# History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2012 Memo (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 memorandum from the Eastern Cape Mock Exam 2012 (English), 32 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p2-s12-memo-eng/2632bbb4-07c5-4085-b81d-93b943d3528d
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2012
- Exam period: Eastern Cape Mock Exam
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 32

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2012 Memo (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p2-s12-memo-eng/2632bbb4-07c5-4085-b81d-93b943d3528d)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · Eastern Cape Mock Exam · 2012. Memorandum, 32 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

                  Province of the
                  EASTERN CAPE
                  EDUCATION

                           NATIONAL
                      SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                            GRADE 12

                      SEPTEMBER 2012

                          HISTORY P2
                         MEMORANDUM

MARKS:   150

                  This memorandum consists of 32 pages.

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
2                               HISTORY P2 (Memo)                            (SEPTEMBER 2012)

SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

1.1   The following Learning Outcomes and Assessment Standards were used to
      assess candidates in this question paper:

      LEARNING                         ASSESSMENT STANDARDS
      OUTCOMES                         The ability of the learner to:
                       1. Formulate questions to analyse concepts for investigation
                           within the context of what is being studied. (Not for
                           examination purposes.)
      Learning         2. Access a variety of relevant sources of information in order
      Outcome 1            to carry out an investigation. (Not for examination
                           purposes.)
      (Historical      3. Interpret and evaluate information and data from sources.
      enquiry)         4. Engage with sources of information evaluating the
                           usefulness of the sources for the task, including
                           stereotypes, subjectivity and gaps in the evidence available
                           to the learners.
                       1. Analyse historical concepts as social constructs.
      Learning
                       2. Examine and explain the dynamics of changing power
      Outcome 2
                           relations within the societies studied.
                       3. Compare and contrast interpretations and perspectives of
      (Historical
                           events, people’s actions and changes in order to draw
      concepts)
                           independent conclusions about the actions or events.
                       1. Identify when an interpretation of statistics may be
                           controversial and engage critically with the conclusions
      Learning             presented by the data.
      Outcome 3        2. Synthesise information to construct an original argument
                           using evidence to support the argument.
      (Knowledge       3. Sustain and defend a coherent and balanced argument with
      construction         evidence provided and independently accessed.
      and              4. Communicate knowledge and understanding in a variety of
      communication)       ways including discussion (written and oral), debate,
                           creating a piece of historical writing using a variety of
                           genres, research assignments, graphics, oral presentation.

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                   HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                         3

 1.2    The following levels of questions were used to assess source-based
        questions:

                           LEVELS OF SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS
                             Extract relevant information and data from the sources.
          LEVEL 1 (L1)       Organise information logically.
                             Explain historical concepts.
                             Categorise appropriate or relevant source of information
                             provided to answer the questions raised.
                             Analyse the information and data gathered from a variety of
          LEVEL 2 (L2)
                             sources.
                             Evaluate the sources of information provided to assess the
                             appropriateness of the sources for the task.
                             Interpret and evaluate information and data from the
                             sources.
                             Engage with sources of information evaluating the
                             usefulness of the sources for the task taking into account
                             stereotypes, subjectivity and gaps in the evidence available.
                             Analyse historical concepts as social constructs.
                             Examine and explain the dynamics of changing power
          LEVEL 3 (L3)
                             relations within the aspects of societies studied.
                             Compare and contrast interpretations and perspectives of
                             peoples’ actions or events and changes to draw independent
                             conclusions about the actions or events.
                             Identify when an interpretation of statistics may be
                             controversial and engage critically with the conclusions
                             presented by the data.

 1.3    The following table indicates how to assess source-based questions:

            In the marking of source-based questions credit needs to be given to
            (Any other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or
            examples.
            In the allocation of marks emphasis should be placed on how the
            requirements of the question have been addressed.
            In the marking guideline the requirements of the question (skills that need
            to be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated in
            italics.

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4                                 HISTORY P2 (Memo)                          (SEPTEMBER 2012)

EXTENDED WRITING

2.1   The extended writing questions focus on one of the following levels:

      LEVELS OF QUESTIONS
      Level 1
         Discuss or describe according to a given line of argument set out in the
         extended writing question.
         Plan and construct an argument based on evidence, using the evidence to
         reach a conclusion.
      Level 2
         Synthesise information to construct an original argument using evidence to
         support the argument.
         Sustain and defend a coherent and balanced argument with evidence.
         Write clearly and coherently in constructing the argument.

2.2   Marking of extended writing

         MARKERS MUST BE AWARE THAT THE CONTENT OF THE
         ANSWER WILL BE GUIDED BY THE TEXTBOOKS IN USE AT THE
         PARTICULAR CENTRE.
         CANDIDATES MAY HAVE (ANY OTHER RELEVANT INTRODUCTION
         AND OR CONCLUSION THAN THOSE INCLUDED IN A SPECIFIC
         EXTENDED WRITING MARKING GUIDELINE.
         IN ASSESSING THE OPEN-ENDED SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS
         CANDIDATES SHOULD BE GIVEN CREDIT FOR ANY OTHER
         RELEVANT RESPONSE.

