# History Grade 12 Paper 2 Eastern Cape Mock 2014 Memo

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 memorandum from the Eastern Cape Mock Exam 2014, 21 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-sept-memo-engl/ec81d230-65ef-49e4-9c81-c566c2977d77
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2014
- Exam period: Eastern Cape Mock Exam
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 21

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 Paper 2 Eastern Cape Mock 2014 Memo](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-sept-memo-engl/ec81d230-65ef-49e4-9c81-c566c2977d77)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · Eastern Cape Mock Exam · 2014. Memorandum, 21 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

                         NATIONAL
                    SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                         GRADE 12

                     SEPTEMBER 2014

                        HISTORY P2
                       MEMORANDUM

MARKS:   150

                  This memorandum consists of 21 pages.

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
2                                       HISTORY P2                           (SEPTEMBER 2014)

 1. SOURCE BASED QUESTIONS

 1.1    The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based
        questions:

        COGNITVE                    HISTORICAL SKILLS                    WEIGHTING
        LEVELS                                                           OF
                                                                         QUESTIONS
        LEVEL 1         Extract evidence from sources
        (L1)            Selection and organisation of relevant              30%
                          information from sources                           (15)
                        Define historical concepts/terms
        LEVEL 2         Interpretation of evidence from sources
        (L2)            Explain information gathered from                  40%
                         sources                                            (20)
                        Analyse evidence from sources
        LEVEL 3         Interpret and evaluate evidence from the
        (L3)             sources
                        Engage with sources to determine its
                                                                              30%
                         usefulness, reliability, bias and limitations       (15)
                        Compare and contrast interpretations and
                         perspectives presented in sources and
                         draw independent conclusions

 1.2    The following information below indicates how to source-based
        questions are assessed:

           In the marking of source-based questions, credit needs to be given to
            any other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or
            examples.
           In the allocation of marks, emphasis should be placed on how the
            requirements of the question have been addressed.
           In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that
            need to be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated
            in italics.

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014)                       HISTORY P2                                           3

2.     ESSAY QUESTIONS

2.1    The essay questions require candidates to:

          Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner.
           They need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so
           that they are able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an
           effective argument to answer the question posed. It is essential that an
           essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of evidence
           and a conclusion.

2.2    Marking of essays questions

          Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by
           the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
          Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion
           than those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific
           essay.
          When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should
           be credited for any other relevant answer.

2.3    Global assessment of the essay

       The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the
       teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the
       component parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer
       an individual opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an
       argument. The learners will not be required to simply regurgitate ‘facts’ in
       order to achieve a high mark. This approach discourages learners from
       preparing ‘model’ answers and reproducing them without taking into account
       the specific requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the essay
       credits learners’ opinion supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike
       content-based marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the
       emphasis is on the following:
            The construction of argument
            The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such
             argument
            The learner’s interpretation of the question

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4                                        HISTORY P2                            (SEPTEMBER 2014)

 2.4    Assessment procedures of the essay

        2.4.1 Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing essays.

        2.4.2 During the first reading of the extended writing, ticks need to be
              awarded for a relevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in
              memorandum) each of the main points/aspects that is properly
              contextualised (also indicated by bullets in the memorandum) and a
              relevant conclusion (indicated by a bullet in the memorandum) e.g. in
              an answer where there are 5 main points there will be 7 ticks.

        2.4.3 The following additional symbols can also be used:
               introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly
                contextualised
               Wrong statement
               Irrelevant statement

                 Repetition                                                     R
                 Analysis                                                       A√
                 Interpretation                                                 I√

 2.5    The Matrix

        2.5.1 Use of analytical matrix in the marking of essay

                In the marking of essays, with reference to page 5, the given criteria
                shown in the matrix should be used. In assessing the extended
                writing note should be taken of both the content and presentation. At
                the point of intersection of the content and presentation based on the
                seven competency levels, a mark should be awarded.

