# History Grade 12 Paper 2 EC June 2019 Memo (English)

> Grade 12 History Paper 2 memorandum from the EC June 2019 (English), 24 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download, question paper linked when available.

- Page: https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-memo-june-2019-eng/253a87a8-2fe1-4a4c-9f33-bfecaf576d0a
- Updated: 2026-09-27
- Subject: History
- Grade: Grade 12
- Document type: Memorandum
- Year: 2019
- Exam period: EC June
- Paper: 2
- Curriculum: CAPS
- Pages: 24

Breadcrumbs: [Home](https://www.hlayiso.com/) › [Library](https://www.hlayiso.com/library) › [Grade 12](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12) › [History](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12/history) › [History Grade 12 Paper 2 EC June 2019 Memo (English)](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-memo-june-2019-eng/253a87a8-2fe1-4a4c-9f33-bfecaf576d0a)

## About this document

History · Grade 12 · EC June · 2019. Memorandum, 24 pages. Read online or download the PDF.

Read it free online on the page above; download the PDF from there.

## Document text

Text extracted from the PDF. Layout, diagrams and tables may not survive extraction.

### Page 1

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

                           NATIONAL
                      SENIOR CERTIFICATE

                             GRADE 12

                              JUNE 2019

                       HISTORY P2
                    MARKING GUIDELINE

MARKS:   100

                 This marking guideline consists of 17 pages.

### Page 2

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
2                                      HISTORY P2                            (EC/JUNE 2019)

1. SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

    1.1   The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based
          questions:

            COGNITIVE               HISTORICAL SKILLS                 WEIGHTING OF
             LEVELS                                                    QUESTIONS
                             Extract evidence from sources.
                             Selection and organisation of               30%
              LEVEL 1
                              relevant information from sources.          (15)
                             Define historical concepts/terms.
                             Interpretation of evidence from the
                              sources.
                             Explain information gathered from           40%
              LEVEL 2
                              the sources.                                (20)
                             Analyse evidence from the
                              sources.
                             Interpret and evaluate evidence
                              from sources.
                             Engage with sources to determine
                              its usefulness, reliability, bias and
                                                                          30%
              LEVEL 3         limitations.
                                                                          (15)
                             Compare and contrast
                              interpretations and perspectives
                              presented in sources and draw
                              independent conclusions.

    1.2   The information below indicates how source-based questions are
          assessed:

           In the marking of source-based questions credit needs to be given to
            any other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or
            examples.
           In the allocation of marks emphasis should be placed on how the
            requirements of the question have been addressed.
           In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that
            need to be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated
            in italics.
           When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should
            be credited for any relevant answers.
           Learners are expected to take a stance when answering ‘to what extent’
            questions in order for any marks to be awarded.

    1.3   Assessment procedures for source-based questions

           Use a tick () for each correct answer
           Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2 × 2) which translates to two
            reasons and is given two marks each ( ); (1 × 2) which
            translates to one reason and is given two marks ()
           If a question carries 4 marks then indicate by placing 4 ticks ()

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 3

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2019)                          HISTORY P2                                              3

           Paragraph question
           Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the content and
           structure of the paragraph must be taken into account when awarding a
           mark. The following steps must be used when assessing a response to a
           paragraph question:
            Read the paragraph and place a bullet ( . ) at each point within the text
              where the candidate has used relevant evidence to address the
              question.
            Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate has
              been able to use relevant evidence to write a paragraph.
            At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (√) that the candidate has
              been awarded for the paragraph; as well as the level (1, 2 or 3) as
              indicated in the holistic rubric and a brief comment e.g.

           ___________ ˖ __________________________ ˖ _________________
           _________________ ˖ __________________________ ˖ ___________
                                                                √√√√ Level 2

           Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph
            Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the mark on
             the right-hand bottom margin e.g.
                                                  32
                                                  50

            Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back cover
             the answer script.

2. ESSAY QUESTIONS

     2.1   The essay questions require candidates to:
            Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner.
             They need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so
             that they are able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an
             effective argument to answer the question posed. It is essential that an
             essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of evidence
             and a conclusion.

