# History Grade 12 Paper 1 EC June 2019 Memo (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 1 memorandum from the EC June 2019 (English), 24 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download, question paper linked when available.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-memo-june-2019-eng/411a2ef0-5927-4221-899a-41bafeccc20c
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2019
- Exam period: EC June
- Paper: 1
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 24

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 Paper 1 EC June 2019 Memo (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-memo-june-2019-eng/411a2ef0-5927-4221-899a-41bafeccc20c)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · EC June · 2019. Memorandum, 24 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

                          NATIONAL
                     SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                          GRADE 12

                            JUNE 2019

                     HISTORY P1
                  MARKING GUIDELINE

MARKS:   100

                   This marking guideline consists of 23 pages.

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
2                                       HISTORY P1                            (EC/JUNE 2019)

 1. SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

     1.1   The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based
           questions:

     COGNITIVE                                                          WEIGHTING OF
                                 HISTORICAL SKILLS
      LEVELS                                                             QUESTIONS
                      Extract evidence from sources.
                      Selection and organisation of relevant               30%
       LEVEL 1
                       information from sources.                            (15)
                      Define historical concepts/terms.
                      Interpretation of evidence from the
                       sources.
                                                                            40%
       LEVEL 2        Explain information gathered from the
                                                                            (20)
                       sources.
                      Analyse evidence from the sources.
                      Interpret and evaluate evidence from
                       sources.
                      Engage with sources to determine its
                                                                            30%
       LEVEL 3         usefulness, reliability, bias and limitations.
                                                                            (15)
                      Compare and contrast interpretations and
                       perspectives presented in sources and
                       draw independent conclusions.

     1.2   The information below indicates how source-based questions are
           assessed:

            In the marking of source-based questions credit needs to be given to any
             other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or examples.
            In the allocation of marks emphasis should be placed on how the
             requirements of the question have been addressed.
            In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that
             need to be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated
             in italics.
            When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should
             be credited for any relevant answers.
            Learners are expected to take a stance when answering ‘to what extent’
             questions in order for any marks to be awarded.

     1.3   Assessment procedures for source-based questions

            Use a tick () for each correct answer
            Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2 x 2) which translates to two
             reasons and is given two marks each ( ); (1 x 2) which translates
             to one reason and is given two marks ()
            If a question carries 4 marks then indicate by placing 4 ticks ()

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
   (EC/JUNE 2019)                         HISTORY P1                                             3

            Paragraph question
            Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the content and
            structure of the paragraph must be taken into account when awarding a
            mark. The following steps must be used when assessing a response to a
            paragraph question:
             Read the paragraph and place a bullet ( . ) at each point within the text
               where the candidate has used relevant evidence to address the question.
             Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate has
               been able to use relevant evidence to write a paragraph.
             At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (√) that the candidate has
               been awarded for the paragraph; as well as the level (1, 2 or 3) as
               indicated in the holistic rubric and a brief comment e.g.

            ___________ ˖ __________________________ ˖ _________________
            _________________ ˖ __________________________ ˖ ___________
                                                                 √√√√ Level 2

            Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph
             Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the mark on the
              right-hand bottom margin e.g.
                                                   32
                                                   50

             Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back cover
              the answer script.

 2. ESSAY QUESTIONS

      2.1   The essay questions require candidates to:
             Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner.
              They need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so
              that they are able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an
              effective argument to answer the question posed. It is essential that an
              essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of evidence
              and a conclusion.

      2.2   Marking of essay questions
             Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by
              the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
             Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion
              than those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific
              essay.
             When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should
              be credited for Any other relevant answers.

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4                                         HISTORY P1                            (EC/JUNE 2019)

 2.3    Global assessment of the essay
        The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the
        teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the
        component parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer
        an individual opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an
        argument. The learner will not be required to simply regurgitate 'facts' in order
        to achieve a high mark. This approach discourages learners from preparing
        ‘model’ answers and reproducing them without taking into account the specific
        requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the essay credits learners’
        opinions supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike content-based
        marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the emphasis is on the
        following:
         The construction of argument
         The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such argument
         The learner’s interpretation of the question.

 2.4    Assessment procedures of the essay

        2.4.1    Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing the essay.

        2.4.2    During the reading of the essay ticks need to be awarded for a
                 relevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in the marking
                 guideline/memorandum), each of the main points/aspects that is
                 properly contextualised (also indicated by bullets in the marking
                 guideline/memorandum) and a relevant conclusion (indicated by a
                 bullet in the marking guideline/memorandum) e.g. in an answer where
                 there are 5 main points there will be 7 ticks.

