# History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2020 Memo (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 memorandum from the Eastern Cape Mock Exam 2020 (English), 22 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-memo-sept-2020-english/3e39553b-a887-4090-914b-ed46d67764fd
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Language: English
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2020
- Exam period: Eastern Cape Mock Exam
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 22

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2020 Memo (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-memo-sept-2020-english/3e39553b-a887-4090-914b-ed46d67764fd)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · Eastern Cape Mock Exam · 2020 · English. Memorandum, 22 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

                           NATIONAL
                      SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                         GRADE 12

                       SEPTEMBER 2020

                      HISTORY P2
                   MARKING GUIDELINE

MARKS:   150

                  This marking guideline consists of 22 pages.

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
 2                                      HISTORY P2                         (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

1.   SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

     1.1    The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based
            questions:

            COGNITIVE                                                  WEIGHTING OF
                                    HISTORICAL SKILLS
             LEVELS                                                     QUESTIONS
                            Extract evidence from sources.
                            Selection and organisation of                   30%
              LEVEL 1
                             relevant information from sources.              (14)
                            Define historical concepts/terms.
                            Interpretation of evidence from the
                             sources.
                                                                             40%
              LEVEL 2       Explain information gathered from
                                                                             (20)
                             the sources.
                            Analyse evidence from the sources.
                            Interpret and evaluate evidence from
                             sources.
                            Engage with sources to determine its
                             usefulness, reliability, bias and
                                                                             30%
              LEVEL 3        limitations.
                                                                             (16)
                            Compare and contrast
                             interpretations and perspectives
                             presented in sources and draw
                             independent conclusions.

     1.2    The information below indicates how source-based questions are
            assessed:

             In the marking of source-based questions credit needs to be given to any
              other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or examples.
             In the allocation of marks emphasis should be placed on how the
              requirements of the question have been addressed.
             In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that
              need to be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated in
              italics.
             When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should be
              credited for any relevant answers.
             Learners are expected to take a stance when answering ‘to what extent’
              questions in order for any marks to be awarded.

     1.3    Assessment procedures for source-based questions

             Use a tick () for each correct answer
             Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2 x 2) which translates to two
              reasons and is given two marks each ( ); (1 x 2) which translates
              to one reason and is given two marks ()
             If a question carries 4 marks then indicate by placing 4 ticks ()

 Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
 (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                        HISTORY P2                                           3

            Paragraph question
            Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the content and
            structure of the paragraph must be taken into account when awarding a
            mark. The following steps must be used when assessing a response to a
            paragraph question:
             Read the paragraph and place a bullet ( . ) at each point within the text
               where the candidate has used relevant evidence to address the question.
             Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate has
               been able to use relevant evidence to write a paragraph.
             At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (√) that the candidate has
               been awarded for the paragraph; as well as the level (1, 2 or 3) as
               indicated in the holistic rubric and a brief comment e.g.

            ___________ ˖ __________________________ ˖ _________________
            _________________ ˖ __________________________ ˖ ___________
                                                                  √√√√ Level 2

            Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph
             Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the mark on the
              right-hand bottom margin e.g.
                                                   32
                                                   50

             Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back cover of
              the answer script.

2.   ESSAY QUESTIONS

     2.1    The essay questions require candidates to:
             Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner.
              They need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so
              that they are able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an
              effective argument to answer the question posed. It is essential that an
              essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of evidence and
              a conclusion.

     2.2    Marking of essay questions
             Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by
              the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
             Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion
              than those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific
              essay.
             When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should be
              credited for Any other relevant answers.

 Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4                                      HISTORY P2                        (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

2.3    Global assessment of the essay
       The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the
       teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the
       component parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer
       an individual opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an
       argument. The learner will not be required to simply regurgitate 'facts' in
       order to achieve a high mark. This approach discourages learners from
       preparing ‘model’ answers and reproducing them without taking into account
       the specific requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the essay
       credits learners’ opinions supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike
       content-based marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the
       emphasis is on the following:
        The construction of argument
        The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such argument
        The learner’s interpretation of the question.

2.4    Assessment procedures of the essay

       2.4.1    Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing the essay.

       2.4.2    During the reading of the essay ticks need to be awarded for a
                relevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in the marking
                guideline/memorandum), each of the main points/aspects that is
                properly contextualised (also indicated by bullets in the marking
                guideline/memorandum) and a relevant conclusion (indicated by a
                bullet in the marking guideline/memorandum) e.g. in an answer where
                there are 5 main points there will be 7 ticks.

