# History Grade 11 P1 Eastern Cape November 2022 Addendum

> Grade 11 History Paper 1 addendum from the Eastern Cape November 2022 (English), 14 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-adden-nov-2022-english/64f5fd6c-62ad-4f20-bf6e-146b38954248
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 11
- Language: English
- Document type: Addendum
- Year: 2022
- Exam period: Eastern Cape November
- Paper: 1
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 14

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 11](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-11) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-11/history) › [History Grade 11 P1 Eastern Cape November 2022 Addendum](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-adden-nov-2022-english/64f5fd6c-62ad-4f20-bf6e-146b38954248)

## About this document

History · Grade 11 · Eastern Cape November · 2022 · English. Addendum, 14 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Matching paper and memo

- [HISTORY P1 GR11 QP NOV 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-qp-nov-2022-english/fd4dd7ff-e9df-40b3-b9aa-23b5e481a143) — QP · 2022 · Eng

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

          NATIONAL
     SENIOR CERTIFICATE

             GRADE 11

       NOVEMBER 2022

           HISTORY P1
           ADDENDUM

     This addendum consists of 14 pages.

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
2                                   HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                          (EC/NOVEMBER 2022)

SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

QUESTION 1:          HOW DID STALIN’S FIVE-YEAR PLANS TRANSFORM RUSSIA
                     INTO AN INDUSTRIALISED STATE BY 1939?

SOURCE 1A

This source explains the reasons why Stalin implemented the First Five-Year plan in
Russia.

Leon Trotsky, Gregory Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev and other left-wing members of the
Politburo had always been in favour of the rapid industrialisation of the Soviet Union. Stalin
disagreed with this view. He accused them of going against the ideas of Lenin who had
declared that it was vitally important to ‘preserve the alliance between the workers and the
peasants.’ When left-wing members of the Politburo advocated (supported) the building
of a hydro-electric power station on the Dnieper River, Stalin accused them of being ‘super
industrialisers’ and said that it was equivalent to suggesting that a peasant buys a
‘gramophone instead of a cow’.

When Stalin accepted the need for collectivisation, he also had to change his mind about
industrialisation. His advisers told him that with the modernisation of farming the Soviet
Union would require 250 000 tractors. In 1927, they had only 7 000. As well as tractors,
there was also a need to develop the oil fields to provide the necessary petrol to drive the
machines. Power stations also had to be built to supply the farms with electricity.

However, Stalin suddenly changed policy and made it clear he would use his control over
the country to modernise the economy. The first Five Year Plan that was introduced in
1928, concentrated on the development of iron and steel, machine-tools, electric power
and transport. Stalin set the workers high targets. He demanded a 111% increase in coal
production, 200% increase in iron production and 335% increase in electric power. He
justified these demands by claiming that if rapid industrialisation did not take place, the
Soviet Union would not be able to defend itself against an invasion from capitalist countries
in the west.

                       [From https://spartacus-educational.com/RUSfive.htm. Accessed on 6 May 2021.]

Copyright reserved                                                                     Please turn over

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/NOVEMBER 2022)                   HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                                               3

SOURCE 1B

This source explains how Stalin improved the agricultural, industrial and military sectors
in Russia during the second Five-year plan.

The Second Five-Year Plan (1933–37) continued the primary emphasis on heavy industry.
By 1932 Stalin realised that both the economy and society were seriously overstrained
(overstretched). Although industry failed to meet its production targets and agriculture lost
ground in comparison with 1928 yields (crops), Stalin declared that the First Five-Year
Plan had successfully met its goals in four years. He then proceeded to set more realistic
goals.

Under the Second Five-Year Plan (1933–37), the state devoted attention to consumer
goods, and the factories built during the first plan helped increase industrial output in
general. By the late 1930s, however, collectivised farms were performing somewhat
better. In 1935 a new law permitted individual peasants to have private plots, the produce
of which they could sell on the open market. According to official statistics, during the
Second Five-Year Plan gross agricultural production increased by just under 54 percent.
In contrast, gross industrial production more than doubled.