     2.2   Marking of essay questions
            Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by
             the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
            Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion
             than those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific
             essay.
            When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should
             be credited for Any other relevant answers.

Copyright reserved                                                                Please turn over

### Page 4

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4                                       HISTORY P2                              (EC/JUNE 2019)

2.3    Global assessment of the essay
       The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the
       teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the
       component parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer
       an individual opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an
       argument. The learner will not be required to simply regurgitate 'facts' in
       order to achieve a high mark. This approach discourages learners from
       preparing ‘model’ answers and reproducing them without taking into account
       the specific requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the essay
       credits learners’ opinions supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike
       content-based marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the
       emphasis is on the following:
        The construction of argument
        The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such argument
        The learner’s interpretation of the question.

2.4    Assessment procedures of the essay

       2.4.1    Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing the essay.

       2.4.2    During the reading of the essay ticks need to be awarded for a
                relevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in the marking
                guideline/memorandum), each of the main points/aspects that is
                properly contextualised (also indicated by bullets in the marking
                guideline/memorandum) and a relevant conclusion (indicated by a
                bullet in the marking guideline) e.g. in an answer where there are 5
                main points there will be 7 ticks.

       2.4.3    Keep the PEEL structure in mind when assessing an essay.

                      Point: The candidate introduces the essay by taking a line of
                 P
                      argument/making a major point.
                      Explanation: The candidate should explain in more detail what
                 E    the main point is all about and how it relates to the question
                      posed (line of argument).
                      Example: The candidates should answer the question by
                      selecting content that is relevant to the line of argument.
                 E
                      Relevant examples should be given to sustain the line of
                      argument.
                      Link: Candidates should ensure that the line of argument is
                 L
                      sustained throughout the essay and is written coherently.

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 5

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2019)                            HISTORY P2                                          5

         2.4.4   The following symbols MUST be used when assessing an essay:

                 • Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly
                   contextualised
                                                                     ^
                 • Wrong statement               _________________

                 • Irrelevant statement                |
                                                       |
                                                       |

                 • Repetition                          R

                 • Analysis                            A√

                 • Interpretation                      I√
                     • Line of argument                LOA

2.5      The matrix

         2.5.1   Use of the matrix in the marking of essays.

                 In the marking of essays, the criteria as provided in the matrix should
                 be used. When assessing the essay note both the content and
                 presentation. At the point of intersection of the content and
                 presentation based on the seven competency levels, a mark should
                 be awarded.

                 (a)     The first reading of essays will be to determine to what extent
                         the main aspects have been covered and to allocate the
                         content level (on the matrix).

                                                             C      LEVEL 4

                 (b)     The second reading of essays will relate to the level (on the
                         matrix) of presentation.
                                                             C      LEVEL 4
                                                             P      LEVEL 3

                 (c)     Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.

                                                             C     LEVEL 4
                                                             P     LEVEL 3      }26–27

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 6

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6                                                                HISTORY P2                                                      (EC/JUNE 2019)

MARKING MATRIC FOR ESSAY – TOTAL: 50
                           LEVEL 7             LEVEL 6             LEVEL 5             LEVEL 4            LEVEL 3             LEVEL 2             LEVEL 1*
PRESENTATION             Very well           Very well           Well planned and    Planned and        Shows some          Attempts to         Little or no
                         planned and         planned and         structured essay.   constructed an     evidence of a       structure an        attempt to
                         structured essay.   structured essay.   Attempts to         argument.          planned and         answer.             structure the
                         Good synthesis      Developed a         develop a clear     Evidence used to   constructed         Largely             essay.
                         of information.     relevant line of    argument.           some extent to     argument.           descriptive or
                         Developed an        argument.           Conclusion          support the line   Attempts to         some attempt at
                         original, well      Evidence used to    drawn from the      of argument.       sustain a line of   developing a line
                         balanced and        defend the          evidence to         Conclusions        argument.           of argument. No
CONTENT                  independent line    argument.           support the line    reached based      Conclusions not     attempt to draw a
                         of argument with    Attempts to draw    of argument.        on evidence.       clearly supported   conclusion.
                         the use of          an independent                                             by evidence.
                         evidence and        conclusion from
                         sustained and       the evidence to
                         defended the        support the line
                         argument            of argument.
                         throughout.
                         Independent
                         conclusion is
                         drawn from
                         evidence to
                         support the line
                         of argument.