        2.4.3    Keep the PEEL structure in mind when assessing an essay.

                         Point: The candidate introduces the essay by taking a line of
                     P
                         argument/making a major point.
                         Explanation: The candidate should explain in more detail what
                     E   the main point is all about and how it relates to the question
                         posed (line of argument).
                         Example: The candidates should answer the question by
                         selecting content that is relevant to the line of argument.
                     E
                         Relevant examples should be given to sustain the line of
                         argument.
                         Link: Candidates should ensure that the line of argument is
                     L
                         sustained throughout the essay and is written coherently.

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
   (EC/JUNE 2019)                           HISTORY P1                                             5

          2.4.4      The following symbols MUST be used when assessing an essay:

                     • Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly
                       contextualised
                                                                         ^
                     • Wrong statement               _________________

                     • Irrelevant statement              |
                                                         |
                                                         |

                     • Repetition                        R

                     • Analysis                          A√

                     • Interpretation                    I√
                     • Line of argument                  LOA

 2.5      The matrix

          2.5.1      Use of the matrix in the marking of essays.

                     In the marking of essays, the criteria as provided in the matrix should
                     be used. When assessing the essay note both the content and
                     presentation. At the point of intersection of the content and
                     presentation based on the seven competency levels, a mark should
                     be awarded.

                     (a)   The first reading of essays will be to determine to what extent the
                           main aspects have been covered and to allocate the content level
                           (on the matrix).

                                                               C        LEVEL 4

                     (b)   The second reading of essays will relate to the level (on the matrix)
                           of presentation.
                                                               C        LEVEL 4
                                                               P        LEVEL 3

                     (c)   Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.

                                                               C       LEVEL 4
                                                               P       LEVEL 3       }26–27

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6                                                                    HISTORY P1                                                    (EC/JUNE 2019)

    MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY: TOTAL: 50
                               LEVEL 7             LEVEL 6             LEVEL 5             LEVEL 4            LEVEL 3             LEVEL 2           LEVEL 1*
    PRESENTATION             Very well           Very well           Well planned and    Planned and        Shows some          Attempts to         Little or no
                             planned and         planned and         structured essay.   constructed an     evidence of a       structure an        attempt to
                             structured essay.   structured essay.   Attempts to         argument.          planned and         answer.             structure the
                             Good synthesis      Developed a         develop a clear     Evidence used to   constructed         Largely             essay.
                             of information.     relevant line of    argument.           some extent to     argument.           descriptive or
                             Developed an        argument.           Conclusion          support the line   Attempts to         some attempt at
                             original, well      Evidence used to    drawn from the      of argument.       sustain a line of   developing a line
                             balanced and        defend the          evidence to         Conclusions        argument.           of argument. No
    CONTENT                  independent line    argument.           support the line    reached based      Conclusions not     attempt to draw a
                             of argument with    Attempts to draw    of argument.        on evidence.       clearly supported   conclusion.
                             the use of          an independent                                             by evidence.
                             evidence and        conclusion from
                             sustained and       the evidence to
                             defended the        support the line
                             argument            of argument.
                             throughout.
                             Independent
                             conclusion is
                             drawn from
                             evidence to
                             support the line
                             of argument.

    LEVEL 7
    Question has been
    fully answered.
    Content selection
                                 47–50               43–46
    fully relevant to line
    of argument.
    LEVEL 6
    Question has been
    answered.
    Content selection
                                 43–46               40–42               38–39
    relevant to a line of
    argument.
    LEVEL 5
    Question answered
    to a great extent.
    Content adequately
                                 38–39               36–37               34–35              30–33               28–29
    covered and
    relevant.
    LEVEL 4
    Question
    recognisable in
    answer.                                                              30–33              28–29               26–27
    Some omissions or
    irrelevant content
    selection.
    LEVEL 3
    Content selection
    does relate to the
    question, but does
    not answer it, or
    does not always
                                                                                            26–27               24–25               20–23
    relate to the
    question.
    Omissions in
    coverage.
    LEVEL 2
    Question
    inadequately                                                                                                20–23               18–19             14–17
    addressed. Sparse
    content.
    LEVEL 1*
    Question
    inadequately
    addressed or not at
                                                                                                                                    14–17              0–13
    all. Inadequate or
    irrelevant content.

*Guidelines for allocating a mark for Level 1:

       Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content; no attempt to structure the essay = 0
       Question includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt to structure the essay = 1–6
       Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay = 7–13

Copyright reserved                                                                                                               Please turn over

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
   (EC/JUNE 2019)                         HISTORY P1                                           7

    SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

    QUESTION 1:          HOW DID THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS LEAD TO COLD WAR
                         TENSIONS BETWEEN THE USA AND USSR IN THE 1960s?