      Global assessment of extended writing

      The extended writing will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach
      requires the educator to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring
      the component parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to
      offer an individual opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an
      argument. The learner will not be required to simply regurgitate "facts" in
      order to achieve a high mark. This approach discourages learners from
      preparing "model" answers and reproducing them without taking into account
      the specific requirements of the question. Holistic marking of extended
      writing credits learners' opinions supported by evidence. Holistic
      assessment, unlike content-based marking, does not penalise language
      inadequacies as the emphasis is on the following:
          The construction of argument;
          The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such argument;
          and
          The learner's interpretation of the question.

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                   HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                      5

 Assessment procedures of extended writing

                   1. Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing extended writing.

                   2. During the first reading of the extended writing ticks need to be
                      awarded for a relevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in the
                      marking guideline/memorandum), each of the main
                      points/aspects that is properly contextualised (also indicated by
                      bullets in the marking guideline/memorandum) and a relevant
                      conclusion (indicated by a bullet in the marking
                      guideline/memorandum) e.g. in an answer where there are 5
                      main points there will be 7 ticks.

                   3. The following additional symbols can also be used:

                           introduction, main aspects and conclusion not
                           properly contextualised

                           wrong statement

                           irrelevant statement

                           repetition                                          R

                           analysis                                            A√

                           interpretation                                      I√

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6                               HISTORY P2 (Memo)                         (SEPTEMBER 2012)

4.    The Matrix

4.1   Use of analytical matrix in the marking of extended writing (refer to
      page 7)

      In the marking of extended writing with reference to page 6 the given
      criteria shown in the matrix should be used. In assessing the extended
      writing note should be taken of both the content and presentation.
      At the point of intersection of the content and presentation based on the
      seven competency levels, a mark should be awarded.

      4.1.1   The first reading of extended writing will be to determine to what
              extent the main aspects have been covered and to allocate the
              content level (on the matrix).
                                                         C       LEVEL 4

      4.1.2   The second reading of extended writing will relate to the level (on
              the matrix) of presentation.
                                                     C        LEVEL 4
                                                     P        LEVEL 5

      4.1.3   Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.
                                                C       LEVEL 4
                                                                         18 – 19
                                                P       LEVEL 5

4.2   Use of holistic rubric in the marking of extended writing (refer to page 7)

      The given rubric, which takes into account both content and presentation,
      should be used in the marking of extended writing.
                                                     C&P       LEVEL 5      18 − 20

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
       (SEPTEMBER 2012)                                  HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                                             7
       Grade 12 extended writing matrix
PRESENTATION          LEVEL 7                 LEVEL 6          LEVEL 5       LEVEL 4             LEVEL 3           LEVEL 2        LEVEL 1
                      Very well planned and   Well planned     Writing       Clear attempt to    Some attempt      Largely        Answer not
                      structured. Good        and structured   structured.   construct an        to organise the   descriptive    at all well-
                      synthesis of            Synthesis of     Constructed   argument            information       /with little   structured.
                      information             information      an argument   Evidence used       into an           some
                      Constructed an          Constructed an   Evidence      to a large extent   argument          attempt to
                      argument                argument         used to       to support the      Evidence not      develop
                      Very good use of        Evidence used    support       argument            well used in      an
                      evidence to support     to support the   argument                          supporting the    argument.
CONTENT               the argument            argument                                           argument.
LEVEL 7
Question has
been fully
answered.
Content
                            27-30                24-26
selection fully
relevant to line of
argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has
been answered.
Content                     24-26                   23          21-22
selection
relevant to a line
of argument.
LEVEL 5
Question
answered to a
great extent.
Content
                                                 21-22            20             18-19
adequately
covered and
relevant.
LEVEL 4
Question
recognisable in
answer.
Some
                                                                18-19              17               15-16
omissions/irrelev
ant content
selection.
LEVEL 3
Content
selection does
not always                                                                       15-16                14            12-13
relate.
Omissions in
coverage.
LEVEL 2
Sparse content.
Question                                                                                            12-13              11           9-10
inadequately
addressed
LEVEL 1
Question not
answered.
Inadequate                                                                                                           9-10            0-8
content.
Significant
irrelevance

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8                                              HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                              (SEPTEMBER 2012)

GRADE 12 HOLISTIC RUBRIC TO ASSESS EXTENDED WRITING (SUCH AS AN
         ESSAY USING SOURCES, REPORT, NEWSPAPER ARTICLE, ETC.)