LEVEL 7
Question has been
fully answered.               47–50               43–46
Content selection
fully relevant to line
of argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has been
answered.                     43–46               40–42               38–39
Content selection
relevant to a line of
argument.
LEVEL 5
Question answered
to a great extent.            38–39               36–37               34–35               30–33              28–29
Content adequately
covered and
relevant.
LEVEL 4
Question
recognisable in
answer.                                                               30–33               28–29              26–27
Some omissions or
irrelevant content
selection.
LEVEL 3
Content selection
does relate to the
question, but does
not answer it, or                                                                                                                20–23
                                                                                          26–27              24–25
does not always
relate to the
question.
Omissions in
coverage.
LEVEL 2
Question
inadequately                                                                                                 20–23               18–19               14–17
addressed. Sparse
content.
LEVEL 1*
Question
inadequately                                                                                                                     14–17                0–13
addressed or not at
all. Inadequate or
irrelevant content.

*Guidelines for allocating a mark for Level 1:
         Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content; no attempt to structure the essay = 0
         Answer includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt to structure the essay = 1–6
         Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay = 7–13

Copyright reserved                                                                                                             Please turn over

### Page 7

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2019)                         HISTORY P2                                            7

SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS

QUESTION 1:          HOW DID THE DIFFERENT YOUTH ORGNISATIONS AND
                     LEADERS INFLUENCE THE SOUTH AFRICAN YOUTH IN THE
                     1970s?

1.1     1.1.1    [Explanation of historical concept from Source 1A – L1]
                  Black Consciousness is a philosophy based on the belief that
                    liberation for blacks would only be attained if they removed the
                    shackles of inferiority and fear
                  Black Consciousness is the belief in oneself as a black/self –
                    reliance/pride
                  Any other relevant response                                    (1 x 2)    (2)

        1.1.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                  Black people take pride in their in their blackness            (1 x 2)    (2)

        1.1.3    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
                  Restore black consciousness
                  Restore African consciousness                                  (2 x 1)    (2)

        1.1.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
                  Black Consciousness (BC) revived a sense of identity
                  It inspired the blacks to fight the apartheid system
                  Any other relevant response                                    (2 x 2)   (4)

        1.1.5    [Ascertain the usefulness of Source 1A – L3]
                 The source is useful because:
                  It highlights the involvement of African American leaders influence
                    on Biko
                  It emphasises the need for Black people to change their mindset
                  It shows the need for them to be proud as a human being, being
                    black and having some dignity.
                  Any other relevant response                             (Any 2 x 2)       (4)

1.2     1.2.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
                     BPC
                     SASO                                                        (2 x 1)    (2)

        1.2.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
                  To reach the masses in all provinces
                  To create/identify leaders in all provinces
                  To spread the ideas of Black Consciousness across
                     South Africa
                  To equip university students in various skills
                  To cater for the needs of high-schools and township-based youth
                  Any other relevant response                          (Any 2 x 2)          (4)

Copyright reserved                                                             Please turn over

### Page 8

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8                                       HISTORY P2                               (EC/JUNE 2019)

       1.2.3   [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
                Taught Black South African students to be self-reliant
                Instilled Black pride and independence
                Taking responsibility for their well-being
                Created leadership for the liberation movement
                Acquisition of skills
                Any other relevant response                            (Any 2 x 2)         (4)

1.3    1.3.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
                  There was serious mobilisation in the schools                 (1 x 2)    (2)

       1.3.2    Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]

                (a)    Proposed a mass demonstration against Afrikaans          (1 x 2)     (2)

                (b)    Led the initial class boycott at Orlando West Junior Secondary
                       School                                                   (1 x 2)     (2)

       1.3.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
                 Afrikaans was the oppressor’s language
                 Students and teachers were not familiar with the language
                 Resulted in demotivation, drop outs and failure among black South
                    African learners.
                 Any other relevant response                            (Any 2 x 2)        (4)

