# History Grade 10 P2 Eastern Cape November 2020 Memo (Eng)

> Grade 10 History Paper 2 memorandum from the Eastern Cape November 2020 (English), 19 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr-10-nov2020-memo-english/113b3cf5-21b9-449f-8097-c7fcd0954af9
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 10
- Language: English
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2020
- Exam period: Eastern Cape November
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 19

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 10](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10/history) › [History Grade 10 P2 Eastern Cape November 2020 Memo (Eng)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr-10-nov2020-memo-english/113b3cf5-21b9-449f-8097-c7fcd0954af9)

## About this document

History · Grade 10 · Eastern Cape November · 2020 · English. Memorandum, 19 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

NATIONAL
                SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                         GRADE 10

                   NOVEMBER 2020

                HISTORY (VERSION 2)
                 MARKING GUIDELINE
                    (EXEMPLAR)

MARKS:   150

               This marking guideline consists of 19 pages.

### Page 2

2                                    HISTORY P2                               (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)
 1. SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

     1.1 The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based
         questions:

     COGNITIVE                                                        WEIGHTING OF
                                HISTORICAL SKILLS
      LEVELS                                                           QUESTIONS
                     • Extract evidence from sources.
                     • Selection and organisation of relevant               30%
     LEVEL 1
                       information from sources.                            (15)
                     • Define historical concepts/terms.
                     • Interpretation of evidence from the
                       sources.
                                                                            40%
     LEVEL 2         • Explain information gathered from the
                                                                            (20)
                       sources.
                     • Analyse evidence from the sources.
                     • Interpret and evaluate evidence from
                       sources.
                     • Engage with sources to determine its
                       usefulness, reliability, bias and                    30%
     LEVEL 3
                       limitations.                                         (15)
                     • Compare and contrast interpretations
                       and perspectives presented in sources
                       and draw independent conclusions.

     1.2 The information below indicates how source-based questions are
         assessed:

                      •   In the marking of source-based questions credit needs to be
                          given to any other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments,
                          evidence or examples.
                      •   In the allocation of marks emphasis should be placed on
                          how the requirements of the question have been
                          addressed.
                      •   In the marking guideline the requirements of the question
                          (skills that need to be addressed) as well as the level of the
                          question are indicated in italics.
                      •   When assessing open-ended source-based questions,
                          learners should be credited for any other relevant answers.
                      •   Learners are expected to take a stance when answering ‘to
                          what extent’ questions in order for any marks to be awarded.

     1.3 Assessment procedures for source-based questions

           • Use a tick (✓) for each correct answer
           • Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2 x 2) which translates to two
             reasons and is given two marks each (✓✓✓✓); (1 x 2) which translates
             to one reason and is given two marks (✓✓)
           • If a question carries 4 marks then indicate by placing 4 ticks (✓✓✓✓)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 3

(EC/NOVEMBER 2020)                       HISTORY P2                                         3

           Paragraph question
           Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the content
           and structure of the paragraph must be taken into account when awarding
           a mark. The following steps must be used when assessing a response to
           a paragraph question:
           • Read the paragraph and place a bullet ( • ) at each point within the text
              where the candidate has used relevant evidence to address the
              question.
           • Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate
              has been able to use relevant evidence to write a paragraph.
           • At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (√) that the candidate
              has been awarded for the paragraph; as well as the level (1, 2 or 3) as
              indicated in the holistic rubric and a brief comment e.g.

           ___________ ˖ __________________________ ˖ _________________
           _________________ ˖ __________________________ ˖ ___________
           √√√√
           Level 2

           Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph
           • Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the
             mark on the right-hand bottom margin e.g.          32
                                                                 50

           • Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back
             cover of the answer script.

 2. ESSAY QUESTIONS

     2.1 The essay questions require candidates to:
         • Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner.
           They need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so
           that they are able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an
           effective argument to answer the question posed. It is essential that an
           essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of evidence
           and a conclusion.

     2.2 Marking of essay questions

           • Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided
             by the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
           • Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or
             conclusion than those included in a specific essay marking guideline
             for a specific essay.