                   If the candidate has demonstrated all or most of the skills listed in a particular level, she/he will be awarded
      LEVEL        a mark relevant to the category.
                   Consistently focuses on topic – demonstrates a logical and coherent progress towards a conclusion
                   Clearly comprehends the sources
                   Uses all or most of the sources
          7        Selects relevant sources
                   Quotes selectively
    Outstanding
                   Groups sources(not essential but should not merely list sources)
     80 – 100%     Demonstrates a setting of sources in background understanding
      24 – 30      If appropriate, deals fully with counter-argument
                   Refers appropriately to relevancy, bias, accuracy, limitation of sources
                   Expresses him/herself clearly
                   Concludes essay with clear focus on topic – takes a stand (i.e. reaches an independent conclusion)
                   Makes a good effort to focus consistently on the topic but, at times, argument loses some focus
                   Clearly comprehends the sources
                   Uses all or most of the sources
         6         Selects relevant sources
                   Quotes selectively
    Meritorious
                   Perhaps, lacking some depth of overall focuses, or does not make reference to one or more relevant
     70 – 79%      source.
      21 – 23      If appropriate, makes an attempt to consider counter-argument
                   Rather superficial or no attempt to refer to relevancy, bias, accuracy, limitation of sources
                   Expression good
                   Concludes essay with clear focus on topic – takes a stand (i.e. reaches an independent conclusion)
                   Makes an effort to focus on the topic but argument has lapses in focus
                   Comprehends most of the sources
                   Uses most of the sources
         5         Selects relevant sources
    Substantial    Good use of relevant evidence from the sources
     60 – 69%      Good attempt to consider counter-argument
      18 – 20      Good attempt to refer to relevancy, bias, accuracy, limitation of source
                   Expression good but with lapses
                   Does not make an altogether convincing attempt to take a stand (i.e. limitations in reaching an independent
                   conclusion)
                   Makes an effort to focus on the topic but argument has many lapses in focus
                   Adequate comprehension of most of the sources
         4         Adequate use of relevant evidence from the sources
                   Adequate attempt to consider counter-argument
     Moderate
                   Adequate attempt to refer to relevancy, bias, accuracy, limitation of sources
     50 – 59%      Expression adequate
      15 – 17      Makes an attempt to take a stand but there are serious inconsistencies with making links with the rest of
                   the essay
                   Essay might have a tendency to list sources and “tag” on focus
                   Poor attempt to focus on the topic
                   Little comprehension of the sources
         3         Struggles to select relevant information from the sources
                   No quotes – or generally irrelevant
     Adequate
                   Makes no effort to consider counter-argument – or exceptionally weak attempt
     40 – 49%      Easily characterised by listing of sources
      12 – 14      No attempt to refer to relevancy, bias, accuracy of sources
                   Expression poor
                   Makes a very poor attempt to take a stand (i.e. battles to reach an independent conclusion)
                   Uses only one or two sources
                   Unable to identify relevant sources
         2         No quotes – or generally irrelevant
    Elementary     Makes no effort to consider counter-argument
     30 – 39%      Essay characterised by listing of sources
      09 – 11      No attempt to refer to relevancy, bias, accuracy of sources
                   Expression very poor
                   Makes a very poor attempt to take a stand – if at all
          1        No attempt to focus on the topic
                   Uses no sources
    Not Achieved
                   Completely irrelevant
      0 – 29%      Answer extremely poor
        0–8        sources copied without relevance

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                   HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                      9

 QUESTION 1: HOW DID GORBACHEV’S DECISION NOT ONLY BRING CHANGES
             TO THE SOVIET UNION, BUT ALSO INFLUENCED THE SITUATION
             IN SOUTH AFRICA?

 1.1    1.1.1      [Explanation of concept from source 1A–L1–LO2(AS1)]

                   (a)    Communism
                             Is a political philosophy that believes that factories,
                             mines, shops and all businesses should be
                             controlled by the state instead of individuals and
                             that everyone should share in the wealth of the
                             country.
                             Any other relevant response                        (1x2)   (2)

                   (b)    Coup
                             Sudden seizure of power in a country, often
                             undertaken violently and with the help of the army to
                             overthrow the government
                             Any relevant explanation                        (1x2)      (2)

        1.1.2      [Extraction of evidence from source 1A–L1–LO1(AS3)]

                   Perestroika/Reform
                   Glasnost/Openness                                           (1x2)    (2)

        1.1.3      [Interpretation of evidence from source 1A–L2–LO2(AS3)]

                         Led to the end of communism
                         Hard-line communist protested against democratisation
                         Fall of the Berlin Wall
                         Independence of East European countries(satellite states)
                         Any other relevant response                   (Any 2x2)        (4)

        1.1.4      [Interpretation and synthesis of information from source 1A–L3–
                   LO2(AS2)]

                         It emphases the fact that previous regimes have been
                         oppressive
                         People could for the first time in history, openly express
                         their opinions and feelings
                         People could express their grievances publically
                         Had freedom of speech
                         Any other relevant response                        (Any 2x2)   (4)

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10                             HISTORY P2 (Memo)                         (SEPTEMBER 2012)

1.2   1.2.1   [Interpretation of evidence from source 1B L2–LO2(AS2)]

                    After the fall of communism the excuse could no longer
                    be used that the ANC were communist
                    The ANC no longer got support from the Soviet Union
                    Worried how they going to justify apartheid
                    Any other relevant response                    (Any 2x2)        (4)

      1.2.2   [Interpretation of evidence from source 1B–L2–LO2(AS2)]