       2.4.3    Keep the PEEL structure in mind when assessing an essay.

                      Point: The candidate introduces the essay by taking a line of
                 P
                      argument/making a major point.
                      Explanation: The candidate should explain in more detail what
                 E    the main point is all about and how it relates to the question
                      posed (line of argument).
                      Example: The candidates should answer the question by
                      selecting content that is relevant to the line of argument.
                 E
                      Relevant examples should be given to sustain the line of
                      argument.
                      Link: Candidates should ensure that the line of argument is
                 L
                      sustained throughout the essay and is written coherently.

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                         HISTORY P2                                        5

        2.4.4     The following symbols MUST be used when assessing an essay:

                  • Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly
                    contextualised
                                                                      ^
                  • Wrong statement               _________________

                  • Irrelevant statement              |
                                                      |
                                                      |

                  • Repetition                        R

                  • Analysis                          A√

                  • Interpretation                    I√
              •      Line of argument              LOA

2.5     The matrix

        2.5.1     Use of the matrix in the marking of essays.

                  In the marking of essays, the criteria as provided in the matrix should
                  be used. When assessing the essay note both the content and
                  presentation.   At the point of intersection of the content and
                  presentation based on the seven competency levels, a mark should
                  be awarded.

                  (a)    The first reading of essays will be to determine to what extent
                         the main aspects have been covered and to allocate the
                         content level (on the matrix).

                                                           C        LEVEL 4

                  (b)    The second reading of essays will relate to the level (on the
                         matrix) of presentation.
                                                           C        LEVEL 4
                                                           P        LEVEL 3

                  (c)    Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.

                                                           C       LEVEL 4
                                                           P       LEVEL 3      }26–27

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6                                                                HISTORY P2                                                 (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY: TOTAL: 50
                           LEVEL 7             LEVEL 6             LEVEL 5             LEVEL 4            LEVEL 3               LEVEL 2           LEVEL 1*
PRESENTATION             Very well           Very well           Well planned and    Planned and        Shows some            Attempts to         Little or no
                         planned and         planned and         structured essay.   constructed an     evidence of a         structure an        attempt to
                         structured essay.   structured essay.   Attempts to         argument.          planned and           answer.             structure the
                         Good synthesis      Developed a         develop a clear     Evidence used to   constructed           Largely             essay.
                         of information.     relevant line of    argument.           some extent to     argument.             descriptive or
                         Developed an        argument.           Conclusion          support the line   Attempts to           some attempt at
                         original, well      Evidence used to    drawn from the      of argument.       sustain a line of     developing a line
                         balanced and        defend the          evidence to         Conclusions        argument.             of argument. No
CONTENT                  independent line    argument.           support the line    reached based      Conclusions not       attempt to draw a
                         of argument with    Attempts to draw    of argument.        on evidence.       clearly supported     conclusion.
                         the use of          an independent                                             by evidence.
                         evidence and        conclusion from
                         sustained and       the evidence to
                         defended the        support the line
                         argument            of argument.
                         throughout.
                         Independent
                         conclusion is
                         drawn from
                         evidence to
                         support the line
                         of argument.

LEVEL 7
Question has been
fully answered.
Content selection
                             47–50               43–46
fully relevant to line
of argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has been
answered.
Content selection
                             43–46               40–42               38–39
relevant to a line of
argument.
LEVEL 5
Question answered
to a great extent.
Content adequately
                             38–39               36–37               34–35              30–33               28–29
covered and
relevant.
LEVEL 4
Question
recognisable in
answer.                                                              30–33              28–29               26–27
Some omissions or
irrelevant content
selection.
LEVEL 3
Content selection
does relate to the
question, but does
not answer it, or
does not always
                                                                                        26–27               24–25                 20–23
relate to the
question.
Omissions in
coverage.
LEVEL 2
Question
inadequately                                                                                                20–23                 18–19             14–17
addressed. Sparse
content.
LEVEL 1*
Question
inadequately
addressed or not at
                                                                                                                                  14–17              0–13
all. Inadequate or
irrelevant content.

*Guidelines for allocating a mark for Level 1:

     Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content; no attempt to structure the essay = 0
     Question includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt to structure the essay = 1–6
     Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay = 7–13

Copyright reserved                                                                                                               Please turn over

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                        HISTORY P2                                            7

SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

QUESTION 1:           HOW DID THE PHILOSOPHY OF BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS
                      INFLUENCE THE SOUTH AFRICAN YOUTH IN THE 1970s?