1.4    [Comparison of sources and ascertaining similarities between Sources 1B
       and 1C–L3]
        Source 1B indicates the training of leaders in various political skills and
          Source 1C shows the leaders taking action against oppression.
        Both sources highlight the influence that the student movements had on
          the youth in the 1970s
        Source 1B influenced students to resist Bantu Education and Source 1C
          shows how students resisted Bantu Education.
        Any other relevant response                                        (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

1.5    1.5.1    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                 Biko believed in one nation for the country which he called Azania
                 People still believed in Steve Biko and the Black Consciousness
                    Movement
                 Motivate people to continue the fight against apartheid
                 To commemorate Biko for his contribution in the fight against
                    apartheid
                 Any other relevant response                              (Any 1 x 2)      (2)

       1.5.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
                 Our country should belong to everyone that lives in it
                 The countries name should be changed to Azania.
                 Any other relevant response                            (Any 1 x 2)        (2)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 9

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2019)                        HISTORY P2                                          9

1.6    [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources –
       L3]
       Candidates could include the following aspects in their responses:
            Black Consciousness expressed black pride and the determination to rise
             against oppression (Source 1A)
            Created independence/self- reliance amongst black South Africans
             (Source 1A)
            The ideas of Black Consciousness spread across schools which
             conscientised learners to reject Bantu Education (Source 1B)
            Mobilised students to resist Afrikaans as a medium of instruction
             (Sources 1C and 1D)
            BC encouraged students to embark on mass demonstrations/class
             boycotts against Bantu Education (Source 1C)
            Encouraged black South African youth to stand up for their rights (own
             knowledge)
            The philosophy of Black Consciousness served to politically conscientise
             South Africans (own knowledge)
            Biko spoke about the new South Africa which he called Azania (Source
             1D)
            People still believe in Biko and Black Consciousness (Source 1D).
            Any other relevant response                                                 (8)

       Use the following rubric to allocate marks:

                         Uses evidence in an elementary manner,
                          e.g. shows no or little understanding of
                          how the different youth organisations
                                                                          MARKS
            LEVEL 1       and leaders influence the South African
                                                                           0–2
                          youth in the 1970s.
                         Uses evidence partially or cannot write a
                          paragraph.
                         Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to
                          a great extent on the topic, e.g. shows
                          some understanding of how the
                          different youth organisations and               MARKS
            LEVEL 2
                          leaders influenced the South African             3–5
                          youth in the 1970s.
                         Uses evidence in a very basic manner to
                          write a paragraph.
                         Uses relevant evidence, e.g.
                          demonstrates a thorough
                          understanding of how the different
                          youth organisations and leaders
                                                                          MARKS
            LEVEL 3       influenced the South African youth in
                                                                           6–8
                          the 1970s.
                         Uses evidence very effectively in an
                          organised paragraph that shows an
                          understanding of the topic.
                                                                                         (8)
                                                                                        [50]

Copyright reserved                                                          Please turn over

### Page 10

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10                                      HISTORY P2                                (EC/JUNE 2019)

QUESTION 2:          HOW SUCCESSFUL WAS THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION
                     COMMISSION (TRC) IN DEALING WITH SOUTH AFRICA’S
                     DIVIDED PAST?

2.1    2.1.1    [Explanation of historical concepts from Source 2A – L1]
                (a) Apartheid
                       Discrimination of people on the basis of their colour, race
                        and gender
                       Separation of races politically, economically and socially
                       Any other relevant explanation                     (Any 1 x 2)       (2)

                (b)    Amnesty
                        Is the granting of official pardon for people that committed
                         politically related offences during apartheid
                        Any other relevant explanation                       (Any 1 x 2)    (2)

       2.1.2    [Extraction of information from Source 2A – L1]
                 To bring to light the causes, nature and extent of gross human
                    violations
                 Granting of amnesty
                 Disclosure of all relevant facts related to acts of violence.
                 Restoring human and civil dignity
                 Recommending reparation/amnesty
                 Any other relevant response                                (Any 3 x 1)     (3)

