# History Grade 12 P2 NSC November Mock 2026 Memo (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 memorandum from the NSC November Mock Exam 2026 (English), 26 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-history-2026-nsc-november-mock-exam-memorandum-paper-2/693e8f4f-2da2-4dc9-9ba7-3326f95ab21d
- Updated: 2026-10-29
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Language: English
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2026
- Exam period: NSC November Mock Exam
- Paper: 2
- Publisher: Hlayiso
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 26

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 P2 NSC November Mock 2026 Memo (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-history-2026-nsc-november-mock-exam-memorandum-paper-2/693e8f4f-2da2-4dc9-9ba7-3326f95ab21d)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · NSC November Mock Exam · 2026 · English. Memorandum, 26 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

hlayiso mock exams
                             Practice Series:
                             Grade 12 NSC Preparation
                             WWW.HLAYISO.COM

                                  NATIONAL
                             SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                                     GRADE 12

                                     HISTORY P2
                             MOCK EXAMINATION 2026
                               MARKING GUIDELINES

  MARKS: 150

                     These marking guidelines consist of 26 pages.

Copyright reserved                                                   Please turn over

### Page 2

History/P2                                    2                               Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                   NSC – Marking Guidelines

1.     SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS
1.1 The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based questions:
 Cognitive                          Historical skills                          Weighting of
  levels                                                                        questions
     LEVEL 1   • Extract evidence from sources                                    30%
               • Selection and organisation of relevant information from            (15)
               sources
               • Define historical concepts/terms in own words
     LEVEL 2   • Interpretation of evidence from sources                          40%
               • Explain information gathered from sources                          (20)
               • Analyse evidence from sources
               • Explain historical concepts in context
     LEVEL 3   • Interpret and evaluate evidence from sources                     30%
               • Engage with sources to determine usefulness, reliability,          (15)
               bias and limitations
               • Compare and contrast interpretations and perspectives
               presented in sources and draw independent conclusions
1.2 The information below indicates how source-based questions are assessed:
 • In the marking of source-based questions, credit must be given to any other valid and
   relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or examples.
 • In the allocation of marks, emphasis should be placed on how the requirements of the
   question have been addressed.
 • In the marking guidelines the requirements of the question (skills to be addressed) as well
   as the level of the question are indicated in italics.
 • When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should be credited for any
   other relevant answers.
 • Learners are expected to take a stance when answering ‘to what extent’ questions in order
   for any marks to be awarded.
1.3 Assessment procedures for source-based questions
 • Use a tick (✓) for each correct answer.
 • Pay attention to the mark scheme, e.g. (2 x 2) means two reasons, each awarded two
   marks (✓✓✓✓); (1 x 2) means one reason awarded two marks (✓✓).
 • If a question carries 4 marks, indicate this by placing 4 ticks (✓✓✓✓).
Paragraph question
Paragraphs are assessed globally (holistically). Both the content and the structure of the
paragraph must be taken into account when awarding a mark. Use the following steps:
 • Read the paragraph and place a bullet (•) at each point within the text where the candidate
   has used relevant evidence to address the question.
 • Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate has been able to use
   relevant evidence to write a paragraph.
 • At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (✓) awarded, the level (1, 2 or 3) as indicated
   in the holistic rubric and a brief comment, e.g.

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 3

History/P2                                   3                             Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                  NSC – Marking Guidelines

                     •
               •                       •                               Level 2 ✓✓✓✓
     COMMENT: Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph.
 • Count all the ticks for the source-based question and write the mark (e.g. 32/50) on the
   right-hand bottom margin.
 • Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back cover of the answer
   script.

2.   ESSAY QUESTIONS
2.1 The essay questions require candidates to structure their argument in a logical and
coherent manner. They need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so that
they present a reasonable sequence of facts or an effective argument to answer the question
posed. It is essential that an essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of
evidence and a conclusion.
2.2 Marking of essay questions: Candidates may have any other relevant introduction
and/or conclusion than those included in the essay marking guidelines for a specific essay.
2.3 Global assessment of the essay
The essay is assessed holistically (globally): the teacher assesses the essay as a whole
rather than marking the main points separately. This approach rewards an original argument
supported by relevant evidence; learners are not required simply to regurgitate content
to achieve a Level 7, and it discourages the reproduction of prepared essays that ignore
the specific requirements of the question. Holistic assessment does not penalise language
inadequacies; the emphasis is on:
  • The learner’s interpretation of the question
  • The appropriate selection of factual evidence (relevant content selection)
  • The construction of an argument (planned, structured and with an independent line of
    argument)
2.4 Assessment procedures of the essay
 • Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing the essay.
 • During the reading of the essay, ticks are awarded for a relevant introduction, the main
   aspects/body of the essay that sustain the line of argument and a relevant conclusion
   (each indicated by a bullet in the marking guidelines). For example, in an essay with five
   main points there could be about seven ticks.
 • Keep the PEEL structure in mind:
   P    Point: The candidate introduces the essay by taking a line of
        argument/making a major point. Each paragraph should include a point that
        sustains the major point.
   E    Explanation: The candidate explains in more detail what the main point is
        about and how it relates to the question posed.
   E    Example: The candidate selects relevant content and examples to sustain
        the line of argument.
   L    Link: The line of argument is sustained throughout the essay and written
        coherently.
 • The following symbols MUST be used when assessing an essay:

