# History Grade 12 Paper 2 EC June 2018 Memo (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 memorandum from the EC June 2018 (English), 18 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download, question paper linked when available.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-memo-june-2018-english/88d88b3f-90df-4cdf-9ae5-ffffe7dc4a82
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Language: English
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2018
- Exam period: EC June
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 18

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 Paper 2 EC June 2018 Memo (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-memo-june-2018-english/88d88b3f-90df-4cdf-9ae5-ffffe7dc4a82)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · EC June · 2018 · English. Memorandum, 18 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

                           NATIONAL
                      SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                           GRADE 12

                              JUNE 2018

                       HISTORY P2
                    MARKING GUIDELINE

MARKS:   100

                  This marking guideline consists of 18 pages.

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
2                                          HISTORY P2                             (EC/JUNE 2018)

    1. SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

      1.1    The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-
             based questions:

             LEVELS OF SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS.
                                                                        WEIGHTING
             COGNITVE
                                   HISTORICAL SKILLS                       OF
              LEVELS
                                                                        QUESTIONS
             LEVEL 1        •   Extract evidence from sources.
             (L1)           •   Selection and organisation of              30%
                                relevant information from sources.         (15)
                            •   Define historical concepts/terms.
             LEVEL 2        •   Interpretation of evidence from
             (L2)               sources.
                                                                           40%
                            •   Explain information gathered from          (20)
                                sources.
                            •   Analyse evidence from sources.
             LEVEL 3        •   Interpret and evaluate evidence
             (L3)               from the sources.
                            •   Engage with sources to determine
                                its usefulness, reliability, bias and       30%
                                limitations.                               (15)
                            •   Compare and contrast
                                interpretations and perspectives
                                presented in sources and draw
                                independent conclusions.

      1.2    The following information below indicates how source-based
             questions are assessed:

                In the marking of source-based questions, credit needs to be
                 given to any other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments,
                 evidence or examples.
                In the allocation of marks, emphasis should be placed on how
                 the requirements of the question have been addressed.
                In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills
                 that need to be addressed) as well as the level of the question
                 are indicated in italics.

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2018)                                 HISTORY P2                                       3

       1.3       Assessment procedures for source-based questions

                  Use a tick () for each correct answer
                  Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2 × 2) which translates to
                   two reasons and is given two marks each ( ); (1 x 2) which
                   translates to one reason and is given two marks ()
                  If a question carries 4 marks then indicate by placing
                   4 ticks ()

                 Paragraph question
                 Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the
                 content and structure of the paragraph must be taken into account
                 when awarding a mark. The following steps must be used when
                 assessing a response to a paragraph question:
                  Read the paragraph and place a bullet (•) at each point within the
                    text where the candidate has used relevant evidence to address
                    the question.
                  Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the
                    candidate has been able to use relevant evidence to write a
                    paragraph.
                  At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (√) that the candidate
                    has been awarded for the paragraph; as well as the level (1,2 or 3)
                    as indicated in the holistic rubric and a brief comment e.g.

                 ___________ ˖ _______________________˖ _________________
                 _________________ ˖ ______________________ ˖ ___________
                 √√√√
                 Level 2

                 Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph
                  Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the
                   mark on the right-hand bottom margin e.g.

                                                     32
                                                     50

                    Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the
                     front/back cover of the answer script.

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4                                             HISTORY P2                                 (EC/JUNE 2018)

 2.    ESSAY QUESTIONS

       2.1   The essay questions require candidates to:
              Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner. They need
                to select, organise and connect the relevant information so that they are able to
                present a reasonable sequence of facts or an effective argument to answer the
                question posed. It is essential that an essay has an introduction, a coherent and
                balanced body of evidence and a conclusion.

       2.2   Marking of essay questions
              Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by the
                textbooks in use at the particular centre.
              Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion than
                those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific essay.
              When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should be
                credited for any other relevant answer.

