# History Grade 11 P1 Eastern Cape November 2014 Memo (Eng)

> Grade 11 History Paper 1 memorandum from the Eastern Cape November 2014 (English), 20 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p1-gr11-memo-nov2014-eng/deffcb43-90cd-49ac-b51f-e608b893aedd
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 11
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2014
- Exam period: Eastern Cape November
- Paper: 1
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 20

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 11](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-11) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-11/history) › [History Grade 11 P1 Eastern Cape November 2014 Memo (Eng)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p1-gr11-memo-nov2014-eng/deffcb43-90cd-49ac-b51f-e608b893aedd)

## About this document

History · Grade 11 · Eastern Cape November · 2014. Memorandum, 20 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

                    NATIONAL
               SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                       GRADE 11

                 NOVEMBER 2014

                   HISTORY P1
                  MEMORANDUM

MARKS:   150

               This memorandum consists of 20 pages.

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
2                                     HISTORY P1                            (NOVEMBER 2014)

 1. SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

     1.1 The following cognitive levels of questions, the associated historical
         skills and weighting of questions have been used to assess source-
         based questions.

           COGNITIVE HISTORICAL SKILLS                              WEIGHTING OF
           LEVELS                                                   QUESTIONS
           LEVEL 1      Extract evidence from sources.
                        Selection and organisation of                    30%
                         relevant information from sources.               (15)
                        Define historical concepts.
           LEVEL 2      Interpretation of evidence from the
                         sources.
                        Explain information gathered from                50%
                         the sources.                                     (25)
                        Analyse evidence from the
                         sources.
           LEVEL 3      Interpret and evaluate evidence
                         from sources.
                        Engage with sources to determine
                         its usefulness, reliability, bias and
                                                                          20%
                         limitations.
                                                                          (10)
                        Compare and contrast
                         interpretations and perspectives
                         presented in sources and draw
                         independent conclusions.

     1.2 The following table indicates how to assess source-based questions.

            In the marking of source-based questions credit needs to be given to
             any other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or
             examples.
            In the allocation of marks emphasis should be placed on how the
             requirements of the question have been addressed.
            In the marking guideline the requirements of the question (skills that
             need to be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated
             in italics.

 2. EXTENDED WRITING

     2.1 The extended writing questions focus on one of the following levels:

           LEVELS OF QUESTIONS
           LEVEL 1
            Discuss or describe according to a given line of argument set out in the
              extended writing question.
            Plan and construct an argument based on evidence, using the
              evidence to reach a conclusion.

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(NOVEMBER 2014)                         HISTORY P1                                         3

              LEVEL 2
               Synthesise information to construct an original argument using
                 evidence to support the argument.
               Sustain and defend a coherent and balanced argument with
                 evidence.
               Write clearly and coherently in constructing the argument.

       2.2    Marking of extended writing

                    MARKERS MUST BE AWARE THAT THE CONTENT OF THE
                     ANSWER WILL BE GUIDED BY THE TEXTBOOKS IN USE AT
                     THE PARTICULAR CENTRE.
                    CANDIDATES MAY HAVE ANY OTHER RELEVANT
                     INTRODUCTION AND/OR CONCLUSION THAN THOSE
                     INCLUDED IN A SPECIFIC EXTENDED WRITING MARKING
                     GUIDELINE FOR A SPECIFIC ESSAY.
                    WHEN ASSESSING OPEN-ENDED SOURCE-BASED
                     QUESTIONS, LEARNERS SHOULD BE CREDITED FOR ANY
                     OTHER RELEVANT ANSWERS.

              Global assessment of extended writing

              The extended writing will be assessed holistically (globally). This
              approach requires the educator to score the overall product as a
              whole, without scoring the component parts separately. This
              approach encourages the learner to offer an individual opinion by
              using of selected factual evidence to support an argument. The
              learner will not be required to simply regurgitate “facts” in order to
              achieve a high mark. This approach discourages learners from
              preparing “model” answers and reproducing them without taking into
              account the specific requirements of the question. Holistic extended
              writing marking credits learners’ opinions supported by evidence.
              Holistic assessment, unlike content based marking, does not penalise
              language inadequacies as the emphasis is on the following:

                    The construction of argument
                    The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such
                     argument and
                    The learner’s interpretation of the question

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4                                       HISTORY P1                            (NOVEMBER 2014)

 Assessment procedures of extended writing

 1.    Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing extended writing.