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 4

4                                       HISTORY P2                               (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

    2.3 Global assessment of the essay
        The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the
        teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the component
        parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer an individual
        opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an argument. The
        learner will not be required to simply regurgitate ‘facts’ in order to achieve a
        high mark. This approach discourages learners from preparing ‘model’
        answers and reproducing them without taking into account the specific
        requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the essay credits learners’
        opinions supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike content-based
        marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the emphasis is on the
        following:

        •    The learner's interpretation of the question
        •    The appropriate selection of factual evidence (relevant content selection)
        •    The construction of argument (planned, structured and has independent line
             of argument)

    2.4 Assessment procedures of the essay

         2.4.1       Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing the essay.

         2.4.2       During the reading of the essay ticks need to be awarded for a relevant
                     introduction (indicated by a bullet in the marking guideline), each of the
                     main points/aspects that is properly contextualised (also indicated by
                     bullets in the marking guideline) and a relevant conclusion (indicated by
                     a bullet in the marking guideline) e.g. in an answer where there are 5
                     main points there will be 7 ticks.

         2.4.3       Keep the PEEL structure in mind when assessing an essay.

     P Point:       The candidate introduces the essay by taking a line
                    of argument/making a major point. Each paragraph
                    should include a point that sustains the major point
                     (line of argument) that was made in the introduction.
     E Explanation: The candidate should explain in more detail what the
                    main point is all about and how it relates to the
                    question posed (line of argument)
     E Example:     The candidates should answer the question by
                    selecting
                    content that is relevant to the line of argument.
                    Relevant examples should be given to sustain the
                    line of argument.
     L Link:        Candidates should ensure that the line of argument
                    is sustained throughout the essay and is written
                    coherently.

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 5

(EC/NOVEMBER 2020)                            HISTORY P2                                        5

         2.4.4       The following additional symbols can also be used:

                     • Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly
                           contextualised

                     • Wrong statement                             ____________

                     • Irrelevant statement

                     • Repetition                                    R
                     • Analysis                                      A√
                     • Interpretation                                I√
                     • Line of argument                            LOA

 2.   The matrix

      2.5.1 Use of the matrix in the marking of essays.

              In the marking of essays, the criteria as provided in the matrix should
              be used. When assessing the essay note both the content and
              presentation. At the point of intersection of the content and
              presentation based on the seven competency levels, a mark should be
              awarded.

              (a)       The first reading of essays will be to determine to what extent the
                        main aspects have been covered and to allocate the content
                        level (on the matrix).

                                                           C       LEVEL 4

              (b)       The second reading of essays will relate to the level (on the
                        matrix) of presentation.
                                                           C       LEVEL 4
                                                           P       LEVEL 5

              (c)       Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.

                                                           C       LEVEL 4
                                                           P       LEVEL 5      }30 – 33

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 6

6                                                         HISTORY P2                                            (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

    MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY ‒ TOTAL: 50
                             LEVEL 7            LEVEL 6         LEVEL 5        LEVEL 4       LEVEL 3        LEVEL 2        LEVEL 1
                             Very well          Very well       Well           Planned and   Shows some     Attempts to    Little or no
                             planned and        planned and     planned and    constructed   evidence of    structure an   attempt to
                             structured         structured      structured     an            a planned      answer.        structure the
                             essay. Good
                                                essay.          essay.         argument.     and            Largely        essay.
                             synthesis of
    PRESENTATION             information.       Developed a     Attempts to    Evidence      constructed    descriptive
                             Developed an       relevant line   develop a      used to       argument.      or some
                             original, well     of argument.    clear          some extent   Attempts to    attempt at
                             balanced and       Evidence        argument.      to support    sustain a      developing
                             independent        used to         Conclusion     the line of   line of        a line of
                             line of argument   defend the      drawn from     argument.     argument.      argument.
    CONTENT                  with the use of
                             evidence and
                                                argument.       the evidence   Conclusions   Conclusions    No attempt
                             sustained and      Attempts to     to support     reached       not clearly    to draw a
                             defended the       draw an         the line of    based on      supported      conclusion.
                             argument           independent     argument.      evidence..    by evidence.
                             throughout.        conclusion
                             Independent        from the
                             conclusion is      evidence to
                             drawn from
                             evidence to
                                                support the
                             support the line   line of
                             of argument.       argument.

    LEVEL 7
    Question has been
    fully answered.
    Content selection
                                47–50             43–46
    fully relevant to line
    of argument.

