDP': a comparison of a country's GDP to the total GDP of the world

 'purchasing power parity': a comparison of buying power of currencies between two
 or more countries

Copyright reserved                                                                      Please turn over

### Page 13

History/P2                                   13                              DBE/November 2025
                                 NSC – Addendum Confidential

 SOURCE 3D

 The extract below was taken from an article, titled 'How Trump's Dump on
 De-dollarisation Affects BRICS' by K Wadhwa and published in the Responsible
 Statecraft Weekly newsletter on 28 November 2024. It includes an extract from a
 speech that Trump delivered as president-elect during a campaign rally in Wisconsin in
 September 2024, highlighting how BRICS poses a threat to the balance of power
 between the Global North and the Global South.

 'Many countries are leaving the dollar. They are not going to leave the dollar with me.
 I'll say, you leave the dollar, you are not doing business with the United States because
 we're going to put a 100% tariff (tax) on your growth.' He was referring to *BRICS+
 countries, many of whom are critical of the 'rules-based' international order, established
 by the United States in the Bretton Woods era, which they see as benefitting the West
 (especially the United States) over the emerging Global South.

 De-dollarisation may not happen anytime soon but the fact that the BRICS+ countries,
 which form 35% of the world's GDP and 45% of the world's population, appear to be
 taking it seriously, is a real concern for American leaders, including Trump.

 In his previous presidential term, Trump started a trade war with China in addition to
 unleashing a new torrent of sanctions on Iran, Venezuela and Russia. If he (Trump)
 doubles down on using sanctions as a weapon, more countries will want **to hedge
 their bets. After all they might also be on the receiving end of sanctions if they were to
 fall out of favour with the United States one day. 'That will mean more consolidation
 (strengthening) of China's leadership of the BRICS+ and more innovation in terms of
 financial infrastructure, co-operation and integration …'

 He [Trump] noted that even Western-friendly countries, like Turkey, wish to join the
 alliance (BRICS+).

                               [From Responsible Statecraft Weekly newsletter, 28 November 2024]

 *BRICS+: Original BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) plus
 the new members (Ethiopia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates)
 and any other country that could still join. Argentina had already withdrawn after a
 change in government by December 2023.

 **to hedge your bets: to avoid committing oneself when faced with a difficult choice or
 to protect oneself against making the wrong choice

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 14

History/P2                                  14                         DBE/November 2025
                                NSC – Addendum Confidential

 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 Visual sources and other historical evidence were taken from the following:

 'BRICS Intergovernmental Organization', the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian
 Federation, Kazan Summit, Russia, 2024

 Erasmus, P. 2021. Confessions of a STRATCOM Hitman. (Jacana Media,
 Johannesburg)

 Funeral Programme of Reverend Tshenuwani Farisani, 7 June 2025

 Gentle, L; Callinicos, L; Jansen, M; Nieftegoedien, N and Jordie, R. 2018. History of
 Trade Unionism in South Africa, (Workers World Media Productions, Johannesburg)

 Howarth, N. 2012. War in Peace: The Truth about the South African Police's East Rand
 Riot Unit 1986–1994 (Galogo Books, Johannesburg)

 https://www.statista.com/chart/30638/brics-and-g7-share-of-global-gdp/

 Mooradian, MG. 2024. 'The BRICS Challenge to the G7 Established International Order'
 (Foreign Policy Research Institute)

 Responsible Statecraft Weekly newsletter, 2024

 The New York Times magazine, 15 June 1986

 The Truth and Reconciliation Commission Special Report. Decisions, 1998

 TRC Final Report, Volume 5, Chapter 2, 1998

 Verwoerd, W. and Mabizela, M. 2000. Truths Drawn in Jest: Commentary on the TRC
 Through Cartoons. (New Africa Books, Cape Town)

Copyright reserved

## Related documents

- [History P2 Nov 2023 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2023-addendum-eng/115e775e-ffa7-4295-a812-c3f541a7b7bb) — History · Addendum · 2023 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2021 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2021-addendum-eng/becc8caa-ed93-4752-8c5e-f4099e0322d1) — History · Addendum · 2021 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2020 Addendum Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2020-addendum-afr/134b494d-b154-4096-829d-f653e284a31e) — History · Addendum · 2020 · Afr
- [History P2 Nov 2019 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2019-addendum-eng/12189d7f-06ef-4026-899e-44679058dce8) — History · Addendum · 2019 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2018 Addendum Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2018-addendum-afr/fa6444a8-b449-46d6-992a-b81bfd0a7ad3) — History · Addendum · 2018 · Afr
- [History P2 Nov 2016 Addendum Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2016-addendum-afr/809cfc97-bcdd-427e-b688-04a75940b593) — History · Addendum · 2016 · Afr

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [History Grade 12 NSC P2 MEMO September 2025 North West](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-grade-12-nsc-p2-memo-september-2025-north-west/3d9bf167-1e97-42c1-826a-bf344c0e964e) — Memo · 2025
- [History P1 May-June 2025 MG Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-may-june-2025-mg-eng/9e0f813e-e888-4061-a259-20b4dbe98907) — Memo · 2025 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 MEMO GR12 JUNE 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-memo-gr12-june-2024-afrikaans/f313b62b-041f-4225-bf96-3a6052a2f919) — Memo · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P1 MEMO GR12 SEPT2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-memo-gr12-sept2024-afrikaans/49472cc4-f28c-41d3-b6c4-2623ae0611e3) — Memo · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-sept-2024-afrikaans/8367f672-7028-4e67-a52a-705b946b5122) — QP · 2024 · Afr

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