       2.3   Global assessment of the essay
             The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the
             teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the component
             parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer an individual
             opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an argument. The learners
             will not be required to simply regurgitate ‘facts’ in order to achieve a high mark. This
             approach discourages learners from preparing ‘model’ answers and reproducing
             them without taking into account the specific requirements of the question. Holistic
             marking of the essay credits learners’ opinion supported by evidence. Holistic
             assessment, unlike content-based marking, does not penalise language
             inadequacies as the emphasis is on the following:
                   The construction of argument
                   The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such argument
                   The learner’s interpretation of the question

       2.4   Assessment procedures of the essay

             2.4.1    Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing essays.

             2.4.2    During the first reading of the extended writing, ticks need to be awarded
                      for a relevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in memorandum) each of
                      the main points/aspects that is properly contextualised (also indicated by
                      bullets in the memorandum) and a relevant conclusion (indicated by a
                      bullet in the memorandum) e.g. in an answer where there are 5 main points
                      there will be 7 ticks.

Copyright reserved                                                                       Please turn over

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2018)                                 HISTORY P2                                            5

                 2.4.3   The following additional symbols can also be used:

                           Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not
                            contextualised
                          Wrong statement
                          Irrelevant statement                                     |
                                                                                    |
                                                                                    |

                              Repetition                                           R
                             Analysis                                              A√
                             Interpretation                                        I√

        2.5      The Matrix

                 2.5.1   Use of analytical matrix in the marking of essay
                         In the marking of essays, with reference to page 5, the given
                         criteria shown in the matrix should be used. In assessing
                         the extended writing note should be taken of both the
                         content and presentation. At the point of intersection of the
                         content and presentation based on the seven competency
                         levels, a mark should be awarded.

                 (a)     The first reading of essay will be to determine to what extent
                         the main aspects have been covered and to allocate the
                         content level (on the matrix).
                                                             C      LEVEL 4

                 (b)     The second reading of essay will relate to the level (on the
                         matrix) of presentation.
                                                          C        LEVEL 4
                                                          P        LEVEL 3

                 (c)     Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.
                                                     C      LEVEL 4
                                                                                26 – 27
                                                     P      LEVEL 3

Copyright reserved                                                                      Please turn over

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6                                                                     HISTORY P2                                                    (EC/JUNE 2018)

MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY:                                         TOTAL MARKS: 50
                            LEVEL 7            LEVEL 6               LEVEL 5              LEVEL 4             LEVEL 3              LEVEL 2              LEVEL 1
                           Very well        Very well planned     Well planned and      Planned and        Shows some          Attempts to structure   Little or no
PRESENTATION               planned and      and structured                                                                     an answer. Largely      attempt to
                                                                  structured essay.     constructed an     evidence of a
                           structured       essay.                Attempts to           argument.          planned and         descriptive or some     structure the
                           essay. Good      Developed a                                                    constructed         attempt at              essay.
                                                                  develop a clear       Evidence used to
                           synthesis of     relevant line of                                               argument.           developing a line of
                           information.     argument.             argument.             some extent to     Attempts to         argument. No
                           Developed an     Evidence used to      Conclusion drawn      support the line   sustain a line of   attempt to draw a
                           original, well   defend the            from the evidence     of argument.       argument.           conclusion.
                           balanced and     argument.             to support the line   Conclusions        Conclusions not
                           independent      Attempts to draw      of argument.          reached based      clearly supported
                           line of          an independent                                                 by evidence.
                           argument with    conclusion from                             on evidence.
                           the use of       the evidence to
                           evidence and     support the line of
CONTENT                    sustained and    argument.
                           defended the
                           argument
                           throughout.
                           Independent
                           conclusion is
                           drawn from
                           evidence to
                           support the
                           line of
                           argument.
LEVEL 7
Question has been
fully answered.
                               47–50              43–46
Content selection fully
relevant to line of
argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has been
answered. Content              43–46              40–42                 38–39
selection relevant to a
line of argument.
LEVEL 5
Question answered to
a great extent.                38–39              36–37                 34–35                30–33              28–29
Content adequately
covered and relevant.

LEVEL 4
Question recognisable
in answer. Some                                                         30–33                28–29              26–27
omissions or irrelevant
content selection.

LEVEL 3
Content selection does
not relate to the
question, but does not
answer it, or does not                                                                       26–27              24–25                 20–23
always relate to the
question. Omissions in
coverage.