1.1    1.1.1    [Definition of historical concepts from Source 1A – L1]

                      Accepting oneself as black/self-value/self-esteem/self-worth
                      To be proud of what you are/black pride
                      Black South Africans should be proud of themselves and should
                       strive for self-reliance
                      Black South Africans should become independent
                      Any other relevant response                         (Any 1 x 2)     (2)

       1.1.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
                 Motivated blacks to unite and fight against apartheid
                 Black South Africans should stand up and fight for their rights
                 Black South Africans should change their mindset
                 Blacks should stop feeling inferior
                 Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)        (4)

       1.1.3    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                 It mobilised the people when all the major political opposition
                     was banned, their leaders in exile or in jail        (1 x 2)          (2)

       1.1.4    [Evaluate the usefulness of the evidence from Source 1C – L3]
                This source is useful because:
                 It became the mouth piece/voice of the oppressed people in
                    South Africa
                 It filled the political vacuum that existed at that stage
                 It made black South Africans aware not to accept their
                    oppression by the apartheid government
                 Any other relevant response                               (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

       1.1.5    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                 Independent thinking
                 Self-reliance
                 Fearlessness
                 Dignity                                                       (4 x 1)    (4)

1.2    1.2.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                 Self-concept
                 Self-esteem                                                   (2 x 1)    (2)

       1.2.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
                 The apartheid government saw the BCM as a threat
                 Many leaders were imprisoned/banned
                 Any other relevant response                      (Any 1 x 2)             (2)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8                                      HISTORY P2                        (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

       1.2.3    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                 There were forces that threatened to deal with them
                 Denied employment if we didn’t abandon our political beliefs
                                                                           (2 x 1)     (2)

1.3    1.3.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
                 Because they spread the ideas of Black Consciousness (1 x 2)        (2)

       1.3.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                 Major anti-apartheid organisations were banned at this stage
                 Influenced by the BCM, they learned to resist apartheid
                 They became aware of their social, political and economic
                    oppression they endured
                 Any other relevant response                          (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

       1.3.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                 He was banned
                 Detained
                 Could not leave King William’s Town
                 He could not attend meetings
                 The police often searched his home to check on him
                 Could not write for newspapers or magazines
                 He was refused a passport and could not leave the country
                 Any other relevant response                        (Any 1 x 2)       (2)

       1.3.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                 Wanted to maintain white minority rule
                 Saw the Black Consciousness Movement as a threat
                 Perceived the Black Consciousness Movement as agitators that
                    wanted to overthrow the government
                 Any other relevant response                     (Any 1 x 2)          (2)

1.4    1.4.1    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                 Fearless
                 Independent
                 Prepared to die for his beliefs
                 He lived according to his beliefs
                 Any other relevant response                          (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

       1.4.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                 Power to the people                                      (1 x 2)     (2)

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                      HISTORY P2                                     9

1.5 [Comparison of evidence from Sources 1A and 1D – L3]
     Both sources reveal that the BCM influenced the youth
     Both sources show that the youth were taught to become fearless
     Any other relevant response                                           (2 x 2)     (4)

1.6 [Interpretation, comprehension and synthesis of evidence from relevant
    sources – L3]
    Candidates can include the following aspects in their responses:
     BCM mobilised the people (Source 1A)
     BCM instilled independent thinking, self-reliance, fearlessness and dignity
        (Source1A)
     Broke the silence of the time (Source 1A)
     It conscientised black South Africans to stand up against oppression (Own
        knowledge)
     Young blacks refused to be held in an inferior position (Own knowledge)
     Students were at the forefront of the struggle (Source 1B)
     Black people to be proud of their colour (Source 1B)
     Made black South Africans realise their self-worth (Source 1B)
     Conscientised black students to reject apartheid (Source 1B)
     Led to the formation of community organisations (Own knowledge)
     Students influenced through the writings of Biko (Source 1C)
     Influenced by the BCM, students became fearless (Source 1A and 1D)
     Transformed into disciplined young black men (Source 1C)
     Any other relevant response

Use the following rubric to allocate a mark:

              Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g. show
               no or little understanding of how the philosophy of
               Black Consciousness influence the South African
LEVEL 1                                                               Marks: 0–2
               youth in the 1970s.
              Uses evidence partially to report on topic or cannot
               write a paragraph.
              Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
               extent to the topic, e.g. shows some understanding
               of how the philosophy of Black Consciousness
LEVEL 2                                                               Marks: 3–5
               influence the South African youth in the 1970s.
              Uses evidence in a very basic manner to write a
               paragraph.
              Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a
               thorough understanding of how the philosophy of
               Black Consciousness influence the South African
LEVEL 3                                                               Marks: 6–8
               youth in the 1970s.
              Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
               paragraph that shows an understanding of the topic.                     (8)
                                                                                      [50]

Copyright reserved                                                        Please turn over

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10                                      HISTORY P2                          (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

QUESTION 2:          HOW SUCCESSFUL WAS THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION
                     COMMISSION (TRC) IN DEALING WITH THE MURDER OF AMY
                     BIEHL?

