# History Grade 12 Paper 1 NSC June 2017 Addendum (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 1 addendum from the NSC June Exam 2017 (English), 14 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-may-june-2017-addendum-eng/aefc4824-2d4d-4779-ad94-8f8b33047b0b
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Document type: Addendum
- Year: 2017
- Exam period: NSC June Exam
- Paper: 1
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 14

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 Paper 1 NSC June 2017 Addendum (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-may-june-2017-addendum-eng/aefc4824-2d4d-4779-ad94-8f8b33047b0b)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · NSC June Exam · 2017. Addendum, 14 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

                      SENIOR CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS

                                 HISTORY P1

                                      2017

                                  ADDENDUM

                        This addendum consists of 14 pages.

Copyright reserved                                            Please turn over

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                   2                                          DBE/2017
                                      SCE – Addendum

QUESTION 1:          HOW DID THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE SOVIET
                     UNION RESPOND TO THE ECONOMIC SITUATION IN EUROPE
                     AFTER 1946?

SOURCE 1A

This source explains the United States of America's intention to contain the spread of
communism in Europe from 1947 onwards.

… United States officials in 1947 and 1948 did not have precise ideas about how to
implement containment. Should containment be applied everywhere? Should it be applied
militarily? Should the United States focus on economic aid to nations seeking to
reconstruct their economies? Should the United States assign priority to occupation
policies, especially in Germany and Japan?

Initially, in what became known as the Truman Doctrine, the United States president
proposed military aid to Greece and Turkey, and declared that the United States would
contest totalitarian expansion everywhere. But his subordinates quickly recognised that
they had to calculate priorities carefully. They decided that they should focus on economic
reconstruction in Western Europe rather than military rearmament; that they should seek
to erode (wear down) support for communist parties in France, Italy, and Greece; that
they should manage the revitalisation (recovery) of Western Germany and Japan, and co-
opt (choose) their future power. Containment meant that Soviet influence and communist
ideology should be contained within the areas occupied by the forces of the Soviet Union
at the end of World War II.

In June 1947, the United States announced the Marshall Plan to help rebuild Europe. The
governments of most Western European nations were happy to receive US money and
participate in a reconstruction programme. But they possessed deep fears about the
revival of German power. In order to get the French to cooperate, the United States
promised to retain its occupation forces inside Germany.

                                        [From http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/pons/s2-9143.pdf.
                                                                     Accessed on 16 October 2016.]

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                    3                                        DBE/2017
                                       SCE – Addendum

SOURCE 1B

The source below is an extract from George Marshall's speech which was delivered at
Cambridge, Massachusetts in the United States of America on 5 June 1947.
He announced his economic plan to assist European countries.

… The remedy seems to lie in breaking the vicious (brutal) circle and restoring the
confidence of the people of Europe in the economic future of their own countries and of
Europe as a whole. The manufacturer and the farmer throughout wide areas must be able
and willing to exchange their products for currencies, the continuing value which is not
open to question.

Aside from the demoralising (disturbing) effect on the world at large and the people
concerned, the consequences (costs) to the economy of the United States should be
apparent to all. It is logical that the United States should do whatever it is able to do to
assist in the return of normal economic health in the world, without which there can be no
political stability and no assured peace. Our policy is directed not against any country or
doctrine, but against hunger, poverty and chaos. Its purpose should be the revival of a
working economy in the world, so as to permit the emergence of political and social
conditions in which free institutions can exist …

Any government that is willing to assist in the task of recovery will find full co-operation, I
am sure, on the part of the United States government. Any government which
manoeuvres (moves) to block the recovery of other countries cannot expect help from us.
Furthermore, governments, political parties or groups which seek to perpetuate (continue)
human misery (suffering) in order to profit politically or otherwise, will encounter the
opposition of the United States.

                                                        [From Book of Great Speeches by A Burnet]

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                    4                                        DBE/2017
                                       SCE – Addendum

SOURCE 1C

The extract below is from an article entitled, 'The Turn Towards Confrontation:
The Soviet Reaction to the Marshall Plan, 1947'. It was written by Scott D Parrish who
analyses Stalin's rejection of the Marshall Plan.