 2.    During the first reading of the extended writing ticks need to be awarded for
       arelevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in marking guideline/
       memorandum) each of the main points/aspects that is properly
       contextualised (also indicatedby bullets in the marking guideline/
       memorandum) and a relevant conclusion (indicated by a bullet in marking
       guideline/memorandum) e.g. in an answer where there are 5 main points
       there will be 7 ticks.

 3.    The following additional symbols can also be used:

              Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly contextualised

              Wrong statement                                                  ------
              Irrelevant statement                                                |
                                                                                   |
                                                                                   |
                                                                                   |
              Repetition                                                          R
              Analysis                                                            A√
              Interpretation                                                      I√

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
   (NOVEMBER 2014)                                                      HISTORY P1                                                                                 5

     4. The matrix

             4.1           Use of analytical matrix in the marking of extended writing (Refer
                           to the Matrix as attached).

                             LEVEL 7               LEVEL 6               LEVEL 5                LEVEL 4              LEVEL 3               LEVEL 2                LEVEL 1
                         Very well planned     Very well planned     Well planned and      Planned and           Shows some            Attempts to            Little or no attempt
PRESENTATION
                         and structured        and structured        structured essay.     constructed an        evidence of a         structure an           to structure the
                         essay. Good           essay. Developed a    Attempts to           argument.             planned and           answer. Largely        essay.
                         synthesis of          relevant line of                                                                        descriptive or some
                                                                     develop a clear       Evidence used to      constructed
                         information.          argument.                                                                               attempt at
                         Developed an                                argument.             some extent to        argument.             developing a line of
                                               Evidence used to
                         original, well        defend the            Conclusion drawn      support the line of   Attempts to sustain   argument. No
                         balanced and          argument.             from the evidence     argument.             a line of argument.   attempt to draw a
                         independent line      Attempts to draw      to support the line   Conclusions           Conclusions not       conclusion.
                         of argument with      an independent        of argument.          reached based on      clearly supported
                         the use of            conclusion from
                                                                                           evidence.             by evidence.
                         evidence and          the evidence to
                         sustained and         support the line of
                         defended the          argument.
CONTENT
                         argument
                         throughout.
                         Independent
                         conclusion is
                         drawn from
                         evidence to
                         support the line of
                         argument.

LEVEL 7
Question has been
fully answered.
                               47–50                 43–46
Content selection
fully relevant to line
of argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has been
answered. Content              43–46                 40–42                 38–39
selection relevant to
a line of argument.
LEVEL 5
Question answered
to a great extent.             38–39                 36–37                 34–35                 30–33                 28–29
Content adequately
covered and relevant.
LEVEL 4
Question
recognisable in
answer.                                                                    30–33                 28–29                 26–27
Some omissions or
irrelevant content
selection.
LEVEL 3
Content selection
does not relate to the
question, but does                                                                                                                           20–23
not answer it, or does                                                                           26–27                 24–25
not always
relate to the
question. Omissions
in coverage.
LEVEL 2
Question
inadequately                                                                                                           20–23                 18–19                  14–17
addressed. Sparse
content.
LEVEL 1
Question
inadequately
                                                                                                                                             14–17                     0–3
addressed or not at
all. Inadequate or
irrelevant content.

   Copyright reserved                                                                                                                         Please turn over

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6                                       HISTORY P1                               (NOVEMBER 2014)

       4.1.1    The first reading of extended writing will be to determine to what
                extent the main aspects have been covered and to determine the
                content level (on the matrix).

                                                               C       LEVEL 4

       4.1.2    The second reading of extended writing will relate to the level (on the
                matrix) of presentation.

                                                               C       LEVEL 4
                                                               P       LEVEL 5

       4.1.3    Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.

                                                           C       LEVEL 4       30 − 33
                                                           P       LEVEL 5

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(NOVEMBER 2014)                           HISTORY P1                                            7

 SECTION A: SOURCE BASED QUESTIONS

 QUESTION 1: COMMUNISM IN RUSSIA, 1900 – 1940

 HOW DID THE RUSSIAN REVOLUTION LEAD TO THE OVERTHROW OF THE
 TSARIST REGIME IN RUSSIA IN 1917?