LEVEL 2
Question inadequately
addressed. Sparse                                                                                               20–23                 18–19                14–17
content.

LEVEL 1
Question inadequately
addressed or not at all.                                                                                                              14–17                 0–13
Inadequate or
irrelevant content.

*Guidelines for allocating a mark for Level 1:
        Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content; no attempt to structure the essay = 0
        Question includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt to structure the essay = 1–6
        Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay = 7–13

Copyright reserved                                                                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2018)                               HISTORY P2                                          7

  SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

  QUESTION 1:          WHAT WAS THE ROLE OF THE SOWETO UPRISING IN
                       THE EVENTUAL DOWNFALL OF THE APARTHEID
                       GOVERNMENT?

  1.1     1.1.1      [Extraction of information from Source 1A – L1]
                      High school fees
                      Bursaries given to rich children rather than the poor
                      Class numbers are high
                      Few desks
                      No heaters
                      No resources                                      (Any 3 x 1)       (3)

          1.1.2      [Explanation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
                      Not all learners had a desk to sit
                      Learners did not receive quality education
                      No effective teaching and learning
                      Classroom very noisy
                      Difficult to maintain order/silence
                      Any other relevant response                         (Any 1 x 2)     (2)

          1.1.3      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
                          Teachers did not care about the well-being of their learners
                          Teachers did not exhibit professional conduct
                          Classroom environment not conducive for quality teaching
                           and learning
                          Any other relevant response                     (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

  1.2     1.2.1. [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                  Three                                                        (1 x 1)    (1)

          1.2.2      [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                      Physics
                      Biology
                      Geography                                                (3 x 1)    (3)

          1.2.3      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
                      They refused to be taught in Afrikaans
                      Any other relevant response                         (Any 1 x 2)     (2)

  1.3     1.3.1      [Definition of historical concepts Source 1B – L1]
                      Philosophy that argues that Black people must take pride in
                        being black and start doing things for themselves.
                      Any other relevant response                           (1 x 2)       (2)

          1.3.2      [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
                      SASO                                                     (1 x 1)    (1)

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8                                             HISTORY P2                             (EC/JUNE 2018)

          1.3.3      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                      It made them aware of the need to resist apartheid
                      It instilled self-reliance and pride in being black
                      It broke the mental slavery blacks suffered from
                      It made them aware of why they were oppressed
                      Any other relevant response                         (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

    1.4   1.4.1      [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
                      It provided the ANC with 14 000 eager new recruits.       (1 x 1)     (1)

          1.4.2      [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
                      Botswana
                      Mozambique
                      Swaziland
                      Lesotho                                              (Any 3 x 1)      (3)

          1.4.3      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                      They totally rejected the whole apartheid system
                      They were resilient in their efforts to end apartheid
                      They were prepared to die in order to see the end of
                         Apartheid.
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

          1.4.4      [Determining usefulness of Source 1D – L3]
                      The international community condemned SA
                      The international community called for economic boycotts
                        and sanctions
                      International companies disinvested
                      UN imposed an arms embargo on SA
                      Frontline states harboured ANC MK bases
                      Any other relevant response                      (Any 2 x 2)          (4)

          1.4.5      [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                      It forced the NP to reconsider the apartheid policy
                      It forced the NP to make minor changes to their apartheid
                         policy
                      It forced the NP to look at negotiations with the ANC
                      It would lead to the eventual demise of apartheid
                      Any other relevant response.                        (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                   Please turn over

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2018)                              HISTORY P2                                          9

  1.5     [Comparison of Sources 1D and 1E to determine similarities – L3]
           Source 1D states that ANC was boosted by 14 000 eager black
             recruits while Source 1E shows the recruits
           Source 1D states that frontline states became a key ANC operational
             centre for guerrilla warfare training while Source 1E shows the
             military training in action at one of the bases in Africa
           Any other relevant response                                      (2 x 2)      (4)

  1.6     [Interpretation, comprehension and synthesis of evidence from sources
          – L3]

