Engineering Graphics Design PAT GR 12 2017 Eng

Downloaded from hlayiso.com 333 ENGINEERING GRAPHICS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT TASKS 2017 These guidelines consist of 27 pages. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 2 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 SECTION A (TEACHER GUIDELINES) 3 2. The structure of the practical assessment task (PAT) for EGD 3 Elements that make up the PAT mark for Engineering Graphics and Design 5 3. Administration of the PAT 5 4. Assessment and moderation of the PAT 6 4.1 Assessment 6 4.2 Moderation 6 4.3 Declaration of authenticity 7 5. Conclusion 7 SECTION B (LEARNER TASKS) 8 6. Practical assessment task 1 (PAT 1) A civil design project 8 7. Practical assessment task 2 (PAT 2) A mechanical design project 16 8. ANNEXURE A: Rubric for assessing drawing methods, skills and presentation 24 9. A simplified rubric for the allocation and verification of marks 25 10. Practical assessment task 2017: Summative assessment sheet 26 11. Declaration of authenticity 27 Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 3 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC 1. INTRODUCTION The 16 Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement subjects which contain a practical component all include a practical assessment task (PAT). These subjects are: • AGRICULTURE: Agricultural Management Practices, Agricultural Technology • ARTS: Dance Studies, Design, Dramatic Arts, Music, Visual Arts • SCIENCES: Computer Applications Technology, Information Technology • SERVICES: Consumer Studies, Hospitality Studies, Tourism • TECHNOLOGY: Civil Technology, Electrical Technology, Mechanical Technology and Engineering Graphics and Design A practical assessment task (PAT) mark is a compulsory component of the final promotion mark for all candidates offering subjects that have a practical component and counts 25% (100 marks) of the end-of-year examination mark. The PAT is implemented across the first three terms of the school year. This is broken down into different phases or a series of smaller activities that make up the PAT. The PAT allows for learners to be assessed on a regular basis during the school year and it also allows for the assessment of skills that cannot be assessed in a written format, e.g. test or examination. It is therefore important that schools ensure that all learners complete the practical assessment tasks within the stipulated period to ensure that learners are resulted at the end of the school year. The planning and execution of the PAT differs from subject to subject. SECTION A (TEACHER GUIDELINES) 2. THE STRUCTURE OF THE PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT TASK (PAT) FOR EGD As the Engineering Graphics and Design (EGD) PAT is a compulsory national formal assessment task that contributes 25% (i.e. 100 marks) towards a learner's final NSC mark, it is essentially the third NSC examination paper of EGD. All the presentation requirements must therefore be adhered to and, with the exception of the required research, completed at school, under the supervision of the EGD teacher. Each learner must complete the PAT individually and ALL the presentations must be his/her own original work. The primary purpose of the EGD PAT is to assess four subjective content and concept topics which are not assessed in the examination papers. These are: • The design process • The application of drawing knowledge and drawing skills to the design process • CAD management and drawings • The quality and neatness of free-hand, instrument and CAD drawings The EGD PAT is therefore designed to develop a learner's ability to integrate and apply knowledge and to demonstrate acquired levels of skills and competency. With the inclusion of the PAT into EGD, the learner is given an opportunity to apply Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 4 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC acquired knowledge, skills and values in a creative way through the design process. The learner is given an opportunity to complete the PAT in an environment which is more conducive to the creative processes. This environment should therefore provide the learner with easier access to, and a wider variety of, resource material than would be available in a formal examination. The various components of the EGD PAT gives the learner an opportunity to demonstrate the level of drawing skill that has been attained in all the appropriate drawing methods through the presentation of the required drawings. Each EGD PAT consists of TWO parts: • Part A: The design process • Part B: Required working and pictorial drawings Part A of both PATs requires that the learner demonstrates a clear understanding of, and is able to apply, the design process. As part of the design process, the learner must be able to do the following: • Identify the problem(s) and formulate a design brief with specifications and constraints • Conduct and use relevant external research in an appropriate way • Generate a number of own ideas/concepts/solutions analytically and graphically through comprehensive freehand drawings • Select a final solution(s) that demonstrates a clear understanding of the design brief • Present the final solution(s) as working drawings and pictorial drawings • Provide clear evidence of continuous self-evaluation during the development of the PAT Part B of both PATs requires that the learner demonstrates and provides evidence of a high level of knowledge and understanding of the concepts and content of Engineering Graphics and Design through the presentation of orthographic drawings and pictorial drawings. Part A and Part B of both PATs also give the learner the opportunity to demonstrate that a high level of competency and skill has been attained in the following required EGD drawing methods: • Freehand drawings prepared in pencil • Instrument drawings prepared in pencil • Using a CAD (Computer-aided Drawing/Design) system TWO practical assessment tasks (PATs) are included in this document: • PAT 1 is a design task in the context of civil technology • PAT 2 is a design task in the context of mechanical technology Each learner must, with the guidance of the teacher, select ONE of the PATs contained in this document. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 5 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC Elements that make up the PAT mark for Engineering Graphics and Design ELEMENTS OF THE MARK FOR THE PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT TASK ELEMENT MARK The design process 25 The correctness of the working and pictorial drawings 50 The drawing methods (freehand, instrument and CAD) 25 TOTAL 100 3. ADMINISTRATION OF THE PAT At the beginning of the academic year the EGD teacher must ensure that every Grade 12 learner receives a copy of the entire SECTION B of the PAT document, i.e. ALL the pages from page 8 to page 27. The completed phases of ALL the PATs must be submitted in time for summative assessment to be done before the commencement of phase moderation in the second and third terms and provincial moderation in the third term. The PATs must therefore be completed in the following phases during the first three terms: • Phase 1: Design process (completed by the end of the 1st term) • Phase 2: Presentation drawings (completed by the end of the 2nd term) • Phase 3: Completion of portfolio (before the commencement of provincial/ final moderation in the 3rd term or at the latest before the commencement of the preparatory examinations) Although the phases could be done either CYCLICALLY or in BLOCK TIMES, as indicated in the EGD CAPS, it is recommended that ONE ENTIRE DAY per term, e.g. as an extra paper during the June examinations, be allocated for each phase. The teaching/period time that may be allocated for the completion of all three phases of the PAT is 12 hours to a maximum of 16 hours. Additional non- teaching-/non-period time may, however, also be allocated for the completion of the PAT at the school. However, the total maximum time for the completion of all the phases of the PAT should not exceed 20 hours. To ensure that the PAT is completed within the stipulated time it is essential that the teacher draw up a PAT work schedule/pacesetter/management plan, with target dates that are in line with the Annual Teaching Plan of the EGD CAPS and the prescribed completion of the phases of the 2017 EGD PAT, for the learners at the beginning of the year. This will help learners to assess their own progress and teachers to set up intervention programmes. NOTE: • ALL the presentation requirements of the selected PAT must be adhered to and, with the exception of the required research, completed at school under the guidance and supervision of the EGD teacher, who must observe the learners' progress at all times. Not adhering to this instruction will be deemed to be an examination irregularity. • It is the teacher's responsibility to ensure that each learner's PAT is of an appropriate higher-order Grade 12 complexity. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 6 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC 4. ASSESSMENT AND MODERATION OF THE PAT 4.1 Assessment The assessment of the PAT must be done according to the included relevant Assessment Criteria and Checklist. Frequent developmental feedback is needed to guide and give support to each learner and to ensure that each learner is on the right track. Both formal and informal assessment should therefore be conducted throughout the development of the PAT. Informal assessment can be conducted by the learner, a peer or by the teacher. However, the teacher must conduct ALL the formal assessment and record the results on the official mark sheets himself/herself. Each learner's marks must also be indicated on the official 2017 summative assessment sheet in the learner's PAT file/portfolio. The completed PAT must be submitted in time for final formal assessment to be done before the commencement of provincial/final moderation or, at the latest, before the preparatory examinations in the 3rd term. Once the PAT has been formally assessed the teacher must retain the PAT for the purpose of external moderation. All the PATs must also be retained at the school for the period of time, as prescribed by the provincial departments of education. Clarification of level descriptive and the verification of marks: • A 1-mark level descriptive: o 1 mark is allocated to elementary/basic presentation requirements and/or drawing features that should be done correctly. o The 1 mark is therefore not for done or not done, but for done correctly, i.e. 1 for right or 0 (zero) for wrong, even if done, e.g. if hatching on the floor plan is done, but not done correctly. • A 2-mark level descriptive: o A 0 (zero) must be allocated if not done or if little/no evidence of knowledge of the requirement and/or drawing feature(s) is shown and/or very poor, e.g. the design. o 1 mark must be allocated if done and