2.1   2.1.1   [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
               Establish the causes, nature and extent of the gross violation of
                  human rights
               Conducting investigations and holding hearings
               To facilitate the granting of amnesty to persons who made full
                  disclosure of all the relevant facts, related to acts associated with
                  a political objective
               Restore the human and civil dignity of victims
               Recommend reparation measures
               To compile a report of its findings and activities and recommend
                  measures to prevent future violations of human rights (Any 2 x 1)         (2)

      2.1.2   [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
               Apartheid violated the rights of most South Africans
               Apartheid discriminated against South Africans based on the
                   colour of their skin
               Any other relevant response                          (Any 1 x 2)            (2)

      2.1.3   [Definition of historical concepts from Source 2A – L2]
               Is the granting of official pardon for people that committed
                  politically related offences
               Any other relevant response                                  (1 x 2)        (2)

      2.1.4   [Evaluate the usefulness of the evidence from Source 2B – L3]
              This source is useful because:
               It explains the reasons for the establishment of the TRC
               It gives an overview of the period being investigated
               It gives the reasons for the need of a TRC
               It gives information on the committees that will perform the duties
                  of the TRC
               Any other relevant response                             (Any 2 x 2)         (4)

      2.1.5   [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
                  Human Rights Violation Committee
                  Amnesty Committee
                  Reparation and Rehabilitation Committee                      (3 x 1)     (3)

2.2   2.2.1   [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
                  She was a victim of racial violence
                  She was white                                               (2 x 1)      (2)

      2.2.2   [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
      .        Beaten
               Stabbed                                                         (2 x 1)     (2)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                       HISTORY P2                                         11

      2.2.3   [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
               She was an anti-apartheid activist
               She did legal research for the ANC
               Assisted with voter registration/education
               Worked with underprivileged communities
               Any other relevant response                                 (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

      2.2.4   [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
               To kill white people
                By killing the white people, they would get their land back
                Wanted to end apartheid
               Wanted whites to feel what blacks had to endure
               Any other relevant response                               (Any 2 x 2)        (4)

2.3   2.3.1   [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
               Mzikhona Nofemela
               Ntobeka Peni
               Vusumzi Ntamo
               Mongezi Manqina                                             (Any 3 x 1)      (3)

      2.3.2   [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
               Wanted their forgiveness
               Wanted amnesty
               Showed remorse for their senseless deeds
               Any other relevant response                                 (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

      2.3.3   [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
               “I feel sorry and very down-hearted, especially today, realising the
                 contribution Amy Biehl played in the struggle”               (1 x 2)        (2)

2.4   2.4.1   [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
               It provided a platform for perpetrators to tell their stories
               It provided a platform for victims to find closure
               Any other relevant response                                  (Any 1 x 2)     (2)

      2.4.2   Interpretation of evidence Source 2D – L2]
               To tell the truth
               To prove that their actions were politically motivated
               To be released from jail
               Any other relevant response                                 (Any 1 x 2)      (2)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
12                                     HISTORY P2                          (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

2.5   [Comparison of evidence from Sources 2C and 2D – L3]
       Source 2C indicates that the killers of Amy Biehl applied for amnesty and
         Source 2D shows them appearing before the Amnesty Commission
       Both sources reveal that it provided a platform for the killers to reveal the
         truth of their atrocities
       Both sources show they showed remorse for their actions
       Any other relevant response                                         (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