       2.1.3    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                 Much hatred/mistrust existed between different races
                 To make the new dispensation work in South Africa
                 To prevent further violence that has plagued South Africa for
                    years
                 To secure the survival of the new democracy
                 Any other relevant response                            (Any 2 x 2)         (4)

       2.1.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
                 Victim-friendly: Allowed them to find closure and an opportunity
                    to forgive
                                                   OR
                 Perpetrator-friendly: They were not jailed for their actions/they
                    were granted amnesty                                        (1 x 2)      (2)

2.2    2.2.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
                 Eugene De Kock                                                  (1 x 2)    (2)

       2.2.2    [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
                 De Kock was approached by General van Rensburg to kill the
                    Motherwell policemen
                 De Kock approached the technical division of the Pretoria police
                 He had a bomb made                                          (3 x 1)        (3)

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 11

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2019)                         HISTORY P2                                          11

        2.2.3    [Interpretation of evidence of from Source 2B – L2]

                    Candidates need to take a stance and support their response
                     with relevant answers
                    YES
                    He made an appeal to meet with the widows of the victims
                    He wanted to apologise
                    He acknowledged their pain
                    Any other relevant response                           (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

        2.2.4    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
                  Emotional
                  Forgiveness
                  Tearful
                  Any other relevant response                              (Any 1 x 2)    (4)

2.3     2.3.1    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
                  It depicts Eugene de Kock, Craig Williamson and Johan Coetzee
                     appearing before the Amnesty Commission of the TRC
                  The Amnesty Commission sat at the Union buildings in Pretoria
                  They were responsible for the murders of many anti-apartheid
                     activists
                  They have committed many political crimes in different counties
                  Any other relevant response                            (Any 1 x 2)      (2)

        2.3.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
                  Seat of power of the government which was guilty of human rights
                     abuses
                  It represented the leadership of the government who gave orders
                  They were all ex government officials.
                  Any other relevant response                           (Any 1 x 2)       (2)

2.4     [Comparison of Source 2B and Source 2C – L3]
         Source 2B indicates that De Kock was an implicated witness in the TRC
           hearings. Source 2C shows that De Kock appears before the TRC at the
           Union building
         Both sources refer to bombs being used to get rid of state enemies
         In Source 2B De Kock reveals the truth about the Motherwell bombing and
           in Source 2C the truth unfolds/The show ain’t over till the fat man sings
         Any other relevant response                                        (Any 2 x 2)   (4)

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 12

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
12                                     HISTORY P2                              (EC/JUNE 2019)

2.5    2.5.1    [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
                 The truth is being told of what happened                     (1 x 2)    (2)

       2.5.2    [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
                 The issue on the granting of amnesty
                 Some victims wanted perpetrators to be punished for their crimes
                 Some people who were guilty of gross human violations refused to
                    appear before the TRC
                 Some perpetrators did not tell the truth and showed no remorse
                 Any other relevant response                             (Any 2 x 2)     (4)

       2.5.3    [Evaluating the usefulness of Source 2D – L3]
                The source is useful because:
                 Hatred and animosities of the past would go away/heal the
                   wounds of the past
                 It would restore the respect (worth) of the South African nation
                 It would be an admission that something wrong was done
                 Bring about reconciliation/unity
                 Any other relevant response                              (Any 2 x 2)    (4)

2.6    [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources –
       L3]
       Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:
        After winning the 1994 elections, the ANC established the TRC (Source
            2A)
        Objectives were to establish causes, nature and extent of gross human
            violations (Source 2A)
        Granting of amnesty to those that made full disclosure (Source 2 A)
        They were able to come forward and tell their stories (Source 2A)
        Eugene de Kock was the first implicated witness that applied for amnesty
            (Source 2B)
        The mothers of the victims in the Motherwell Bombing forgave him
            (Source 2B)
        They wanted De Kock to have a future (Source 2B)
        Three of them were involved in atrocities (Source 2C)
        They also appeared before the TRC (Source 2C)
        Mbeki gives reasons as to why it is important to tell the truth at the TRC
            (Source 2D)
        Telling the truth is as painful as hurting the victims (Source 2D)
        Any other relevant response

Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 13

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2019)                        HISTORY P2                                      13

Use the following rubric to allocate marks:

                      Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g.
                       shows no or little understanding of how
                       successful the Truth and Reconciliation
    LEVEL 1            Commission (TRC) was in dealing with           MARKS 0–2
                       South Africa’s divided past.
                      Uses evidence partially or cannot write a
                       paragraph.
                      Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a
                       great extent on the topic, e.g. shows an
                       understanding of how successful the
                       Truth and reconciliation commission
    LEVEL 2                                                           MARKS 3–5
                       (TRC) was in dealing with South Africa’s
                       divided past.
                      Uses evidence in a very basic manner to
                       write a paragraph.
                      Uses relevant evidence, e.g.
                       demonstrates a thorough understanding
                       of how successful the Truth and
                       reconciliation commission (TRC) was in
    LEVEL 3                                                           MARKS 6–8
                       dealing with South Africa’s divided past.
                      Uses evidence very effectively in an
                       organised paragraph that shows an
                       understanding of the topic.                                    (8)
                                                                                     [50]

Copyright reserved                                                       Please turn over

### Page 14

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
14                                      HISTORY P2                               (EC/JUNE 2019)

SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS

QUESTION 3:          CIVIL RESISTANCE, 1970s TO 1980s: SOUTH AFRICA:
                     THE CRISIS OF APARTHEID IN THE 1980s

[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills]

SYNOPSIS
Candidates should explain to what extent the international anti-apartheid movement
played a major role in ensuring the eventual downfall of the apartheid regime in the
1980s. Candidates need to use relevant examples that the international civil
resistance movement used against the apartheid regime.

MAIN ASPECTS

Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:

    Introduction: Candidates need to explain to what extent the international anti-
     apartheid movement was responsible for the eventual downfall of apartheid
     regime.

ELABORATION
 Formation and role of the Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) in the United Kingdom
   (background)
 Formation and role of Irish Anti-Apartheid Movement (IAAM) (background)
 IDAF: financial backing to activists
 PW Botha's attempts at reforming apartheid by introducing the Tri-Cameral
   parliamentary system in 1983
 PW Botha's Rubicon Speech of 1985 forced the international community into
   action which embarked on various forms of boycotts, sanctions and
   disinvestments against the apartheid regime
 Sport Boycotts: The role of the South African Non-Racial Olympic Committee
   (SANROC) campaigned against discrimination in sport/against participants of
   whites only South African teams in international sporting events
 The role of Halt All Racial Tours (HART) (staged protest action against the 'racist'
   Springbok rugby tour in New Zealand in 1981)
 The role of the South African Council on Sport (SACOS) (established political
   links with the UDF and COSATU and they insisted that sports boycotts be
   maintained until apartheid ended - their slogan 'No normal sport in an abnormal
   society')
 By the late 1980s South Africa was banned from 90% of world sport
 Cultural Boycotts: In 1985, US artists protested against apartheid and refused
   to perform in South Africa
 Raised money for liberation movements (In 1986 the Freedom Festival in
   London;
 Musicians expressed their solidarity with freedom loving South Africans

Copyright reserved                                                              Please turn over

### Page 15

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2019)                      HISTORY P2                                          15