    LEVEL 6
    Question has been
    answered.
    Content selection
                                43–46             40–42          38–39
    relevant to a line of
    argument.
    LEVEL 5
    Question answered
    to a great extent.
    Content adequately
                                38–39             36–37          34–35          30–33         28–29
    covered and
    relevant.
    LEVEL 4
    Question
    recognisable in
    answer.                                                      30–33          28–29         26–27
    Some
    omissions/irrelevan
    t content selection.

    LEVEL 3
    Content selection
    does not always
    relate.
                                                                                26–27         24–25          20–23
    Omissions in
    coverage.
    LEVEL 2
    Sparse content.
    Question                                                                                  20–23          18–19          14–17
    inadequately
    addressed
    LEVEL 1
    Question not
    answered.
    Inadequate
                                                                                                             14–17           0–13
    content. Significant
    irrelevance

*Guidelines for allocating a mark for Level 1:
      Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content; no attempt to structure the essay        = 0
•     Content selection includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt to structure the
      essay                                                                                          = 1–6
•     Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay             = 7 – 13

Copyright reserved                                                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 7

(EC/NOVEMBER 2020)                        HISTORY P2                                         7
•
 SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

 QUESTION 1:         HOW DID SHAKA BECOME A POWERFUL ZULU LEADER?

 1.1    1.1.1        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                     • 1816                                                        (1 x 1)       (1)

        1.1.2        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                     • ‘It was easy to wield and deadly …’                        (1 x 2)         (2)

        1.1.3        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
                     • He formed well commanded regiments
                     • He armed his warriors with short asseggais/spears
                     • Any other relevant answer                                   (1 x 2)        (2)

        1.1.4        [Explanation of a historical concept Source 1A – L2]
                     Mfecane/Difaqane                                              (1 x 2)        (2)

        1.1.5        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A –L2]
                      • The Zulus were quick to attack neighbouring tribes
                      • They would incorporate the remaining members of the tribe into
                         the Zulu tribe
                      • Any other relevant answer                                (1 x 2)          (2)

 1.2    1.2.1        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                      • ‘He conquered other tribes’
                      • ‘He dispossessed other tribes of their wealth, young men and
                        young women’                                              (2 x 1)        (2)

        1.2.2        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                     • ‘long throwing spear’
                     • ‘full length body shield’                                   (2 x 1)       (2)

        1.2.3        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                     • Napoleon                                                    (1 x 1)       (1)

        1.2.4        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                     • ‘ivory’
                     • ‘exotic animal hides’                                       (2 x 1)       (2)

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 8

8                                   HISTORY P2                                (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

        1.2.5    [interpretation of historical concept from Source 1B – L2]
                 • They got along very well.
                 • They traded with each other
                 • Shaka gave them occupational rights in Durban
                 • Any other relevant explanation                                 (2 x 2)    (4)

        1.2.6    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                 • Britain                                                        (1 x 1)    (1)

        1.2.7    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
                 • He built enormous military barracks in strategic locations
                 • He populated the barracks with vast numbers of new recruits
                 • He created women’s auxiliary regiments
                 • He manipulated marriages within the corps
                 • Any other relevant response                              (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

 1.3    1.3.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
                 • 1878                                                           (1 x 1)    (1)

        1.3.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
                 • He had allowed a dog to kill a sheep in his care and when he
                   was admonished by his father, his mother took his side.     (1 x 2)       (2)

        1.3.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
                 • He killed a black mamba, one of the most dangerous African
                     snakes, after it had bitten and killed a bull in his care. (1 x 2) (2)

        1.3.4    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
                 Nandi and Senzangakhona                                          (2 x 1) (2)

 1.4    1.4.1    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                 • To show us how he thought a Zulu warrior should look like
                 • To show us the weapons that he thought were used by the Zulus
                 • He misrepresented the Zulu warrior by showing a long-handed
                    spear and big shield
                 • Any other relevant response                            (Any 2 x 2)        (4)

        1.4.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                 • He would never feel proud of being a Zulu
                 • He would never be proud of their culture and attire
                 • He would never be motivated to be a strong man and fight for the
                    Zulus
                 • Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)         (4)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 9

(EC/NOVEMBER 2020)                        HISTORY P2                                      9

 1.5    [Comparison of evidence from Sources 1B and 1C – L3]
        • Source 1C speaks about Shaka replacing the long spear with a short
           spear
        • In Source 1D Shaka is carrying a long spear
        • Source 1C Shaka replaced the full length body shield with a small shield,
           while in source 1D Shaka is carrying a full length body shield.
        • Any other relevant response                                       (2 x 2)       (4)