 1.1 1.1.1        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                   To ensure workers are not influenced by socialism.
                   Strengthen support for the Tsar.
                   Strengthen their loyalty to the Russian Orthodox (religion).
                   To undermine communist influence.
                   Any other relevant answer.                                       (2 x 1)    (2)

       1.1.2      [Extraction and interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                   He was a Russian Orthodox priest.
                   Priests were regarded as a class closer to the ruling elite under the
                     Tsar.                                                         (1 x 2)      (2)

       1.1.3      [Extraction and interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                   Nicholas II                                                   (1 x 1)       (1)

       1.1.4      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
                   He was sincere in his beliefs.
                   His ability to influence people through his oratory.
                   Enjoyed a measure of popularity.
                   Any other relevant answer.                                       (2 x 2)    (4)

       1.1.5      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
                   Undemocratic government that had no regard for the people.
                   Autocratic and cruel.
                   Any other relevant response.                             (1 x 2)            (2)

       1.1.6      [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                   A parliament.
                   Right to vote.
                   Universal education (education for all)
                   A minimum wage
                   Eight-hour working day
                   Income tax system
                   Separation of state and church
                   Amnesty for political prisoners.                                 (4 x 1)    (4)

 1.2   1.2.1      [Extraction from Source 1B – L1]
                   “... who must bear their fate and be silent.”                    (1 x 2)    (2)

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8                                       HISTORY P1                             (NOVEMBER 2014)

       1.2.2    [Analysis and interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L3]
                 To show respect for the Tsar.
                 To make an emotional appeal.
                 To attempt to absolve the Tsar from the brutality of the government.
                 Any other relevant response.                                   (1 x 2)     (2)

       1.2.3    [Comparison of evidence from Source 1A and 1B – L2]
                  Both sources contain demands recognition of basic human rights of
                   the ordinary people.
                  The role of Gapon is prominent in both sources.
                  Both sources highlight the repressive nature of the government.
                  Any other relevant response.                                 (2 x 2)      (4)

 1.3 1.3.1      [Explanation/definition of a historical concept from Source 1C – L2]
                 Nobles who were closely related to the royal family and who owned
                   vast tracks of land.                                           (1 x 2)    (2)

       1.3.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                 To demonstrate against the government.
                 To highlight the plight of workers.
                 Demand workers’ rights.                                         (1 x 2)    (2)

       1.3.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                 It took place in February 1917 according to the Gregorian calendar
                   which is in use in many Western countries.
                 It happened in March according to the Russian calendar.
                 To distinguish it from the later revolution.                  (2 x 2)      (4)

 1.4 1.4.1      [Explanation/definition of a historical concept from Source 1C – L2]
                Implementation of communism in Russia by the Bolsheviks in order to
                win the Russian Civil War.                                        (1 x 2)    (2)

       1.4.2    [Analysis and interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                 To spread the communist ideology.
                 To consolidate the gains of revolution in Russia.
                 To ensure the hegemony of the communist system and the total
                  demise of capitalism.
                 Any other relevant answer.                                  (2 x 2)        (4)

       1.4.3    [Analysis and interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                 Industries were destroyed.
                 Best workers had been killed.
                 Framers demoralised by the 1920 crop failure and the war.
                 Starvation in the cities.                                       (2 x 2)    (4)

       1.4.4    [Recall of information using Source 1D as a reference – L1]
                 The New Economic Policy                                         (1 x 1)    (1)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(NOVEMBER 2014)                         HISTORY P1                                         9

1.5    [Paragraph – Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of information from all the
       sources – L3]
         Bolsheviks came into power as a result of the October Revolution in
            1917.
         Russia was participating in the First World War.
         As a result of the war there were food shortages and starvation in
            Russia.
         To make matters worse Russia was catapulted into a civil war.
         The Bolsheviks had to fight for the defence of the revolution.
         War Communism was introduced as a measure to deal with the
            emergency situation in Russia.
         The Red Army and the factory workers needed to be supplied with food.
         The peasants were compelled to sell their produce to the state.
         Prices were determined by the state.
         Negative reaction of peasants led to a drastic drop in food production.
         Russia descended into famine.
         Revolts became common – Kronstadt Naval Base.
         Lenin was forced to abandon War Communism.
         The New Economic Policy was introduced.
         Any other relevant answer.                                                       (8)

       Use the following rubric to allocate a mark.