… Stalin revealed his fear that American economic power might effectively undermine the
Soviet sphere of influence in Eastern Europe. Under the guise (excuse) of the Marshall
Plan, not only Western Europe, but also Eastern Europe, could be mobilised into an anti-
Soviet coalition …

The Soviet reaction to the Marshall Plan was a comprehensive shift in grand strategy.
Before Marshall's announcement Stalin had retained hopes that it would prove possible to
cooperate with the West on at least some issues, in the context of a mixed relationship of
competition and co-operation, now he apparently believed that even limited co-operation
was impossible. The offensive threat which the Marshall Plan appeared to represent
seems to have convinced the Soviet leader that the West, led by the United States, was
intent (determined) on creating a hostile encirclement of the Soviet Union. Since by its
actions the West had shown that it was intrinsically (naturally) hostile to the Soviet Union,
he [Stalin] seems to have reasoned, any further attempts to work out a compromise
settlement would not only fail to yield positive results, but might leave the Soviet Union
open to Western exploitation. Consequently, Stalin rapidly moved to implement a series of
harsh measures designed not only to protect his own sphere of influence in Eastern
Europe, but also to undermine what he perceived to be American efforts to consolidate an
anti-Soviet bloc in Western Europe. This general line of policy would continue until his
death in 1953 …

Prior (before) to the Marshall Plan, coalition governments with varying levels of non-
communist participation were the norm in the region. Prior to the summer of 1947, such
coalition governments had been in place in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria
and Romania. After the Marshall Plan, the decision to launch full-scale sovietisation of
these states was evidently taken. While the earlier New Type Government Strategy had
not called for the imposition of Stalinist police states throughout the region, the new policy
did.

                                                        [From http://fliphtml5.com/lpnd/mdrn/basic.
                                                                Accessed on 10 November 2016.]

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                 5                                        DBE/2017
                                    SCE – Addendum

SOURCE 1D

The cartoon below, by Joe Spier, was published in a booklet that was printed by the
government of Netherlands in November 1949.

                                                 [From http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/7/.
                                                   Accessed on 15 November 2016.]

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                    6                                       DBE/2017
                                       SCE – Addendum

QUESTION 2:          HOW SIGNIFICANT WAS THE BATTLE OF CUITO CUANAVALE
                     FOR SOUTHERN AFRICA?

SOURCE 2A

The extract below is from a South African government publication that commemorated
the 20th anniversary of the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale.

In 1991 former President Nelson Mandela made Cuba his first foreign destination to pay
an official visit to after his release. During this visit he remarked in an address in Havana
(Cuba):

'The defeat of the racist army at Cuito Cuanavale has made it possible for me to be here
today! Cuito Cuanavale is a milestone in the history of the struggle for Southern African
liberation!'

From 1987 to 1988, shielded from the international media and therefore largely
unreported, the town of Cuito Cuanavale suffered under siege for over ten months in one
of the biggest, and what turned out to be the last, battles of the Cold War.

The Battle of Cuito Cuanavale irreversibly changed the history and political landscape of
the Southern African region. At the previously insignificant village of Cuito Cuanavale,
Angolan, Namibian and Cuban forces managed to bring the military aggression of the
apartheid military forces to a halt. At the same time, South African liberation fighters of
Umkhonto we Sizwe, fighting in Northern Angola, managed to contain Angolan rebel
soldiers preventing them from re-enforcing the apartheid armies to the south. The peace
negotiations that followed the battle led to the withdrawal of the South African military
from Angola and Namibia, resulting in the independence of Namibia, and spurring on
South Africa's negotiated settlement …
                                                  [From www.pmpsa.gov.za/files/pdfs/synopsis.pdf.
                                                                Accessed on 7 February 2017.]

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                      7                                       DBE/2017
                                         SCE – Addendum

SOURCE 2B

The photograph below depicts Nelson Mandela and Fidel Castro attending a public
rally in Havana, Cuba, in 1991. This was Nelson Mandela's first international trip after
being released from prison.

        [From https://www.democracynow.org/2013/12/10/nelson_mandela_fidel_castro_a_video.
                                                           Accessed on 7 February 2017.]

                 Nelson Mandela                                       Fidel Castro

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                      8                                       DBE/2017
                                         SCE – Addendum

SOURCE 2C

The extract below is part of an address that Ronnie Kasrils delivered in Havana, Cuba,
on 24 April 2008. He focused on how the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale was a major defeat
for the apartheid regime.

… Cuito Cuanavale. One thousand kilometres from Luanda, Windhoek and Lusaka, two
thousand kilometres from Pretoria, over ten thousand kilometres from Havana, yet such a
remote spot at the End of the Earth created a political earthquake and helped bury a once
powerful [apartheid] regime that threatened all of Africa. Cuito Cuanavale helped free tens
of millions of Africans in Angola, Namibia and South Africa, strengthened the anti-
imperialist forces of Africa and beyond, and established unbreakable ties between South
Africa and Cuba …

This week South Africa celebrates its 14th anniversary of freedom. We have made
spectacular strides in improving the living conditions of our people, particularly the poor …
and Cuba is with us at the most demanding points.