                Poor condition of education in Black schools (Source 1A)
                Underlying problems like overcrowding, insufficient furniture
                 (Source 1A)
                The change of the medium of instruction to Afrikaans (Source 1B)
                Some subjects posed problems for black learners. (Source 1B)
                The influence of BC on learners (Source 1C)
                The influence of SASO taught black students to confront the
                 education and apartheid system (Source 1C)
                ANC took advantage by recruiting youth (Source 1D)
                ANC established bases in frontline states to continue the armed
                 struggle (Source 1D)
                International community condemned the violence and apartheid
                 system of NP (Source 1D)
                International community imposed sanctions, boycotts and
                 disinvestments on SA (Source 1D)
                Internal resistance continued in spite of state of emergency (Source
                 1D)
                Massive boost of ANC exiles joining MK in preparation for armed
                 struggle (Source 1E)
                Internal and external pressure forced NP to rethink the apartheid
                 policy
                Any other relevant response.

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10                                       HISTORY P2                         (EC/JUNE 2018)

  Use the following rubric to allocate a mark.

  LEVEL 1        Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g.
                   show little or no understanding of the role
                   of the Soweto Uprising in the eventual
                                                                    Marks: 0–2
                   downfall of the apartheid government.
                  Uses evidence partially to report on topic or
                   cannot report on topic.
  LEVEL 2        Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a
                   great extent to the topic, e.g. shows an
                   understanding of the role of the Soweto
                                                                    Marks: 3–5
                   Uprising in the eventual downfall of the
                   apartheid government.
                 Uses evidence in a very basic manner.
  LEVEL 3        Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a
                   thorough understanding of the role of the
                   Soweto Uprising in the eventual downfall of
                   the apartheid government.
                                                                    Marks: 6–8
                 Evidence relates well to the topic.
                  Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                   paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                   topic.                                                          (8)
                                                                                  [50]

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2018)                               HISTORY P2                                       11

  QUESTION 2:           WHAT HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES WERE EXPOSED BY THE
                        TRC?

  2.1    2.1.1   [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
                     To establish as much as possible the truth of what happened
                      in the past                                           (1 x 2)          (2)

         2.1.2       [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
                          Many did not testify
                          Some have failed to testify
                          Many of them lied                                 (Any 2 x 1)     (2)

         2.1.3       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                          To put on record, the human rights atrocities
                          To ensure that these atrocities do not happen again
                          To safeguard the newly found democracy
                          To eradicate the hatred between blacks and whites
                          To bring about reconciliation
                          Any other relevant response                           (2 x 2)     (4)

  2.2    2.2.1       [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
                         Abduction
                         Murder                                                 (2 x 1)     (2)

         2.2.2       [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
                      She was a woman
                      The remoteness of the terrain
                      The condition of her detention and death                   (3 x 1)    (3)

         2.2.3       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
                      She was MK commander for operations in KZN
                      She knew about the MK structures and plans
                      They wanted her to reveal the secret operations of MK
                      Any other relevant response                         (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

         2.2.4   [Interpretations of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
                  She was breastfeeding her baby
                  Any other relevant response                              (Any 1 x 2)      (2)

  2.3    [Comparison of Sources 2A and 2B to determine similarities – L3]
          Source 2A talks about the disappearance of friends and colleagues
            whilst Source 2B talks about the disappearance of Portia
          Source 2A talks about people who were killed mysteriously whilst
            Source 2B describes how Portia was killed
          Source 2A states the spot where people were buried was identified
            whilst Source 2B shows the spot where Portia’s body was exhumed.
          Any other relevant response                                    (2 x 2)            (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
12                                            HISTORY P2                            (EC/JUNE 2018)

  2.4   2.4.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
                  Torture                                                         (1 x 1)    (1)

        2.4.2        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
                      She was psychologically scared or damaged
                      Her situation became worse
                      She would not live a normal life again
                      Any other relevant response                             (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

  2.5   2.5.1        [Definition of historical concepts – L1]
                      Official pardon for politically motivated crimes committed during
                       apartheid.
                      Any other relevant response                                (1 x 2)     (2)

        2.5.2        [Extraction of evidence from Source 2D – L1]
                      It was not part of the function of committee
                      He cannot apologise for the act of war                      (2 x 1)    (2)