          LEVEL                           CRITERIA                          MARKS

                          Uses evidence in an elementary manner.
                          Question not answered.
                          Little or no concept why Lenin introduced the
                           policy of War Communism.
       LEVEL 1                                                               0–2
                          Little or no understanding of the
                           challenges leading to the introduction of
                           War Communism and the impact thereof.
                          Cannot respond to the question asked.
                          Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a
                           great extent to the topic.
                          Some understanding of the challenges
       LEVEL 2             leading to the introduction of War                3–5
                           Communism and the impact thereof.
                          Uses evidence in a basic manner but it
                           relates to the question asked.
                          Evidence relates very well to the question
                           asked.
                          Demonstrate a good understanding why
       LEVEL 3             Lenin introduced the policy of War                6–8
                           Communism.
                          Evidence is used very effectively in an
                           organised paragraph.
                                                                                         [50]

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10                                      HISTORY P1                              (NOVEMBER 2014)

 QUESTION 2:         CAPITALISM IN THE USA, 1900 – 1940

 HOW DID ROOSEVELT’S NEW DEAL BRING ABOUT RELIEF, REFORM AND
 RECOVERY FOR THE AMERICANS?

 2.1 2.1.1      [Recall of information using Source 2A as a reference – L1]
                 The 1932 presidential election in USA.                           (1 x 2)   (2)

       2.1.2    [Extraction of information from Source 2A – L1]
                 Relief
                 Reform
                 Recovery                                                         (3 x 1)   (3)

       2.1.3    [[Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                 Congress refers to the parliament of USA (Lower House)           (1 x 2)   (2)

       2.1.4    [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                 The economy of USA collapsed in 1929.
                 The Great Depression set in.
                 An intervention plan was needed to bring relief, recovery and
                     reform.
                 Any other relevant response.                                (2 x 2) (4)

       2.1.5    [Analysis and interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                 The newspaper reports on the results of the vote in Washington.
                 Public support for the New Deal is demonstrated.
                 The headline shows support for Roosevelt.
                 Any other relevant response.                                (1 x 2)        (2)

       2.1.6    [Analysis and interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                 Shows Washington voters supported Roosevelt.
                 The New Deal was well supported even by the press.
                 Affectionate reference to Roosevelt – F.D.R.
                 Any other relevant response.                                     (2 x 2)   (4)

       2.1.7    [Comparison of the written and visual sources – L2]
                  The visual source shows public support for the New Deal
                   announced in the written source.
                  In the written source Roosevelt made an appeal for support of his
                   programmes and the visual source shows how voters gave him the
                   mandate to implement the New Deal.
                  Any other relevant response.                              (2 x 2)         (4)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(NOVEMBER 2014)                           HISTORY P1                                        11

 2.2 2.2.1        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
                    To bring about immediate relief from starvation.
                    So that families and individuals can be able to buy the basic
                       necessities of life.
                    Any other relevant answer.                             (1 x 2)         (2)

       2.2.2      [Extraction of information from Source 2B – L1]
                   Works Progress Administration – to provide work opportunities.
                   Public Works Administration – public projects undertaken e.g.
                       construction of dams, roads, public buildings etc.
                   Civil Conservation Corps – employment in conservation for young
                       men.                                                     (2 x 2)     (4)

       2.2.3      [Extraction of information from Source 2B – L1]
                    Minimum wages were set.
                    Standardised working hours.
                    Right to join trade unions.                                  (3 x 1)   (3)

       2.2.4      [Analysis and interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
                    To reduce surpluses due to overproduction.
                    To attempt to control supply in order to raise commodity prices.
                    To maximise profits in the agricultural sector.
                    Any other relevant response.                                 (1 x 3)   (3)

 2.3 2.3.1        [Analysis and interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L3]
                   US economy was revived and the country brought back from a
                      catastrophe.
                   Relief for the destitute made a telling impact on the people.
                   Employment opportunities that were created provide the needed
                      income.
                   Hunger and starvation were minimised.
                   Any other relevant response.                                  (1 x 2)   (2)