if some evidence of knowledge is shown, but the requirement(s) and/or drawing feature(s) is/are not completely correct and/or complete and/or compliant and/or achieved and/or clear and/or just average. o 2 marks may only be allocated if ALL evidence of knowledge is shown and the requirement(s) and/or drawing feature(s) is/are completely (at least 90%+) correct and/or complete and/or compliant and/or achieved and/or clear and/or very good. • A 7-mark level descriptive: The 7-mark descriptive of the simplified rubric on page 45 of the EGD CAPS must be used. This implies that a 7 can only be allocated if the presentation requirement is completely (100%) correct/compliant. • Verification of ALL final marks out of 10: Each final mark out of 10 for each assessment criteria must be verified according to the simplified 10-mark rubric on page 25 of this document. This implies that a 10 can only be allocated if the presentation requirement is completely (100%) correct/compliant. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 7 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC NOTE: The concept of 'benchmarking', i.e. the identification and mark allocation of the best example(s) for each assessment criterion, should be applied when the PATs are being assessed. 4.2 Moderation The moderation of the PAT must be done according to the included relevant Assessment Criteria and Checklists. Monitoring and/or moderation of the PAT can take place at any time during the development of the PAT. ALL completed presentation requirements of the PAT must therefore always be available at the school. However, in order to make provision for intervention programmes, the following phase moderation must be done during the second and third terms: • Phase 1: Design process (beginning of the 2nd term before the commencement of phase 2 or the June examinations) • Phase 2: Presentation drawings (beginning of the 3rd term before the commencement of phase 3) During the moderation process the moderator will randomly select the PAT files/portfolios that have to be moderated. To assist the process of final provincial moderation the teacher must supply the moderator with a completed mark sheet(s) and a merit list(s). During the moderation process learners may be called upon to explain the functions and principles of operating a CAD system and to demonstrate drawing skills through performing capability tasks. 4.3 Declaration of authenticity Prior to the final submission of the PAT for formative assessment ALL the learners and the teacher must complete the declaration of authenticity, as set out on the final page of this document. NOTE: Only the official 2017 SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SHEET (page 26) and the completed DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY (page 27) of this document must be included in the front of the learner's completed PAT file/portfolio. 5. CONCLUSION On completion of the practical assessment task learners should be able to demonstrate their understanding of the industry, enhance their knowledge, skills, values and reasoning abilities as well as establish connections to life outside the classroom and address real-world challenges. The PAT furthermore develops learners' life skills and provides opportunities for learners to engage in their own learning. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 8 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC SECTION B (LEARNER TASKS) General information and instructions: • The EGD PAT is a compulsory national formal assessment task that contributes 100 marks towards your final National Senior Certificate (NSC) mark. • This document contains TWO PATs, i.e. a civil design project (PAT 1) and a mechanical design project (PAT 2). You, the learner, with the guidance of your EGD teacher, must select ONE of the PATs contained in this document. • ALL the presentation requirements of the selected PAT must be adhered to and, with the exception of the required research, completed at school, under the guidance and supervision of your EGD teacher. • The PAT must be completed individually and ALL the presentations, including the front page and index, must be your own original work. • The PAT must be completed in phases and within the given time frame of your teacher's PAT work schedule/pace setter/management plan. • ALL freehand drawings and instrument drawings must be prepared in pencil. • The PAT must be of an appropriate higher-order Grade 12 complexity. • The PAT will be assessed and moderated according to the relevant Assessment Criteria and Checklists included in this document. • Untidy and messy work, as well as the late submission of presentation requirements, will be penalised. 6. PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT TASK 1 (PAT 1) A civil design project Scenario In a small rural town in the South African Midlands, the Community Business Forum (CBF) has been looking for new ways to generate funds in order to maintain the aging infrastructure of their town. The CBF was approached by a few local entrepreneurs who want to rebuild the 50 km stretch of disused railway track that runs past the town and meanders through the scenic countryside surrounding the town. The proposal suggests that by so doing they would attract tourists to their town and the surrounding countryside, and so create the prospect of jobs and encourage further development. The entrepreneurs have already secured four standard length passenger carriages, each measuring 21 m in length, which will be pulled by an old steam locomotive. Their plan is dependent on building a new railway station building as well as a separate new railway platform for the 1 065 mm gauge railway track. The CBF accepted the idea and has agreed to carry the cost of building the new railway station platform as well as to invest R1,5 million into the construction of a new railway station building. The municipality has also set aside a plot of land (PLOT 256) alongside the railway track for this project. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 9 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC With your appointment as the designer of the railway station project, you were informed that the railway station building must be a single-story structure that must have sandstone cladding on the outside and a corrugated iron roof of Dutch gabled design, so that it will fit in with many of the other buildings in the town. The railway station building must contain a curio shop, a small coffee shop with a seating and serving area and a kitchenette, a ticket and tourism information office and male and female toilet facilities. The male toilet facility must have two urinals, a toilet and a hand wash basin and the female toilet facility must have three toilets and a hand wash basin. The project also requires the design of a new railway platform, that must run parallel to the single gauge railway track and has to be long enough to accommodate all four passenger carriages, separate from the new railway station building, a parking area with 100 demarcated parking bays, a demarcated loading zone for deliveries and an entrance and exit point off Aloe Street. You were also informed that the acacia tree on the site may not be removed. The developers have informed you that the building cost for the railway station building is currently R5 750 m². Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 10 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC Given: The site plan of PLOT 256, which has been demarcated for the project. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 11 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC PHASE 1: Presentation requirements 1. Identify the primary and secondary problem(s) and formulate your own design brief on the given scenario. Include the following as part of the design brief: • An extended and comprehensive list of specifications for each requirement of the project • A list of at least FIVE constraints that are relevant to the task • A list of ALL the presentation requirements of the PAT together with a management plan for the development of the PAT 2. Conduct your own research on: • Designs of sand stone building and Dutch gable roofs • Designs of small railway platforms for a 1 065 mm gauge railway track • The requirements and layouts of the seating and serving area as well as the kitchenette for a small coffee shop • Sizes of parking bays, the layout designs for parking lots and entrance and exit points for motor vehicles NOTE: - The research must be relevant and usable. - Evidence of ALL the relevant resource material used must be presented as proof that the required research had been done. - There must be clear evidence that the research was used. - Include a list of ALL references (bibliography). 3. Generate THREE neat freehand drawings of the layout of THREE possible design solutions for the new railway station building. Also show a 10 m section of the new platform in relation to the building on each possible design solution. Each freehand drawing must show all primary dimensions and relevant labels as well as the correct presentation of ALL building features, permanent fixtures and the roof line. The electrical fittings and waste-water disposal systems (sewerage) are not required for the freehand drawings. The calculation and indication of the area of each possible solution should also be clearly shown. NOTE: - ALL the features should be drawn proportionally the same size. Grid/Graph paper should therefore be used. - These drawings must provide clear evidence that a high level of competency has been attained in freehand drawings as one of the required EGD drawing methods. - All the drawings must comply with the SANS 10143 Guidelines. 4. Select the best solution, which demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the design brief within the context of the specifications and constraints. Create a table and use at least TEN criteria to evaluate and compare the possible design solutions of the THREE freehand drawings. Include a comprehensive summary of the reasons for the solution selected. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 12 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC PHASE 2: Presentation requirements 5. Present the selected solution as a set of working drawings and a pictorial drawing (5.1, 5.2 and 5.3) that adhere to the following: • All the working drawings must be presented on appropriately sized drawing sheets, correctly set up with borders. However, only the first working drawing (5.1) has to be set up with a complete civil title panel. • The drawings must provide clear evidence that a high level of competency had been attained in the following TWO required EGD drawing methods: o Instrument drawings o CAD (Computer-aided Drawing/Design) NOTE: - ONE entire working drawing (i.e. 5.1 or 5.2) must be prepared as an instrument drawing and the other using a CAD system. - The perspective drawing (5.3) may be prepared either as an instrument drawing or by using a CAD system. - Schools that do not have CAD facilities must prepare all the required drawings (5.1, 5.2 and 5.3) as instrument drawings. • The title panels and ALL the drawings must comply with the SANS 10143 Guidelines. 