 1.6    [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of information from the
        sources – L3]

        Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:

        • Shaka was a brilliant military organiser (Source 1A)
        • He had well-commanded regiments using assegaais that were deadly (1A)
        • Shaka was a brave man who once killed a black mamba (Source 1B)
        • Shaka devised lethal new tactics and weaponry (Source 1C)
        • Shaka was regarded as the Black Napoleon (Source 1C)
        • He conquered and dispossessed in all directions (Source 1C)
        • The Zulu nation was the largest and most populous tribe ever seen in
          south-eastern Africa (Source 1C)
        • Any other relevant response

 Use the following rubric to allocate a mark:

                     • Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g.
                       shows little or no understanding of how
                                                                            MARKS
       LEVEL 1         Shaka rose to be a powerful Zulu leader.
                                                                             0–2
                     • Uses evidence partially or cannot write a
                       paragraph.
                     • Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                       extent to the topic e.g. shows some
                       understanding of how Shaka rose to be a              MARKS
       LEVEL 2
                       powerful Zulu leader.                                 3–4
                     • Uses evidence in a basic manner to write a
                       paragraph.
                     • Uses relevant sources e.g. demonstrates a
                       thorough understanding of how Shaka rose to
                       be a powerful Zulu leader.                           MARKS
       LEVEL 3
                     • Uses evidence very effectively in an organised        5–6
                       paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                       topic.                                                              (6)
                                                                                          [50]

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 10

10                                  HISTORY P2                            (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

 QUESTION 2:         WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF BRITISH COLONIALISM ON THE
                     POPULATION OF THE CAPE COLONY?

 2.1    2.1.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
                 • All living cattle would have to be slaughtered
                 • The dead will rise from their graves
                 • The sun will set at midday
                 • New grain pits would have to be dug as there was going to be a lot
                    of food
                 • The dead will bring joy and wealth                      (Any 2 x 1) (2)

        2.1.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
                 Nongqawuse was Mhlakaza’s niece                                (1 x 1)    (1)

        2.1.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                 • She came with a false prophecy
                 • Her prophecy never came true                                 (2 x 2)    (4)

        2.1.4    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A]
                 • on the banks of the river                                    (1 x 1)    (1)

        2.1.5    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
                 • The Xhosa                                                    (1 x 1)    (1)

        2.1.6    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A –L2]
                 • Nothing happened on that day
                 • No cattle came from the sea
                 • The sun never set at midday
                 • Any other relevant response                                  (1 x 2)    (2)

 2.2    2.2.1    Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
                 • The Hottentot Proclamation of 1809                           (1 x 1)    (1)

        2.2.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
                 • Passes for the Khoikhoi were abolished
                 • Right to land ownership was clarified at last
                 • Khoikhoi no longer subjected to compulsory labour
                 • Children could not be apprenticed without parental consent
                 • Contracts for more than a month were to be in writing
                                                                                (4 x 1)    (4)

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 11

(EC/NOVEMBER 2020)                        HISTORY P2                                           11

        2.2.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
                 • They hoped it would improve the colonies’ economy
                 • To strip the Boers the right to control the Hottentots
                 • To end slavery
                 • Any other relevant response                                       (2 x 2)        (4)

        2.2.4    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
                 • It applied to ‘Hottentot and other free persons of colour’, instead of
                    being colour blind.                                              (1 x 1)        (1)

 2.3    2.3.1    [Definition of historical concept from Source 2C – L2]
                 • It is the mass migration of the Afrikaners from the Cape to the interior
                 • Any other relevant response                                      (1 x 2)         (2)

        2.3.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
                 • There was constant conflict between the Boer farmers and the
                   Xhosa inhabitants on the frontier
                 • Growing resentment between the farmers and the British colonial
                   authorities
                 • The Colonial government limited the activities of the Boer
                   Commandos according to the Boers
                 • The colonial government refused to let them handle law and order
                 • They blamed the government for not giving them financial support
                   during the wars and other conflicts with the Xhosa
                 • Lack of labour
                 • They could not protect themselves from Xhosa attacks
                                                                              (Any 4 x 1)           (4)