       2.3.2      [Interpretation, analysis of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
                   They belonged to two different parties.
                   Hoover belonged to the Republican Party which believed
                       government should not interfere in business.
                   Roosevelt’s Democratic Party believed that government must
                       make strategic interventions in the economy on behalf of the
                       people.
                   Any other relevant answer.                               (2 x 2)        (4)

       2.3.3      [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
                    “Hoovervilles” – cardboard box homes
                    “Hoover Stew” – free food handouts                           (2 x 1)   (2)

       2.3.4      [Recall of information using Source 2A as a reference – L1]
                   Republican Party                                              (1 x 1)   (1)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
12                                       HISTORY P1                            (NOVEMBER 2014)

 2.4 [Paragraph – Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of information from a
     selected sources – L3]

           New Deal brought immedite state intervention in the economy.
           It dealt with the immediate results of the depression.
           Aims of New Deal broadcasted on radio.
           New Deal had the support of majority of the population.
           It provided hope for the future.
           Employment opportunities for the youth created.
           Even farmers were supported to get their farms running again.
           Unemployment immediately relieved.
           Brought some sort of stability to economy.
           Over speculation was prevented.
           Old age pensions for the elderly were introduced.
           Unemployment insurance fund created.
           Soup kitchens relieved the plight of the poor
           The banking system was reformed to regain people’s confidence.
           The American infrastructure was boosted by new job opportunities
           Soil erosion programmes were introduced.
           Rural areas supplied with electricity.
           Honest competitive business practice was introduced to reform business.
           Trade unions were allowed to bargain with employers.
           Any other relevant answer.                                                      (8)

       Use the following rubric to allocate a mark.

          LEVEL                            CRITERIA                            MARKS
                        Uses evidence in an elementary manner.
                        Question not answered.
                        Partial use of evidence to respond to the question.    0–2
       LEVEL 1
                        Little or no understanding of how the impact of the
                         New Deal on the American population.
                        Cannot respond to the question asked.
                        Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                         extent to the topic.
                        Some understanding of the impact of the New
       LEVEL 2                                                                  3–5
                         Deal on the American population.
                        Uses evidence in a basic manner but it relates to
                         the question asked.
                        Uses evidence that is relevant and appropriate.
                        Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the
                         impact of the New Deal on the American
       LEVEL 3           population.                                            6–8
                        Evidence relates very well to the question asked.
                        Evidence is used very effectively in an organised
                         paragraph.
                                                                                           [50]

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(NOVEMBER 2014)                           HISTORY P1                                        13

 QUESTION 3:         IDEAS OF RACE IN THE LATE 19th AND 20th CENTURIES

 HOW WERE THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF MINORITIES VIOLATED IN NAZI
 GERMANY AS A RESULT OF RACE THEORIES?

 3.1 3.1.1        [Definition of a historical concept from Source 3A – L2]
                   Systematic and deliberate mass killing of Jews and other minorities
                      in Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler.                       (1 x 2) (2)

       3.1.2      [Extraction of information from Source 3A – L1]
                   Tall
                   Blonde-haired
                   White
                   Blue-eyed                                                     (4 x 1)   (4)

       3.1.3      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3A – L2]
                   In order to isolate and identify clearly the target of Nazi racist
                       policies.
                   To ensure that all elements that could contaminate the German
                       nation are excluded and eliminated.
                   To avoid racial impurities.
                   Any other relevant answer.                                 (1 x 3)      (3)

       3.1.4      [Recall of information using Source 3A as a reference – L1]
                   Adolf Hitler                                                  (1 x 1)   (1)

 3.2 3.2.1        [Definition of a historical concept from Source 3B – L2]
                   Fundamental hatred towards Jews or people of Jewish extraction.
                                                                             (1 x 2)        (2)

       3.2.2      [Extraction of information from Source 3B – L1]
                   Jews were dismissed from national services.
                   Jews could not vote.
                   Could not take part in politics.
                   Jewish scholars to attend separate schools.
                   Jews to wear the Star of David, their businesses to display the star
                       as well.                                                  (3 x 1)    (3)

       3.2.3      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
                   They would be victims of unemployment.
                   Their quality of life would be negatively affected.
                   The Jews would be excluded from the German society and be
                       removed from interaction with Germans.
                   Any other relevant response.                        (2 x 2)             (4)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
14                                      HISTORY P1                            (NOVEMBER 2014)