        (a)     The first reading of essay will be to determine to what extent the main
                aspects have been covered and to allocate the content level (on the
                matrix).
                                                          C       LEVEL 4

        (b)     The second reading of essay will relate to the level (on the matrix) of
                presentation.
                                                         C       LEVEL 4
                                                         P       LEVEL 5

        (c)     Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.
                                                      C      LEVEL 4
                                                                              30 – 33
                                                      P      LEVEL 5

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
  (SEPTEMBER 2014)                                                   HISTORY P2                                                                                  5

  MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY: TOTAL MARKS: 50

                             LEVEL 7               LEVEL 6               LEVEL 5                LEVEL 4              LEVEL 3               LEVEL 2                LEVEL 1
                         Very well planned     Very well planned     Well planned and      Planned and           Shows some            Attempts to            Little or no attempt
PRESENTATION             and structured        and structured                                                                          structure an           to structure the
                                                                     structured essay.     constructed an        evidence of a
                         essay. Good           essay. Developed a    Attempts to           argument.             planned and           answer. Largely        essay.
                         synthesis of          relevant line of                                                                        descriptive or some
                                                                     develop a clear       Evidence used to      constructed
                         information.          argument.                                                                               attempt at
                         Developed an                                argument.             some extent to        argument.             developing a line of
                                               Evidence used to
                         original, well        defend the            Conclusion drawn      support the line of   Attempts to sustain   argument. No
                         balanced and          argument.             from the evidence     argument.             a line of argument.   attempt to draw a
                         independent line      Attempts to draw      to support the line   Conclusions           Conclusions not       conclusion.
                         of argument with      an independent        of argument.          reached based on      clearly supported
                         the use of            conclusion from
                                                                                           evidence.             by evidence.
                         evidence and          the evidence to
                         sustained and         support the line of
                         defended the          argument.
                         argument
CONTENT                  throughout.
                         Independent
                         conclusion is
                         drawn from
                         evidence to
                         support the line of
                         argument.

LEVEL 7
Question has been
fully answered.
                               47–50                 43–46
Content selection
fully relevant to line
of argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has been
answered. Content              43–46                 40–42                 38–39
selection relevant to
a line of argument.
LEVEL 5
Question answered
to a great extent.             38–39                 36–37                 34–35                 30–33                 28–29
Content adequately
covered and relevant.
LEVEL 4
Question
recognisable in
answer.                                                                    30–33                 28–29                 26–27
Some omissions or
irrelevant content
selection.
LEVEL 3
Content selection
does not relate to the
question, but does                                                                                                                           20–23
not answer it, or does                                                                           26–27                 24–25
not always
relate to the
question. Omissions
in coverage.
LEVEL 2
Question
inadequately                                                                                                           20–23                 18–19                   14–17
addressed. Sparse
content.
LEVEL 1
Question
inadequately
                                                                                                                                             14–17                    0–3
addressed or not at
all. Inadequate or
irrelevant content.

  Copyright reserved                                                                                                                        Please turn over

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6                                                HISTORY P2                            (SEPTEMBER 2014)

 SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

 QUESTION 1:                 WHAT ROLE DID STEVE BIKO PLAY IN SOUTH AFRICA’S
                             LIBERATION STRUGGLE IN THE 1970s?

 1.1    1.1.1        [Explain historical concepts from Source 1A – L1]

                     (a)           When people are treated unfairly and their freedom is
                                    limited.
                                   People are denied their basic human rights.
                                   Any other relevant explanation.                   (1 x 2)         (2)

                     (b)           A philosophy based on the belief that liberation for blacks
                                    would be attained if they remove the shackles of their
                                    inferiority.
                                   Any other relevant explanation.                     (1 x 2)       (2)

        1.1.2        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]

                             ANC
                             PAC                                                      (2 x 1)        (2)

        1.1.3        [Interpretation of information from Source 1A – L2]

                              All non-white people should unite and fight against apartheid.
                              Biko wanted to make the people aware that all non-whites are
                               being oppressed in South Africa.
                              Appeal to black people to join the BCM in their fight against
                               apartheid.
                              Any other relevant response.                        (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

        1.1.4        [Extraction of information from Source 1A – L1]

                              “We must unite ourselves and respond as a strong force”
                              “BC made an effort to go beyond its narrow student base”
                              “Black people – workers, students, teachers, the unemployed
                               – all gathered in the hall”
                              Any other relevant response.                      (Any 2 x 1)        (2)

Copyright reserved                                                                          Please turn over

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014)                          HISTORY P2                                          7

 1.2    1.2.1        [Interpretation of information from Source 1B – L2]