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 4

History/P2                                   4                            Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                  NSC – Marking Guidelines

   Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly       ∧
   contextualised
   Wrong statement
   Irrelevant statement                                         |
   Repetition                                                   R
   Analysis                                                     A✓
   Interpretation                                               I✓
   Line of argument                                             LOA
 2.5 The matrix
 In the marking of essays the criteria provided in the matrix should be used. Note both
 the content and the presentation; at the point of intersection of the content level and the
 presentation level a mark is awarded.
(a) The first reading determines to what extent the main aspects have been covered and
    allocates the content level, e.g. C LEVEL 4 .
(b) The second reading relates to the level of presentation, e.g. C LEVEL 4 P LEVEL 3 .
(c) Allocate an overall mark using the matrix, e.g. C LEVEL 4 and P LEVEL 3 → 26–27.
    COMMENT: Some omissions in content coverage. Attempts to sustain a line of argument.

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 5

History/P2                                                                     5                                                                         Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                                                    NSC – Marking Guidelines

MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY: TOTAL: 50
PRESENTATION →                  LEVEL 7               LEVEL 6               LEVEL 5               LEVEL 4               LEVEL 3                LEVEL 2                LEVEL 1*
                                Very well planned     Very well planned     Well planned and      Planned and           Shows some             Attempts to            Little or no attempt
                                and structured        and structured        structured essay.     constructed an        evidence of a          structure an           to structure the
                                essay. Good           essay. Developed a    Attempts to develop   argument.             planned and            answer. Largely        essay.
CONTENT ↓                       synthesis of          relevant line of      a clear argument.     Evidence used to      constructed            descriptive or some
                                information.          argument.             Conclusion drawn      some extent to        argument. Attempts     attempt at
                                Developed an          Evidence used to      from the evidence     support the line of   to sustain a line of   developing a line of
                                original,             defend the            to support the line   argument.             argument.              argument. No
                                well-balanced and     argument. Attempts    of argument.          Conclusions           Conclusions not        attempt to draw a
                                independent line of   to draw an                                  reached based on      clearly supported      conclusion.
                                argument with the     independent                                 evidence.             by evidence.
                                use of evidence       conclusion from the
                                and sustained and     evidence to support
                                defended the          the line of
                                argument              argument.
                                throughout.
                                Independent
                                conclusion is drawn
                                from evidence to
                                support the line of
                                argument.

LEVEL 7                             47–50                 43–46
Question has been fully
answered. Content selection
fully relevant to line of
argument.

LEVEL 6                             43–46                 40–42                 38–39
Question has been
answered. Content selection
relevant to a line of
argument.

LEVEL 5                             38–39                 36–37                 34–35                 30–33                 28–29
Question answered to a
great extent. Content
adequately covered and
relevant.

LEVEL 4                                                                         30–33                 28–29                 26–27
Question recognisable in
answer. Some omissions or
irrelevant content selection.

LEVEL 3                                                                                               26–27                 24–25                  20–23
Content selection does
relate to the question, but
does not answer it, or does
not always relate to the
question. Omissions in
coverage.

LEVEL 2                                                                                                                     20–23                  18–19                   14–17
Question inadequately
addressed. Sparse content.

LEVEL 1*                                                                                                                                           14–17                    0–13
Question inadequately
addressed or not at all.
Inadequate or irrelevant
content.

* Guidelines for allocating a mark for Level 1:
  • Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content; no attempt to structure the                                                                         =0
  essay
  • Content selection includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt                                                                             = 1–6
  to structure the essay
  • Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay                                                                              = 7–13

Copyright reserved                                                                                                                                            Please turn over

### Page 6

History/P2                                       6                                Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                      NSC – Marking Guidelines

SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

QUESTION 1: HOW DID THE BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS MOVEMENT CHALLENGE
            THE APARTHEID STATE IN THE 1970s?
1.1
1.1.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
             • African National Congress (ANC)
             • Pan Africanist Congress (PAC)
                                                                                       (2 x 1)   (2)
1.1.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
             • Their leaders were imprisoned, exiled or silenced, so there was no
               organisation inside the country to lead black opposition
             • Open political activity by black South Africans was crushed and people
               were afraid of state repression
             • There was no legal political voice for black South Africans
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                  (any 1 x 2)    (2)
1.1.3    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
             • ‘…NUSAS was dominated (controlled) by white liberal students …’
             • ‘…who spoke on behalf of black people …’
             • ‘…who could never fully share the experience of oppression’
             • ‘…their own concerns were not taken seriously in the organisation’
                                                                                  (any 2 x 1)    (2)
1.1.4    [Definition of a historical concept from Source 1A – L1]
             • A philosophy that encouraged black people to free themselves from
               feelings of inferiority, to be proud of their identity and culture, and to rely
               on themselves to achieve liberation
             • An attitude of mind and way of life that rejected white domination and
               promoted black pride and self-reliance
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                  (any 1 x 2)    (2)

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 7

History/P2                                     7                             Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                    NSC – Marking Guidelines

1.2
1.2.1    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
             • To put the Black Consciousness idea of self-reliance into practice
             • To provide health care to poor black communities that were neglected by
               the apartheid government
             • To show that black people could solve their own problems without white
               charity or government help
             • To restore the dignity and self-confidence of black communities
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                              (any 1 x 2)    (2)
1.2.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B and own knowledge – L2]
             • The government regarded Black Consciousness as a threat to apartheid
             • Biko was an influential leader whose ideas were spreading among students
               and the youth
             • To silence him – he was not allowed to speak in public or to be quoted in
               the press
             • To weaken SASO and the BPC and stop the growth of the movement
             • To prevent the revival of mass resistance after the banning of the ANC and
               PAC
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                              (any 2 x 2)    (4)
1.2.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
             • FRELIMO’s victory over Portuguese colonialism showed that liberation in
               southern Africa was possible
             • To inspire black South Africans to challenge the apartheid state
             • To show solidarity with African liberation movements
             • To openly defy the apartheid government and mobilise support for Black
               Consciousness
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                              (any 1 x 2)    (2)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 8

History/P2                                      8                             Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                     NSC – Marking Guidelines

1.3
1.3.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
             • ‘In 1974 the Bantu Education Department issued an instruction known as
               the Afrikaans Medium Decree’
             • ‘It required black secondary schools to use Afrikaans and English equally
               as languages of instruction …’
             • ‘Many learners and teachers rejected Afrikaans as the language of the
               oppressor’
                                                                               (any 1 x 2)    (2)
1.3.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
             • SASM members discussed the Afrikaans issue and the ideas of Black
               Consciousness in schools
             • They held meetings and formed an action committee (the Soweto Students’
               Representative Council) to organise the protest
             • They encouraged learners to reject Bantu Education and to take pride in
               themselves
             • They developed student leaders, e.g. Tsietsi Mashinini
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 1 x 2)    (2)
1.3.3    [Interpretation of visual evidence from Source 1C – L2]
             • The police were armed and prepared to shoot at learners
             • The police used brutal/excessive force against unarmed and peaceful
               learners
             • The police treated the learners as enemies/a threat rather than as children
             • The apartheid state was prepared to use violence to crush any opposition
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 2 x 2)    (4)
1.3.4    [Ascertaining the usefulness of Source 1C – L3]
         The photograph is USEFUL because:
          • It was taken at the scene on 16 June 1976 by a press photographer
            (primary evidence)
          • It shows that the police were armed and aimed their firearms at learners
          • It shows the brutal response of the police to a student protest
          • It was published overseas on the same day and shows how the event
            turned international opinion against apartheid
          • It is supported by other accounts of the events of 16 June 1976
         LIMITATION (any relevant point may also be credited):
          • It shows only the police and not the learners, so it shows only one side of
            the events
          • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 2 x 2)    (4)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 9

History/P2                                      9                              Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                     NSC – Marking Guidelines

1.4      [Comparison of evidence from Sources 1A and 1C – L3]
             • Source 1A states that Black Consciousness taught black people to free
               their minds and take pride in themselves, and Source 1C shows learners
               rejecting Afrikaans as the language of the oppressor
             • Source 1A refers to self-reliance (‘Black man, you are on your own’), and in
               Source 1C the students organised their own action committee and protest
             • Source 1A shows SASO spreading Black Consciousness among students,
               and in Source 1C SASM members, influenced by Black Consciousness,
               led the protest
             • Source 1A shows Black Consciousness challenging white domination, and
               Source 1C shows students openly challenging Bantu Education
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 2 x 2)     (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 10

History/P2                                      10                                Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                      NSC – Marking Guidelines