2.6   [Interpretation, comprehension and synthesis of evidence from sources – L3]
      Candidates could include some of the following:
        The reason for the establishment of the TRC was to deal with the past
           (Source 2A)
        The TRC offered full amnesty to those who came forward and confessed
           their crimes (Source 2A)
        TRC provided a platform for the killers of Amy to reveal the truth about the
           reasons for their actions (Source 2C)
        Peni revealed the truth of their actions and claimed that it was politically
           motivated at his amnesty hearing (Source 2C)
        Victims had the opportunity to confront those who hurt their loved ones
           (Own knowledge)
        Perpetrators had the chance to show remorse (Source 2C and 2D)
        The TRC provided a platform for the parents of Amy to give their opinions
           on the amnesty process (Source 2C)
        Victims found out for the first time what happened to their loved ones and
           how they had died (Own knowledge)
        Parents forgave the perpetrators (Source 2C)
        Perpetrators were released from jail (Source 2C)
        Perpetrators received amnesty (Source 2C and 2D)
        The Amy Biehl Foundation was set up by her parents to commemorate
           Amy (Own knowledge)
        Perpetrators are working at the foundation level, doing community work
           and help to prevent violence (Own knowledge)
        Any other relevant response

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                     HISTORY P2                                    13

Use the following rubric to assess this paragraph.

               Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g.
                shows no or little understanding of how
                successful the Truth and Reconciliation
LEVEL 1         Commission (TRC) was in dealing with the          Marks: 0–2
                murder of Amy Biehl.
               Uses evidence partially to report on topic or
                cannot write a paragraph.
               Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a
                great extent to the topic, e.g. shows an
                understanding of how successful the Truth
LEVEL 2         and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was in        Marks: 3–5
                dealing with the murder of Amy Biehl.
               Uses evidence in a very basic manner to write a
                paragraph.
               Uses relevant evidence, e.g. demonstrates a
                thorough understanding of how successful
                the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
                (TRC) was in dealing with the murder of Amy
LEVEL 3                                                           Marks: 6–8
                Biehl.
               Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                paragraph that shows an understanding of the
                topic.                                                              (8)
                                                                                   [50]

Copyright reserved                                                       Please turn over

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
 14                                      HISTORY P2                          (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

QUESTION 3:       WHAT MPACT DID MULTI-NATIONAL CORPORATIONS (MNC’S)
                  HAVE ON GLOBAL CULTURES IN THE 1990s?

3.1   3.1.1    [Definition of historical concepts from Source 3A – L1]
                 Refers to the technological, political and economic changes which
                  have resulted in the world functioning in a different way from what it
                  did 20 years ago
                 Any other relevant explanation                                  (1 x 2)   (2)

      3.1.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
                 International trade
                 Investment                                                      (2 x 1) (2)

      3.1.3    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
                ‘For thousands of years, people – and later, corporations – have
                  been buying from and selling to each other in lands at great
                  distances’                                                   (1 x 2)      (2)

      3.1.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3A – L2]
                 Less trade barriers between countries
                 Mass production by MNC’s led to cheaper products
                 Technological advances enable goods to move faster between
                   countries
                 Many countries have adopted a free-market economic system
                 Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)         (4)

3.2   3.2.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
                 American countries
                 European countries                                            (2 x 1)     (2)

      3.2.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L2]
                 Television
                 Radio
                 Satellite
                 Internet                                                  (Any 2 x 1)     (2)

      3.2.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3B – L2]
                 Consumers have access to a variety of goods and services
                 Inter-connectedness of the world through information technology
                 People can learn about other people’s cultures and traditions
                 Any other relevant response                               (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

      3.2.4    Evaluate the reliability of the evidence from Source 3B – L3]
               This source is reliable because:
                The source shows both the positive and negative effects that
                  globalisation had on the cultures of people around the world
                It is not biased
                People wearing name brands from overseas corporations has
                  become a daily feature
                Many people around the world have acquired some knowledge of
                  the English language
                Any other relevant response                                 (Any 2 x 2)    (4)
 Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 15

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
 (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                     HISTORY P2                                       15

3.3   3.3.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3C – L1]
                Sweatshops
                Child labour                                                  (2 x 1)    (2)
      3.3.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3C – L1]
                 Boston
                 Washington D.C.
                 Bangalore
                 San Pedro Sula                                           (Any 2 x 1)    (2)

      3.3.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
                 People worked under harsh conditions
                 People were paid low wages
                 It did not respect workers’ rights
                 The commitment to change the company’s practices were not
                    implemented
                 Any other relevant response                        (Any 2 x 2)          (4)

3.4   3.4.1    [Interpretation of evidence Source 3D – L2]
                It shows opposition against the corporations
                It accuses the big corporations of enslaving the people
                Any other relevant response                                   (2 x 2)    (4)

      3.4.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3D – L2]
               JUSTIFIED
                TNC’s only motive was profit-making
                People had to work in harsh conditions for low wages
                TNC’s used contractors and sub-contractors thus saving on
                    operation costs and allowing them to leave whenever they desire
                Any other relevant response