                          To uplift black communities.
                          Blacks to help each other.
                          Create employment.
                          To become self-reliant.
                          Any other relevant response.                     (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

        1.2.2        [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]

                          Zimele Trust Fund
                          Ginsberg Educational Trust                            (2 x 1)      (2)

        1.2.3        [Interpretation of information from Source 1B – L1]

                     ●     Zanempilo Clinic                                      (1 x 1)      (1)

        1.2.4        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]

                          Apartheid government was against the BCM.
                          Apartheid saw BC as a threat to their existence.
                          BC challenged apartheid government to end apartheid
                          Apartheid government not prepared to share power
                          Apartheid government not prepared to relinquish power to
                           blacks.
                          Any other relevant response.                     (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

 1.3    1.3.1        [Extraction of information from Source 1C – L1]

                          Be proud
                          Assert yourself
                          Be self-reliant
                          Any other relevant response.                          (3 x 1)      (3)

        1.3.2        [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 1C – L3]

                     JUSTIFIED
                         Both Mandela and Biko were black
                         Both Mandela and Biko fought against apartheid.
                         Biko and the BC filled the vacuum left by the banned ANC.
                         Biko and the BC kept the struggle alive during the
                          banishment of the ANC.
                         Any other relevant response.

                     NOT JUSTIFIED
                         Mandela is subjective.
                         Mandela did not know Biko very well.
                         Mandela was in prison during the 1970s.
                         BC did not remove apartheid immediately.
                         Any other relevant response.                      (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8                                          HISTORY P2                            (SEPTEMBER 2014)

        1.3.3        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]

                          He mobilised the youth into action against apartheid.
                          The formation of the BCM filled the political vacuum in
                           South Africa.
                          Biko initiated the formation of student organisations to
                           oppose Apartheid.
                          He motivated blacks not to fear and remove the feeling of
                           inferiority.
                          Biko played a key role in dismantling apartheid.
                          Any other relevant response.                       (Any 2 x 2)          (4)

        1.3.4        [Interpretation of information from Source 1C – L2]

                          To stand up and fight against oppression.
                          Mental emancipation
                          To break the chains of oppression against apartheid.
                          Any other relevant response.                    (Any 2 x 2)             (4)

        1.3.5        [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from Source 1C – L3]

                     Candidates should take a stance and indicate whether they
                     AGREE or DISAGREE and motivate their answer.

                     AGREE
                        Apartheid was an evil system.
                        Apartheid led to black servitude.
                        Both Mandela and Biko condemned apartheid.
                        Biko’s Black Consciousness contributed to the demise of
                         apartheid.
                        Any other relevant response.

                     DISAGREE
                        Internal and external pressures in the 1980s led to the fall of
                         apartheid.
                        Collapse of communism forced both the ANC and NP to
                         negotiate a peaceful settlement.
                        Biko and his BC brought no change in the 1970s.
                        The UDF and trade unions brought the apartheid government
                         to its knees.
                        Any other relevant response.                       (Any 2 x 2)      (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                     Please turn over

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014)                       HISTORY P2                                             9

 1.4    [Interpretation and evaluation of information from all the sources – L3]

        Candidates may use the following points to answer the question.

              BC kept the liberation struggle alive while the ANC was banned
               (Source 1A)
              BC united black people, students, teachers and workers to fight
               against apartheid (Source 1A)
              Apartheid discriminated against all blacks irrespective of tribes/race
               (Source 1A)
              Mobilised parents, workers and students to spread the ideas of BC
               (Source 1B)
              Self-help programs established by Biko and controlled by blacks
               (Source 1B)
              Mandela acknowledge Biko’s role in shaping the new South Africa
               (Source 1C)
              Biko’s emphasis on self-reliance united blacks (Source 1C)
              Shows that the BC was feared by the NP
              BC was seen as an extension of the aims of the ANC (Source 1C)
              Shows that Biko was killed but his legacy lives on (Source 1C)
              Poster shows that although he was killed his ideas lived on.
              Any other relevant response.                                                   (8)

 Use the following rubric to allocate marks.

