# History Grade 10 North West June 2018 Memo

> Grade 10 History memorandum from the North West June 2018, 14 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download, question paper linked when available.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-gr-10-memo-1/49cebf2f-cbb0-4627-89ee-ff83c9c101e1
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 10
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2018
- Exam period: North West June
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 14

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 10](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10/history) › [History Grade 10 North West June 2018 Memo](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-gr-10-memo-1/49cebf2f-cbb0-4627-89ee-ff83c9c101e1)

## About this document

History · Grade 10 · North West June · 2018. Memorandum, 14 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                      0
HISTORY                     NCS – Memorandum                NW/MID YEAR 2018

                               GRADE 10

                            NATIONAL
                       SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                                 HISTORY

                             MEMORANDUM

                             MID YEAR 2018

   MARKS: 100

                    This memorandum consists of 14 pages.

                     Demo
                            NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                                     1
    HISTORY                                NCS – Memorandum                           NW/MID YEAR 2018

1. SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

1.1 The following levels of questions were used to develop source-based questions.

     COGNITIVE                                                                    WEIGHTING OF
                                       HISTORICAL SKILLS
      LEVELS                                                                       QUESTIONS
                           Extract evidence from sources
                           Selection and organisation of relevant
        LEVEL 1             information from sources
                                                                                          20
                           Define historical concepts/terms
                           Interpretation of evidence from sources
        LEVEL 2            Explain information gathered from sources
                                                                                          20
                           Analyse evidence from sources
                           Interpret and evaluate evidence from
                            sources
                           Engage with sources to determine its
        LEVEL 3             usefulness, reliability, bias and limitations
                                                                                          10
                           Compare and contrast interpretations and
                            perspectives presented in sources and draw
                            independent conclusions

1.2 The information below indicates how source-based questions are assessed:

   In the marking of source-based questions, credit needs to be given to any other valid and
    relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or examples.

   In the allocation of marks, emphasis should be placed on how the requirements of the question
    have been addressed.

1.3 Assessment procedures for Source-based questions
 Use a tick (√ ) for each correct answer
 Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2x2) which translate to TWO reasons and is given TWO
    marks each (√ √ √ √ );(1x2) which translate to ONE reason and is given TWO marks(√√ )

Paragraph question
 Read the paragraph and then place a bullet within the paragraph at the relevant point/answer.
   Then indicate the level you have allocated at the end of the paragraph e.g. Level 3=5

   Count all the ticks for the source-based question then write the mark on the right hand bottom
    e.g. 32/50

   Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back cover of the answer script

                                    Demo
                                           NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                                    2
    HISTORY                               NCS – Memorandum                           NW/MID YEAR 2018

2. ESSAY QUESTIONS

2.1 The essay questions require candidates to:

   Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner.
   They need to select, organize and connect the relevant information so that they are able to present
    a reasonable sequence of facts or an effective argument to answer the question posed.
   It is essential that an essay have a contextualized introduction, a coherent and balanced body of
    evidence and a relevant conclusion.

2.2 Marking of essay questions

   Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by the textbooks in use at the
    particular centre.
   Learners may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion than those included in a
    specific essay marking guideline for a specific essay
   When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should be credited for any
    other relevant responses

2.3 Global assessment of the essay

   The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the educator to score the
    overall product as a whole, without scoring the component parts separately.
   This approach encourages the learner to offer an individual opinion by using selected factual
    evidence to support an argument. The learner will not be required to simply regurgitate 'facts' in
    order to achieve a high mark.
   This approach discourages learners from preparing 'model' answers and reproducing them without
    taking into account the specific requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the essay credits
    learners' opinions supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike content-based marking,
    does not penalise language inadequacies as the emphasis is on the following: The construction of
    argument; The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such argument; The learner's
    interpretation of the question.

2.4 Assessment procedures of an essay

2.4.1 Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing the essay.