1.5
1.5.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
             • 18 August 1977
                                                                                       (1 x 1)   (1)
1.5.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
             • He was kept naked
             • He was kept in leg irons
             • He was assaulted and suffered serious head injuries
             • He did not receive proper medical treatment
             • He was placed naked in the back of a Land Rover and driven more than
               1 000 km to Pretoria
                                                                                  (any 3 x 1)    (3)
1.5.3    [Definition of a historical concept from Source 1D – L1]
             • Imprisonment of a person by the state without being charged with a crime
               or brought before a court
             • Holding a person in custody for long periods without a trial, often in solitary
               confinement
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                  (any 1 x 2)    (2)
1.5.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
             • The government did not care about the deaths of political detainees
             • The government was arrogant/insensitive and showed no respect for black
               lives
             • The government refused to take responsibility for Biko’s death
             • The government condoned (accepted) police brutality
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                  (any 1 x 2)    (2)
1.5.5    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
             • To crush the Black Consciousness Movement, which it blamed for the
               unrest after 1976
             • To silence criticism and media reporting of Biko’s death
             • The World reported sympathetically on the struggle and had to be silenced
             • To prevent further protests and restore its control
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                  (any 1 x 2)    (2)

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 11

History/P2                                   11                                Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                   NSC – Marking Guidelines

1.6      [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources –
         L3]
         Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:
          • Black students broke away from NUSAS and formed SASO in 1968–1969
            to lead their own struggle (Source 1A)
          • Black Consciousness freed black people from feelings of inferiority and
            promoted black pride and self-reliance (Source 1A)
          • It filled the political vacuum left by the banning of the ANC and PAC (Source
            1A)
          • The BPC and SASM spread Black Consciousness to adults and school
            learners (Source 1B)
          • Black Community Programmes, e.g. the Zanempilo Community Health
            Centre, promoted self-reliance (Source 1B)
          • Viva FRELIMO rallies openly defied the government (Source 1B)
          • Black Consciousness inspired the learners of Soweto to reject Afrikaans
            and Bantu Education on 16 June 1976 (Source 1C)
          • The Soweto uprising spread across the country and drew international
            condemnation (Source 1C)
          • Biko’s death in detention exposed the brutality of the apartheid state to the
            world (Source 1D)
          • The movement’s ideas survived the bannings of 19 October 1977, e.g.
            AZAPO was formed in 1978 (Source 1D)
          • Black Consciousness influenced trade unions (e.g. BAWU) and the 1973
            Durban strikes (own knowledge)
          • Many students went into exile and joined the ANC and PAC (own
            knowledge)
          • Any other relevant response
                                                                                                  (8)
Use the following rubric to allocate marks:
 LEVEL 1     • Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g. shows no or little          MARKS:
             understanding of how the Black Consciousness Movement challenged          0–2
             the apartheid state in the 1970s.
             • Uses evidence partially or cannot write a paragraph.
 LEVEL 2     • Evidence is mostly relevant and relates largely to the topic, e.g.      MARKS:
             shows some understanding of how the Black Consciousness Movement          3–5
             challenged the apartheid state in the 1970s.
             • Uses evidence in a basic manner to write a paragraph.
 LEVEL 3     • Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a thorough understanding      MARKS:
             of how the Black Consciousness Movement challenged the apartheid          6–8
             state in the 1970s.
             • Uses evidence very effectively in an organised paragraph that shows
             an understanding of the topic.
                                                                                                [50]

Copyright reserved                                                                   Please turn over

### Page 12

History/P2                                      12                                 Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                      NSC – Marking Guidelines

QUESTION 2: HOW DID THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION (TRC)
            ATTEMPT TO DEAL WITH SOUTH AFRICA’S VIOLENT PAST?
2.1
2.1.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
             • deeply divided    • strife   • conflict   • untold suffering   • injustice
                                                                                   (any 3 x 1)     (3)
2.1.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
             • It linked the divided, oppressive apartheid past with a democratic future
             • It made a peaceful transition from apartheid to democracy possible
             • It laid the foundation for human rights and democracy for all South Africans,
               irrespective of race, class, belief or sex
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                   (any 1 x 2)     (2)
2.1.3    [Definition of a historical concept from Source 2A – L1]
             • An official pardon granted to people who committed politically motivated
               crimes, which frees them from prosecution
             • Freedom from criminal and civil liability for crimes committed for political
               reasons, granted after full disclosure
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                   (any 1 x 2)     (2)
2.1.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
             • South Africans should try to understand the causes and motives of past
               violence instead of seeking revenge
             • Reconciliation rather than punishment (e.g. Nuremberg-style trials) was
               needed to unite the nation
             • Victims and perpetrators should be brought together to heal the divisions
               of the past
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                   (any 1 x 2)     (2)

Copyright reserved                                                                    Please turn over

### Page 13

History/P2                                     13                               Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                     NSC – Marking Guidelines