 LEVEL 1               Uses evidence in an elementary          Marks: 0 – 2
                        manner, e.g. show little or no
                        understanding of the role of Biko in
                        the South African liberation struggle.
                       Uses evidence partially to report on
                        topic or cannot report on topic.
 LEVEL 2               Evidence is mostly relevant and relates Marks: 3 – 5
                        to a great extent to the topic, e.g.
                        shows an understanding of the role
                        of Biko in the South African liberation
                        struggle.
                       Uses evidence in a very basic manner.
 LEVEL 3               Uses relevant evidence, e.g.            Marks: 6 – 8
                        demonstrates a thorough
                        understanding of the role of Biko in
                        the South African liberation struggle.
                       Evidence relates well to the topic.
                       Uses evidence very effectively in an
                        organised paragraph that shows an
                        understanding of the topic.                                         [50]

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10                                            HISTORY P2                              (SEPTEMBER 2014)

QUESTION 2:          TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION
                     COMMISSION (TRC) SUCCESSFUL IN DEALING WITH SOUTH
                     AFRICA’S DIVIDED PAST?

2.1     2.1.1        [Explanation of historical concepts from Source 2A – L1]

                     (a)         Racial segregation
                                 Discrimination of people on the basis of their colour, race
                                  and gender.
                                 Separation of races politically, economically or socially.
                                 Any other relevant explanation.                   (Any 1 x 2)          (2)

                     (b)         Is the granting of official pardon for people that committed
                                  politically related offences.
                                 Any other relevant explanation.                    (Any 1 x 2)         (2)

        2.1.2        [Extraction of information from Source 2A – L1]

                              To bring to light the causes and nature of gross human
                               violations.
                              Granting of amnesty
                              Disclosure of all relevant facts related to acts of violence.
                              Restoring human and civil dignity
                              Recommending reparation/amnesty.
                              Any other relevant response.                           (Any 4 x 1)        (4)

        2.1.3        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]

                              Much hatred/mistrust existed between different races.
                              To make the new dispensation work in South Africa
                              To prevent further violence that has plagued South Africa for
                               years.
                              To secure the survival of the new democracy.
                              Any other relevant response.                      (Any 1 x 2)             (2)

        2.1.4        [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                           Victim-friendly: Allowed them to find closure and an
                            opportunity to forgive.

                                                            OR

                              Perpetrator-friendly: They were not jailed for their
                               actions/they were granted amnesty.                         (1 x 2)        (2)

Copyright reserved                                                                         Please turn over

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014)                         HISTORY P2                                             11

2.2    2.2.1       [Extraction of information from Source 2B – L1]

                   ●     To seek amnesty.                                          (1 x 1)      (1)

       2.2.2       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]

                        Victims were allowed to tell their perpetrators how the
                         atrocities affected them.
                        The perpetrators got a chance to tell their stories.
                        The perpetrator applied for amnesty.
                        The victims’ families forgave the perpetrators.
                        The victims’ families received compensation.
                        Any other relevant response.                        (Any 2 x 2)         (4)

       2.2.3       [Interpretation of information from Source 2B – L2]

                        Restorative justice – bent on repairing the harm caused by
                         political crimes
                        Retributive justice – bent on punishment for crimes
                         committed                                             (2 x 2)          (4)

       2.2.4       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]

                        Some did not reveal the full detail of their atrocities.
                        Some refused to testify before the TRC.
                        Some perpetrators showed no remorse for the crimes they
                         committed.
                        They favoured retributive justice system.
                        Any other relevant response.                          (Any 1 x 2)      (2)

       2.2.5       [Extraction of information from Source 2B – L1]

                        Mxenges
                        Seremanes
                        Khulumani group                                      (Any 3 x 1)       (3)

Copyright reserved                                                                   Please turn over

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
 12                                     HISTORY P2                           (SEPTEMBER 2014)

        2.2.6    [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from Source 2B – L3]

                 Candidates should take a stance and motivate their answer.

                 JUSTIFIED
                     People must be punished for their crimes.
                     Perpetrators cannot get away with murder.
                     Victims could not be denied justice.
                     Perpetrators held responsible for their crimes.
                     Any other relevant response.