    1.1 1.1.1        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                      Cuba                                                         (1 x 1)    (1)

          1.1.2      [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                      The armed bands that invaded the country were trained, equipped
                        and armed by the USA
                      The planes which bombarded the Cuban cities belong to the USA
                      The bombs they drop are supplied by the American government
                                                                            (Any 2 x 1)        (2)

          1.1.3      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
                      Cuba was a communist state
                      Khrushchev wanted to expand communism in Latin America
                      He wanted to protect the independence of Cuba as a communist
                         state
                      Any other relevant response                        (Any 2 x 2)          (4)

          1.1.4      [Own knowledge of topic – L1]
                      Cuban exiles                                                 (1 x 1)    (1)

    1.2 1.2.1        [Definition of historical concepts from Source 1B – L1]
                     (a) Communism
                     (b) Dictatorship                                               (2 x 2)    (4)

          1.2.2      [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                       There has been evident and growing resistance to Castro’s
                        dictatorship
                       Refugees … are able to return and support their countrymen in the
                        continuing struggle for freedom
                       Where people are denied their right of choice, recourse to such
                        struggle is the only means of achieving their liberties (Any 2 x 1)    (2)

          1.2.3      [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
                       Kennedy supports capitalism and Khrushchev supports
                         communism
                       Source 1A is an American view and blames communism for the
                         invasion whereas Source 1B is a Russian view and blames the
                         USA as the mastermind behind the attack
                       Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8                                         HISTORY P1                              (EC/JUNE 2019)

          1.2.4      [Comparison of sources to identify differences – L3]
                      Source 1A blames the USA for the attack while Source 1B
                        blames communism
                      Source 1A states that the USA trained, equipped and armed the
                        bands, whilst Source 1B states that the Cuban people disliked
                        Castro’s dictatorship
                      Source 1A states that America wanted to get rid of Castro
                        because he was communist, whilst Source 1B states that the
                        reason for the invasion was because Castro denied his citizens
                        the right of choice
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

          1.2.5      [Own knowledge – L1]
                      No – they were defeated by Castro                           (1 x 1)    (1)

    1.3 1.3.1        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
                      Turkey
                      Italy
                      West Germany                                           (Any 2 x 1)     (2)

          1.3.2      [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
                      The USA had already surrounded the Soviet Union with its
                        bomber bases and missiles
                      America would not leave Cuba alone unless we did something
                      We had an obligation to do everything in our power to protect
                        Cuba’s existence as a socialist country
                      We wanted to give them a little of their own medicine (Any 1 x 1)      (1)

          1.3.3      [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                      USA would be seen as an irresponsible country
                      USA would be seen as the aggressor
                      It could have led to a full-scale nuclear war between the USA and
                         Russia
                      Any other relevant response                             (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

    1.4 1.4.1        [Determining bias of information from Source 1D – L3]
                      Khrushchev seen as an irresponsible leader
                      Khrushchev seen as aggressive – sword
                      Khrushchev bringing the world on the brink of a nuclear war
                      Khrushchev seen as the cause of the Cuban missile crisis
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2) (4)

          1.4.2      [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                      USA and Russia reached a compromise
                      Russia agreed to withdraw the missiles
                      USA agreed not to invade Cuba
                      USA secretly agreed to remove the missiles from Europe
                      Any other relevant response                            (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
   (EC/JUNE 2019)                        HISTORY P1                                         9

          1.4.3      [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                      Khrushchev seen as weak by his own people
                      Khrushchev was sacked as president of Russia
                      Any other relevant response                               (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

    1.5 [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources – L3]
         Tension started when Cuban exiles attacked Cuba (Source 1A)
         USA was the mastermind behind the attack – supplied the weapons and
           training (Source 1A)
         Russia committed themselves to protect Cuba against American aggression
           (Source 1A)
         Tension increased when the USA denied their involvement and blamed
           communism for the invasion (Source 1B)
         Castro defeated the exiles and approached Russia for help
         Russia supplied Cuba with nuclear weapons to protect herself from further
           American aggression (Source 1C)
         USA had already surrounded the USSR with their nuclear missiles (Source
           1C)
         USSR determined to protect communism in Latin America (Source 1C)
         USA furious when they discovered the missiles – Excom options
         USA imposed a blockade to prevent further missiles being shipped to Cuba
         USA propaganda made Khrushchev the scapegoat for the crisis (Source 1D)
         Khrushchev seen as a leader bringing the world to the brink of a nuclear war
           (Source 1D)
         Tension was eased when leaders reached a compromise
         Any other relevant response