2.4.2 During the first reading of the essay, ticks need to be awarded for a relevant introduction
(indicated by a bullet in marking guideline/memorandum) each of the main points/aspects that are
properly contextualized (also indicated by bullets in marking

guideline/memorandum) and a relevant conclusion (indicated by a bullet in marking
guideline/memorandum), e.g. in an answer where there are 5 main points, there will be 7 ticks.

2.4.3 The following additional symbols can also be used:

                                   Demo
                                          NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                                      3
      HISTORY                               NCS – Memorandum                          NW/MID YEAR 2018

       Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly contextualized.

       Wrong statement

       Irrelevant statement

       Repetition                              R

       Analysis                               A√

       Interpretation                         I√

2.5. The matrix

2.5.1 Use of analytical matrix in the assessment of essays

In the marking of essays, the criteria shown in the matrix should be used. In assessing the essay,
both the content and presentation should be considered. At the point of intersection of the content
and the presentation based on the seven competency levels, a mark should be awarded.

(a)     The first reading of an essay will be to determine to what extent the main aspects have
been covered and to determine the content level (on the matrix).

                     C         LEVEL 4

(b)      The second reading of the extended writing will relate to the level (on the matrix) of
presentation.

                     C         LEVEL 4
                     P         LEVEL 5

(c)        Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.

                     C         LEVEL 4
                     P         LEVEL 5              30–33

                                     Demo
                                            NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                                                  4
       HISTORY                                          NCS – Memorandum                                             NW/MID YEAR 2018

      MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY TOTAL MARKS: 50
                         LEVEL 7              LEVEL 6             LEVEL 5            LEVEL 4         LEVEL 3            LEVEL 2          LEVEL 1
                  Very well planned and  Well planned        Well planned and      Planned and   Shows some          Attempts to       Little or no
  PRESENTATION    structured essay.      and structured      structured essay.     constructed   evidence of a       structure an      attempt to
        →         Good synthesis of      essay. Relevant     Developed a clear     an            planned and         answer.           structure the
     CONTENT      information.           line of argument.   argument.             argument.     constructed         Largely           essay.
        ↓         Developed an original  Evidence used       Conclusions           Evidence      argument.           descriptive, or
                  well-balanced and      to defend the       drawn from            used to       Attempts to         some attempt
                  independent line of    argument.           evidence.             support       sustain a line of   at developing
                  argument with the use  Attempts to draw    Independent           argument.     argument.           an argument.
                  of evidence, sustained an independent      conclusion.           Conclusions   Conclusions not     No attempt to
                  and defended the       conclusion from     Evidence used to      reached       clearly             draw a
                  argument throughout.   the evidence to     support the           based on      supported by        conclusion.
                  Independent            support the line    conclusion.           evidence.     evidence.
                  conclusion is drawn    of argument.        Evidence used to
                  from evidence to                           support the
                  support the line of                        conclusion drawn
                  argument.                                  from the evidence
                                                             to support the line
                                                             of argument.
  LEVEL 7
  Question has been
  fully answered.           47-50               43-46
  Content selection
  fully relevant to
  line of argument.
  LEVEL 6
  Question has been
  answered. Content         43-46               40-42              38-39
  selection relevant
  to a line of
  argument.
  LEVEL 5
  Question
  answered to a             38-39               36-37              34-35              30-33           28-29
  great extent.
  Content
  adequately
  covered and
  relevant.
  LEVEL 4
  Question
  recognizable in                                                  30-33              28-29           26-27
  answer. Some
  omissions or
  irrelevant content
  selection
  LEVEL 3
  Content selection
  does relate to the                                                                  26-27           24-25              20-23
  question, but does
  not always relate
  to the question.
  Omissions in
  coverage.
  LEVEL 2
  Question
  inadequately                                                                                        20-23              18-19            14-17
  addressed.
  Sparse content.
  LEVEL 1
  Question
  inadequately                                                                                                           14-17             0-13
  addressed or not
  at all. Inadequate
  or irrelevant
  content.