                    Abandon apartheid
                    Give political rights to majority of people in South Africa
                    Start negotiations with the ANC
                    Any other relevant response                        (Any 1x2)    (2)

      1.2.3   [Interpretation and synthesis of evidence from source 1B–L3–
              LO2(AS2)]

                    It changed the NP thinking of their opponents and
                    themselves
                    The NP could no longer claim to be the protector of
                    capitalism in Southern Africa
                    The government believed the ANC will be weak after it
                    lost its support from the Soviet Union
                    The USA’s distrust for the ANC as a communist front and
                    their support for the apartheid government became
                    irrelevant
                    Any other relevant response                     (Any 2x2)       (4)

      1.2.4   [Interpretation of evidence from source 1B–L1–LO2(AS2)]

                    Sanctions imposed on South Africa
                    Collapse of the Soviet Union
                    International pressure
                    Any other relevant response                      (Any 2x2)      (4)

1.3   1.3.1   [Interpretation of evidence from source 1C–L2–LO2(AS2)]

                    Unbanned political organisations
                    Release political prisoners
                    Laid the foundation for negotiations
                    Paved the way for a new dispensation
                    Any other relevant response                      (Any 2x2)      (4)

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                   HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                   11

        1.3.2      [Interpretation of evidence from source 1C–L2–LO3(AS2)]

                   Candidates should take a stance and motivate their answer.

                   No
                         It led to a new democratic South Africa
                         Any other relevant response

                   Yes
                         He was determined to maintain the apartheid principle of
                         group rights
                         Any other relevant response                    (Any 1x3)     (3)

        1.3.3      [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from source 1C–L3–
                   LO3(AS2&3)]

                         A new era in the history of both countries has started
                         In both countries the majority of people who have been
                         oppressed are now free
                         Changes in leadership in both countries led to political
                         changes/freedom of expression allowed
                         Any other relevant response                      (Any 1x3)   (3)

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
12                               HISTORY P2 (Memo)                         (SEPTEMBER 2012)

1.4   [Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of evidence from all sources–L3–
      LO1(AS3);LO2(AS2&3);LO3(AS2)]

      Candidates should include some of the following in their response:

            The collapse of communism forced the ANC and the NP to start
            negotiations
            Internal pressure
            External pressure – sanctions
            USA no longer willing to support the apartheid government
            Britain started putting pressure on the South African government
            USSR no longer willing to assist the ANC
            USSR encourages negotiation
            Negotiations start after F.W. De Klerk’s famous speech
            Any other relevant response                                               (6)

      Use the following rubric to award a mark:

                  ●   Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g.
                      Shows no or little understanding of why the
                      apartheid government was forced to change
      LEVEL 1                                                              Marks: 0 – 2
                      its policy
                  ●   Uses evidence partially to report on topic or
                      cannot report on topic
                  ●   Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a
                      great extent to the topic e.g. Shows an
      LEVEL 2         understanding on why the apartheid                   Marks: 3 – 4
                      government was forced to change its policy
                  ●   Uses evidence in a basic manner
                  ●   Uses relevant evidence e.g. Demonstrates a
                      thorough understanding on why the
                      apartheid government was forced to change
                      its policy
      LEVEL 3                                                              Marks: 5 – 6
                  ●   Evidence relates well to topic
                  ●   Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                      paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                      topic

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                    HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                   13

 1.5    EXTENDED WRITING

        1.5.1      [Plan and construct an argument based on evidence using
                   analytical and interpretative skills –L1–
                   LO1(AS3&4);LO2(AS1,2&3);LO3(AS1,2,3&4)]

                   SYNOPSIS
                   Candidates should explain how Gorbachev’s decision not only
                   brought changes in the Soviet Union but in South Africa as well.

                   MAIN ASPECTS
                   Candidates should include the following in their response:

                   Introduction:
                   Candidates can explain why changes were necessary in both the
                   Soviet Union and South Africa.

                   Elaboration:
                         The Soviet Union were economically weak
                         Gorbachev implement Perestroika and Glasnost
                         Describe the policy of Perestroika and Glasnost shortly
                         Led to democratic policy
                         Open-door policy in the economy applied
                         Collapse of communism – impact on South Africa
                         Internal and external pressure
                         South Africa cannot justify apartheid anymore
                         To prevent further blood shedding in South Africa
                         Forced to negotiate with the ANC
                         ANC no longer receive support from the Soviet Union
                         Also forced to negotiate
                         Start with the process of negotiations to end apartheid
                         Any other relevant response

                   Conclusion:
                   Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant
                   conclusion.

                   Use the analytical matrix (page 7) to assess this extended
                   writing.                                                           (30)

                                                  OR

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
14                              HISTORY P2 (Memo)                       (SEPTEMBER 2012)

     1.5.2   [Synthesise information to construct an original argument using
             evidence from all the sources and your own knowledge L2–
             LO1(AS3&4);LO2(AS1,2&3);LO3(AS1,2,3&4)]

             SYNOPSIS
             Candidates must write an essay on how the collapse of
             communism, internal and external pressure forced the NP and the
             ANC to negotiate.