As our ambassador, comrade Thenjiwe Mtintso, recently pointed out: None of South
Africa's newly found friends are prepared, as the Cubans, to sacrifice their lives to serve
in the rural areas of South Africa. Currently there are 27 co-operation agreements in
areas such as health, housing, construction, education, science and technology. Since
1994 150 young [South African] doctors have, graduated from Cuban universities while
287 are still on Cuban scholarships with 60 arriving annually. More than 500 Cuban
experts are currently doing internationalist duty in South Africa working as doctors,
professors, specialists, in various spheres …

We are most grateful for the assistance we received.

         [From www.ssa.gov.za/portals/0/SSA%20docs/speeches/2008/minister%20kasrils%cuba%2024%
                                                 20April%202008.pdf. Accessed on 7 February 2017.]

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                    9                                       DBE/2017
                                       SCE – Addendum

SOURCE 2D

The extract below is from an article that was written by Gary Baines. It focuses on the
significance of the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale for some white South African Defence
Force soldiers who fought in Angola.

Since becoming the ruling party in South Africa, African National Congress
spokespersons have regularly declared that the triumph of the Angolan and Cuban forces
at Cuito Cuanavale over the 'apartheid army' strengthened the ANC's hand in negotiating
a ceasefire in South Africa. From Nelson Mandela to Jacob Zuma, ANC presidents have
fêted (celebrated) the Cubans as heroes who sacrificed their lives out of solidarity with the
liberation struggle …

These developments have led retired SADF apologists (supporters) to challenge the
ANC's version. Books, letters, newspapers and blogs have been written in a bid to correct
what are widely regarded as 'biased' and 'mistaken' interpretations of the events. In
February 2012 Afriforum, the Afrikaner lobby group, used social media to request that
people pledge support for a campaign to demand that the government cease its
misrepresentation of [white] Afrikaner history ... They were also asked to endorse
(approve) General Jannie Geldenhuys' recent book We Were There: Winning the War for
Southern Africa, which purports (claims) to tell the 'real' history of the battle of Cuito
Cuanavale …

SADF veterans (soldiers) have mobilised on a number of occasions in order to contest the
ANC's version of the history of the Border War in general … For this history is part of who
they are and goes some way to defining their identities in post-apartheid South Africa.

                                                    [From Replaying Cuito Cuanavale by G Baines]

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                   10                                         DBE/2017
                                       SCE – Addendum

QUESTION 3:          HOW DID THE CITIZENS OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS,
                     RESPOND TO THE DESEGREGATION OF CENTRAL HIGH
                     SCHOOL IN THE 1950s?

SOURCE 3A

This source focuses on the judgement of the United States Supreme Court on school
desegregation in 1954. It highlights how Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas,
was affected by this judgement.

… the Court … spoke in a unanimous decision written by [Chief Justice] Earl Warren
himself. The decision held that racial segregation of children in public schools violated the
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that 'no state shall
make or enforce any law which shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.'

On the other hand, that Amendment did not prohibit (ban) integration. In any case, the
Court asserted (declared) that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal education
today. Public education in the 20th century, said the Court, had become an essential
component of a citizen's public life, forming the basis of democratic citizenship, normal
socialisation and professional training. In this context, any child denied a good education
would be unlikely to succeed in life. Where a state, therefore, has undertaken to provide
universal education, such education becomes a right that must be afforded equally to
both blacks and whites.

Were the black and white schools 'substantially' (largely) equal to each other, as the
lower courts had found? After reviewing psychological studies showing black girls in
segregated schools had low racial self-esteem, the Court concluded that separating
children on the basis of race creates dangerous inferiority complexes that may adversely
affect black children's ability to learn. The Court concluded that, even if the tangible
(physical) facilities were equal between the black and white schools, racial segregation in
schools is inherently unequal and is thus always unconstitutional.

                            [From http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_brown.html.
                                                                   Accessed on 16 October 2016.]

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                        11                                         DBE/2017
                                            SCE – Addendum

SOURCE 3B

The extract below focuses on how the Little Rock School Board accepted the Supreme
Court ruling of 1954 on school desegregation. The board was only willing to implement
a gradual desegregation process that would take place over many years.

On 22 May 1954 the Little Rock School Board issued a statement saying that it would
comply with the Court's decision, once the Court outlined the method and time frame
for implementation. Meanwhile, the board directed Superintendent Virgil Blossom to
formulate a plan for desegregation. In May 1955 the school board adopted the Phase
Programme Plan of gradual desegregation that became known as the 'Blossom Plan',
after its author.