        2.3.3    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
                 • The Magna Carta of the Khoikhoi                                   (1 x 1)        (1)

        2.3.4    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
                 1820s and 1830s                                                    (1 x 2)         (2)

        2.3.5    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
                  • The government passed Ordinance 50 which gave too much
                     freedom to the Khoikhoi
                  • The Khoikhoi were no longer forced to carry passes
                  • Slavery was abolished
                  • Any other relevant response                            (2 x 2)                  (4)

        2.3.6    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C-L1]
                 • Gert Maritz                                                      (1 x 1)         (1)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 12

12                                  HISTORY P2                             (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

 2.4    2.4.1    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D –L1]
                  • It was exactly hundred years after the Great Trek            (1 x 1)     (1)

        2.4.2    [Interpretation of relevant information from Source 1D – L2]
                  • It shows the Voortrekkers commemorating the Great Trek
                  • It shows the support they received from Afrikaners
                  • It shows the unity among the Afrikaners
                  • Children were watching them as they travelled in the streets
                  • Any other relevant response                                  (2 x 2)     (4)

 2.5    [Comparison of evidence from Sources 2B and 2C – L3]
         • In Source 2B the Khoikhoi received freedom with the arrival of the British
           colonists. In Source 2C the Boers’ freedom of controlling the Khoikhoi was
           taken away
         • In Source 2B the Khoikhoi were free from slavery and were happy with the
           British arrival
         • In Source 2C the abolition of slavery hit the Afrikaners badly
         • Any other relevant response                                          (2 x 2)      (4)

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 13

(EC/NOVEMBER 2020)                       HISTORY P2                                       13

 2.6    [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of information from the sources – L3]

        Candidates could include the following aspects in their responses:

        • The innocent nation of Phalo was killed by Nongqawuse’s false prophecy
          (Source 2A)
        • The Xhosa ended up working for the British
        • Ordinance 50 gave the Khoikhoi freedom (Source 2B)
        • Khoikhoi were no longer carrying passes (Source 2B)
        • Slavery was abolished (Own knowledge)
        • Led to the Great Trek (Source 2C)
        • Boers unhappy with British colonisation (Source 2C)
        • Boers wanted to be independent (Source 2C)
        • Boers blamed the British for the conditions they found themselves in
          (Source 2C)
        • Any other relevant response

        Use the following rubric to allocate a mark:

                     •   Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g.
                         shows no or little understanding of the
                         impact that British colonialism had on the          MARKS
         LEVEL 1
                         population at the Cape Colony.                       0–2
                     •   Uses evidence partially or cannot write a
                         paragraph.
                     •   Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a
                         great extent to the topic e.g. shows some
                         understanding of the impact that British
                                                                             MARKS
         LEVEL 2         colonialism had on the population at the
                                                                              3–4
                         Cape Colony.
                     •   Uses evidence in a basic manner to write a
                         paragraph.
                     •   Uses relevant sources e.g. demonstrates a
                         thorough understanding of the impact that
                         British colonialism had on the population at
                                                                             MARKS
         LEVEL 3         the Cape Colony.
                                                                              5–6
                     •   Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                         paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                         topic.                                                             (6)
                                                                                           [50]

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 14

14                                   HISTORY P2                             (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

 QUESTION 3:         WHAT WERE THE EFFECTS OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN WAR
                     (1899–1902) TO BOTH BLACK AND AFRIKANER SOUTH
                     AFRICANS?

 3.1    3.1.1        Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
                     • Scorched Earth Policy                                    (1 x 1)    (1)

        3.1.2        Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1
                     • 13 000 men                                               (1 x 1)    (1)

        3.1.3        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
                     • Labour tenants
                     • Cash tenants
                     • Share croppers                                           (3 x 1)    (3)

        3.1.4        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
                     • Camps were filled with women, children, the elderly and the
                        infirm                                                  (1 x 2)    (2)

        3.1.5        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3A – L2]
                     • They were getting a wage
                     • Rations were now given to them
                     • They would be free from the Afrikaner rule which was bad
                     • Any other relevant response
                                                                          (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

        3.1.6        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A-L1]
                     • In 1901                                                  (1 x 1)    (1)

 3.2    3.21         [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
                     • Men
                     • Children
                     • Women                                                    (3 x 1)      (3)