Guidelines for allocating a mark for level 1:

                                              Demo
                                                        NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                                             5
      HISTORY                                      NCS – Memorandum                                   NW/MID YEAR 2018
Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content, no attempt to structure the essay      =0
Answer includes basic and generally irrelevant information, no attempt to structure the essay = 1-6
Question inadequately addressed and vague, little attempt to structure the essay =7-13

      SECTION A: SOURCE BASED QUESTIONS

      QUESTION 1: HOW DID ASKIA MUHHAMAD RULE THE SONGHAI KINGDOM BETWEEN
                  1493 AND 1528?

      1.1
      1.1.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A- L1]
                  Sunni Ali (Sunni Baru)                                                                (1 x 1)    (1)

      1.1.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                  To ridicule the daughters of the fallen Sunni’s                                       (1 x 2)    (2)

      1.1.3 [Definition of a concept from Source 1A – L1]
                  A line of hereditary rulers of a kingdom/empire/country
                  Rulers who are from the same family
                  Any other relevant response                                                           (1 x 2)    (2)

      1.1.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
            (a)     Sunni Ali: A warrior                                                                 (1 x 2)    (2)

              (b)      Askia Muhammad: A statesman                                                       (1 x 2)    (2)

      1.1.5 [Extraction of information from Source 1A – L1]
                 He divided Songhai into provinces (each under a governor)
                 He organized a standing army and a fleet of war canoes under the commander
                  of a general and an admiral
                 He created positions of director of finance, justice, interior, protocol, agriculture,
                  water and forest and of “tribes of white race”                              (3 x 1)    (3)

      1.1.6    [Extraction of information from Source 1A – L1]
                    Moors
                    Tauregs                                                                              (2 x 1)   (2)

      1.1.7 [Explaining the usefulness from Source 1A – L3]
                 The source explains hoe Askia Muhammad came into power (he wrested power
                  from Snni Baru)
                 The source explains why Muhammad assumed the title Askia
                   The source explains how Askia Muhhamad set up an efficient administration
                  of the regions conquered by Sunni Ali
                 Any other relevant response                                    (Any 1 x 2)  (2)

                                           Demo
                                                   NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                                6
HISTORY                               NCS – Memorandum                          NW/MID YEAR 2018

1.2
1.2.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
            He allied himself with scholars from Timbuktu
            He ushered a golden age in the city of Muslim scholarship               (2 x 1)   (2)

1.2.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
            He took the daughters of his vassal chiefs as his wives
            He married his own daughters and nieces to his subject chiefs, his dignitaries,
             governors and judges                                                   (2 x 1)    (2)

1.2.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
            Children of Songhai were encouraged to attend Muslim universities in places
              like Europe and Asia
            Scholars from around the world were invited to study in Timbuktu      (2 x 2)     (4)

1.2.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
            Anyone who threatened his power was put to death without any question
            He came harshly on non believers
            Any other relevant response                                         (2 x 2)       (4)

1.3
1.3.1 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C - L2]
            Songhai accumulated its wealth with the salt and gold
            Sunni Ali contributed in making the kingdom strong (Sunni Baru failed)
            Sunni Baru was defeated by Askia the Great (Muhammad)
            Askia the Great supported education
            Any other relevant response                                            (2 x 2)    (4)

1.3.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
            Salt
            Gold                                                                    (2 x 1)   (2)

1.4   [Comparison of evidence from Sources 1B and 1C – L3]
          Both sources shows that Askia Muhammad took power from Sunni dynasty by
           force
          In both sources, Askia Muhammad is shown as supporting education
          Any other relevant response                                      (1 x 2)            (2)

1.5
1.5.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
            As soldiers
            As royal advisors

                               Demo
                                      NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                                   7
   HISTORY                               NCS – Memorandum                            NW/MID YEAR 2018