        2.5.3        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
                      He did not have a political motive
                      He did not disclose the whole truth
                      He did not show remorse
                      The killing was meant to stop the process of negotiations
                      Negotiations were at an advanced stage – no reason for killing
                      Any other relevant response.                          (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

  2.6   2.6.1        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
                      The apartheid government did not disclose the truth to her
                         regarding her son’s death
                      She was forced to bury her son without viewing/identifying his
                         body
                      Any other relevant response                         (Any 1 x 2)        (2)

        2.6.2        [Determining reliability of evidence in Source 2E – L3]
                      Reliable
                      She looks sad
                      Black dress befitting of funeral occasion
                      Flowers befitting of funeral occasion/sign of love
                      Her facial expression shows that she was still mourning her
                        son’s death
                      Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2018)                            HISTORY P2                                     13

  2.7    [Interpretation, comprehension and synthesis of evidence from sources –
         L3]
          People now knew what happened to missing loved ones during the
              apartheid era (Source 2A)
          People now knew where missing loved ones were buried (Source 2A)
          The truth of why and how Portia Ndwandwe was killed was revealed
              (Source 2B)
          The abduction and torture of Portia revealed the violent nature of the
              apartheid security forces (Source 2B)
          Torture through solitary confinement was revealed (Source 2C)
          The psychological effects of torture scared Narkedien for life (Source
              2C)
          Amnesty give perpetrators a change to come forward and reveal the
              truth (Source 2D)
          Darby-Lewis was found guilty of murder and sentenced life
              imprisonment
          Amnesty offered perpetrators a chance to reconcile with victims
          TRC revealed the truth about the death of Wallace McGregor (Source
              2E)
          TRC offered people a chance to find closure
          Any other relevant response

         Use the following rubric to assess this paragraph.

                  Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g.
                   shows no or little understanding of the
                   human rights abuses that were exposed by
  LEVEL 1                                                           Marks: 0–2
                   the TRC.
                  Uses evidence partially to report on topic or
                   cannot report on topic.
                  Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a
                   great extent to the topic, e.g. shows an
  LEVEL 2          understanding of the human rights abuses         Marks: 3–5
                   that were exposed by the TRC.
                  Uses evidence in a very basic manner.
                  Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a
                   thorough understanding of the human
                   rights abuses that were exposed by the
                   TRC.
  LEVEL 3                                                           Marks: 6–8
                  Evidence relates well to the topic.
                  Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                   paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                   topic.                                                              (8)
                                                                                      [50]

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
14                                       HISTORY P2                             (EC/JUNE 2018)

 SECTION B: ESSAY TYPE QUESTIONS

 QUESTION 3: CIVIL RESISTANCE IN SOUTH AFRICA: 1970s TO 1980s

 Explain to what extent the international community’s condemnation of
 apartheid was successful in dismantling Nationalist rule in South Africa
 between the years 1970 and 1989

 [Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using
 analytical and interpretative skills.]

 SYNOPSIS
 Candidates should indicate whether the international community's condemnation
 of apartheid was successful in the disintegration of the nationalist regime in South
 Africa between the 1970s and 1980s.

 MAIN ASPECTS
 Candidates should include the following aspects in their essays:
 Introduction: Candidates should state to what extent they agree with the
 statement.

 ELABORATION
  The anti-apartheid movement (AAM) in Britain aimed to end apartheid
    through boycotts and isolating South Africa from the international community
  They held demonstrations outside the South African Embassy in Britain and
    against companies who did business with South Africa
  The result of this action: Barclays Bank sold their holdings in South Africa
  They held a star-studded concert in Wembley to demand the release of
    Mandela
  (AAM) initiated sport, cultural, academic and economic boycotts that isolated
    South Africa internationally
  Sport Boycotts:
   o The AAM prevented South Africa from participating in international
       competitions:
   o The Gleneagles Agreement called on Commonwealth countries to cut all
       sporting ties with South Africa
   o South Africa was expelled from the International Olympics
  Cultural Boycotts:
    o British and American musicians refused to perform in South Africa
  Academic Boycotts:
   o South African academics were barred from attending international
       academic conferences
   o Consumer Boycotts:
   o The general public were urged to boycott South African products
  Disinvestment:
   o Chase Manhattan Bank cut its links with SA
   o The European Economic Community banned new investments in South
       Africa in 1985
   o In 1986 America banned all new loans and investments in SA
   o Large companies like General Electric, Pepsi Cola, IBM General Motors
       and Mobil closed their operations in South Africa.