        3.2.2        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
                     • Spain                                                    (1 x 1)      (1)

        3.2.3        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3B – L2]
                     • To prevent Boers from resupplying from a home base
                     • To make it impossible for the Boers to get any assistance from
                         their families
                     • Any other relevant explanation                           (1 x 2)      (2)

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 15

(EC/NOVEMBER 2020)                           HISTORY P2                                          15

        3.2.4        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
                     • They were overcrowded
                     • Poor hygiene
                     • Bad sanitation
                     • Food rations were meagre
                     • Malnutrition and endemic contagious diseases
                     • Shortage of modern medical facilities                      (Any 4 x1)          (4)

 3.3    3.3.1        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
                     • It shows the pain the women were experiencing due to the
                          Scorched Earth Policy
                     • It shows us that women were strong
                     • It implies that women were sent to concentration camps during
                          the South African war
                     • Any other relevant response
                                                                            (Any 2 x 2)               (4)

        3.3.2        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
                     • She did not want to show the others that she was scared
                     • She did not want to demoralise the other women
                     • Any other relevant response                           (Any 1 x 2)              (2)

        3.3.3        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3 C-L2
                     • She knew that many hardships were awaiting her
                     • She knew that life was going to be very tough for all of the prisoners
                     • Any other relevant response                                     (1 x 2)        (2)

 3.4    3.4.1        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3D – L1]
                      • Lord Roberts                                                   (1 x 1)        (1)

        3.4.2        [Explanation of historical concept from Source 3D – L1]
                     • The use of hit and run tactics
                     • A form of warfare in which small groups use military
                        tactics like ambushes, sabotage.
                     • Raid to fight a larger traditional military
                     • Any other relevant response                                     (1 x 2)        (2)

        3.4.3        [Extraction of evidence from Source 3D – L1]
                     • Protection
                     • Safety
                     • Food                                                           (3 x 1)         (3)

        3.4.4        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3D – L2]
                     • The British government improved the conditions in the camps
                     • Lord Milner took over the administration of the camps
                     • Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)              (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                   Please turn over

### Page 16

16                                  HISTORY P2                              (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

 3.5    [Comparison of evidence from Sources 3B and 3D – L3]
        • Both sources show that Boer women were sent to concentration camps
           during the war
        • Source 3 C states that women were deposited in the camps. Source 3 D
           families were taken against their will
        • Any other relevant response                                  (Any 2 x 2)           (4)

 3.6    [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of information from the sources – L3]

        Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:

        •   The war had terrible results for Blacks (Source 3A)
        •   Blacks were enlisted in the British army (Source 3A)
        •   The majority of the Boers were sent to the concentration camps (Source 3B)
        •   The camps were poorly administered (Source 3B)
        •   The conditions in the camp led to diseases and malnutrition (Source 3B)
        •   Women were not happy with being in the camps (Source 3C)
        •   Emily Hobhouse exposed the deplorable conditions in the camps
            (Source 3D)
        •   Sent to concentration camps (Own knowledge)
        •   Many people died in concentration camps (Own knowledge)
        •   Any other relevant response

        Use the following rubric to allocate a mark:

                     • Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g. shows
                       no or little understanding of the impact of the
                       South African war to both Black and Afrikaner           MARKS
         LEVEL 1
                       communities.                                             0–2
                     • Uses evidence partially to report on the topic or
                       cannot write a paragraph.
                     • Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                       extent to the topic e.g. shows some
                       understanding of the impact of the South African        MARKS
         LEVEL 2
                       war to both Black and Afrikaner communities.             3–4
                     • Uses evidence in a very basic manner to write a
                       paragraph.
                     • Uses relevant sources e.g. demonstrates a
                       thorough understanding of the impact of the
                       South African war to both Black and Afrikaner           MARKS
         LEVEL 3
                       communities.                                             5–6
                     • Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                       paragraph that shows an understanding of the topic.                    (6)
                                                                                             [50]

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 17

(EC/NOVEMBER 2020)                       HISTORY P2                                       17

 SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS
 Answer at least ONE question, but not more than TWO questions from this section.