             MAIN ASPECTS
             Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:

             Introduction:
             Candidates should explain how the collapse of communism
             influenced the situation in South Africa.

             Elaboration:
                   Gorbachev’s policy of Perestroika and Glasnost
                   Eventually led to the collapse of communism
                   No Soviet danger anymore
                   ANC without financial and military aid – weaken the ANC
                   USSR encouraged negotiations
                   Britain and the USA pressure South Africa to change
                   Sanctions and boycotts launched against South Africa
                   South Africa cornered
                   Previous negotiations failed
                   Deadlock reached with De Klerk’s speech in 1990
                   Led to a democratic South Africa in 1994
                   Any other relevant response

             Conclusion:
             Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant
             conclusion.

             Use the analytical matrix (page 8) to assess this extended
             writing.                                                              (30)
                                                                                  [75]

### Page 15

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                   HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                    15

 QUESTION 2: HOW DID THE COLLAPSE OF THE USSR CONTRIBUTE TO
             ANGOLA TO RE-IMAGINE ITSELF IN THE 1990s?

 2.1    2.1.1      [Interpretation of evidence using source 2A–L1–LO1(AS2)]

                         The involvement of the Soviet Union in Angola
                         The Soviet Union supporting Angola financially and
                         military
                         Any other relevant answer                       (Any 1x2)     (2)

        2.1.2      [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from source 2A–L2–
                   LO2(AS2)]

                         Wanted to spread communism
                         Supported the MPLA government that was communist
                         The Soviet Union could benefit economically from the
                         natural resources that Angola had
                         Any other relevant response                    (Any 2x2)      (4)

        2.1.3      [Interpretation and analysis of information from source 2A–L3–
                   LO2(AS3)]

                         The fall of communism made the Soviet Union to adopt a
                         democratic form of government
                         No longer supplied military and financial aid to Angola
                         The Soviet Union became actively involved to arrange a
                         ceasefire between the MPLA and UNITA
                         The Soviet Union was part of the peace negotiation
                         between the rivalry groups
                         Any other relevant answer                         (Any 2x2)   (4)

        2.1.4      [Explanation of concept from source 2A L1–LO2(AS1)]

                         Is a war between different groups in the same country
                         Any other relevant explanation                  (Any 1x2)     (2)

        2.1.5      [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from source 2A–L3–
                   LO2(AS2)]

                         The Soviet Union and Cuba assisted the MPLA
                         government in Angola against South Africa, together with
                         the USA backed the UNITA forces
                         Any other relevant response                    (Any 1x2)      (2)

### Page 16

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
16                              HISTORY P2 (Memo)                       (SEPTEMBER 2012)

      2.1.6   [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from source 2A–L1–L3–
              LO2(AS2)]

                    Feared the spread of communism
                    It will help the exiled ANC movement
                    South Africa wanted to protect South-West Africa (now
                    Namibia) from communist rule
                    Any other relevant response                    (Any 2x2)       (4)

      2.1.7   [Interpretation of evidence from source 2A–L1–LO2(AS)]

                    “The people of Angola elect the president and National
                    Assembly”
                    “Multi-Party elections was held in September 1992”
                    “The UN declared the elections free and fair”  (Any 2x2)       (4)

2.2   2.2.1   [Extraction of information from source 2B–L1–LO2(AS)]

                    Diamonds
                    Petroleum
                    Iron-ore                                             (3x1)     (3)

      2.2.2   [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from source 2B–L2–
              LO2(AS2)]

                    Because of the civil war that broke out after
                    independence
                    The diamond mines were controlled by UNITA as used to
                    finance her guerrilla struggle
                    MPLA controlled oil fields
                    Skilled and experienced technicians fled the country due
                    to civil wars
                    Any other relevant response                     (Any 2x2)      (4)

      2.2.3   [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from source 2B–L3–
              LO2&3(AS3)]

                    They only produce for their families and not to feed the
                    people of the country.
                    Any other relevant response                       (Any 1x2)    (2)

### Page 17

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                     HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                  17

 2.3    2.3.1      [Extraction and interpretation of information from source 2C–L2–
                   LO2(AS3)]

                           Innocent people lost limbs
                           Had no freedom of choice
                           More than a million died
                           Lack of health facilities
                           Shortage of food
                           No share in the wealth of their own country
                           Education in bad state
                           Any other relevant response                    (Any 2x2)    (4)

        2.3.2      [Interpretation and analysis of information from source 2C–L3–
                   LO2(AS3)]

                   Candidates should explain whether the statement is justified
                   or not justified. Candidates need to support their answer
                   with relevant evidence.