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 15

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2018)                           HISTORY P2                                       15

 Sanctions:
  o In 1977 the UN banned the sales of weapons to SA
  o In 1973 OPEC imposed an oil embargo on SA
  o The USA refused to buy South African agricultural products, iron and steel
  o The USA banned direct air travel between the countries
 International trade unions called on the anti-apartheid movements to boycott
  South African goods and to support sanction and disinvestment initiatives
 The Frontline states allowed the ANC to establish bases and military training
  camps in their countries
 From here the ANC was able to step up MK raids and intensify the armed
  struggle.
 By the late 1980s the South African economy was on the verge of collapse
 Sanctions and disinvestment led to increased unemployment and poverty
 This led to increased internal resistance
 All this made it very difficult for the NP to survive in power
 It was the combination of internal and external pressures that eventually led to
  the downfall of apartheid.
 Any other relevant answer.

CONCLUSION: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.

Use the matrix on page 6 to assess this essay.                                           [50]

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 16

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
 16                                        HISTORY P2                            (EC/JUNE 2018)

QUESTION 4:           THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY IN SOUTH AFRICA AND
                      COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST
‘The transfer of political power from white minority rule to black majority rule in
South Africa was not an easy process.’
Do you agree with the statement? Substantiate your argument with relevant
historical evidence.
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills.]
SYNOPSIS
Candidates need to focus on all the challenges and the solutions the political parties
faced whilst trying to transfer the political power from whites to blacks.
MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their essays:
Introduction: Candidates need to indicate whether they agree with the statement or not
              and briefly explain why.
ELABORATION
 De Klerk comes to power in 1989 – brief background (De Klerk’s speech)
 The unbanning of political and civic organisations such as the ANC and SACP
 De Klerk’s decision to release Mandela from prison on 11 February 1990 which
  paved the way for negotiations
 Violence that erupted in Sebokeng – April 1990
 Groote Schuur Minute – 2 May 1990 (ANC and NP met, ANC delegation led by
  Nelson Mandela, NP delegation led by F.W. de Klerk)
 Pretoria Minute – August 1990 (ANC agreed to suspend the armed struggle)
 Third force violence in Natal between Inkatha, the ANC and the apartheid
  government
 CODESA 1 (19 political parties minus AZAPO, CP and PAC/300 delegates)
 Violence erupts in some parts of the country i.e. Transvaal and Natal
 White’s only referendum and its impact (March 1992)
 CODESA 2 (2 May 1992) collapsed. Parties failed to agree on a new constitution-
  making body and interim government
 NP wanted minority veto while ANC wanted an interim government for no longer
  than 18 months and simple majority rule
 Boipatong massacre and its consequences (17 June 1992)
 Bisho massacre nearly derailed the process of negotiations (7 September 1992)
 Record of Understanding signed on 26 September 1992 between Roelf Meyer (NP)
  and Cyril Ramaphosa (ANC)
 Assassination of Chris Hani (10 April 1993) and its impact on South Africa
 Right-wing (AWB) attack on World Trade Centre and its consequences
 Multiparty negotiating forum
 Sunset Clause introduced by Joe Slovo broke the negotiations deadlock
 Shell House massacre and its consequences – March 1994
 Election date – 27 April 1994 announced
 ANC won elections and Mandela first black South African President
 Any other relevant response
CONCLUSION: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.
Use the matrix on page 6 to assess this essay.                                               [50]
 Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 17

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
 (EC/JUNE 2018)                              HISTORY P2                                         17

QUESTION 5:       THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND A NEW WORLD ORDER: 1989
                  TO THE PRESENT

‘The collapse of communism in 1989 and the subsequent talks of peaceful
coexistence between the ANC and the National Party laid the platform for the birth
of a democratic South Africa.’
Critically assess the validity of this statement by referring to the events as it unfolded in
the late 1980’s to 1990.