   Academic Boycotts: International scholars refused to travel to South Africa/
    International publishers refused to publish South African manuscripts and grant
    access to information/International conferences barred South African scholars/
    Institutions abroad denied South Africa academics access and refused to
    recognise South African degrees
   Consumer boycotts: OPEC placed an embargo on oil sales to South Africa
    (South Africa experienced a recession in 1980s)/Irish workers refused to handle
    fruits from SA/Imports of raw materials from South Africa – coal, iron, steel –
    were banned
   Disinvestments: In 1980s foreign investments dropped by 30%; by 1980 Britain
    already disinvested from Simon’s Town naval dockyard; General Motors and
    Barclays Bank pulled out of SA/In the 1980s SAs economy struggled as investors
    left the country
   The effects of AAM protests had a negative effect on the South African
    government
   Between 1985 and 1990 over 200 US companies pulled out of South Africa,
    University of California withdrew investments of three billion dollars from South
    Africa
   Sanctions: (In 1980s the Sullivan Principle, workers of all USA companies
    should be treated equally) In 1985 the US Bank – Chase Manhattan Bank cut
    ties with South Africa; the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) closed for 4
    days. The value of the rand dropped by 35% from 54 to 34 cents to the dollar), in
    1986 the US Congress passed a law that banned all new investments and loans
    in SA; big corporations such as General Electric, Pepsi Cola, General Motors,
    Mobil and IBM stopped their activities in South Africa; USA threatened to stop
    weapon sales to countries which provided weapons to South Africa; in 1986 the
    Anti-Apartheid Law of the USA caused Europe and Japan to introduce sanctions
    against South Africa/International banks lost confidence in South Africa's
    economy
   In 1982, United Nations (UN) condemned apartheid and called for total sanctions
    against South Africa
   In 1985, the European Economic Community banned new investments in South
    Africa
   In 1988 one fifth of British companies withdrew their businesses from South
    Africa because of pressure from shareholders/Barclays Bank, sold their shares
    due to pressure of the British public/The South African economy kept stagnating
    and produced a growth of only 1,1%
   Release Mandela Campaign: (Wembley Stadium/United Nations/UN Security
    Council and UN General Assembly called for the release of Nelson Mandela)
   The Role of international trade unions: (The AAM in Europe and Australia;
    Liverpool dockworkers; Finland's Transport Workers Union imposed a ban on
    trade with South Africa)
   This resulted in SA experiencing great economic difficulties and they were forced
    to begin negotiations with liberation organisations in South Africa
   The role of the Front-Line states
   Any other relevant response

   Conclusion: Candidates need to tie up their argument with a relevant
    conclusion.                                                                         [50]

Copyright reserved                                                         Please turn over

### Page 16

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
16                                     HISTORY P2                              (EC/JUNE 2019)

QUESTION 4:          THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY TO SOUTH AFRICA AND
                     COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST

[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills.]

SYNOPSIS
Candidates need to critically discuss how South Africa emerged as a democracy
from the crisis of the 1990s. Relevant examples to South Africa’s road to democracy
must be discussed.

MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their essays:

    Introduction: Candidates need to critically discuss the different role-players
     in creating conditions for South Africa’s road to democracy from 1990 to 1994.

ELABORATION
Focus on different role players in the following key historical events and turning
points:
 Release of Mandela and unbanning of ANC, PAC and SACP
 The process of negotiations (i.e. Groote Schuur Minute, Pretoria Minute)
 Suspension of the armed struggle
 CODESA 1
 Referendum
 CODESA 2
 Record of Understanding
 Increased violence – Rolling mass action (i.e. Boipatong, Bhisho, etc.)
 Goldstone Commission
 Multi party negotiations
 Death of Hani – call for peace
 Storming of the World Trade Centre, etc.
 1994 election – cast ballot in KZN
 ANC won elections and Mandela became the first black South African president
 Any other relevant response

 Conclusion: Candidates need to tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion. [50]

Copyright reserved                                                           Please turn over

### Page 17

Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/JUNE 2019)                        HISTORY P2                                           17

QUESTION 5:          THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND A NEW WORLD ORDER:
                     THE EVENTS OF 1989
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills]
SYNOPSIS
Candidates need to state whether they agree or disagree with the statement. They
need to indicate whether the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1989 served as a
catalyst for South Africa to begin its political transformation in the 1990s. Candidates
must support their given line of argument with relevant historical evidence.
MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their response:
 Introduction: Candidates need to indicate whether the disintegration of the Soviet
  Union in 1989 served as a catalyst for the political transformation that occurred in
  South Africa in the 1990s.