In the mid-1930’s, in response to imminent military danger from fascist countries, the
Central Committee of the Party and the Soviet Government were forced to revise the
previously planned orientation and working pace of the defence industry, and to effect a
transition from the compound system of building a regular Red Army. At the same time,
the structure of the defence industry was improved. In January 1938, on the base of the
People's Commissariat of the Defence Industry, branch People’s Commissariats were
created for aviation, the shipbuilding industry, ammunition, and arms. The defence
enterprises were reinforced by technical cadre. In one year alone, 1938, five thousand
young engineers were assigned to them.

   [From https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/industry-stalin-2fyp.htm. Accessed on 6 May
                                                                                                    2021.]

Copyright reserved                                                                          Please turn over

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4                               HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                    (EC/NOVEMBER 2022)

 SOURCE 1C

 The table below outlines the production figures during the Five-Year Plans.

                             1928                   1937                   1940

    Cast iron
    million tons              3,3                   14,5                       14,9

    Steel
    million tons               4                    17,7                       18,3

    Coal
    million tons              35,4                  128                    165,9

    Oil
    million tons              11,7                  28,5                       31,1

    Electricity
    million kilowatts         5,1                   36,2                       48,3

    Motor vehicles
    (000s=thousands)          0,8                   200                    245,4

    Tanks (000s)
    (000s=thousands)          0,2                    1,5                       2,8

    Warplanes (000s)
    (000s=thousands)          0,2                    3,4                       8,2

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/NOVEMBER 2022)                  HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                                            5

SOURCE 1D

This source below outlines the impact of Stalin’s Five-Year Plans on Russia.

By 1939 Russian industrial production levels were far higher than they had been in 1928.
The USSR was able to play a major part in the defeat of Germany during the Second
World War and emerged as a superpower, ranked second only to the USA.

Centralised decision-making under the Five-Year Plans was not always the most efficient
way to run an economy. However, particular successes were the improved supply of
electricity and the greater number of machines built. Almost all heavy industries enjoyed
substantial increases in production. There were many large-scale industrial and building
developments, such as the Dnieper Dam, the Moscow Metro and the steelworks at
Magnitogorsk, Gorky and Kutznetsk.

Life for many ordinary Russians improved after 1917. They had city housing schemes,
universal health care, pensions and sickness benefits. From 1934 onwards, it was
compulsory for children to receive eleven years of education. Illiteracy declined from about
50% in 1924 to 19% in 1939. The USSR was also largely free from the unemployment
suffered in other countries during the 1930s depression.

Much of the new wealth of the country was never seen by ordinary citizens. Most of it went
to the government to pay for more industrialisation, as well as for military and police costs
and the bureaucracy that kept control of the economy. There was little in the way of luxury
consumer goods and sometimes there were shortages in the necessities.

  [From https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/leaders-and-controversies/g4/cs3/. Accessed on 7
                                                                                            May 2021.]

Copyright reserved                                                                      Please turn over

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6                                    HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                           (EC/NOVEMBER 2022)

QUESTION 2:          DID ROOSEVELT’S NEW DEAL ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVES OF
                     RELIEF, REFORM AND RECOVERY OF THE AMERICAN
                     ECONOMY?

SOURCE 2A

This source below explains the aims and objectives of the New Deal programme in
America in the 1930s.

The term New Deal derives from Franklin Roosevelt’s 1932 speech accepting the
Democratic Party’s nomination for president. At the convention Roosevelt declared, “I
pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people.” Though Roosevelt
did not have concrete policy proposals in mind at the time, the phrase ‘New Deal’ came to
encompass his many programs designed to lift the United States out of the Great
Depression.

The New Deal created a broad range of federal government programs that sought to offer
economic relief to the suffering, regulate private industry, and grow the economy. The
New Deal is often summed up by the ‘Three Rs’: relief (for the unemployed), recovery (of
the economy through federal spending and job creation), and reform (of capitalism, by
means of regulatory legislation and the creation of new social welfare programs).

Roosevelt’s New Deal expanded the size and scope of the federal government
considerably, and in doing so fundamentally reshaped American political culture around
the principle that the government is responsible for the welfare of its citizens. As one
historian has put it: “Before the 1930s, national political debate often revolved around the
question of whether the federal government should intervene in the economy. After the
New Deal, debate rested on how it should intervene.”