                                                  OR

               NOT JUSTIFIED
                TNC’s provide jobs
                They stimulate economic growth of countries
                It promotes access to technology and skills
                Any other relevant response                               (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

3.5   [Comparison of evidence from Sources 3C and 3D – L3]
       Source 3C shows that a demonstration was held against the Nike
         sweatshop and Source 3D shows opposition against sweatshops
       Source 3C indicates that people worked in harsh conditions and
         Source 3D indicates that corporates were enslaving people in sweatshops
       Both sources indicate that MNC’s being accused of exploiting people
       Any other relevant response                                     (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

 Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 16

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
   16                                     HISTORY P2                      (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

3.6     [Interpretation, comprehension and synthesis of evidence from sources – L3]
        Candidates could include some of the following:
         Cultures have been changed due to globalisation (Source 3B)
         People’s culture changed through television, radio, satellite and internet
             (Source 3B)
         Globalisation made people to learn about other people’s cultures (own
             knowledge)
         Name brand goods produced by MNC’s has become a popular
             phenomenon worldwide (Own knowledge)
         It has led to the destruction of local cultures and identities (own
             knowledge)
         It has impoverished many nations as many people do not buy locally
             produced products (Own knowledge)
         It caused poverty in many countries as the profits made from production is
             taken out of the countries (own knowledge)
         People work in harsh conditions in sweatshops (Source 3C)
         TNC’s only care about making profit (own knowledge)
             Led to opposition against MNC’s (Source 3D)
         Any other relevant response

Use the following rubric to assess this paragraph.

                 Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g.
                  shows no or little understanding of the impact
 LEVEL 1          that MNC’s had on global cultures.                    Marks: 0–2
                 Uses evidence partially to report on the topic
                  or cannot write a paragraph.
                 Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great
                  extent to the topic, e.g. shows some
                  understanding of the impact that MNC’s had on
 LEVEL 2                                                                Marks: 3–5
                  global cultures.
                 Uses evidence in a very basic manner to write a
                  paragraph.
                 Uses relevant evidence, e. g. demonstrates a
                  thorough understanding of the impact that
 LEVEL 3          MNC’s had on global cultures.                         Marks: 6–8
                 Uses evidence very effectively in an organised
                  paragraph that shows an understanding of the topic.                       (8)
                                                                                           [50]

   Copyright reserved                                                         Please turn over

### Page 17

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                     HISTORY P2                                        17

SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

QUESTION 4:           CIVIL RESISTANCE, 1970s TO 1980s: SOUTH AFRICA: THE
                      CRISIS OF APARTHEID IN THE 1980s

[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills.]

SYNOPSIS
Candidates need to indicate to what extent demonstrations, boycotts, sanctions and
disinvestments by the international anti-apartheid organisations contributed to the
eventual demise of the apartheid regime in the 1980’s.

MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:
 Introduction: Candidates need to take a stance and demonstrate how different
  actions taken by the international anti-apartheid organisations eventually led to the
  demise of apartheid.

ELABORATION
 Formation and role of the Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) in the United
  Kingdom/Irish Anti-Apartheid
 The role of the International Defence Aid Fund (IDAF) made funds available for
  anti-apartheid activities
 P. W. Botha’s attempt at reforming apartheid/cosmetic reforms
 P.W. Botha’s Rubicon speech in 1985 forced the international community into
  action which embarked on various forms of boycotts, sanctions and
  disinvestments against the apartheid regime
 Sport boycotts: SANROC, HART and SACOS
 Cultural boycotts: In 1985 US artists protested against apartheid and refused to
  perform in South Africa and raised money for liberation movements (In 1986 the
  Freedom Festival in London); Musicians displayed their solidarity with the people
  in SA
 Academic boycotts: International scholars refused to travel to South Africa /
  International publishers refused to publish South African manuscripts and grant
  access to information/International conferences barred South Africa scholars/
  Institutions abroad denied South Africa academic access and refused to recognise
  South African degrees
 Consumer boycotts: OPEC placed an embargo on oil sales to South Africa
  (South Africa experienced a recession in the 1980s)/Irish workers refused to
  handle fruits from SA/Imports of raw materials from South Africa – coal, iron, steel
  – were banned
 Disinvestment: In 1980s foreign investments dropped by 30%; by 1980 Britain
  already disinvested from Simon’s Town naval dockyard; General Motors and
  Barclays Bank pulled out of SA/ In the 1980s South Africa’s economy struggled as
  investors left the country/The effects of AAM protests had a negative effect on the
  South African government
 Between 1985 and 1990 over 200 US companies pulled out of South Africa/ The
  University of California withdrew investments of three million dollars from South
  Africa