2.1.5    [Ascertaining the usefulness of Source 2A – L3]
         The source is USEFUL because:
          • It is an extract from an official legal document, the Interim Constitution of
            1993 (primary source)
          • It shows that the negotiators agreed that amnesty would be granted, which
            formed the basis of the TRC
          • It explains why reconciliation was preferred to vengeance and retaliation
          • It shows that the TRC was part of the negotiated settlement
          • It reflects the values (e.g. ubuntu) on which the new democracy was to be
            built
          • Any other relevant response
                                                                                (any 2 x 2)     (4)
2.2
2.2.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
             • 1 March 1960
                                                                                     (1 x 1)    (1)
2.2.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
             • Make full disclosure of all the relevant facts
             • The acts must be associated with a political objective
             • Comply with the requirements of the Act
                                                                                (any 2 x 1)     (2)
2.2.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
             • To restore their human and civil dignity
             • To allow victims to heal by having their suffering publicly acknowledged
             • To establish as complete a picture as possible of the truth about past
               violations
             • To establish the fate or whereabouts of victims
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                (any 1 x 2)     (2)
2.2.4    [Explanation of a historical concept from Source 2B – L2]
             • Compensation (financial, symbolic or community-based) to victims of gross
               human rights violations to help restore their dignity and rebuild their lives
             • Measures to make amends for the suffering of victims
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                                (any 1 x 2)     (2)

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 14

History/P2                                     14                              Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                     NSC – Marking Guidelines

2.3
2.3.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
             • Archbishop Desmond Tutu
                                                                                    (1 x 1)    (1)
2.3.2(a) [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
             • Amnesty Committee
                                                                                    (1 x 1)    (1)
2.3.2(b) [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
             • Reparation and Rehabilitation Committee
                                                                                    (1 x 1)    (1)
2.3.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
             • The TRC had different objectives (truth, amnesty and reparation) that
               required specialised work
             • There were thousands of statements and applications to process
             • Amnesty decisions required a separate, court-like (judicial) process from
               the victims’ hearings
             • To work efficiently and complete the process within the time available
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 1 x 2)     (2)
2.4      [Comparison of evidence from Sources 2B and 2C – L3]
             • Source 2B refers to establishing a picture of gross human rights violations,
               and in Source 2C the Human Rights Violations Committee investigated
               violations committed between 1960 and 1994
             • Source 2B refers to amnesty for persons who make full disclosure of
               politically motivated acts, and in Source 2C the Amnesty Committee
               required full disclosure and political motivation
             • Source 2B refers to victims relating their own accounts, and in Source 2C
               victims told their stories at public hearings
             • Source 2B refers to recommending reparation measures, and in Source 2C
               the Reparation and Rehabilitation Committee recommended reparation to
               the government
             • Both sources refer to the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation
               Act 34 of 1995
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 2 x 2)     (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 15

History/P2                                     15                              Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                     NSC – Marking Guidelines

2.5
2.5.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2D – L1]
             • Biko   • Mxenge     • Ribeiro
                                                                                    (3 x 1)    (3)
2.5.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
             • Amnesty took away their right to have the killers of their loved ones
               prosecuted in a court of law
             • Amnesty took away their right to claim damages (compensation) from the
               perpetrators
             • They wanted justice and believed that perpetrators should be punished
             • They believed that the amnesty provisions were unconstitutional
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 2 x 2)     (4)
2.5.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
             • He regarded the TRC as biased/a ‘circus’/a witch-hunt against Afrikaners
               and the National Party
             • He did not want to take responsibility for human rights violations committed
               under his government
             • He did not recognise the legitimacy of the TRC
             • He feared that he would incriminate himself
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 1 x 2)     (2)
2.5.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
             • The government did not fully implement the TRC’s recommendations on
               reparations
             • The payment was inadequate compared with the suffering of the victims
             • The government lacked the funds or the commitment to pay regular grants
             • Victims felt neglected because the payment came late (2003)
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 1 x 2)     (2)
2.5.5    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
             • Perpetrators who received amnesty were never punished and could not be
               sued
             • Many senior politicians and generals never applied for amnesty and were
               not prosecuted
             • Reparations to victims were inadequate
             • Some leaders refused to co-operate or tried to stop the publication of
               findings
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 1 x 2)     (2)

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 16

History/P2                                     16                                   Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                     NSC – Marking Guidelines