    [From https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/rise-to-world-power/great-depression/a/the-
                                                                 new-deal. Accessed on 21 June 2021.]

Copyright reserved                                                                       Please turn over

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/NOVEMBER 2022)                   HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                                              7

 SOURCE 2B

 The source below describes the various Acts that President Roosevelt implemented
 during his New Deal Policy.

 Roosevelt’s theory in rebuilding the economy rested on the notion (thought) of limited
 production. He wanted farmers, labourers and businessmen to begin producing less in
 the hope that supply and demand would restore (to put back in place) the market.
 Therefore, much of his legislation during the first 100 days focused on curbing
 production.

 The Agricultural Adjustment Act, for example, was aimed primarily at farmers. To curb
 production, the act paid farmers to farm less land. Roosevelt also focused on the
 industrial sector. The National Industrial Recovery Act was the centrepiece of
 Roosevelt’s New Deal legislation. Once again, the act attempted to prevent the
 overproduction of goods.

 Roosevelt, under the National Industrial Recovery Act, created the National Recovery
 Administration (NRA), which encouraged an increase in labour wages and a decrease in
 hours worked during a week. The solution worked for a brief period time, but a dip in the
 economy and the unwillingness of employers to enact (to use) important National
 Recovery Administration codes hurt the program.

 The Agricultural Adjustment Act and the National Recovery Administration, born under
 the National Industrial Recovery Act, were expected to be two important programs to
 help the United States economy. Instead, both programs struggled. The Agricultural
 Adjustment Act failed to account (answer) for sharecroppers, who were individuals paid
 to work on a farmer's land. Since the act encouraged less farming, sharecroppers
 became unemployed.

        [From https://study.com/academy/lesson/franklin-d-roosevelt-and-the-first-new-deal-the-first-100-
                                                               days.html. Accessed on 11 April 2019.]

Copyright reserved                                                                         Please turn over

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8                                    HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                          (EC/NOVEMBER 2022)

SOURCE 2C

This source explains the Tennessee Valley Authority.

Roosevelt also created the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), whose goal was to
modernise and reduce unemployment in the Tennessee River Valley, one of the poorest
and hardest-hit regions in the country. The agency hired local workers to construct a series
of dams and hydroelectric power plants, which brought cheap electricity to thousands of
people. The public corporation also created affordable employee housing, manufactured
cheap fertiliser, and drained thousands of acres for farming.

Roosevelt also created the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), whose goal was to
modernise and reduce unemployment in the Tennessee River Valley, one of the poorest
and hardest-hit regions in the country. The agency hired local workers to construct a series
of dams and hydroelectric power plants, which brought cheap electricity to thousands of
people. The public corporation also created affordable employee housing, manufactured
cheap fertiliser and drained thousands of acres for farming.

The TVA, like the AAA, was highly controversial. Many conservatives claimed that the
government production of electricity was a mild form of socialism and that it disrupted
market prices too much. Competing electric companies also attacked the TVA for selling
cheaper electricity and lowering their profits. Still, the TVA had such a profound impact on
the economy and quality of life in the Tennessee River Valley Region that the federal
government initiated similar projects throughout the West and South. Within a decade,
many major American rivers were set up to produce hydroelectric power that provided
both electricity and jobs.

    [From https://www.sparknotes.com/history/american/depression/section5/page/2. Accessed on 12 June
                                                                                               2019.]

Copyright reserved                                                                      Please turn over

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/NOVEMBER 2022)                 HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                                           9

SOURCE 2D

This poster depicts the Social Security Act of 1935.

        [From https://apps.irs.gov/app/understandingTaxes/student/whys_thm02_les04.jsp. Accessed on 10
                                                                                      September 2021.]

Copyright reserved                                                                    Please turn over

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10                                  HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                           (EC/NOVEMBER 2022)

QUESTION 3:          WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC RACE
                     THEORIES ON NAZI RACIAL POLICIES IN THE 1930s AND 1940s?