              LEVEL                               CRITERIA                         MARKS
                             Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g.
                              shows no or little understanding of how the
                              Cuban Missile Crisis led to tension between
          LEVEL 1                                                                    0–2
                              the USA and the USSR.
                             Uses evidence partially or cannot write a
                              paragraph.
                             Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                              extent to the topic e.g. shows some
                              understanding of how the Cuban Missile Crisis
          LEVEL 2                                                                    3–5
                              led to tension between the USA and the USSR.
                             Uses evidence in a basic manner to write a
                              paragraph.
                             Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a
                              thorough understanding of how the Cuban
                              Missile Crisis led to tension between the USA
          LEVEL 3             and the USSR.                                          6–8
                             Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                              paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                              topic.                                                              (8)
                                                                                                 [50]

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10                                      HISTORY P1                             (EC/JUNE 2019)

 QUESTION 2:         WHY DID CUBA BECOME INVOLVED IN THE ANGOLAN
                     CIVIL WAR?

 2.1    2.1.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
                   Cuba had expansionist aims
                   Cuba was acting as a puppet of the Soviet Union            (2 x 1)     (2)

        2.1.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
                   The only thing we have taken from Angola has been the
                      remains of our soldiers that died there
                   We don’t want any of Angola’s riches                  (2 x 1)         (2)

        2.1.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                   He meant that they pulled out of Angola on request of the ruling
                      party
                   He meant that Cuba was not there to colonise but was there to
                      fulfil a duty on the request of the ruling party
                   Any other relevant response                              (2 x 2)       (4)

        2.1.4    [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                      No
                   Cuba decided on its own to support Angola
                   Cuba did not consult Russia when it made the decision to
                      support Angola
                   Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

 2.2    2.2.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source B– L1]
                   Many of our ancestors came as slaves from Africa to this land.
                   They fought as members of the liberating army of Cuba
                                                                              (2 x 1)      (2)

        2.2.2    [Definitions of historical concepts from Source 2B – L1]
                 (a) Discrimination
                 (b) Imperialism                                               (2 x 2)     (4)

        2.2.3    [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
                 The USA was the mastermind behind the attack on the Angolan
                     government because they did not want a communist government
                 The USA used South African troops to overthrow the Angolan
                     government
                 Both the USA and SA were against the communist government
                     in Angola
                 Both the USA and SA wanted a pro-capitalist government in
                     Angola
                 Any other relevant response                             (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
   (EC/JUNE 2019)                          HISTORY P1                                        11

 2.3     2.3.1       [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
                     Soviet and Cuban intervention in Angola                      (1 x 2)     (2)

         2.3.2       Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
                     SA did not want a communist state near its border
                     SA felt that Cuba would try to spread communism to SA
                     The Angolan communist government were sympathetic towards
                        the ANC
                     SA feared the ‘Swart Gevaar’
                     Any other relevant response                             (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

         2.3.3       [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
                     They have a tremendous advantage in any conventional war
                     They can get raw materials from Angola and other Southern
                        African countries
                     They will control the Cape sea route which is the lifeline of Europe
                                                                               (Any 2 x 1)     (2)

 2.4     [Comparison of evidence in Source 2B and Source 2C – L3]
         Source 2B gives a communist perspective on the war in Angola whilst
            Source 2C gives a capitalist perspective
         Source 2B states that Cuba got involved to stop American imperialism
            and racial discrimination whilst Source 2C states that Cuba got involved
            to spread the communist ideology
         Source 2B states that the USA and SA wanted to get rid of the legitimate
            government of Angola – hence Cuba committed themselves to protect
            the independence of Angola whilst Source 2C states that Cuba got
            involved for material gain and to control the sea route
         Any other relevant response                                     (Any 2 x 2)          (4)

 2.5     2.5.1       [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
                     Cuba and Angola have a very good relationship
                     Both Cuba and Angola are happy to share the communist
                         ideology
                     Cuba and Angola were allies
                     Any other relevant response                             (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

         2.5.2       [Ascertain the usefulness of the evidence in the Source 2D – L3]
                     It is an original source, a photograph taken on the 19th
                        December 1988
                     It shows that Angola was appreciative of the Cuban support
                     It shows Cuba’s commitment towards helping Angola
                     It shows that Angola and Cuba have a strong communist bond
                     Any other relevant response                             (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
12                                    HISTORY P1                             (EC/JUNE 2019)