2.6      [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources –
         L3]
         Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:
          • The Interim Constitution (1993) provided for amnesty as a ‘historic bridge’
            between the past and the future (Source 2A)
          • It called for understanding rather than vengeance, reparation rather than
            retaliation, ubuntu rather than victimisation (Source 2A)
          • The TRC was established by the Promotion of National Unity and
            Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995 (Sources 2B and 2C)
          • It aimed to establish as complete a picture as possible of gross human
            rights violations from 1960 to 1994 (Source 2B)
          • Amnesty was granted to perpetrators who made full disclosure of politically
            motivated acts (Sources 2B and 2C)
          • Victims told their stories at public hearings, which restored their dignity
            (Sources 2B and 2C)
          • The Reparation and Rehabilitation Committee recommended reparations
            (Source 2C)
          • The final report was handed to President Mandela on 29 October 1998
            (Source 2C)
          • The TRC faced criticism, e.g. the AZAPO case, PW Botha’s refusal to
            appear, the challenges by De Klerk and the ANC (Source 2D)
          • Reparations were limited to a once-off payment of R30 000 (Source 2D)
          • Public hearings were broadcast on radio and television so that South
            Africans learnt the truth about the past (own knowledge)
          • Examples of hearings, e.g. the amnesty applications of the killers of Steve
            Biko and the testimony of Eugene de Kock (own knowledge)
          • Any other relevant response
                                                                                                       (8)
Use the following rubric to allocate marks:
 LEVEL 1     • Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g. shows no or little               MARKS:
             understanding of how the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC)             0–2
             attempted to deal with South Africa’s violent past.
             • Uses evidence partially or cannot write a paragraph.
 LEVEL 2     • Evidence is mostly relevant and relates largely to the topic, e.g. shows     MARKS:
             some understanding of how the Truth and Reconciliation Commission              3–5
             (TRC) attempted to deal with South Africa’s violent past.
             • Uses evidence in a basic manner to write a paragraph.
 LEVEL 3     • Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a thorough understanding           MARKS:
             of how the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) attempted to              6–8
             deal with South Africa’s violent past.
             • Uses evidence very effectively in an organised paragraph that shows
             an understanding of the topic.
                                                                                                     [50]

Copyright reserved                                                                        Please turn over

### Page 17

History/P2                                    17                             Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                    NSC – Marking Guidelines

QUESTION 3: WHAT IMPACT DID GLOBALISATION HAVE ON DEVELOPING
            COUNTRIES AFTER THE END OF THE COLD WAR?
3.1
3.1.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
             • December 1991
                                                                                 (1 x 1)    (1)
3.1.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
             • International Monetary Fund (IMF)
             • World Bank
                                                                                 (2 x 1)    (2)
3.1.3    [Definition of a historical concept from Source 3A – L1]
             • The process by which the world becomes increasingly interconnected
               through trade, investment, technology, communication and culture
             • The integration of national economies into a single world economy
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                             (any 1 x 2)    (2)
3.1.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3A – L2]
             • The Soviet Union, the only rival superpower, collapsed and was dissolved
             • Communism lost credibility and the world became unipolar
             • The USA had the strongest economy and military in the world and no longer
               faced a counterbalance
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                             (any 1 x 2)    (2)
3.1.5    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3A and own knowledge – L2]
             • They were deeply in debt and needed loans to survive
             • After the collapse of the Soviet Union there was no alternative source of
               aid; they could no longer play the superpowers against each other
             • The IMF and World Bank were controlled by the USA and Western Europe,
               which set the conditions
             • They needed foreign investment to develop their economies
             • Loans were only granted if they agreed to structural adjustment
               programmes
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                             (any 2 x 2)    (4)

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 18

History/P2                                     18                              Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                     NSC – Marking Guidelines

3.2
3.2.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
             • ‘…to ensure that globalization becomes a positive force for all the world’s
               people’
                                                                                    (1 x 2)    (2)
3.2.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
             • Developing countries
             • Countries with economies in transition
                                                                                    (2 x 1)    (2)
3.2.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3B – L2]
             • Rich/developed countries gained most of the profits while poor countries
               gained very little
             • The gap between rich and poor countries widened
             • The costs of globalisation, e.g. job losses and debt, were carried mainly by
               developing countries
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 1 x 2)     (2)
3.2.4    [Ascertaining the reliability of Source 3B – L3]
         The source is RELIABLE because:
          • It is an official declaration adopted by the United Nations General
            Assembly, representing the world’s governments
          • It is a primary source produced at the time (2000)
          • It is balanced: it acknowledges both the opportunities and the costs of
            globalisation
          • The information is supported by other sources, e.g. Sources 3C and 3D
          • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 2 x 2)     (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 19

History/P2                                    19                             Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                    NSC – Marking Guidelines