               To work on village farms                                             (Any 2 x 1)     (2)

  1.5.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
              They were trusted not to overthrow their rulers
              They were trusted not to provide unbiased advise
              They held no personal stake on the outcome of decisions
              Any other relevant response                                                 (2 x 2)   (4)

  1.6    [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources – L3]

          Learners could include the following aspects in their response

               Askia Muhammad wrested power from the Sunni dynasty (Battle of Anfao) (1A))
               He assumed the title of Askia (1A)
               He was a statesman (1A)
               He set up an efficient administration (1A)
               He divided Songhai into provinces: wach under a viceroy/governor (1A and 1B)
               Kings were often weakHe had an army and fleet of war canoes (1A and 1B)
               He created positions of directors of finance, justice, interior, etc (1A)
               His relatives were part of government (1A and 1B)
               He respected education (1B and 1C)
               He was cruel (anyone threatening his power was put to death (1B)
               He preferred to use slaves as soldiers, advisors and in village farms (1D)
               Any other relevant response

Use the following rubric to allocate a mark:

                   Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g. shows little or no
                    understanding of how Askia Muhammad ruled the Songhai
                    kingdom between 1493 and 1591.                                            Marks:
LEVEL 1                                                                                       0-2
                   Uses evidence partially to report on topic or cannot report on topic
                   Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great extent to the
                    topic e.g. shows some understanding of how Askia
                    Muhammad ruled the Songhai kingdom between 1493 and
LEVEL 2                                                                                       Marks:
                    1591.
                                                                                              3-5
                   Uses evidence in a basic manner

                   Uses relevant evidence e.g. that shows a thorough
                    understanding of how Askia Muhammad ruled the Songhai
                    kingdom between 1493 and 1591. Uses evidence very                         Marks:
                                                                                              6-8
                    effectively in an organized paragraph that shows an understanding
LEVEL 3
                    of the topic

                                                                                                      (8)
                                                                                                     [50]

                                  Demo
                                         NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                               8
HISTORY                              NCS – Memorandum                         NW/MID YEAR 2018

QUESTION 2: HOW DID SOCIAL INEQUALITY CONTIRIBUTE TO THE FRENCH
            REVOLUTION?

2.1
2.1.1 [Explanation of a historical concept from Source 2A – L1]
           A fundamental change in government in a short space of time
           A rapid overthrow of government, usually by ordinary citizens
           Any other relevant response                                            (1 x 2)   (2)

2.1.2 [Extraction of information from Source 2A – L1]
            They had to gain power within the government
            They had to improve the tax system
            They had to create a fair system of production
            They had to improve the whole economic system of government           (4 x 1)   (4)

2.1.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
           Middle class
           Peasants
           City workers                                                           (3 x 1)   (3)

2.1.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
            They were forced to pay tax
            Any other relevant response                                           (1 x 2)   (2)

2.1.5 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A - L1]
           The differences that the three groups had                              (1 x 2)   (2)

2.1.6 [Explanation of usefulness from Source 1A – L3]
           The source gives information on what the middle class need to do to gain
            equality
           The source mentions the classes that belonged to the Third Estate
           The source mentions one of the major cause of the French Revolution
           Any other relevant response                                       (Any 1 x 2)    (2)

2.2
2.2.1 [Interpretation of evidence from source 2B- L2]
            The clergy and the nobility crushed the peasants (had power over them)
            The First and Second Estates depended on the taxes of the peasants (Third
             Estates)
            The peasants carried the burden of taxes in France                (Any 2 x 2)   (4)

2.2.2 [Extraction evidence from source 2B- L1]
            Taille
            Impost

                              Demo
                                     NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                                 9
HISTORY                                NCS – Memorandum                     NW/MID YEAR 2018

             Corvees                                                            (3 X 1)   (3)

2.2.3    [Extraction of evidence from source 2B- L1]
              To fight for the king                                             (1 x 2)   (2)