       3.2.4    [Comparison of Sources 3A and 3B – L2]
                 Both sources relate to the racist treatment meted out to the Jews
                   by the Nazis.
                 In Source 3A non-Aryans are clearly defined and in Source 3B
                   Jews are subjected to total exclusion from German society as they
                   have been identified as non-Aryans.
                 Both sources represent German oppression.
                 Any other relevant answer.                                  (2 x 2)      (4)

       3.2.5    [Recall of information using Source 3A as a reference – L1]
                 Israel                                                         (1 x 1)   (1)

 3.3 3.3.1      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
                 The event when Jewish business premises were destroyed and
                     damaged by Germans under Nazi police supervision.
                 This refers to the broken glass that covered the streets after the
                     demolition of Jewish business premises.                     (1 x 2)   (2)

       3.3.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
                 They viewed the Germans as their liberators.
                 They were tired of Russian autocratic rule.
                 Any other relevant response.                                   (1 x 2)   (2)

       3.3.3    [Extraction of information from Source 3C – L1]
                 Jews to be killed in extermination camps (concentration camps)
                 Urgent design of ovens and gas chambers to carry out mass
                     murders quickly.
                 German personnel not to be involved too much in the killing of
                     Jews.
                 Concentration camps to be built with great urgency.        (3 x 2)       (6)

       3.3.4    [Analyse and evaluate the usefulness Source 3C – L3]
                 Source useful it contains information about the actual roll out of the
                    holocaust.
                 It gives crucial information on the acceleration of the extermination
                    of Jews.
                 Involvement of the German industries and businesses in the
                    extermination of Jews is exposed.
                 Establishment of concentration camps is shown.
                 The extermination of Jews is consistent with the belief that the
                    Germans belonged to a master race.
                 Any other relevant answer.                                     (1 x 2)   (2)

 3.4 3.4.1      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3D – L2]
                 Poland had the highest number of Jews in Europe.               (1 x 2)   (2)

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 15

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(NOVEMBER 2014)                            HISTORY P1                                       15

     3.4.2     [Comparison of Source 3C and 3D – L2]
                Both sources deal with the mass murder of Jews.
                Source 3D gives statistical information to show the number of
                  Jews killed in the concentration camps built in Source 3C.
                The Final Solution in Source 3C is shown in graphic details in
                  Source 3C.
                Source 3D depicts the success of Himmler’s plans hatched in
                  Source 3C.
                Any other relevant response.                                (2 x 2)          (4)

3.5 [Paragraph – Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of information from a
    selected sources – L3]

         The right to dignity.
         The right to live.
         Freedom of movement.
         Freedom of association.
         Access to education.
         To be protected against inhumane treatment.
         Jews were excluded from German society.
         Right not to be subjected to slavery.
         Right not to be moved against your own free will.
         Mass killing of Jews and other minorities.
         Right to medical assistance
         Any other relevant answer.                                                          (8)

     Use the following rubric to allocate a mark.

         LEVEL                                CRITERIA                           MARKS
                        Uses evidence in an elementary manner.
                        Question not answered.
                        Partial use of evidence to respond to the question.
     LEVEL 1                                                                     0–2
                        Little or no understanding of how Hitler violated the
                         rights of Jews and other minorities.
                        Cannot respond to the question asked.
                        Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                         extent to the topic.
     LEVEL 2            Some understanding of how Hitler violated the
                                                                                 3–5
                         rights of Jews and other minorities.
                        Uses evidence in a basic manner but it relates to the
                         question asked.
                        Uses evidence that is relevant and appropriate.
                        Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the how
                         Hitler violated the rights of Jews and other
     LEVEL 3             minorities.                                             6–8
                        Evidence relates very well to the question asked.
                        Evidence is used very effectively in an organised
                         paragraph.
                                                                                            [50]

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 16

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
16                                   HISTORY P1                            (NOVEMBER 2014)

 SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

 QUESTION 4.1: COMMUNISM IN RUSSIA, 1900 – 1940

 Candidates must answer only ONE of the following questions.

 SYNOPSIS

 Candidates should focus on the impact of the NEP on Russia’s economy after the
 disastrous War Communism. War Communism must be discussed as a way of
 laying a background for a discussion of the NEP.