3.3
3.3.1    [Extraction of visual evidence from Source 3C – L1]
             • The passengers on the ship are raising glasses (celebrating)
             • The sign ‘FIRST CLASS: PROFITS, TECHNOLOGY, INVESTMENT’
             • The large, sturdy ship labelled ‘GLOBALISATION’ is moving ahead
             • The flag ‘NORTH’ flies over the comfortable ship
                                                                              (any 2 x 1)    (2)
3.3.2(a) [Interpretation of visual evidence from Source 3C – L2]
             • Developing countries are tied to and dependent on the economies of
               developed countries
             • They have no choice but to follow the direction set by the developed North
             • They are dragged along by a world economy that they do not control
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                              (any 1 x 2)    (2)
3.3.2(b) [Interpretation of visual evidence from Source 3C – L2]
             • Debt is a burden that threatens to sink developing countries
             • Developing countries struggle to stay afloat because debt repayments
               drain their resources
             • Loans with conditions (SAPs) trapped developing countries
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                              (any 1 x 2)    (2)
3.3.3    [Interpretation of visual evidence from Source 3C – L2]
             • Globalisation benefits developed countries, while developing countries
               struggle to survive
             • The relationship is unequal: the North enjoys the profits while the South
               carries the costs
             • The claim that ‘we’re all in the same ocean’ hides the inequality between
               rich and poor countries
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                              (any 1 x 2)    (2)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 20

History/P2                                     20                             Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                     NSC – Marking Guidelines

3.4      [Comparison of evidence from Sources 3B and 3C – L3]
             • Source 3B states that the benefits of globalisation are very unevenly
               shared, and Source 3C shows the developed countries enjoying ‘first class’
               profits, technology and investment while the developing countries are in a
               small boat
             • Source 3B states that the costs are unevenly distributed, and Source 3C
               shows the developing countries’ boat filling with ‘DEBT’
             • Source 3B states that developing countries face special difficulties, and
               Source 3C shows people in the small boat bailing water and struggling to
               keep up
             • Source 3B calls for globalisation to become a positive force for all, while
               Source 3C shows the claim ‘we’re all in the same ocean’ to be unequal in
               reality
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                               (any 2 x 2)    (4)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 21

History/P2                                    21                             Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                    NSC – Marking Guidelines

3.5
3.5.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3D – L1]
             • Seattle   • Genoa    • Porto Alegre
                                                                                  (3 x 1)    (3)
3.5.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3D – L2]
             • A fairer form of globalisation that puts people and the environment before
               profits is possible
             • There are alternatives to free-market globalisation controlled by rich
               countries and multinational companies
             • Ordinary people can work together to change unfair global trade rules
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                              (any 1 x 2)    (2)
3.5.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3D and own knowledge – L2]
             • They forced governments to cut spending on health care and education
             • People had to pay fees for basic services
             • Workers lost their jobs when state companies were privatised or downsized
             • Removal of subsidies increased the prices of food and fuel
             • They were imposed by outside institutions, which undermined national
               sovereignty
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                              (any 1 x 2)    (2)
3.5.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3D – L2]
             • Tariffs were reduced, allowing cheaper imports, especially from China, to
               flood the local market
             • Local factories could not compete with cheaper imports and closed down
             • The GEAR strategy followed free-market principles that exposed local
               industries to global competition
             • Any other relevant response
                                                                              (any 1 x 2)    (2)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 22

History/P2                                     22                                   Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                     NSC – Marking Guidelines

3.6      [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources –
         L3]
         Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:
          • The end of the Cold War left the USA as the only superpower and spread
            free-market capitalism (Source 3A)
          • Developing countries privatised state companies, lowered trade barriers
            and welcomed foreign investment (Source 3A)
          • Indebted developing countries had to accept IMF/World Bank loans with
            structural adjustment conditions (Source 3A)
          • The benefits of globalisation were unevenly shared and the costs unevenly
            distributed (Source 3B)
          • Developing countries were tied to the developed North and burdened by
            debt (Source 3C)
          • Anti-globalisation protests, e.g. Seattle (1999) and Genoa (2001), and the
            World Social Forum (Source 3D)
          • Cuts to health care and education, user fees and job losses under SAPs
            (Source 3D)
          • South Africa’s clothing and textile industry lost thousands of jobs to cheaper
            imports (Source 3D)
          • Some benefits: new investment, cheaper technology, mobile phones
            (Source 3D)
          • Developing countries formed new partnerships, e.g. South Africa joined
            BRICS in 2010/2011 (own knowledge)
          • Any other relevant response
                                                                                                       (8)
Use the following rubric to allocate marks:
 LEVEL 1     • Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g. shows no or little               MARKS:
             understanding of the impact that globalisation had on developing               0–2
             countries after the end of the Cold War.
             • Uses evidence partially or cannot write a paragraph.
 LEVEL 2     • Evidence is mostly relevant and relates largely to the topic, e.g. shows     MARKS:
             some understanding of the impact that globalisation had on developing          3–5
             countries after the end of the Cold War.
             • Uses evidence in a basic manner to write a paragraph.
 LEVEL 3     • Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a thorough understanding           MARKS:
             of the impact that globalisation had on developing countries after the         6–8
             end of the Cold War.
             • Uses evidence very effectively in an organised paragraph that shows
             an understanding of the topic.
                                                                                                     [50]