[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical and
interpretative skills.]

SYNOPSIS
Candidates should assess the validity of the statement and briefly explain their stance in
relation to the impact the collapse had on South African politics in the late 1980’s to 1990.

MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their essays:
Introduction: Candidates should focus on the validity of the statement and elaborate why.

ELABORATION
 Economic conditions in Russia in the late 1980s
 Gorbachev’s policies of Glasnost and Perestroika
 Gorbachev ends the nuclear arms race with the USA
 Gorbachev ends the war in Afghanistan
 USSR relinquishes her dominance over Eastern Europe
 The fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of communism
 Changes in the world contributed to the end of apartheid
 The collapse of the USSR deprived the ANC of its main source of support
 The ANC could not depend on the USSR to support it economically or with weapons
  anymore
 Gorbachev was also in favour of a peaceful transition of power in South Africa
 The National Party’s claim that it was acting as a ‘bulwark’ against communist
  expansion in southern Africa became unrealistic
 The National Party’s claim that it was protecting South Africa from a communist take-
  over was naïve
 Western world powers supported the move that South Africa resolved its problems
  peacefully and democratically
 It became clear that the National Party could no longer maintain white supremacy rule
  in South Africa anymore
 Influential National Party members started to realise that apartheid was not the answer
  to the needs of white capitalist development
 The Battle of Cuito Cuanavale and the independence of Namibia
 There was no doubt that the continued repression of black South Africans would not
  ensure political stability
 P.W. Botha suffered a stroke and was succeeded by F.W. de Klerk

 Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 18

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
 18                                       HISTORY P2                           (EC/JUNE 2018)

 F.W. de Klerk started to accept that the black South Africans struggle against apartheid
  was not a conspiracy directed from Moscow
 This enabled De Klerk to engage in discussions with the liberation organisations
 On 2 February 1990, De Klerk announced, ‘a new and just constitutional dispensation’
 This signalled the end of apartheid rule
  Any other relevant answer

CONCLUSION: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.

Use the matrix on page 6 to assess this essay.                                                  [50]

                                                                                  TOTAL:        100

 Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

## Related documents

- [History P1 Gr12 Addendum June 2018 English Flat](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr12-addendum-june-2018-english-flat/4c5dfc40-194e-46ad-8243-339e8e3277ff) — History · Addendum · 2018 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 ADDENDUM SEPT 2018 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-addendum-sept-2018-english/4bdc06e1-2d0c-4870-ae86-fda2090131f4) — History · Addendum · 2018 · Eng
- [History P2 Add June 2021 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-add-june-2021-english/4b70309f-2760-4254-8778-f8fe061ab26d) — History · QP · 2021 · Eng
- [History P2 (SG) (English) June 2014 Possible Answer](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-sg-english-june-2014-possible-answer/b6322558-818f-4c67-b34d-309f2eecce06) — History · Memo · 2014 · Eng
- [HISTORY P1 GR12 QP SEP2018 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-gr12-qp-sep2018-english/47dd3041-ad8c-49c9-92a3-636ad391ba9f) — History · QP · 2018 · Eng
- [History P1 QP June 2020 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-qp-june-2020-english/129f645d-3d44-4eee-9e79-4cf08acc19dc) — History · QP · 2021 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [Gr 12 History P1 (English) 2024 Question Paper X05](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-12-history-p1-english-2024-question-paper-x05/7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5) — QP · 2024 · Eng
- [History P1 Nov 2024 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-nov-2024-addendum-eng/df93fb24-73e0-435a-8d91-bce9f456ba2c) — Addendum · 2024 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP JUNE 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-june-2023-english/8444f2f9-4c71-46a1-972c-8b0f923e9927) — QP · 2023 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2023-english/7ebc175c-3acc-4751-b898-2a770db59777) — Addendum · 2023 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2023 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2023-addendum-eng/115e775e-ffa7-4295-a812-c3f541a7b7bb) — Addendum · 2023 · Eng

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