 2.6    [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources –
        L3]
        Cuba became involved in the Angolan Civil War at the request of the
            ruling MPLA (Source 2A)
        Cuba wanted to protect the independence of communist Angola
            (Source 2A)
        Cuba helped the MPLA because of their fight against racism and
            imperialism (Source 2A)
        Cuba decided on their own (independently) to support the MPLA
            (Source 2A)
        Cuba assisted Angola because many blacks fought on the side of Fidel
            Castro during the Cuban Civil War (Source 2B)
        Cuba fought against capitalism which brings discrimination and racism
            (Source 2B)
        Cuba decided to help Angola to prevent American imperialism and South
            African racism (Source 2B)
        Cuba did not get involved for any material gain; they only wanted to
            protect communist Angola
        USA and SA believe Cuba got involved to gain access to Angola’s natural
            resources (Source 2C)
        USA and SA believed that Cuba wanted to orchestrate a communist
            takeover of the whole of Southern Africa (Source 2C)
        USA and SA believed that Cuba and Russia wanted to control the Cape
            sea route which is the lifeline of Europe.
        In spite of these accusations, Cuba and the ruling MPLA had a very good
            relationship (Source 2D)
        The communist bond between Cuba and Angola was very strong as
            depicted in the visual source (Source 2C)
        Cuba believed that the USA was more interested in Angola’s natural
            resources, especially oil
        Any other relevant response

                                           CRITERIA                       MARKS
                     Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g. shows
                     no or little understanding of the reasons for
        LEVEL 1                                                            0–2
                     Cuba’s involvement in the Angolan Civil War.
                     Uses evidence partially or cannot write a paragraph
                     Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                     extent to the topic e.g. shows some understanding
        LEVEL 2      of the reasons for Cuba’s involvement in the          3–5
                     Angolan Civil War.
                     Uses evidence in a basic manner to write a paragraph
                     Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a
                     thorough understanding of the reasons for Cuba’s
        LEVEL 3      involvement in the Angolan Civil War.                 6–8
                     Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                     paragraph that shows an understanding of the topic                   (8)
                                                                                         [50]

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
   (EC/JUNE 2019)                          HISTORY P1                                        13

 QUESTION 3:          WHAT WERE THE REASONS FOR THE FORMATION OF THE
                      BLACK POWER MOVEMENT IN THE USA IN THE 1960s?

 3.1     3.1.1       [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
                      Terror
                      Brutality
                      Murder
                      Repression                                                (4 x 1)     (4)

         3.1.2       [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
                      The American government was waging a racist war of
                        genocide in Vietnam
                      The concentration camps in which Japanese Americans were
                        interned during the Second World War are being renovated
                        and expanded
                      America has historically reserved the most barbaric treatment
                        for non-white people
                      The enslavement of black people from the very beginning of
                        this country
                      The genocide practiced on the American Indians
                      The savage lynching of thousands of black men and women
                      The dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
                                                                           (Any 2 x 1)       (2)

         3.1.3.      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3A – L2]
                      Black people have used peaceful methods (begged, prayed) to
                         gain freedom and equality without any success
                      Blacks were subjected to more repression
                      Authorities turned a deaf ear to the pleas of black people
                      Blacks had no option but to protect themselves from police
                         brutality
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

         3.1.4       [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 3A – L2]
                      If Blacks do not protect themselves, they will be totally
                         destroyed by whites as a race
                      If Black Americans are destroyed as a race they would live the
                         rest of their lives in servitude to whites
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 1 x 2)     (2)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
14                                         HISTORY P1                              (EC/JUNE 2019)

 3.2    3.2.1        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
                      When we started to grow so rapidly                        (1 x 1)     (1)

        3.2.2        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
                      My party was jumping by leaps and bounds
                      In a matter of six months, we swelled; in 1968, from 400
                        members to 5,000 members and 45 chapters and branches
                      Our newspaper swells to over 100,000 circulations ... by mid-
                        1969, we had a 250,000 circulation.                (Any 2 x 1)       (2)

        3.2.3        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3B – L2]
                      He meant that Black Power was not only restricted to Black
                         people per se, but to all people who were not white
                      He meant that power included all people of colour that were
                         oppressed by the American government
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 1 x 2)     (2)

        3.2.4        [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 3B – L2]
                      No, they ran a Breakfast for Children Program
                      No, they ran Preventative Medical Health Care Clinics (2 x 2)        (4)

 3.3    3.3.1        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3C – L1]
                      Bloodshed                                                  (1 x 1)    (1)

        3.3.2        [Definitions of historical concepts from Source 2B – L1]
                     (a) Revolution
                     (b) Desegregation                                            (2 x 2)     (4)

        3.3.3        [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
                      Malcolm X studied history and realised that revolution was the
                         only way to bring about change for Black Americans
                      He believed that bloodshed was the only way for Black
                         Americans to achieve their freedom
                      He believed that Black Americans must control their own
                         destiny
                      He believed that violence was necessary because black
                         churches were bombed, and little Black girls were murdered
                      He believed that violence was the answer because Blacks had
                         exhausted all other avenues to achieve freedom and equality
                      Any other relevant response                          (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 15

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
   (EC/JUNE 2019)                         HISTORY P1                                        15

