SPSC PAT Assessment Rubric 2020 hlayiso.com

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Sport and Exercise Science Practical Assessment Task (PAT) Grade 12 – 2020 Assessment Rubric IEB Copyright © 2020 PLEASE TURN OVER

Downloaded from hlayiso.com NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE: SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE (PAT): ASSESSMENT RUBRIC Page 2 of 6 ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT TASK 2020 TASK COMPONENT LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Plan of Action A detailed, feasible plan is A plan is provided that clearly A plan is provided that No plan or an incomplete plan provided that clearly outlines outlines the methodology that outlines the methodology that that is unclear is provided. (5 marks) the methodology that will be will be followed with some will be followed but it lacks followed: what will be done, minor flaws. some important details and / by whom, when, where and or has questionable how. timeframes. 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Information Gathering The questionnaire complies The questionnaire complies The questionnaire does not The questionnaire is invalid as with all the criteria. There are with almost all of the criteria. comply with many of the it does not comply with most (5 marks) no flaws in detail. There may be some minor criteria. of the criteria. Questionnaire: flaws in detail. A survey was accurately A partial survey was A partial survey was • Appropriate layout conducted. A survey was accurately conducted. conducted. • Clear explanation and conducted. instructions to athletes OR provided The survey is not authentic. • Relevant, appropriate and unambiguous questions • Logical order • Various questioning techniques used 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Data Analysis The three selected athletes' The three selected athletes' The three selected athletes' Interpretation of data is invalid data is comprehensively data is analysed and data is analysed and or not evident. It is largely (5 × 3 = 15 marks) analysed and interpreted; any interpreted, any problems are interpreted, any problems are incomplete or very inaccurate. (5 marks for each athlete problems are clearly and identified identified selected) accurately identified. There are minor There are important flaws/omissions. flaws/omissions. IEB Copyright © 2020

Downloaded from hlayiso.com NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE: SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE (PAT): ASSESSMENT RUBRIC Page 3 of 6 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Baseline Tests All the criteria are fully met. Most of the criteria are met. Some of the criteria are met. Few or none of the criteria are met. (5 × 2 = 10 marks) Clear justification for selected Clear justification for selection Justification for selection of test(s) provided. of test(s) provided test(s) provided Reasoning for test(s) not Criteria: provided • Appropriate Hand-eye or Evidence of tests provided is Evidence of tests provided is Evidence of tests is provided Foot-eye test and Basic complete and explicit. complete and explicit. but incomplete. OR eye test is used • Correct explanation and/or Reasoning for test(s) provided demonstration provided but invalid. for athletes Little or no evidence of tests is • Sound knowledge of test provided or evidence is procedure unclear. • Logical work order • Professionalism • Effective time management • Appropriate use of equipment (if applicable) 5 marks 4 marks 2 – 3 marks 0-1 marks Design Visual Training Training programme meets all One criterion not met in the Two or three criteria not met in Four or more criteria not met Programmes the criteria. training programme. the training programme. in the training programme. (5 × 3 = 15 marks) (5 marks for each training programme) Criteria for programme: • Suitable for athlete (as per questionnaire) • Suitable for athlete's sport • Athlete's level of competence taken into account • Any injuries/weaknesses taken into account • Upcoming competitions / events taken into account • Suited to any visual problems the athlete has IEB Copyright © 2020 PLEASE TURN OVER

Downloaded from hlayiso.com NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE: SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE (PAT): ASSESSMENT RUBRIC Page 4 of 6 5 marks 4 marks 2-3 marks 0–1 marks Create a diary The format of the diary The format of the diary is The format of the diary is Design of the diary is poor captures all relevant slightly flawed either in the flawed either in the (5 marks) information and is user information required or in its information required or in its OR friendly. design design All three diaries are not Three completed diaries are Three completed diaries are OR completed or not provided. provided. provided. All three diaries are not complete 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Post program tests All the criteria are fully met. Most of the criteria are met. Some of the criteria are met. Few or none of the criteria are . met. (5 marks) Evidence of tests provided is Evidence of tests provided is Evidence of tests provided but complete and explicit. complete and explicit. incomplete. Little or no evidence of tests Criteria: provided or evidence is • Identical test(s) used on unclear. each athlete • Identical test procedure used • Correct explanation and/or demonstration provided for athletes • Logical work order • Professionalism • Effective time management • Appropriate use of equipment (if applicable) IEB Copyright © 2020

Downloaded from hlayiso.com NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE: SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE (PAT): ASSESSMENT RUBRIC Page 5 of 6 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Design of Reflection The design of the The design of the The design does not comply The questionnaire is invalid as Questionnaire questionnaire meets all the questionnaire meets almost all with many of the criteria. it does not comply with most criteria. There may be some the criteria of the criteria. (5 marks) minor flaws in detail. Partial surveys are provided. Three completed OR Criteria: Three completed questionnaires are provided. • Format and layout questionnaires are provided. The questionnaires are not • Relevant, appropriate and authentic. unambiguous questions Three surveys are not • Logical order completed or are not • Various question provided. techniques used Questions should include: • Overall ease of training programme • Overall appeal of the training programme • Rating of training programme • Suggestions to improve training programme 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Data Analysis A comprehensive analysis An analysis and interpretation An analysis and interpretation There is an attempt to analyse and interpretation of all the of the data is provided with of the data is provided but and interpret the data but it is (10 marks) data collected is provided. minor flaws/omissions. there are gaps and flaws. largely incomplete or very inaccurate. 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Evaluation of Training A comprehensive and An evaluation of the An evaluation of the There is an attempt to programme(s) objective evaluation of the effectiveness of the training effectiveness of the training evaluate the effectiveness of effectiveness of the training programme(s) is provided with programme(s) is provided but the training programme(s) but (5 × 2 = 10 marks) programme(s) is provided. minor flaws/omissions. there are important flaws it is brief and /or inaccurate. and/or omissions. IEB Copyright © 2020 PLEASE TURN OVER

Downloaded from hlayiso.com NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE: SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE (PAT): ASSESSMENT RUBRIC Page 6 of 6 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Conclusion A concise conclusion is A good conclusion is provided A conclusion is provided but it An attempt at a conclusion is provided that relates directly but it has minor flaws in detail lacks detail and /or focus. provided but it is vague, (5 × 2 = 10 marks) to the topic and links the initial or is not concise. irrelevant or incomplete. information gathered and the final outcome. Strengths in OR the process are identified, No conclusion is attempted. limitations are acknowledged and recommendations are made for improvement. 5 marks 4 marks 2–3 marks 0–1 marks Organisation and Layout All criteria are met. Almost all criteria are met. Some criteria met. Disorganised, minimal criteria Exemplary presentation. Minor flaws. Major flaws. met. (5 marks) Criteria: • All phases included • Typed • Font – Arial • Font size – 12 • Headings – font size 14 • Text is edited for spelling and grammar • References provided in recognised format • Letters of permission included in Appendix • All completed questionnaires included in Appendix IEB Copyright © 2020