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 18

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
18                                   HISTORY P2                        (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

 Sanctions: In 1985 the US Bank Chase Manhattan cut ties with South Africa/the
  Johannesburg Stock Exchange closed for 4 days/The value of the rand dropped
  by 35% from 54 cents to 34 cents against the dollar/In 1986 the US Congress
  passed a law that banned all new investments and loans in South Africa
 Big corporations such as General Electric, Pepsi Cola, General Motors, Mobil
  and IBM stopped their activities in South Africa/The USA threatened to stop
  weapon sales to countries which provided weapons to South Africa/In 1986 the
  Anti-Apartheid Law of the USA caused Europe and Japan to introduce sanctions
  against South Africa/International banks lost confidence in South Africa’s
  economy
 In 1982 the United Nations condemned apartheid and called for total sanctions
  against South Africa
 In 1985 the European Economic Community banned new investments in South
  Africa
 In 1988 one fifth of British companies withdrew their businesses from South
  Africa because of pressure from shareholders/Barclays Bank sold their shares
  due to pressure of the British public/The South African economy kept stagnating
  and produced growth of only 1,1%
 Release Mandela Campaign: Wembley Stadium/United Nations/UN Security
  Council and UN General Assembly called for the release of Nelson Mandela
 The role of international trade unions: The AAM in Europe and
  Australia/Liverpool dockworkers/Finland’s Transport Workers Union imposed a
  ban on trade with South Africa
 This resulted in South Africa experiencing great economic difficulties and they
  were forced to begin negotiations with liberation organisations in South Africa
 The role of the frontline states
 Any other relevant response

Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.        [50]

Copyright reserved                                                         Please turn over

### Page 19

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                    HISTORY P2                                        19

QUESTION 5:           THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY IN SOUTH AFRICA AND COMING
                      TO TERMS WITH THE PAST: NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AND
                      THE GNU

[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills.]

SYNOPSIS
Candidates need to critically discuss how South Africa’s road to democracy was beset
with various challenges, dilemmas and obstacles, but it was the spirit of intense
negotiations, resolute leadership and commitment that eventually led to the birth of a
democratic dispensation in 1994.

MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:
   Introduction: Candidates need to take a stance and indicate how the spirit of
    intense negotiations, resolute leadership, and commitment paved the way for the
    birth of a democratic South Africa in 1994.

ELABORATION
 De Klerk comes to power in 1989 – brief background
 De Klerk’s speech in parliament on 2 February 1990 (Political leadership)
 The unbanning of political and civic organisations, such as the ANC and SACP
 The removal of restrictions on COSATU, AZAPO, etc. (Political leadership and
   commitment)
 Groote Schuur Minute, 2 May 1990 (ANC and NP met, ANC delegation led by
   Nelson Mandela, NP delegation led by FW de Klerk) (Political leadership and
   commitment)
 Apartheid legislation revoked, such as the Reservation of Separate (Amenities Act
   (Political leadership and commitment)
 Pretoria Minute, 6 August 1990 (Suspension the armed struggle by the ANC)
 CODESA 1 (19 political parties, excluding AZAPO, CP and PAC/300 delegates met)
   (Political leadership and commitment)
 Violence erupts in some parts of the country, such as the Witwatersrand and Natal
   Whites-only referendum and its impact (March 1992) (Political leadership)
 CODESA 2 (2 May 1992 collapsed); parties failed to agree on a new constitution
   making body and interim government (Political leadership and commitment)
 NP wanted minority veto while the ANC wanted an interim government for no
   longer than 18 months and simple majority rule
 Boipatong massacre and its consequences (17 June 1992)
 Bhisho massacre derailed the process of negotiations (7 September 1992)
 Record of Understanding signed on 26 September 1992 between Roelf Meyer
   (NP) and Cyril Ramaphosa (ANC) (Political leadership and commitment)
 Assassination of Chris Hani (10 April 1993) and its impact on South Africa
   (Political leadership)
 Multiparty Negotiating Forum (Political leadership and commitment)
 Right-wing (AWB) attack on World Trade Centre and its consequences
 Increasing violence – rolling mass action (i.e. Boipatong, Bisho, etc.)