                   Agree
                           The people of Angola had to fight the Portuguese to gain
                           their independence
                           Immediately after independence a civil war broke out that
                           claimed many lives
                           Even after the collapse of communism, and a democratic
                           form of government was formed, violence continued,
                           leaving many limbless
                           Any other relevant response

                   Disagree
                         Before the 1992 elections a peace accord was signed
                         between the MPLA and UNITA
                         A cease-fire was agreed upon by both parties
                         After 1994 the remaining UNITA forces was assimilated
                         into the national force and appointed to prominent
                         positions in government to promote unity
                         Any other relevant response                     (Any 2x2)     (4)

### Page 18

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
18                               HISTORY P2 (Memo)                         (SEPTEMBER 2012)

2.4   [Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of evidence from all sources L3–
      LO1(AS3&4)LO2(AS1,2&3);LO3(AS1,2,3&4)]                                          (6)

      Candidates should include some of the following in their response:

            Angola continued the Cold War in Africa
            Highlighted the struggle between East and West
            MPLA supported by Cuba and Soviet Union
            UNITA supported by South Africa and the USA
            Superpowers wanted to win the support of Third World countries
            Involvement of superpower intensified fighting in Angola
            Negatively impacted on the economy
            Civil War affected the lives of people in Angola
            Angola became a focus point in the Cold War
            Any other relevant response                                               (6)

      Use the following rubric to award a mark:

                  ● Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g.
                    Shows no or little understanding of the
                    significance of Angola in terms of the Cold
      LEVEL 1                                                              Marks: 0 – 2
                    War
                  ● Uses evidence partially to write a paragraph on
                    the topic or cannot write a paragraph on the topic
                  ● Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                    extent to the topic e.g. Shows an understanding
                    of the significance of Angola in terms of the
      LEVEL 2                                                              Marks: 3 – 4
                    Cold War
                  ● Uses evidence in a very basic manner to write a
                    paragraph
                  ● Uses relevant evidence e.g. Demonstrate a
                    thorough understanding of the significance of
                    Angola in terms of the Cold War
      LEVEL 3     ● Evidence has to do with the topic                      Marks: 5 – 6
                  ● Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                    paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                    topic

### Page 19

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                    HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                   19

 2.5    EXTENDED WRITING

        2.5.1      [Plan and construct an argument based on evidence using
                   analytical and interpretative skills–L1–
                   LO1(AS3&4);LO2(AS1,2&3);LO3(AS1,2,3&4)]

                   SYNOPSIS
                   Candidates should explain how the collapse of communism
                   contributed to the re-imaging of Angola in the 1990s.

                   MAIN ASPECTS
                   Candidates should include some of the following aspects in their
                   response:

                   Introduction:
                   Candidates can explain how the collapse of the USSR impacted
                   on Angola.

                   Elaboration:
                         Gorbachev’s reforms led to the collapse of communism
                         The Soviet Union implemented democracy and an open-
                         door economic policy
                         Russian satellite states become independent
                         USSR forced to leave Angola
                         Because of the collapse of communism it was no longer
                         necessary for the USA to stop the spread of communism
                         The MPLA government replaced communism with a multi-
                         party system
                         Both the USSR and USA laid the foundation to end the civil
                         war
                         Bicesse Peace accord was signed by both the MPLA and
                         UNITA
                         Free and fair elections was held as declared by the United
                         Nations
                         Foreign help and loans lead to economic and social
                         changes
                         Growth and development takes place
                         Any other relevant response

                   Conclusion:
                   Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant
                   conclusion.

                   Use the analytical matrix (page 7) to assess this extended
                   writing.                                                           (30)

### Page 20

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
20                              HISTORY P2 (Memo)                       (SEPTEMBER 2012)

     2.5.2   [Synthesise information to construct an original argument using
             evidence from the sources and your own knowledge to support
             the argument–L2–LO1(AS2&3);LO2(AS1,2&3);LO3(AS1,2,3&4)]

             SYNOPSIS
             Candidates should indicate whether they agree or disagree with
             the statement and motivate their answer.

             MAIN ASPECTS
             Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:

             Introduction:
             Candidates can focus on the consequences that the collapse of
             communism had on Angola.

             Elaboration:
             POSITIVE ASPECTS
                   Democratic form of government implemented – free and
                   fair elections held
                   Implement capitalism
                   Receive loans from the IMF and World Bank
                   Diamonds and oil remain the main asset
                   The USA and Soviet Union play important role to end the
                   civil war
                   Cease-fire arranged
                   Humanitarian programs launched to improve the standard
                   of living
                   Any other relevant response

             NEGATIVE ASPECTS
                 Political instability in Angola
                 Unstoppable civil war after the collapse of communism
                 Four decades of civil war causes Angola to remain
                 underdeveloped
                 People with experience and engineers leave the county
                 Foreign investors hesitant to invest in Angola
                 Ordinary people are suffering
                 Millions killed because of landmines
                 The most limbless people in the world are found here
                 Dependant on foreign aid
                 Any other relevant response

             Conclusion:
             Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant
             conclusion.

             Use the analytical matrix (page 8) to assess this extended
             writing.                                                              (30)
                                                                                  [75]

### Page 21

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                   HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                     21

 QUESTION 3: HOW DID THE PROCESS OF NEGOTIATIONS EVENTUALLY LEAD
             TO THE FIRST DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS IN 1994?