 QUESTION 4:         THE EMERGENCE OF THE SOTHO KINGDOM UNDER KING
                     MOSHOESHOE
 [Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
 and interpretative skills]

 SYNOPSIS
 Candidates should critically discuss how Moshoeshoe strategised, showed
 diplomacy, reconciliation, negotiation skillls and built his nation. Candidates must
 support their given line of argument with relevant historical evidence.
 MAIN ASPECTS
 Candidates should include the following aspects:
 Introduction: Candidates must show Moshoeshoe’s skills in ensuring that his nation
              emerged as a strong nation.
 ELABORATION
 •  Moshoehoe strenghtened his nation by modernising and compromising
 •  He educated his people
 •  He promoted Christianity to modernise his people.
 •  The missionaries had a great influence on shaping the Basotho nation
 •  He acquired knowledge and technology to protect his nation from Boer and
    British attacks
 •  Thaba Bosiu was the centre of his kingdom where his people felt safe
 •  Thaba Bosiu was not easily accessible
 •  Moshoeshoe also modernised his military
 •  He bought horses and illegal firearms
 •  He had a powerful and formidable army of mounted riflemen
 •  He allowed the Boers to stop at Caledon valley as guests
 •  He protected weak people and gave them land
 •  Moshoeshoe supported people who were impoverished
 •  He used the Mafisa system which loaned to people with cattle.
 •  He realised the value of Europeans
 •  He recognised powerful leaders and did not try to fight them or compete for land
    with them
 •  He lived peacefully with both his neighbours and trekboers
 •  When Trekboers asked for assistance on attacking the Ndebele, he refused
 •  Moshoeshoe traded with the Boers
 •  He received guns from the Boers in exchange for grain and cattle
 •  When the Boers were not happy with the Napier Treaty, Moshoeshoe loaned an
    area of Land to the Voortrekkers
 •  Moshoeshoe negotiated with Sir George Grey as he avoided another battle with
    the British after defeating them, fearing his downfall
 •  Any other relevant response.
 Conclusion: Candidates need to tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.            [50]

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 18

18                                 HISTORY P2                            (EC/NOVEMBER 2020)

 QUESTION 5:         COLONIAL EXPANSION AFTER 1750 – CO-OPERATION AND
                     CONFLICT ON THE HIGHVELD
 SYNOPSIS
 Candidates need to ascertain to what extent did Colonial Expansion after 1750 lead to
 cooperation and conflict between the Boers, British and the Basotho. Candidates must
 support their given line of argument with relevant historical evidence.

 MAIN ASPECTS
 Candidates should include the following aspect:s

 Introduction: Candidates can focus on the rise of Moshoeshoe to power and his
 relationship with both the Boers and the British in the Highveld.
 ELABORATION
 •   Moshoeshoe occupied the Highveld and the arrival of Boers and British
     changed the Basotho fortunes
 •   The reason for the conflict among the three nations was land
 •   When the Boers arrived on the Highveld, Moshoeshoe let them use the land in
     the Caledon Valley
 •   The trekkers later claimed the land as theirs
 •   The Griquas, the Tlokwa and the Barolong also wanted part of the land
 •   The Boers increased in numbers and needed more land
 •   Moshoeshoe realised that he was not a match for the Boers and sought
     protection from the British
 •   He made a treaty with the British and agreed on a border for the Sotho
     kingdom, which included the Caledon River valley
 •   Moshoeshoe gave up a piece of triangular land between the Caledon and the
     Orange rivers for White settlement
 •   Henry Warden, British agent, granted four of Moshoeshoe’s subordinate chiefs
     independence from his authority
 •   This led to a war between Moshoeshoe and the British
 •   The British were defeated twice by the Basotho
 •   The British decided to give Boers a right to settle in the Caledon Valley.
 •   Basotho raided the cattle from Boer farmers and this led to a series of wars
     between the Boers and the Sotho
 •   The British supplied the Boers with arms and banned arm sales to the Basotho
 •   A second Sotho Boer war from 1865–1869 had disastrous results for
     Moshoeshoe
 •   He lost support and loyalty from his subordinate chiefs
 •   Moshoeshoe asked the British for protection so as to keep the Basotho land
 •   In 1868 the Sotho kingdom was declared a British colony called Basutoland
 •   Moshoeshoe managed to save his kingdom from being taken over by the
     trekkers
 Any other relevant response

 Conclusion:
 Candidates need to tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.                     [50]

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 19

(EC/NOVEMBER 2020)                     HISTORY P2                                        19

 QUESTION 6:          SOUTH AFRICAN WAR AND THE UNION –THE NATIVE LAND
                      ACT OF 1913
 [Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
 and interpretative skills]