Copyright reserved                                                                        Please turn over

### Page 23

History/P2                                  23                              Hlayiso/Mock 2026
                                  NSC – Marking Guidelines

SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

QUESTION 4: CIVIL RESISTANCE, 1970s TO 1980s: SOUTH AFRICA: THE CRISIS OF
            APARTHEID IN THE 1980s
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical and
interpretative skills]

SYNOPSIS
Candidates should indicate whether they agree or disagree with the statement that PW Botha’s
reforms of the 1980s were an attempt to modernise apartheid rather than to end it, and that
they intensified resistance and plunged the apartheid state into crisis. They need to support
their line of argument with relevant historical evidence.
MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates could include the following aspects in their essays:
 • Introduction: Candidates need to take a stance (e.g. agree) and indicate how they intend
   to support their line of argument.

ELABORATION
 • Background: PW Botha became Prime Minister in 1978; apartheid faced economic
   problems, international isolation and growing resistance after 1976. Botha warned white
   South Africans that they had to ‘adapt or die’.
 • Total Strategy: Response to a perceived ‘total onslaught’ by communism and the liberation
   movements; reform combined with repression; growing power of the State Security Council
   and the military; cross-border raids into neighbouring states.
 • Labour reforms: The Wiehahn Commission (1979) led to the legal recognition of black
   trade unions; the Riekert Commission (1979) separated urban ‘insiders’ from rural
   ‘outsiders’.
    ▷ The reforms strengthened the unions: FOSATU (1979) and COSATU (1985) became
      powerful forces of resistance; strikes and stayaways increased
 • Political reforms – the Tricameral Parliament (1983/1984): Separate houses for
   whites (House of Assembly), coloureds (House of Representatives) and Indians (House
   of Delegates); whites retained control; black Africans were excluded and expected to
   exercise political rights in the homelands.
    ▷ Low voter turnout in the coloured and Indian elections of August 1984 showed rejection
      of the system
    ▷ The United Democratic Front (UDF) was launched on 20 August 1983 in Mitchells Plain,
      uniting hundreds of organisations against the reforms (‘UDF unites, apartheid divides’);
      the National Forum (1983) represented Black Consciousness groups
 • Black Local Authorities Act (1982): Black town councils were seen as puppets of the
   government; rent increases sparked the Vaal Uprising (3 September 1984), which spread
   across the country.
 • Resistance intensified: The ANC called on people to make the townships ungovernable
   (1985); rent, consumer and school boycotts; street committees and people’s courts; the
   National Education Crisis Committee (‘People’s Education for People’s Power’); violence
   between activists and those seen as collaborators.
 • Repression: Partial State of Emergency (July 1985) and national State of Emergency

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

Text truncated here. Open the document page to read the rest.

## Related documents

- [History P2 (SG) (English) June 2014 Possible Answer](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-sg-english-june-2014-possible-answer/b6322558-818f-4c67-b34d-309f2eecce06) — History · Memo · 2014 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP JUNE 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-june-2023-english/8444f2f9-4c71-46a1-972c-8b0f923e9927) — History · QP · 2023 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2023-english/7ebc175c-3acc-4751-b898-2a770db59777) — History · Addendum · 2023 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2022-english/e5d10556-c154-433f-8fd2-98646e28994c) — History · Addendum · 2022 · Eng
- [Gr12 History P2 (English) SEP 2022 Question Paper](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr12-history-p2-english-sep-2022-question-paper/4ecf07fc-c5be-4181-868c-5e74b2676b7a) — History · QP · 2022 · Eng
- [History P2 Add June 2021 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-add-june-2021-english/4b70309f-2760-4254-8778-f8fe061ab26d) — History · QP · 2021 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [Gr 12 History P1 (English) 2024 Question Paper X05](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-12-history-p1-english-2024-question-paper-x05/7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5) — QP · 2024 · Eng
- [History P1 Nov 2024 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-nov-2024-addendum-eng/df93fb24-73e0-435a-8d91-bce9f456ba2c) — Addendum · 2024 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2023 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2023-addendum-eng/115e775e-ffa7-4295-a812-c3f541a7b7bb) — Addendum · 2023 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2023 Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2023-afr/1406231f-0475-4c85-8862-7a120bee5f2e) — QP · 2023 · Afr
- [HISTORY P1 GR12 ADDEN SEPT 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr12-adden-sept-2022-english/f45ccdc0-4084-4c3d-b1b8-1a30ab014473) — Addendum · 2022 · Eng

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