 3.4     [Comparison of evidence in Source 2B and Source 2C – L3]
          Source 3A states that the police are intensifying the terror, brutality,
            murder, and repression of black people, whilst Source 3C states that
            Black churches are being bombed and little black girls murdered
          Source 3A states that the American government is waging a war against
            people of colour whilst Source 3C states that America went to war
            against Germany, Vietnam and Korea
          Source 3A states that America ill-treated Blacks in the USA and this is
            confirmed in Source 3C when blacks are murdered and attacked
          Any other relevant response                                    (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

 3.5     3.5.1       [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
                      Fidel Castro and Malcolm X had a very good relationship
                      Fidel Castro supported Malcolm X and the aims of the Black
                          Power Movement
                      Fidel Castro and Malcolm X perceived the US government as
                          their common enemy
                      Any other relevant response                          (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

         3.5.2       [Ascertain the usefulness of the evidence in Source 2D – L3]
                     Useful
                      Malcolm X and Castro were in favour of communism
                      Malcom X and Castro preached revolution against the USA
                      Castro’s presence shows his influence over the ideals of the
                         Black Power Movement
                      Both Castro and Malcolm X were seen as the enemy of the
                         USA
                      Any other relevant response                         (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

 3.6     [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources]
          Black Americans were subjected to brutality and repression (Source 3A)
          America waged a war against all people of colour (Source 3A)
          Blacks begged, prayed, petitioned and demonstrated without any
              success (Source 3A)
          Blacks decided to form the Black Panther Party for self-defence
              (Source 3A)
          Blacks had to protect themselves from total destruction (Source 3A)
          Black Power Movement grew after the assassination of Martin Luther
              King (Source 3B)
          Black Power Movement sought solidarity with all other oppressed and
              marginalised groups in America (Source 3B)
          Black Power Movement also ran self-help schemes to uplift Black
              communities without the assistance of Whites (Source 3B)
          BPM drew inspiration from the history of American and French
              revolutions (Source 3C)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 16

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
16                                      HISTORY P1                              (EC/JUNE 2019)

             Malcolm X preached bloodshed to achieve goals of freedom and
              equality (Source 3C)
             Constant violence against blacks was the catalyst for the formation of
              the BPM (Source 3C)
             Revolution and bloodshed is the only way to achieve freedom and
              equality (Source 3C)
             BPM also supported by Castro Source 3D)
             Castro and Malcolm X shared the same view on revolution and hence
              they became the enemy of the US government (Source 3D)
             Any other relevant response

             LEVEL                          CRITERIA                          MARKS
                          Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g.
                           shows no or little understanding of the
                           reasons for the formation of the Black Power
        LEVEL 1                                                                0–2
                           Movement.
                          Uses evidence partially or cannot write a
                           paragraph.
                          Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                           extent to the topic e.g. shows some
                           understanding of the reasons for the
        LEVEL 2                                                                3–5
                           formation of the Black Power Movement.
                           Uses evidence in a basic manner to write a
                           paragraph.
                          Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a
                           thorough understanding of the reasons for
                           the formation of the Black Power Movement.
        LEVEL 3                                                                6–8
                          Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                           paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                           topic.                                                          (8)
                                                                                         [50]

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 17

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
     (EC/JUNE 2019)                      HISTORY P1                                         17

 SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

 QUESTION 4: CASE STUDY – CHINA

 [Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using
 analytical and interpretative skills.]

 SYNOPSIS

 Candidates need to ascertain to what extent Mao Zedong’s policies of the Great
 Leap Forward Movement (1958–1961) and the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976)
 were successful in strengthening communism and transforming China into a
 superpower.

 MAIN ASPECTS

 Candidates should include the following aspects in their essays:

 Introduction: Candidates should critically discuss Mao Zedong’s reasons for
 implementing the Great Leap Forward in relation to his aim of transforming China
 into a powerful communist state.

 ELABORATION

       The purpose of Great Leap Forward was to produce more crops very quickly to
        overtake the capitalist countries in a short period of time.
       Mao insisted that Industrialisation should take place on the farms and not in the
        urban areas.
       For this purpose, he collectivised the peasant's cooperative farms to form large
        communes.
       The private ownership of land and property was removed and the commune had
        to provide the families with everything they needed.
       Many peasants became involved in agriculture, whilst others were involved in
        the manufacturing of steel in backyard furnaces.
       By 1958 nearly all the Chinese belonged to one of the forty thousand
        communes.
       The quality of the steel was very weak and could not be used.
       Furthermore, many peasants were reluctant to produce because they lost their
        farms.
       Those who spoke out against Mao were arrested and millions were sent to
        prison.
       Accordingly, the production of coal and the output of industries declined.
       In 1960 Mao had an argument with Khrushchev – Russia withdraw their experts
        from China resulting in the collapse of China’s Russian controlled projects.
       In the same year China suffered one of the worst droughts leading to a drop in
        agricultural production.
       This has led to a widespread famine in which 30 million Chinese died.
       Mao was forced to resign as president of China.