 SYNOPSIS
 Candidates need to take a stance whether they agree or disagree that the Land Act
 impacted negatively on Black South Africans.
 MAIN ASPECTS
 Candidates should include the following aspects:

 Introduction: Candidates need to take a line of argument which shows whether they
 agree or not.
ELABORATION
•    The government passed the Native Land Act of 1913 as pressure was put on
     them by politically powerful white farmers
•    Before the Land Act was passed, many black farmers had become successful
     sharecroppers
•    They farmed the land and sold the crops they produced
•    The introduction of the Land Act had detrimental effects on the sharecroppers
•    The Land Act stopped sharecropping
•    Sharecroppers were forced to work for the white farmers or had to go to the
     mines
•    Some farmers at first refused to work for the whites and took their livestock and
     went to the reserves
•    They were forced to sell the stock to survive as there was not enough land for
     the livestock
•    The Land Act ended the chances of Africans ever becoming successful
     commercial farmers in competition with whites
•    Socially, the Land Act affected the blacks badly
•    The land allocated to Africans was not enough
•    The reserves were overcrowded
•    The land in the reserves was not suitable for agriculture due to soil erosion
•    The reserves were far away from medical care centres which led to a high rate
     of infant mortality
•    The conditions in the reserves were bad which led to malnutrition and diseases
•    A landless black person was not allowed to get a place to live
•    They were penalised 100 pounds or six months imprisonment
•    The SANNC was the first organisation to fight the Act
•    The members of SANNC called several times for the repealing of the Act but
     to no avail
•    They even sent a delegation to Britain about the Act but that was also
     unsuccessful
•    Any other relevant response.                                                         [50]
Conclusion: Candidates need to tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.
                                                                              TOTAL: 150

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

## Related documents

- [HISTORY P1 GR10 ADDENDUM NOV2020 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr10-addendum-nov2020-english/49e0b913-f071-4054-940f-b9b7eb7f0ad5) — History · Addendum · 2020 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR10 QP NOV2020 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr10-qp-nov2020-english/28c7e812-f34a-4b3a-88de-86f1b3a6a700) — History · QP · 2020 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR 10 NOV2020 QP English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr-10-nov2020-qp-english/e6c624bb-837a-49a1-aee7-21aa2e84e156) — History · QP · 2020 · Eng
- [HISTORY GR10 MEMO NOV2018 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-gr10-memo-nov2018-english/368f705a-8a7a-43ae-803d-44f05c14e845) — History · Memo · 2018 · Eng
- [HISTORY GR10 MEMO NOV2017 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-gr10-memo-nov2017-english/1a8cbb07-9472-4ad7-8081-02bec0abfd4e) — History · Memo · 2017 · Eng
- [HISTORY ADDENDUM GR10 NOV English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-addendum-gr10-nov-english/3d29306d-62b6-462d-bcd7-55a0e8b8ed9e) — History · Addendum · 2017 · Eng

## More from Grade 10 History

- [Grade 10 History November 2026 Mock Addendum](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2026-november-mock-exam-addendum/d566e6d9-8258-4765-b80b-6c83e66b06d6) — Addendum · 2026 · Eng
- [Grade 10 History November 2026 Mock](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2026-november-mock-exam-question-paper/6d783e5b-2a47-447a-9161-e3748f3e10a8) — QP · 2026 · Eng
- [Grade 10 History November 2026 Mock 2 Addendum](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2026-november-mock-exam-2-addendum/69ecae02-9d7e-459d-92de-178ab11c8a56) — Addendum · 2026 · Eng
- [Grade 10 History November 2026 Mock 2](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-10-history-2026-november-mock-exam-2-question-paper/bed9a11e-6193-4fe9-851b-93c16def76a6) — QP · 2026 · Eng
- [Gr 10 His ATP 2023-24](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-10-his-atp-2023-24/77b69460-c4e9-4807-8d15-fdb95c83ebd3) — ATP
- [EC History Grade 10 March 2025 QP and Memo](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/ec-history-grade-10-march-2025-qp-and-memo/e50c532b-d70e-4ae5-b45d-e752d9219b14) — QP + Memo · 2025

## Collection

- [Grade 10 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-10/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