 3.1    3.1.1      [Explanation of concept from source 3A–L1–LO2(AS1)]

                   (a)     Referendum
                                 To vote on one issue
                                 To vote yes or no
                                 Any relevant explanation                  (Any 1x2)    (2)

                   (b)     Interim Constitution
                                  A temporary constitution
                                  An agreement that was reached during the multi-
                                  party talks that would be laid before parliament
                                  after the election for approval or changes
                                  Any other relevant explanation            (Any 1x2)   (2)

        3.1.2      [Extraction of evidence from source 3A–L1–LO1(AS3)]

                         Seen as a blank cheque for the ANC where only their
                         wishes would be catered for
                         Would favour the ANC
                         Any other relevant response                  (Any 1x2)         (2)

        3.1.3      [Interpretation of evidence from source 3B–L2–LO2(AS2)]

                         Guerrilla organisation of the ANC
                         Used violence to fight the apartheid government
                         Any other relevant response                     (Any 1x2)      (2)

        3.1.4      [Interpretation of evidence from source 3B–L3–LO1(AS3)]

                   Candidates should explain whether the statement is
                   justified or not justified. Candidates need to support their
                   answer with relevant evidence.

                   Justified
                          Negotiated settlement between the different parties not
                          reached yet
                          Mistrust between the ANC and NP still prevalent during
                          negotiations
                          Would weaken the ANC
                          Have a backup if negotiations failed
                          Any other relevant response

                   Not Justified
                         Violence continued in South Africa
                         Negotiations could fail to reach a settlement
                         De Klerk did not bring the perpetrators of violence to
                         justice
                         Any other relevant response                       (Any 2x2)    (4)

### Page 22

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
22                               HISTORY P2 (Memo)                         (SEPTEMBER 2012)

      3.1.5   [Interpretation of evidence from source 1C–L2–LO2(AS2)]

                      Reflect that white and black sitting together to draw up a
                      new constitution for South Africa
                      All races are sitting together to decide on a new
                      dispensation for South Africa
                      Beams shows they are working together towards a better
                      South Africa
                      Any other relevant response                        (Any 2x2)    (4)

3.2   3.2.1   [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from source 3C–L3–
              LO1(AS3&4);LO2(AS2);LO3(AS2&3)]

              Candidates should decide whether they agree or disagree
              with the statement. They should support their answer with
              relevant evidence.

              Agree
                      For the first time in history the NP government was
                      prepared to negotiate with the ANC
                      In previous elections only relied on the vote of whites
                      The NP election campaign also targeted the black areas
                      De Klerk’s announcement led to the ending of apartheid
                      Any other relevant response

              Disagree
                    The NP government hoped that they would remain in
                    power
                    The NP was forced to change its policy because of
                    international and internal pressure
                    Any other relevant response                   (Any 2x2)           (4)

      3.2.2   [Interpretation and synthesis of information from source 3B–L3–
              LO2(AS)]

                      To frighten black away from voting
                      Right-wing organisations that were not part of
                      negotiations were against elections
                      Black homeland leaders were not happy with settlement
                      reached
                      Any other relevant response                (Any 2x2)            (4)

      3.2.3   [Interpretation of evidence from source 3B–L2–LO2(AS1)]

                      In the past only whites could vote
                      Campaigned to get black votes
                      The party that gained the most votes would become the
                      ruling party                                  (Any 1x2)         (2)

### Page 23

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                   HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                    23

 3.3    3.3.1      [Interpretation of evidence from source 3C–L2–LO2(AS1)]

                         Determined to have change
                         Many voted for the first time in their lives
                         Had patience to vote
                         Determined to get political rights
                         Any other relevant response                      (Any 2x2)    (4)

        3.3.2      [Interpretation of evidence from source 3C–L2–LO2(AS3)]

                         Excited because they are voting for the first time
                         Happy
                         Relieved
                         Satisfied
                         Optimistic about the future
                         Any other relevant response                       (Any 3x1)   (3)

        3.3.3      [Interpretation of evidence from source 3C–L1–LO1(AS3)]

                   Useful
                         Is a primary source
                         Shows the events of the day
                         Any other relevant response

                   Not Useful
                         Not a true reflection of this historical day
                         Only one polling station are shown, while there were
                         many right over the country
                         Millions of people voted on this day, but only a few are
                         reflected
                         Any other relevant response                       (Any 1x2)   (2)

        3.3.4      [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from source 3C–L3–
                   LO3(AS2)]

                         To show the people of the divided province that there
                         were no danger in voting
                         To bring unity between the ANC and IFP
                         Violence would end
                         Any other relevant response                      (Any 2x2)    (4)

### Page 24

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
24                               HISTORY P2 (Memo)                       (SEPTEMBER 2012)

3.4   [Interpretation analysis and synthesis of evidence from all source–L3–
      LO1(AS3&4);LO2(AS1,2&3);LO3(AS1,2,3&4)]

      Candidates should focus on the following aspects:

            27 April 1994 - was decided on as election day
            All political parties launched election campaigns
            Except the IFP
            South Africans enthusiastic, eager and patient
            Many South Africans vote for the first time in their lives
            People wait for hours in long queues
            No incidents of violence reported
            The IEC declare the elections free and fair
            Any other relevant response                                             (6)