 MAIN ASPECTS

 INTRODUCTION

    Introduction should project the dual economic policy approach of Lenin and
     juxtapose War Communism’s failure with the introduction of the more
     successful NEP.

 ELABORATION

    The Bolsheviks coming into power.
    War Communism – as a background.
    Failure of War Communism – reaction of the peasants.
    Lenin’s assessment of the situation.
    Introduction of NEP – compromise with capitalism.
    Focus on agriculture.
    Focus on industry
    Focus on trade and banking.
    Impact of the NEP on the Russian economy.
    Criticism of NEP by ardent communists.
    NEP and unemployment.

 CONCLUSION

    Candidates should tie up the argument with a relevant conclusion.                 [50]

                                        OR

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 17

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(NOVEMBER 2014)                       HISTORY P1                                       17

 QUESTION 4.2

 SYNOPSIS

 Candidates should evaluate the role Stalin played in Russia as its leader. The
 focus must be on both the positive impact as well as the negative impact he had.
 The content focus must be on economic development and planning under Stalin
 and his repressive leadership.

 MAIN ASPECTS

 INTRODUCTION
  Introduction should focus on the impact of Stalin’s leadership and his legacy in
    Russia, both positive and negative.

 ELABORATION

    The power struggle after Lenin’s death.
    Election of Stalin and Trotsky’s exile.
    Stalin’s opposition to the NEP – withdrawal of the NEP.
    Stalin’s objectives – Economic Development and Planning.
    Role of Gosplan
    First Five Year Plan
    Second Five Year Plan
    Third Five Year Plan and the Second World War.
    Impact on economy.
    Stalin’s repressive leadership style.
    Purging of opposition groups.
    Purging of potential challengers within the Communist Party.
    Closed nature of the Russian society.

 CONCLUSION

    Candidates should tie up the argument with a relevant conclusion.                 [50]

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 18

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
18                                   HISTORY P1                          (NOVEMBER 2014)

 QUESTION 5.1: CAPITALISM IN THE USA, 1900 – 1940.

 Candidates must answer only ONE of the following questions.

 SYNOPSIS

 Candidates should demonstrate their understanding of the underlying weaknesses
 (latent defects in the American economy) or causes of the collapse of the New
 York Stock Exchange. This understanding will be evident when candidates use
 historical knowledge and skills to construct their essay.

 MAIN ASPECTS

 INTRODUCTION

    Introduction should focus on the nature of the American economy in the1920s
     highlighting the integrated nature of the causes of the Great depression.

 ELABORATION

    Economic boom of the 1920s under the Republican Party.
    Uneven distribution of wealth.
    Isolation policy applied in the economy.
    Large monopoly companies.
    Government’s failure to stop malpractices.
    Unregulated banking system.
    Overproduction in agriculture.
    Easy credit and extravagance.
    Over speculation in the stock market.
    Panic sales of shares
    Wall Street Crash, October 1929.

 CONCLUSION

 Candidates should tie up the argument with an appropriate conclusion.               [50]

                                        OR

Copyright reserved                                                        Please turn over

### Page 19

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(NOVEMBER 2014)                       HISTORY P1                                      19

 QUESTION 5.2

 SYNOPSIS

 Candidates should demonstrate a thorough understanding of the impact the Great
 Depression had on the economic, social and political life of USA.

 MAIN ASPECTS

 INTRODUCTION

    Introduction should focus on the impact of the Great Depression and
     highlighting the link between the causes and consequences of the Great
     Depression.

 ELABORATION

     Republican Party’s policy of non-interference in the economy.
     The collapse of the New York Stock Exchange – Black Thursday.
     Economic collapse.
     Industries closed down as business became unprofitable.
     Unprecedented unemployment.
     Inability to repay loans.
     Closure of banks – recalled loans.
     Houses and cars repossessed by the banks.
     Number of the homeless people, the hungry and the destitute increased.
     Bread lines and soup kitchens.
     Agricultural production slumped – ‘Dust Bowl’
     Upsurge in social ills – crime.
     Hoover – unable to solve the problems – ‘Hoovervilles’
     1933 elections – Democratic Party victory.