2.3     [Comparison of evidence from Source 2A and 2B – L3]
            The two sources shows the peasants were the ones paying tax in France
            Any other relevant response                                        (1 x 2)    (2)

2.4
2.4.1 [Interpretation of evidence from Sources 2C – L2]
            Peasants were suffering in France
            Peasants were paying much tax to the Lords
            Taxes were crushing the peasants
            Nobody cared about the peasants
            Any other relevant response                                    (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

2.4.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
            Taxes were heavy for them
            They were paying much tax
            Any other relevant response                                    (Any 1 x 2)    (2)

2.4.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
            It was because of hard labour
            It was because of poverty
            Any other relevant response                                    (Any 1 x 2)    (2)

2.5
2.5.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2D – L1]
           Merchants
           Manufactures
           Bankers
           Doctors
           Lawyers
           Intellectuals                                                    (Any 3 x 1)   (3)

2.5.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2D- L1]
            Status or privilege                                                 (1 x 1)   (1)

2.5.3    [Extraction of information from Source 2D – L1]
              They had wealth without status
              They were upwardly mobile, but blocked by the aristocracy     (Any 1 x 2)   (2)

2.5.4 [Extraction of information from Source 2D – L1]
            They tried to become land owners themselves                         (1 x 2)   (2)

                                Demo
                                       NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                                    10
    HISTORY                                NCS – Memorandum                           NW/MID YEAR 2018

    2.6    [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources – L3]

           Learners could include the following points in their response:

                The French Revolution was a war of social classes (2A)
                The middle class believed they were not equal to other classes (2A and 2B)
                They fought for equality (2A)
                Peasants were forced to pay large taxes (2A, 2B and 2C)
                Peasants were always under the crushing weight of the First and Second Estates
                 (2B and 2C)
                The clergy fought for the king (2C)
                The Bourgeoisie fought for status and privilege (they only had wealth) (2D)
                They were always frustrated by the aristocracy (2D)
                Any other relevant answer

Use the following rubric to allocate a mark:

                      Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g. shows little or
                       no understanding of how social inequality contributed to
  LEVEL 1              the French Revolution                                            Marks:0 - 2
                      Uses evidence partially to report on topic or cannot
                        report on topic
                      Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great extent to
  LEVEL 2              the topic e.g. shows some understanding of how social
                       inequality contributed to the French Revolution                  Marks:3 - 5
                      Uses evidence in a basic manner
                      Uses relevant evidence e.g. that shows a thorough
                        understanding of how social inequality contributed to the
  LEVEL 3              French Revolution                                                Marks:6 - 8
                      Uses evidence very effectively in an organized
                        paragraph that shows an understanding of the topic
                                                                                                   (8)
                                                                                                  [50]

                                    Demo
                                           NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                               11
HISTORY                               NCS – Memorandum                            NW/MID YEAR 2018

SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

QUESTION 3: EUROPEAN EXPANSION AND CONQUEST IN THE 15TH AND
            18TH CENTURIES: THE SPANISH CONQUEST IN THE AMERICAS

Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical and
interpretative and skills]

SYNOPSIS

In writing this essay candidates should discuss the reasons why the Spanish were able to defeat
the Aztecs in the 15th and 18th centuries.

MAIN ASPECTS

Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:

     Introduction: Candidates should show how they will approach the question.

ELABORATION

     Superior weapons
     Use of horses
     Help from local allies
     Religion
     Diseases: small pox
     Lack of preparation by the Aztecs
     Attitude towards war
     Weak leader
     Any other relevant response

Conclusion: Candidates to tie up their discussion with any relevant conclusion.               (50)

                               Demo
                                      NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                               12
HISTORY                               NCS – Memorandum                             NW/MID YEAR 2018

QUESTION 4: THE FRENCH REVOLUTION

[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical and
interpretative and skills]

SYNOPSIS

In writing this essay candidates, should discuss how Napoleon modernised (brought reforms in)
France after the French Revolution.