                 NOT JUSTIFIED
                     Did not understand the aims of the TRC.
                     Aimed at repairing the damage caused by Apartheid
                     Attempted to restore human rights’ culture.
                     Any relevant response.                      (Any 2 x 2)                (4)

2.3     2.3.1    [Interpretation of information from Source 2C – L2]

                      P.W. Botha not interested in the aims of the TRC
                      P.W. Botha refused to disclose human rights abuses during
                       his term of office.
                      P.W. refused to appear before the TRC.
                      Any other relevant response.                     (Any 2 x 2)           (4)

        2.3.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L1]

                      Archbishop Desmond Tutu                                 (1 x 2)        (2)

        2.3.3    [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]

                      They felt that the TRC was a witch hunt against them.
                      Some agents felt that they only carried out orders.
                      The TRC focused only on crimes committed by apartheid
                       agents.
                      P.W. Botha maintained, “I did nothing wrong”.
                      Any other relevant response.                        (Any 1 x 2)        (2)

 Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014)                         HISTORY P2                                            13

       2.3.4       [Engage with sources to determine its usefulness, reliability,
                   bias and limitations from Source 2C – L3]

                   RELIABLE
                       It shows that P.W. Botha refused to testify before the TRC
                       The TRC had no legal power to force someone to testify.
                       It was not a court of law.
                       Message can be corroborated with other sources.
                       Any other relevant response.

                   NOT RELIABLE
                       It only shows one person but there were others who also
                        refused to testify.
                       Secondary source.
                       It’s the perception of Shapiro on the TRC.
                       Does not show the reasons for P.W.’s refusal to appear.
                       TRC was a voluntary process.
                       Any other relevant response.                  (Any 2 x 2)             (4)

2.4    [Interpretation and evaluation of information from all sources – L3]

       Candidates should focus on the following in their response.

       SUCCESS
          Brought reconciliation between whites/Blacks (Source 2A)
          Eradicated hatred between blacks and whites
           Aim: - forgiving without forgetting
                  - restorative justice to enhance unity
                  - restorative justice to enhance human rights (Source 2A)
          Amnesty given to those who told their stories (Source 2B)
          Victims forgiven them/find disclosure (Source 2B)
          Victims compensated
          Many people testified (small fry) – (Source 2C)
          Leaders of major parties missed out on the opportunity to enhance
           racial unity by refusing to testify (Source 2C)
          Ensured the survival of the new democracy
          Any other relevant response

       FAILURE
           Did not bring unity amongst blacks and whites (Source 2B)
           Reparation could not replace a human life.
           Some wanted retributive justice (Source 2B)
           Perpetrators must be punished for their crimes
           Leaders of major political parties did not appear before the TRC
           P.W. Botha refused to testify, “I did nothing wrong”(Source 2C)
           F.W. De Klerk said it was a “witch hunt” against whites.
           IFP who committed lots of political crimes refused to testify.
           The ANC said that TRC tried to criminalise the liberation struggle.
           Any other relevant response.                                                      (8)

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
14                                       HISTORY P2                           (SEPTEMBER 2014)

 Use the following rubric to assess this paragraph.

 LEVEL 1            Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g.     Marks: 0 – 2
                     show little or no understanding whether
                     the TRC was a success or failure.
                    Uses evidence partially to report on topic or
                     cannot report on topic.
 LEVEL 2            Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a    Marks: 3 – 5
                     great extent to the topic, e.g. shows an
                     understanding whether the TRC was a
                     success or a failure.
                    Uses evidence in a very basic manner.
 LEVEL 3            Uses relevant evidence, e.g. shows a            Marks: 6 – 8
                     thorough understanding of whether the
                     TRC was a success or a failure.
                    Evidence relates well to the topic
                    Uses evidence very effectively in an
                     organised paragraph that shows an
                     understanding of the topic.                                           [50]

Copyright reserved                                                                  Please turn over

### Page 15

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014)                         HISTORY P2                                           15

QUESTION 3:            WHAT IMPACT DID OF GLOBALISATION HAVE ON AFRICA
                       AFTER 1989?