SOURCE 3A

This source highlights the origins of Social Darwinism.

Social Darwinism is a loose set of ideologies that emerged (began) in the late 1800s in
which Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection was used to justify certain
political, social, or economic views. Social Darwinists believe in ‘survival of the fittest’ –
the idea that certain people become powerful in society because they are innately better.

Social Darwinism has been used to justify imperialism, racism, eugenics and social
inequality at various times over the past century and a half. According to Darwin’s theory
of evolution, only the plants and animals best adapted to their environment will survive to
reproduce and transfer their genes to the next generation. Animals and plants that are
poorly adapted to their environment will not survive to reproduce. Charles Darwin
published his notions on natural selection and the theory of evolution in his influential 1859
book, The Origin of Species.

Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection was a scientific theory focused on
explaining his observations about biological diversity and why different species of plants
and animals look different. Yet in an attempt to convey his scientific ideas to the British
public, Darwin borrowed popular concepts, including ‘survival of the fittest’, from
sociologist Herbert Spencer and; struggle for existence’ from economist Thomas Malthus,
who had earlier written about how human societies evolve (change) over time.

[From https://www.history.com/topics/early-20th-century-us/social-darwinism. Accessed on 12 May 2021.]

Copyright reserved                                                                      Please turn over

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/NOVEMBER 2022)                HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                                        11

SOURCE 3B

This extract explains how eugenics policies were implemented in Germany.

On July14, 1933, the National Socialists introduced the Law for the Prevention of
Hereditarily Diseased Offspring. As a result, hundreds of thousands of people were
forcibly sterilised. Others were murdered. By the summer of 1933, the Nazis had Germany
firmly in their grip. With this newfound power, the far-right party decided to mould German
society in the image of its own making.

The law stated that people suffering from particular illnesses could be forcibly sterilised in
order to prevent the spread of hereditary diseases. Followers of the eugenics movement
believed that the German population could be genetically ‘improved’ and welcomed the
law. For the victims of forced sterilisation, this violent physical intrusion (disturbance)
meant a life without the possibility of having children. Many were heavily traumatised and
suffered their entire lives.

The National Socialists hoped to realise the dream of ‘master race’ in which ‘diseased’
and ‘weak’ people had no place. The new law listed the types of ‘illness’ that warranted
the sterilisation of carriers. This list included congenital mental deficiency, schizophrenia,
epilepsy, hereditary deafness and blindness, as well as people with ‘any severe hereditary
deformity’ and alcoholics. "One cannot say that it was the ‘evil’ Nazis alone," said
Christiane Rothmaler, a doctor and historian who has spent many years researching the
history of forced sterilisation. She knows that the issue of eugenics was already being
discussed in the 19th century.

   [From https://www.dw.com/en/remembering-the-victims-of-nazi-eugenics/a-16945569 Accessed on 12
                                                                                       May 2021.]

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
12                               HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                         (EC/NOVEMBER 2022)

SOURCE 3C

This source explains the effects of Germany’s sterilisation policy on non-Arians in
Germany in the 1940s.

Rita Reinhardt Seibel is the daughter of Gabriel and Theresia Reinhardt. She and her
sister, Rolanda, were born March 3, 1943, in Wuerzburg, where her parents were both
working in the Stadt Theatre. In 1941 several members of Theresia’s family were brought
to Gestapo headquarters where they were forced to sign sterilisation authorisation forms.
They were threatened with deportation if they refused. Before Theresia's sterilisation was
scheduled, she made a conscious decision with her boyfriend, Gabriel, to get pregnant.

By the time she was called in for the procedure, she was three months pregnant with twins.
When this was discovered by the racial hygienists, she and her family were detained and
word was sent to Berlin to determine what should be done. The response was the Theresia
should be allowed to continue the pregnancy on condition that the babies would be turned
over, upon their birth, to the clinic at the University of Wuerzburg. There, Dr Werner Heyde,
professor of neurology and psychiatry, and a key member of the Nazi euthanasia program,
was conducting research on twins. The twins were born in the presence of Dr Heyde at
the University of Wuerzburg. They were allowed brief stays at home with their parents, but
generally were confined to the clinic.