 CONCLUSION

 Candidates should tie up the argument with an appropriate conclusion.                [50]

Copyright reserved                                                         Please turn over

### Page 20

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
20                                     HISTORY P1                           (NOVEMBER 2014)

 QUESTION 6: IDEAS OF RACE IN THE LATE 19th AND 20th CENTURIES

 SYNOPSIS

 Candidates analyse and discuss the effects of the application of eugenics and
 Social Darwinism as implemented by the white settler population in Australia. The
 candidates must demonstrate understanding of the link between the policy and
 practice. Also of importance is to evaluate whether there was a genocide or not in
 Australia.

 MAIN ASPECTS

 INTRODUCTION

    Introduction should focus on the application and impact of eugenics and Social
     Darwinism in Australia by the white settler population. A definition of each of
     these concepts may be accepted. The candidates must demonstrate
     understanding of the link between these theories.

 ELABORATION

     British colonisation and occupation of Australia.
     Policy of an ‘empty land’ – terra nullius.
     Persecution of the Aboriginal communities.
     Application of eugenics policies on the Aborigines.
     The land question and the National Blanket Day.
     White immigration from Europe.
     White mothers encouraged to have more children – five pounds for each white
      child born.
     Racial decay and racial suicide – influencing immigration policies.
     Policy of assimilation.
     The Stolen Generation – half-caste children.
     Lost identity.
     Genocide – a generation of Aborigines decimated.
     Attempts at reconciliation – National Sorry Day, rejection of the terra nullius
      policy.

 CONCLUSION

 Candidates should tie up the argument with a relevant conclusion. It is possible
 that some candidates will communicate their opinion as to whether there was a
 genocide or not in Australia, when they write the conclusion.                          [50]

                                                                   GRAND TOTAL:         150

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

## Related documents

- [HIST P1 GR11 MEMO NOV2014 AFR](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p1-gr11-memo-nov2014-afr/1c5f843b-06f3-463b-b066-d0a2aed990c3) — History · Memo · 2014 · Afr
- [HIST P1 GR11 ADDEN NOV2014 AFR](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p1-gr11-adden-nov2014-afr/e65c9e3a-61c6-401b-9a0b-1a64356355ef) — History · Addendum · 2014 · Afr
- [HIST P1 GR11 ADDEN NOV2014 ENG](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p1-gr11-adden-nov2014-eng/5ddf8f2c-fe29-4161-a894-96bad484740b) — History · Addendum · 2014 · Eng
- [HIST P1 GR11 QP NOV2014 ENG](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p1-gr11-qp-nov2014-eng/b1cec643-6cdf-4481-a0f8-22e963748ca0) — History · QP · 2014 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR11 MEMO NOV 2022 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-memo-nov-2022-afrikaans/f993acba-4e18-43d3-be44-054e0b37af1b) — History · Memo · 2022 · Afr
- [HISTORY P1 GR11 MEMO NOV 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-memo-nov-2022-english/58d91f8a-c79d-495b-889f-4d88434f755b) — History · Memo · 2022 · Eng

## More from Grade 11 History

- [Gr 11 His ATP 2023-24](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-11-his-atp-2023-24/4c199bf3-d253-42ae-b90d-b030dfc6ecc2) — ATP
- [EC History Grade 11 June 2025 P1 only](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/ec-history-grade-11-june-2025-p1-only/555be0f1-39a3-47b5-8fec-f622076c09d3) — QP · 2025
- [EC History Grade 11 June 2025 P2 and Memo](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/ec-history-grade-11-june-2025-p2-and-memo/0051e460-14cf-43df-a19e-374c9f6a797a) — QP + Memo · 2025
- [HISTORY P1 NOVEMBER 2025 ENG QP watermark](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-november-2025-eng-qp-watermark/2d211802-3109-4e26-ba38-b91d09c68e3d) — QP · 2025 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 QP GR11 NOV 2025 AFR watermark](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-qp-gr11-nov-2025-afr-watermark/9143c679-6add-4eb7-8a5d-6ef35e708429) — QP · 2025 · Afr
- [HISTORY P1 QP GR11 NOV 2024 AFR D watermark](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-qp-gr11-nov-2024-afr-d-watermark/80e4101f-56a5-4975-b043-70c0d70f5fea) — QP · 2024 · Afr

## Collection

- [Grade 11 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-11/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