3.1    3.1.1       [Explanation of historical concept from Source 3A – L1]

                         Movement of people, information, investments, goods and
                          services around the world.
                         People and countries become increasingly interconnected –
                          politically, economically and culturally.
                         Any other relevant explanation                   (Any 1 x 2)             (2)

       3.1.2       [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]

                         The growth of large companies                         (1 x 2)            (2)

       3.1.3       [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]

                         They are more profitable than smaller ones.
                         They accounted for 17% of world trade.
                         200 transnational corporations now dominate 32% of world
                          trade                                           (Any 2 x 1)              (2)

       3.1.4       [Interpretation of information from Source 3A – L2]

                         Advanced technology in travel made distance irrelevant
                         Internet made news and information move quickly around the
                          world
                         Disappearance of borders – few trade barriers
                         Greater movement and migration of people in search of jobs
                         Any other relevant response.                      (Any 1 x 2)            (2)

       3.1.5       [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]

                         Coca Cola ●         McDonald’s           ●     Lilly
                         Camel         ●     Microsoft            ●     Pepsi
                         Playboy       ●     Apple                ●     Shell
                         Nike          ●     IBM                  ●     EXXOX
                         Any other relevant answer.                         (Any 4 x 1)           (4)

       3.1.6       [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from Source 3A L3]

                         Both sources mention large companies.
                         The written source shows that large companies produce
                          goods in bulk and the visual source shows these big famous
                          companies.
                         Any other relevant response.                      (Any 2 x 2)            (4)

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 16

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
16                                      HISTORY P2                            (SEPTEMBER 2014)

       3.1.7    [Engage with sources to determine its usefulness, reliability, bias and
                limitations from Source 3A – L3]

                     Large companies control the US.
                     Large companies control US policies.
                     Shows that the designer is against multi-national organisations
                      that not only control the US but also the world.
                     Any other relevant response.                        (Any 2 x 2)            (4)

3.2    3.2.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]

                     Collapse of the USSR
                     Collapse of communism                                     (2 x 1)          (2)

       3.2.2    [Interpretation of information from Source 3B – L2]

                     They forced African countries to adopt democracy.
                     They set conditions for African states.
                     They forced African countries to privatise state enterprises.
                     They wanted less trade union activity.
                     Any other relevant response.                         (Any 2 x 2)           (4)

       3.2.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3B – L2]

                LESSER EXTENT
                    Globalisation widens the gap between rich and poor.
                    Underdeveloped and developing African countries are
                     subjected to a set of pre-conditions for aid.
                    African countries were forced to privatise state enterprises.
                    African countries cannot compete with prices from the North.
                    Western culture spread into African countries – Africa losing
                     their culture.
                    Aid lead to more debt.
                    Any other relevant response.

                GREATER EXTENT
                   Africa countries can sell their products overseas.
                   African skilled labour can migrate in search of a better living.
                   Created an international job market.
                   Any other relevant response.                         (Any 2 x 2)             (4)

3.3    3.3.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 3C – L1]

                     Governments fear they will withdraw their business and
                      relocate.                                              (1 x 1)             (1)

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 17

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014)                         HISTORY P2                                           17

       3.3.2       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2]

                        Low taxes on profit.
                        Relaxation of labour laws.
                        Any other relevant response.                         (Any 2 x 2)          (4)

       3.3.3       [Extraction of evidence from Source 3C – L1]

                   ●     Northern Hemisphere                                       (1 x 1)         (1)

3.4    3.4.1       [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
                        South Africa’s economy is small in relation to other BRICS
                         countries.
                        South Africa’s contribution to BRICS would be limited.
                        South Africa will not be influential in world economics
                        Any other relevant response.                          (Any 1 x 2)         (2)

       3.4.2       [Interpretation of information from Source 3C – L2]
                        To discuss/promote common interest.
                        These countries made up a sizeable chunk of the world’s
                         population and economy.
                        It includes the continents outside the Northern Hemisphere
                         who control the globalisation process.
                        Non-Western countries can play a role in the global economy.
                        Want to establish a South-South development bank.
                        To increase global influence.
                        Any other relevant response.                       (Any 2 x 2)            (4)

3.5    [Interpretation and evaluation of information from all the sources – L3]
       Candidates should include the following points to answer the question.
       POSITIVE IMPACT

              Accumulates wealth
              Accumulates power
              TNC accumulates wealth and power (Source 3A)
              Seeks new investment opportunities (Source 3B)
              Lowering of tariffs/trade barriers (Source 3C)
              Creates jobs
              Extends skills/education
              New trends in fashion culture/ideas/technology (Source 3A)
              Any other relevant response.