The plan was originally conceived (imagined) to begin at the elementary school level.
However, as parents of elementary school students became some of the most
outspoken patrons (supporters) against integration, district officials decided to begin
nominal (small) desegregation in the fall (autumn) of 1957 at Central High School, to
expand to the junior high level by 1960 and tentatively, to the elementary level by
1963. The plan also included a transfer provision that would allow students to transfer
from a school where their race was in the minority. This assured students at Horace
Mann High School would remain predominantly African-American.

             [From http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=718.
                                                                      Accessed on 8 January 2017.]

Copyright reserved                                                                     Please turn over

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
    History/P1                                     12                                         DBE/2017
                                             SCE – Addendum

    SOURCE 3C

    This is a pamphlet that the Mothers' League (an organisation of white American
    women who were against integration) distributed to stakeholders attending Central
    High School. It outlines the direction that the board of Central High School should take
    regarding the Supreme Court ruling on the desegregation of schools in the United
    States of America.

                                                                                                           *

■

     [From http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/media-detail.aspx?mediaID=6625. Accessed
                                                                                 on 17 September 2016.]

    *Negroes: A derogatory (offensive) term used to refer to African Americans
    ■ Fall: Autumn in the United States of America

    Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                     13                                           DBE/2017
                                         SCE – Addendum

SOURCE 3D

This photograph shows soldiers from the National Guard directing Elizabeth Eckford to
find another entrance in her attempt to enter Central High School during the integration
crisis that occurred in Little Rock in 1957.

 [From http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/media-detail.aspx?mediaID=7784.
                                                         Accessed on 17 September 2014.]

         Soldiers from the                                           Elizabeth Eckford
         National Guard

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1                                   14                               DBE/2017
                                       SCE – Addendum

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Visual sources and other historical evidence were taken from the following:

Baines, G. 2012. 'Replaying Cuito Cuanavale' History Today (Volume 62, Issue 9)

Burnet, A. 2013. Book of Great Speeches, UK (Chambers)

http://fliphtml5.com/lpnd/mdrn/basic

http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/pons/s2-9143.pdf

http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/7/

http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=718

http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/media-
detail.aspx?mediaID=7784

http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/media-
detail.aspx?mediaID=6625

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_brown.html

https://www.democracynow.org/2013/12/10/nelson_mandela_fidel_castro_a_video

www.pmpsa.gov.za/files/pdfs/synopsis.pdf

www.ssa.gov.za/portals/0/SSA%20docs/speeches/2008/minister%20kasrils%cuba%20
24%20April%202008.pdf

Copyright reserved

## Related documents

- [History P1 May June 2017 Addendum Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-may-june-2017-addendum-afr/df51a47c-26d5-42fd-8593-592de0e87a21) — History · Addendum · 2017 · Afr
- [History P1 May June 2017 Memo Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-may-june-2017-memo-eng/662ba1e6-fb78-4312-a0cd-1e0d4024f033) — History · Memo · 2017 · Eng
- [Grade 12 NSC History P1 Preparatory 2017 Addendum](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-nsc-history-p1-preparatory-2017-addendum/7da8bbb8-c55d-4436-ba09-b666876b6115) — History · Addendum · 2017
- [History P1 May June 2022 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-may-june-2022-addendum-eng/26551f4a-326d-4c97-be6f-e9e99fb1dd32) — History · Addendum · 2022 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR12 QP SEPT2017 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr12-qp-sept2017-afrikaans/b9dc10fb-ad07-4300-abc2-a509afb2c30f) — History · QP · 2017 · Afr
- [History P1 Feb March 2017 Memo Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-feb-march-2017-memo-eng/85076440-4ade-42cf-9119-7e4e53348597) — History · Memo · 2017 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [History Grade 12 NSC P2 MEMO September 2025 North West](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-grade-12-nsc-p2-memo-september-2025-north-west/3d9bf167-1e97-42c1-826a-bf344c0e964e) — Memo · 2025
- [History P1 May-June 2025 MG Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-may-june-2025-mg-eng/9e0f813e-e888-4061-a259-20b4dbe98907) — Memo · 2025 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 MEMO GR12 JUNE 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-memo-gr12-june-2024-afrikaans/f313b62b-041f-4225-bf96-3a6052a2f919) — Memo · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P1 MEMO GR12 SEPT2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-memo-gr12-sept2024-afrikaans/49472cc4-f28c-41d3-b6c4-2623ae0611e3) — Memo · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-sept-2024-afrikaans/8367f672-7028-4e67-a52a-705b946b5122) — QP · 2024 · Afr

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