Copyright reserved                                                        Please turn over

### Page 20

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
20                                    HISTORY P2                        (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

    Sunset Clause introduced by Joe Slovo broke the negotiations deadlock (Political
     leadership and commitment)
    Election date announced, 27 April 1994 (Political leadership)
    ANC won elections and Mandela became the first black South African President
    Any other relevant response

Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.               [50]

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 21

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)                       HISTORY P2                                         21

QUESTION 6:           THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND A NEW WORLD ORDER: 1989
                      TO THE PRESENT

[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills.]

SYNOPSIS
Candidates need to indicate whether they agree or disagree with the statement and
indicate if it was the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989 that significantly contributed
to the political transformation that occurred in South Africa.

MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:
 Introduction: Candidates need to take a stance and indicate if it was the collapse of
  the Soviet Union that contributed to the political transformation in South Africa.

ELABORATION
 Gorbachev’s reform policies of Glasnost and Perestroika
 By the end of 1989 the Soviet Union disintegrated and its impact
 The communist regimes in Eastern Europa collapsed
 Political changes in the rest of the world put pressure on the apartheid regime to
   embark on changes
 The collapse of communism affected both the National Party and the ANC
 The National Party was now prepared to negotiate with the ANC
 The National Party’s fear of a communist-controlled ANC now seemed unfounded
 After the demise of communism in the Soviet Union; the ANC did not receive
   further support from the Soviet Union
 The ANC could no longer rely on the Soviet Union for economic and military
   support
 The fall of the USSR deprived the ANC of its main source of support (financial,
   military, morally and the consequences thereof)
 The National Party’s claim that it acted as protector to a communist onslaught in
   Southern Africa became unrealistic
 Countries in the western world supported the move that South Africa should
   resolve its problems peacefully and democratically
 There was no doubt that continued repression of black South Africans by the
   apartheid regime was not sustainable and would result in political instability
 The government started to believe that reform was needed to include the
   development of a strong middle class which would act as a ‘bulwark against the
   revolution’
 Influential members of the National Party realised that apartheid was not the answer
   to the needs of white capitalist development
 The Battle of Cuito Cuanavale and the consequences thereof
 The security forces and state of emergency did not stop township protests
 By the late 1980s South Africa was in a state of economic depression
 The role of business leaders in South Africa’s political transformation
 PW Botha suffered a stroke and was succeeded by FW de Klerk

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 22

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
22                                     HISTORY P2                         (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)

    FW de Klerk realised South Africa’s political predicament and began to accept that
     the black South African struggle against apartheid was not a conspiracy directed
     from Moscow
    This enabled De Klerk to engage in discussions with the liberation organisations
    On 2 February 1990 De Klerk announced ‘a new and just constitutional
     dispensation’
    De Klerk unbanned all anti-apartheid organisations including the ANC, PAC and
     South African Communist Party
    This signalled the end of apartheid and the beginning of the process of negotiations
    Any other relevant response

Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.                 [50]

                                                                                TOTAL:          150

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

## Related documents

- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2023-english/7ebc175c-3acc-4751-b898-2a770db59777) — History · Addendum · 2023 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2022 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2022-english/e5d10556-c154-433f-8fd2-98646e28994c) — History · Addendum · 2022 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2019 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2019-english/ee9068f3-f0ae-4df5-91cf-0f91d2112d6b) — History · Addendum · 2019 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 ADDENDUM SEPT 2018 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-addendum-sept-2018-english/4bdc06e1-2d0c-4870-ae86-fda2090131f4) — History · Addendum · 2018 · Eng
- [History P2 (SG) (English) June 2014 Possible Answer](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-sg-english-june-2014-possible-answer/b6322558-818f-4c67-b34d-309f2eecce06) — History · Memo · 2014 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 SEPT2015 MEMO (Afr)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-sept2015-memo-afr/9b4b0c56-0d1c-480b-8ab5-b260d75b5222) — History · Memo · 2015 · Afr

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [Gr 12 History P1 (English) 2024 Question Paper X05](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-12-history-p1-english-2024-question-paper-x05/7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5) — QP · 2024 · Eng
- [History P1 Nov 2024 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-nov-2024-addendum-eng/df93fb24-73e0-435a-8d91-bce9f456ba2c) — Addendum · 2024 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP JUNE 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-june-2023-english/8444f2f9-4c71-46a1-972c-8b0f923e9927) — QP · 2023 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2023 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2023-addendum-eng/115e775e-ffa7-4295-a812-c3f541a7b7bb) — Addendum · 2023 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2023 Afr](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2023-afr/1406231f-0475-4c85-8862-7a120bee5f2e) — QP · 2023 · Afr

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