Copyright reserved                                                                 Please turn over

### Page 18

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
18                                        HISTORY P2                           (SEPTEMBER 2014)

       NEGATIVE IMPACT

              Dividing factor
              Northern Hemisphere controls 80% of global wealth (Source 3A)
              Rich is getting richer, poor getting poorer
              In one way led to the spread of western culture (Source 3A)
              TNC influences/dominates local political and economic policies
               (Source 3B)
              TNC’s favours countries with less trade union activities
              Globalisation operates in the interest of businesses and not in the
               interest of people (Source 3B)
              African continent by and large do not share in the wealth of
               globalisation (Source 3C)
              Millions are not connected to the internet
              IMF/World Bank/WTO set strict rules for financial aid (Source 3C).
              Financial aid reinforces poverty and unemployment in Africa.
              Any other relevant response.                                                       (8)

Use the following rubric to allocate a mark.

                          Uses evidence in an elementary manner,         Marks: 0 – 2
                           e.g. shows little or no understanding of
LEVEL 1                    the impact of globalisation on Africa.
                          Uses evidence partially to report on the
                           topic or cannot report on topic.
                          Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a   Marks: 3 – 5
                           great extent to the topic, e.g. shows an
LEVEL 2                    understanding of the impact of
                           globalisation on Africa.
                          Uses evidence in a very basic manner.
                          Uses relevant evidence, e. g.                  Marks: 6 – 8
                           demonstrates a thorough understanding
                           of the impact of globalisation on Africa.
LEVEL 3
                          Uses evidence very effectively in an
                           organised paragraph that shows an
                           understanding of the topic.                                         [50]

Copyright reserved                                                                   Please turn over

### Page 19

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014)                     HISTORY P2                                           19

SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

Answer at least ONE essay question and not more than TWO from this section.

QUESTION 4: CIVIL RESISTANCE IN SOUTH AFRICA: 1970s TO 1980s

SYNOPSIS

Candidates should take a stance and discuss how internal unrest in South Africa
succeeded in dismantling apartheid during the 1980s.

MAIN ASPECTS

Candidates should include the following aspects in their response.

INTRODUCTION:         Candidates should indicate to what extent the internal
                      resistance succeeded in dismantling apartheid.

ELABORATION
    Botha’s total strategy
    Tri-cameral parliament created by P.W. Botha
    ‘Coloured’ and ‘Indians’ represented but excluded blacks
    Africans were seen to have political rights in the so-called homelands
    Reaction of anti-apartheid movements
    The UDF was a non-racial alliance that was launched in 1983
    The UDF launched a massive nationwide campaign to persuade Coloureds
     and Indians not to participate in the elections for the Houses of
     Representatives and Delegates
    Civil society protest against the Tri-cameral parliament showed that the
     majority of South Africans opposed the new structure.
    Freedom marches/strikes/school, rent and consumer boycotts
    Civil protest – role of civic organisations/‘bread and butter issues’
    Wanted to improve the quality of life of township residence
    Protest against poor services by boycotts – refuses to pay rent
    Role of SACC (South African Council of Churches)
    Prominent in fighting for social justice and challenged the apartheid laws
    Stand up for the poor and oppressed
    Role of trade unions – fought for the rights of black workers
    Role of students COSAS (Congress of South African Students)
    Was to co-ordinate student activities in different regions
    Unite students and fight for the demands of students
   AZASO (Azanian Student Organisation) and COSAS organised school oycotts,
    stay-aways, consumer boycotts and self-defence structures against the
    apartheid security forces
   Mass Democratic Movement (MDM) formed when UDF was banned
   Defiance campaign against segregation
   1989 – “year of mass action”
   End conscription campaign
   Any other relevant response.
Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.             [50]
Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 20

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
20                                      HISTORY P2                          (SEPTEMBER 2014)

QUESTION 5:          THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY IN SOUTH AFRICA AND
                     COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST

SYNOPSIS
Candidates should take a stance regarding the statement and discuss how conflicts
disturbed negotiations and the path to a new South Africa.