… Theresia and Gabriel received notices to report for deportation. The babies were not
included, and Theresia immediately went to the clinic to see them. When she arrived, she
was told she could not see them, but Theresia pushed her way in. She found Rolanda
lying dead in a ward with a bandaged head, the victim of experiments with eye colouration.
Hysterical at this discovery, Theresia grabbed the surviving twin, Rita, and fled.

                                     [From http://www.prezi.com. Accessed on 27 September 2021.]

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/NOVEMBER 2022)                 HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                                         13

SOURCE 3D

This source depicts Gabriel and Theresia Reinhardt, a Sinti couple, pushing their twin
children in a baby carriage, Rolanda and Rita, along the Domstrasse in Wuerzburg under
Nazi escort during a propaganda photo shoot in April 1943.

      [From https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1151175. Accessed on 27 September 2021.]

Copyright reserved                                                                    Please turn over

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
14                               HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM)                      (EC/NOVEMBER 2022)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Visual sources and other historical evidence were taken from the following:

https://spartacus-educational.com/RUSfive.htm

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/industry-stalin-2fyp.htm

https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/leaders-and-controversies/g4/cs3/

https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/rise-to-world-power/great-
depression/a/the-new-deal

https://study.com/academy/lesson/franklin-d-roosevelt-and-the-first-new-deal-the-first-
100-days.html.

https://www.sparknotes.com/history/american/depression/section5/page/2.

https://apps.irs.gov/app/understandingTaxes/student/whys_thm02_les04.jsp.

https://www.history.com/topics/early-20th-century-us/social-darwinism

https://www.dw.com/en/remembering-the-victims-of-nazi-eugenics/a-16945569

http://www.prezi.com.

https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1151175

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

## Related documents

- [HISTORY P1 GR11 MEMO NOV 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-memo-nov-2022-english/58d91f8a-c79d-495b-889f-4d88434f755b) — History · Memo · 2022 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 QP GR11 NOV2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-qp-gr11-nov2022-english/57ba5876-1769-4a91-8f8a-b6d3eae25aad) — History · QP · 2022 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR11 QP NOV2020 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-qp-nov2020-english/849ca3b6-dac5-46e3-b520-479b5a629248) — History · QP · 2020 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR11 MEMO NOV2019 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-memo-nov2019-english/d8830388-603e-4dd6-92aa-0a8f0faa9a7e) — History · Memo · 2019 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR11 MEMO NOV2018 English .docx](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-memo-nov2018-english-docx/1b0bba73-75e2-4c08-89bd-d2604ec1682f) — History · Memo · 2018 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR11 QP NOV2018 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr11-qp-nov2018-english/82cc9346-b01a-4286-b351-99a80f354f8d) — History · QP · 2018 · Eng

## More from Grade 11 History

- [Grade 11 History P1 November 2026 Mock Memo](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-11-history-2026-november-mock-exam-memorandum-paper-1/9fdb86cf-1aac-4c90-9f22-a176bf0d4d37) — Memo · 2026 · Eng
- [Gr 11 His ATP 2023-24](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-11-his-atp-2023-24/4c199bf3-d253-42ae-b90d-b030dfc6ecc2) — ATP
- [EC History Grade 11 June 2025 P1 only](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/ec-history-grade-11-june-2025-p1-only/555be0f1-39a3-47b5-8fec-f622076c09d3) — QP · 2025
- [EC History Grade 11 June 2025 P2 and Memo](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/ec-history-grade-11-june-2025-p2-and-memo/0051e460-14cf-43df-a19e-374c9f6a797a) — QP + Memo · 2025
- [GRADE 11 HISTORY P1 NOVEMBER 2025 MG watermark](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-11-history-p1-november-2025-mg-watermark/15706ac6-5464-4f6c-87c6-1a03afff8695) — Memo · 2025
- [HISTORY P2 MEMO GR11 NOV 2025 ENG watermark](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-memo-gr11-nov-2025-eng-watermark/13c2bd17-2125-463d-a4b3-95b539b0a7de) — Memo · 2025 · Eng

## Collection

- [Grade 11 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-11/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