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 18

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
18                                      HISTORY P1                               (EC/JUNE 2019)

     After the failure of the Great Leap Forward, Mao resigned as president of China
      but stayed on as Chairman of the Communist Party
     The moderates that took over introduced capitalist reforms.
     Mao was opposed to this and called on the Chinese public to get rid of all whom
      he deemed anti-revolutionary
     Mao's call was answered by the students who organised themselves as the Red
      Guards
     In 1966 Mao launched the ‘Cultural Revolution’, which was Mao’s strategy to
      take control of the country
     Mao used the Cultural Revolution to eliminate his opposition and to regain
      control
     The Red Guards were requested to destroy the ‘Four Olds’: Old Ideas, Old
      Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits – even with violence if necessary
     Gangs of young Red Guards, dressed in uniform, roamed in towns with their
      little red books.
     The first targets were Buddhist temples, churches and mosques, which were
      destroyed to the ground
     The Red Guards began to prosecute people who were regarded as anti-
      revolutionary
     Schools and universities were closed and churches, temples, libraries, shops
      and private houses were rifled or destroyed as the attack on the ‘feudal’
      traditions began
     Party officials, teachers and intellectuals were publicly humiliated, beaten and in
      some cases killed or driven to suicide
     The chaos spread quickly and China was immersed in a state of civil war.
     Almost a million people were killed
     By 1968 Mao realised that his revolution was out of control. In an effort to stop
      the violence, he enlisted the army to restore law and order. Millions of urban
      young people were sent to the countryside for ‘re-education’
     The Cultural Revolution officially ended in 1976
     The Cultural Revolution had a negative impact on China. The economy was in a
      crisis – agriculture yield decreased
     Historical buildings, especially churches and monasteries, were burned.
     For the entire decade of the Cultural Revolution, there was no teaching in
      schools, and this led to an entire generation who had not received a formal
      education
     The Chinese population lost confidence in the Communist Party

 Conclusion: Tie up argument with a relevant conclusion.                                    [50]

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 19

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
     (EC/JUNE 2019)                   HISTORY P1                                          19

 QUESTION 5:          INDEPENDENCE IN AFRICA IN THE 1960’s AND 1970’s:
                      COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE CONGO AND TANZANIA

 [Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using
 analytical and interpretative skills.]

 SYNOPSIS

 Candidates are expected to evaluate whether Mobutu Sese Seko (Congo) and
 Julius Nyerere (Tanzania) were successful in their aims of attaining economic
 independence and self-reliance by comparing their social, economic and political
 developments.

 MAIN ASPECTS

 Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:
   Introduction: Candidates should state whether the leaders were successful in
     their ideals and critically analyse the reasons for their success or failures.

 ELABORATION

 Political transformation of the Congo and Tanzania

 Similarities:
  Both the Congo and Tanzania were under European colonial rule until the early
    1960s
  After holding multi-party elections at independence, both countries became one-
    party states within the first five years after gaining independence
  Both countries continued to hold elections
  Both leaders emphasised the importance of Africanisation of their political systems
    (they regarded democracy as ‘un-African’ and a western imposition)
  The leaders of both countries (Mobutu Sese Seko and Julius Nyerere) remained
    ‘president for life’ between the 1960s and 1970s
  In both countries opposition leaders were silenced, imprisoned and in some cases
    killed
  Both Mobutu Sese Seko and Julius Nyerere took pride in building their nations and
    vigorously promoted the pride of being Zairian or Tanzanian

 Differences:
    Mobutu Sese Seko created a kleptocracy, a group of appointed public officials who
     abused their position for financial gain whereas Julius Nyerere introduced the
     'Leadership Code' in the Arusha Declaration which demanded high levels of
     integrity from public officials
  Mobutu Seso Seko was extravagant and enjoyed expensive clothes and built
     extravagant palaces for himself while Julius Nyerere's leadership style was one of
     personal integrity and humility
  Mobutu Sese Seko aligned himself with the West while Julius Nyerere adopted a
     policy of non-alignment with either capitalist or communist countries.