MAIN ASPECTS

Candidates should include the following aspects in their response

INTRODUCTION:          Candidates should agree or disagree with the line of argument
                       to support their answer with relevant examples

ELABORATION
    Release of Mandela
    Process of negotiations and reform
    Talks between major stakeholders begin
    Groote Schuur Minute
    Pretoria Minute
    Violence – Boipatong, Natal and PWV
    COSAG group and Freedom Alliance
    Codesa 1 and 2
    Bisho massacre
    Assassination of Chris Hani
    AWP storming the World Trade Centre
    Bophuthatswana coup
    Record of understanding
    Interim constitution and Bill of Rights
    Multi-party negotiation process – Sunset clause
    1994 elections
    New constitution
    Any other relevant response.

Conclusion:      Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.       [50]

Copyright reserved                                                               Please turn over

### Page 21

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014)                      HISTORY P2                                        21

QUESTION 6:          THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND A NEW WORLD
                     ORDER 1989 TO THE PRESENT
SYNOPSIS
Candidates must discuss how the collapse of communism and the USSR paved
the way for negotiations between the ANC and the apartheid government after
1989.
MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their response.
INTRODUCTION:          Candidates can give some background on the situation in
                       both the USSR and South Africa in the 1980s or any other
                       relevant introduction.
ELABORATION
Gorbachev’s reforms and the collapse of the Soviet Union
      Perestroika and Glasnost
      Reform communism, but not dismantle it
      Resulted in protests and demonstrations
      Boris Yeltsin – held multi-party elections
      This allowed for the break – up of the Soviet Union – 1989 – 1992
International events and the collapse of the Soviet Union
      Star War race with USA in the 1980s
      Economically weak
      War in Afghanistan
      Forced Gorbachev to implement reforms
      USSR weak in the 1980s to enforce discipline on satellite states
      Fall of Berlin Wall – indicated to Soviet bloc states that they could now
       determine their own fate
      Revolts: Czechoslovakia, Romania, Lithuania and Poland
      Soviet satellites followed the example of the Eastern bloc states
      Direct cause of disintegration of the Soviet empire
De Klerk’s policies and the release of Mandela
      Botha steps down and is replaced by De Klerk in 1989
      De Klerk release Mandela
      Unban the ANC and PAC
International events that forced De Klerk to release Mandela
      Increasing external pressure and opposition to apartheid
      Collapse of communism
      Loss of America as an ally
      Defeat of South Africa at Cuito Cuanavale and withdrawal of South African
       forces from Angola and Namibia
      Independence of Namibia
      All of the above forced De Klerk to order the release of Mandela and
       unban the ANC, PAC and SACP
      Any other relevant response.
Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion        [50]

                                                                 GRANDTOTAL:          150

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

## Related documents

- [HISTORY P2 ADD GR12 SEPT2014 (Afr)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-add-gr12-sept2014-afr/eed60833-7a75-4958-a8dd-2cab09ac22e9) — History · QP · 2014 · Afr
- [History P2 (SG) (English) June 2014 Possible Answer](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-sg-english-june-2014-possible-answer/b6322558-818f-4c67-b34d-309f2eecce06) — History · Memo · 2014 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 SEPT2015 MEMO (Afr)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-sept2015-memo-afr/9b4b0c56-0d1c-480b-8ab5-b260d75b5222) — History · Memo · 2015 · Afr
- [HIST P1 GR12 QP AFR SEP 2014](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/hist-p1-gr12-qp-afr-sep-2014/3296a2b9-b5f3-4845-9366-f96f2839b363) — History · QP · 2014 · Afr
- [History P2 (HG) (English) June 2014 QP](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-hg-english-june-2014-qp/50718c3c-2599-4d0c-91fe-dbc300d11e58) — History · QP · 2014 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2023 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2023-english/7ebc175c-3acc-4751-b898-2a770db59777) — History · Addendum · 2023 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [HISTORY P1 ADDEN GR12 SEP 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-adden-gr12-sep-2024-afrikaans/4faf89db-d19f-40cf-891f-e87e004b0bc5) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2024-afrikaans/b61f3bc2-3524-48c9-af60-f3348133d582) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-sept-2024-afrikaans/8367f672-7028-4e67-a52a-705b946b5122) — QP · 2024 · Afr
- [Gr 12 History P1 (English) 2024 Question Paper X05](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-12-history-p1-english-2024-question-paper-x05/7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5) — QP · 2024 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM JUNE 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-june-2024-afrikaans/e7a9d6cf-de1b-4007-b7b2-b4d762b2fa10) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