      Use the following rubric to award a mark:

                      Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g.
                      shows no or little understanding on how the
                      1994 elections were handled by South
      LEVEL 1                                                            Marks: 0 – 2
                      Africans.
                      Uses evidence partially to report on topic or
                      cannot report on topic
                      Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a
                      great extent to the topic e.g. shows some
      LEVEL 2         understanding of how the 1994 elections            Marks: 3 – 4
                      were handled by South Africans.
                      Uses evidence in a very basic manner
                      Uses relevant evidence e.g. demonstrate a
                      thorough understanding of how the 1994
                      elections were handled by South Africans.
      LEVEL 3         Evidence relates well to the topic                 Marks: 5 – 6
                      Uses evidence very effectively an organised
                      paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                      topic.

### Page 25

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2012)                    HISTORY P2 (Memo)                                 25

 3.5    EXTENDED WRITING

        3.5.1      [Plan and construct an argument based on evidence using
                   analytical and interpretative skills–L1–
                   LO1(AS3&4);LO2(AS1,2&3);LO3(AS1,2,3&4)]

                   SYNOPSIS
                   Candidates should explain how the process of negotiations
                   eventually led to the first democratic elections in 1994.

                   MAIN ASPECTS
                   Candidates should include the following aspects in their
                   response:

                   Introduction:
                   Candidates can indicate how De Klerk’s announcement started
                   the negotiation process.

                   Elaboration:
                         Release of Mandela - set the process of negotiations
                         between political parties in motion
                         Talks between Mandela and De Klerk start - 11 April 1990
                         Groote Schuur talks
                         Both parties dedicated to end violence
                         More talks - the so called Pretoria Minute
                         Later Codesa I followed
                         Record of Understanding
                         Certain groups like PAC,CP and IFP boycott the talks
                         Codesa 2 held in May 1992
                         First democratic elections
                         Any relevant response

                   Conclusion:
                   Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant
                   conclusion.

                   Use the analytical matrix (page 7) to assess this extended
                   writing.                                                         (30)

### Page 26

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
26                              HISTORY P2 (Memo)                         (SEPTEMBER 2012)

     3.5.2   [Synthesise information to construct an original argument using
             evidence from the sources and own knowledge to support the
             argument–L2–LO1(AS 3&4);LO2(AS1,2&3);LO3(AS1,2,3&4)]

             SYNOPSIS
             Candidates should explain how Nelson Mandela, a previous
             jailbird became president of South Africa.

             MAIN ASPECTS
             Candidates should include the following aspects in their
             response:

             Introduction:
             Candidates can refer to the historical importance of the 2
             February 1990 speech.

             Elaboration:
                   De Klerk’s decision to unban political parties
                   Release political prisoners
                   The process of negotiations start Groote Schuur, Pretoria
                   Minute)
                   Different viewpoints at negotiations
                   Temporary constitution
                   Codesa1 and 2
                   Only white referendum held
                   Led to the first democratic elections
                   Election campaigns
                   Many people voting for the first time
                   People waited patiently in long queues
                   IEC declare elections free and fair
                   Nelson Mandela becomes the first black president
                   Any other relevant response

             Conclusion:
             Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant
             conclusion.

             Use the analytical matrix (page 8) to assess this extended
             writing.                                                                (30)
                                                                                    [75]

Text truncated here. Open the document page to read the rest.

## Related documents

- [HIST P2 S12 QP Eng(Add)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p2-s12-qp-eng-add/10436d74-809f-4784-abf1-aa645bca6c60) — History · QP · 2012 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2012 Memo Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2012-memo-afr/57d227c3-6da3-41b0-b3c2-be9f492cb525) — History · Memo · 2012 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 SEPT2015 MEMO (Afr)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-sept2015-memo-afr/9b4b0c56-0d1c-480b-8ab5-b260d75b5222) — History · Memo · 2015 · Afr
- [GESKIED P1 QP AFR SEP 2012](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/geskied-p1-qp-afr-sep-2012/cda30303-ff83-479b-b90c-5f6fbf9d5125) — History · QP · 2012 · Afr
- [History P2 (HG) (English) June 2012 Addendum](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-hg-english-june-2012-addendum/4713681a-ef87-4170-b236-9a03661aecef) — History · Addendum · 2012 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2023-english/7ebc175c-3acc-4751-b898-2a770db59777) — History · Addendum · 2023 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [HISTORY P1 ADDEN GR12 SEP 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-adden-gr12-sep-2024-afrikaans/4faf89db-d19f-40cf-891f-e87e004b0bc5) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2024-afrikaans/b61f3bc2-3524-48c9-af60-f3348133d582) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-sept-2024-afrikaans/8367f672-7028-4e67-a52a-705b946b5122) — QP · 2024 · Afr
- [Gr 12 History P1 (English) 2024 Question Paper X05](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-12-history-p1-english-2024-question-paper-x05/7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5) — QP · 2024 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM JUNE 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-june-2024-afrikaans/e7a9d6cf-de1b-4007-b7b2-b4d762b2fa10) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