MAIN ASPECTS

Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:

     Introduction: Candidates should show how they will approach the question

ELABORATION

     Background: Rise of Napoleon Bonaparte
     Kind of leadership: Ruled like a dictator, but believed in equality of opportunity

Napoleon changes
Government
     Strong centralised government
     He dominated as an emperor
     Any other relevant response

Religion
      He believed that religion promoted national unity and prevented class war
      The Concordat of 1801: Recognised Catholicism in France-not state religion
      Jews, Protestants and Catholics could practice freely in France
      Church under state control
      Any other relevant response

Law

NB: One cause of the Revolution was conflicting codes of laws

He instituted the CODE NAPOLEON, which incorporated the following:
      Equality before the law
      Freedom of religion
      Abolition of serfdom

                               Demo
                                      NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
                                               13
HISTORY                               NCS – Memorandum                            NW/MID YEAR 2018

The Code has some less liberal sides: trade unions not allowed, women being inferior to men
and children had no rights

Education
     Favoured state system of public education
     Curriculum to be managed by the state-not church
     Any other relevant response

Economy
    Aided industries through tariffs and loans
    Established Bank of France
    Provided bread at low prices
    Did not restore ancient feudal rights
    Any other relevant response

Conclusion: Candidates to tie up their discussion with any relevant conclusion.               (50)

                               Demo
                                      NW/JUNE/HIST/ EMIS/6*******

## Related documents

- [History-GR-10-ADDENDUM -1](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-gr-10-addendum-1/bd85aecb-4259-491d-a0d7-c970a2f48414) — History · Addendum · 2018
- [History-GR-10-Paper -1](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-gr-10-paper-1/d989b021-3015-4b49-9acc-8b8513a9689a) — History · QP · 2018
- [HISTORY GR 10 MEMO NOV2018 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-gr-10-memo-nov2018-afrikaans/0ca849a7-4395-4c79-839b-864d8e9192a8) — History · Memo · 2018 · Afr
- [HISTORY GR10 MEMO NOV2018 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-gr10-memo-nov2018-english/368f705a-8a7a-43ae-803d-44f05c14e845) — History · Memo · 2018 · Eng
- [HISTORY GR 10 MEMO NOV2018 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2018-national-november-exam-memorandum-afrikaans/b10e212a-2533-4919-adbb-cce6c2226612) — History · Memo · 2018 · Afr
- [HISTORY GR10 MEMO NOV2018 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2018-national-november-exam-memorandum-english/980bf4a7-2abe-4878-a418-e294174ff09f) — History · Memo · 2018 · Eng

## More from Grade 10 History

- [Grade 10 History November 2026 Mock Addendum](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2026-november-mock-exam-addendum/d566e6d9-8258-4765-b80b-6c83e66b06d6) — Addendum · 2026 · Eng
- [Grade 10 History November 2026 Mock](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2026-november-mock-exam-question-paper/6d783e5b-2a47-447a-9161-e3748f3e10a8) — QP · 2026 · Eng
- [Grade 10 History November 2026 Mock 2 Addendum](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2026-november-mock-exam-2-addendum/69ecae02-9d7e-459d-92de-178ab11c8a56) — Addendum · 2026 · Eng
- [Grade 10 History November 2026 Mock 2](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2026-november-mock-exam-2-question-paper/bed9a11e-6193-4fe9-851b-93c16def76a6) — QP · 2026 · Eng
- [Gr 10 His ATP 2023-24](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-10-his-atp-2023-24/77b69460-c4e9-4807-8d15-fdb95c83ebd3) — ATP
- [EC History Grade 10 March 2025 QP and Memo](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/ec-history-grade-10-march-2025-qp-and-memo/e50c532b-d70e-4ae5-b45d-e752d9219b14) — QP + Memo · 2025

## Collection

- [Grade 10 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-10/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