ELABORATION
In agreeing with the assertion, candidates could include the following points in their
answer.
   The impact of the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1989 on South Africa
   Gorbachev’s reform policies of Glasnost and Perestroika
   The communist regimes in Eastern Europe collapsed
   The Berlin Wall had fallen
   Changes in the world contributed to the end of apartheid
   The collapse of the USSR deprived the ANC of its main source of support
    (financial; military and moral and its consequences)
   The National Party claim that it was protecting South Africa from a communist
    onslaught became unrealistic
   Western world powers supported the move that South Africa resolve its problems
    peacefully and democratically
   It became evident the National Party government could not maintain white
    supremacy indefinitely
   Influential National Party members started to realise that apartheid was not the
    answer to the needs of white capitalist development
   The Battle of Cuito Cuanavale and its consequences
   The security forces and state of emergency had not stopped township revolts
   By the late 1980s South Africa was in a state of economic depression
   The role of business leaders in South Africa’s political transformation
   PW Botha suffered a stroke and was succeeded by FW De Klerk
   FW de Klerk started to accept that the black South African struggle against
    apartheid was not a conspiracy directed from Moscow
    This enabled De Klerk to engage in discussions with the liberation organisations
    On 2 February 1990, De Klerk announced ‘a new and just constitutional
     dispensation’
    This signalled the end of apartheid
   Any other relevant response
Conclusion: Candidates need to tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.           [50]
                                                                               TOTAL: 100
Copyright reserved                                                            Please turn over

### Page 18

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

### Page 19

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

### Page 20

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

### Page 21

Downloaded from hlayiso.com

### Page 22

Downloaded from hlayiso.com



         

### Page 23

Downloaded from hlayiso.com



### Page 24

Downloaded from hlayiso.com



## Related documents

- [History P1 Addendum June 2019 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-addendum-june-2019-english/7fe1b20a-ba5e-490b-9abf-be5d980cecd7) — History · Addendum · 2019 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2019 English](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2019-english/ee9068f3-f0ae-4df5-91cf-0f91d2112d6b) — History · Addendum · 2019 · Eng
- [Grade 12 NSC History P2 (Afrikaans) X10 2019 Preparatory Examination Addendum](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-nsc-history-p2-afrikaans-x10-2019-preparatory-examination-addendum/4c8825cb-7328-4a35-b4a2-21579182a6ed) — History · Addendum · 2019 · Afr
- [Grade 12 NSC History P2 (English) X05 2019 Preparatory Examination Question Paper](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-nsc-history-p2-english-x05-2019-preparatory-examination-question-paper/b86194b9-4818-4f56-b6a6-1f8188552349) — History · QP · 2019 · Eng
- [Grade 12 NSC History P2 (English) X10 2019 Preparatory Examination Question Paper](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/grade-12-nsc-history-p2-english-x10-2019-preparatory-examination-question-paper/823f960e-4e82-4df5-9636-7331aa167ec2) — History · QP · 2019 · Eng
- [History P2 Nov 2019 Addendum Eng](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-nov-2019-addendum-eng/12189d7f-06ef-4026-899e-44679058dce8) — History · Addendum · 2019 · Eng

## More from Grade 12 History

- [Workguide - Case Study Strategies](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/workguide-case-study-strategies/0b4c8d70-c563-4cfe-93e0-dad57e8fbeb3) — Guide
- [HISTORY P1 ADDEN GR12 SEP 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p1-adden-gr12-sep-2024-afrikaans/4faf89db-d19f-40cf-891f-e87e004b0bc5) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-sept-2024-afrikaans/b61f3bc2-3524-48c9-af60-f3348133d582) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 QP SEPT 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-qp-sept-2024-afrikaans/8367f672-7028-4e67-a52a-705b946b5122) — QP · 2024 · Afr
- [Gr 12 History P1 (English) 2024 Question Paper X05](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/gr-12-history-p1-english-2024-question-paper-x05/7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5) — QP · 2024 · Eng
- [HISTORY P2 GR12 ADDENDUM JUNE 2024 Afrikaans](https://www.hlayiso.com/library/history-p2-gr12-addendum-june-2024-afrikaans/e7a9d6cf-de1b-4007-b7b2-b4d762b2fa10) — Addendum · 2024 · Afr

## Collection

- [Grade 12 past papers](https://www.hlayiso.com/grade-12/past-papers)

---

Hlayiso: free CAPS and IEB past papers, memos, notes and study guides for South African learners. When citing, link the page URL above, not a PDF or /api/ URL.