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 20

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
20                                     HISTORY P1                               (EC/JUNE 2019)

 Economic transformation of the Congo and Tanzania

 Similarities:
   Both countries relied heavily on agriculture and mineral extraction and neither country
    was able to develop a credible manufacturing sector
  Neither country saw a significant increase in the standard of living for the majority of its
    people
  Both countries experienced economic crises and therefore had to rely on foreign
    aid/assistance

 Differences:
  Mobutu Sese Seko initially nationalised industry with his policy of Zairianisation but when
     this failed he adopted a capitalist model; Julius Nyerere adopted an African socialist
     model (as outlined in the Arusha Declaration) which led to the nationalisation of
     businesses and land
  Mobutu accepted aid, investment and financial support from the West (especially USA
     and France); Nyerere was initially opposed to acceptance of foreign aid (saw it as neo-
     colonialism)
  Mobutu created a new class of elite supporters; Nyerere attempted to rid Tanzania of
     class divisions
  Any other relevant answer

 SOCIAL AND CULTURAL
 Education and language
  Colonial education promoted Eurocentric values
  Under colonialism few African children received more than a primary education
  The Congo and Tanzania had a few qualified technicians and engineers
  Children were taught European history and languages and western knowledge was
   favoured over African knowledge

 Education in Tanzania
  Nyerere promoted the use of Swahili (a common language spoken by most
   Tanzanians) over English
  Between 1961 and 1981 illiteracy in Tanzania dropped from 80% to 20%. As few
   resources were given to tertiary education, primary school enrolments increased
  Structural adjustment in the 1980s resulted in drastic cuts made in social spending
   resulting in a lack of textbooks, desks and teachers.
  Nyerere (Tanzania) wrote a pamphlet, ‘Education for self-reliance’ (1967). He
   expanded primary education in rural areas and focused on basic literacy

 Education in the Congo
  At independence in the Congo there were 14 university graduates and therefore after
   independence, the higher education system was expanded
  From 1960–1974 primary education in the Congo rose from 1,6 million to 4,6 million
  French remained the language of instruction in the Congo

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 21

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
     (EC/JUNE 2019)                    HISTORY P1                                      21

 Africanisation
   In Tanzania: ‘Villagisation’ – Nyerere, promoted ‘traditional’ community values
    through Ujamaa (‘familyhood’) villages
  Tanzanians were encouraged to focus on agriculture, traditional values and
    becoming self-reliant
  Tanzanians worked the land communally rather than producing cash crops for
    export
  In the Congo: Zairianisation: Mobuto promoted African beliefs and culture through
    his policy of authenticité
  Mobuto encouraged people to wear African clothing, play and listen to African
    music and eat African food
  Mobuto renamed many towns and cities in the Congo with African names (e.g.
    Leopoldville became Kinshasa

 CLOTHING
  Mobutu and Nyerere adopted Kwame Nkrumah and Maoist style of dressing.

 ART
  Promotion of African art in literature as well as in handcraft
  Any other relevant response

 Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.        [50]

Copyright reserved                                                        Please turn over

Text truncated here. Open the document page to read the rest.

## Related documents

- [History P1 Addendum June 2019 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-addendum-june-2019-english/7fe1b20a-ba5e-490b-9abf-be5d980cecd7) — History · Addendum · 2019 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR12 QP SEPT 2019 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr12-qp-sept-2019-english/f1c8a44b-2e00-4fd5-9561-e7cf83b1389c) — History · QP · 2019 · Eng
- [Grade 12 NSC History P1 (Afrikaans) X10 2019 Preparatory Examination Addendum](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-nsc-history-p1-afrikaans-x10-2019-preparatory-examination-addendum/4f3ebe5f-1e25-4b5d-9926-1cdd895d3995) — History · Addendum · 2019 · Afr
- [History P1 Nov 2019 Addendum Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-nov-2019-addendum-afr/391dd3f5-321e-4706-b9f0-e56fd90242a9) — History · Addendum · 2019 · Afr
- [History P1 QP June 2020 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-qp-june-2020-english/129f645d-3d44-4eee-9e79-4cf08acc19dc) — History · QP · 2021 · Eng
- [History P1 Gr12 Addendum June 2018 English Flat](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr12-addendum-june-2018-english-flat/4c5dfc40-194e-46ad-8243-339e8e3277ff) — History · Addendum · 2018 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [HISTORY P1 ADDEN GR12 SEP 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-adden-gr12-sep-2024-afrikaans/4faf89db-d19f-40cf-891f-e87e004b0bc5) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2024-afrikaans/b61f3bc2-3524-48c9-af60-f3348133d582) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-sept-2024-afrikaans/8367f672-7028-4e67-a52a-705b946b5122) — QP · 2024 · Afr
- [Gr 12 History P1 (English) 2024 Question Paper X05](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-12-history-p1-english-2024-question-paper-x05/7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5) — QP · 2024 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM JUNE 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-june-2024-afrikaans/e7a9d6cf-de1b-4007-b7b2-b4d762b2fa10) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