5.1 Draw a detailed layout drawing of the selected proposed railway station building, clearly showing all the features. The drawing must show a minimum of FOUR orthographic views drawn to a suitable scale(s). The views must include the following: 5.1.1 The floor plan of the railway station building 5.1.2 A sectional elevation, which must include a door and a window, of the railway station building as well as a sectional elevation of the railway platform 5.1.3 TWO elevations of the railway station building, showing the front view and a side view The following should be included on all relevant views: • ALL sanitary, kitchen and other permanent fixtures • A detailed layout of the seating and serving area of the coffee shop • ALL electrical fittings and the wiring detail • Waste-water disposal systems (sewerage) • Titles, labels and notes • Scale(s) • Dimensions • Cutting plane(s) • All hatching detail • North point Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 13 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC 5.2 Draw a detailed site plan to a suitable scale. The following must be included: • ALL relevant site detail and features, e.g. boundary lines, building lines, natural features, etc. • The railway track • The new railway station building and new railway platform • A demarcated loading zone for deliveries • The parking lot layout for 100 motor vehicles • A 4 m wide motor vehicle entry and exit from Aloe Street • ALL services, sewerage and drainage connections • Electrical supply • Title, labels and notes • Scale • Dimensions and corner heights • North point 5.3 Draw a detailed two-point perspective drawing of the new railway station building, as seen when standing on the new railway platform, i.e. a human eye view perspective from the new railway platform. Evidence of the following must be included with the drawing: • All views/drawings used to produce the drawing • The construction/method used to produce the drawing NOTE: A copy of the perspective drawing, which may contain artistic features, could be used as a picture for the cover page of the PAT file/portfolio. PHASE 3: Presentation requirements Create a PAT file/portfolio containing: • A complete cover page • An index • The 2017 SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SHEET (see page 26) • The completed DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY (see page 27) Present the following phase 1 and phase 2 presentation requirements in the PAT file/portfolio after the DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY: 1. ALL the design brief requirements 2. Evidence of ALL the relevant resource material used for the required research 3. The THREE freehand drawings of the possible design solutions 4. ALL the evidence of the selection of the best solutions 5. ALL the required working drawings (5.1 and 5.2) and the pictorial drawing (5.3) 6. Using the included checklist, clear evidence of continuous self-evaluation of the entire process and of the meeting of all the deadlines during the development of the PAT Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 14 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC NOTE: Include the following on each page of each presentation requirement: - Clear numbering according to the numbers of the presentation requirements - Your (the learner's) name - The date of completion and submission Assessment criteria and checklist for the 2017 EGD Civil PAT • The SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SHEET on page 26 of the EGD PAT document must be used to indicate the final totals out of 10 for each assessment criterion. • The contribution of each aspect of the PAT is as follows: - The design process, i.e. presentation requirements numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7, will contribute 25 marks to the final PAT mark out of 100 - The working drawings and a pictorial drawing, i.e. presentation requirement number 5, will contribute 50 marks to the final PAT mark out of 100 - Drawing methods, drawing skills and presentation, which should be assessed according to ANNEXURE A, will contribute 25 marks to the final PAT mark out of 100 Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 15 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC Page 1 of 2 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND CHECKLIST FOR THE 2017 EGD CIVIL PAT 1-mark level 0 No evidence/not done or not correct/complete/compliant/achieved/very poor descriptive 1 All evidence shown/correct/complete/compliant/achieved/clear Suggested Own marks/ Checked 0 No evidence/not done/very poor mark notes/ 2-mark level allocation 1 Evidence shown but not correct/complete/compliant/achieved/clear/average comments descriptive 2 All evidence shown/correct/complete/compliant/achieved/clear/very good 1. Design Brief 1.1 Identifying the primary problem and secondary problems in own words 2 1.2 Formulating of a design brief in own words 2 1.3 List of the specifications (extended and comprehensive and not just the given) 2 1.4 List of at least FIVE constraints that are relevant to the project 2 1.5 List of the PAT requirements together with a management plan 2 TOTAL 10 2. Research (This should be restricted to a maximum of THREE A4 or TWO A3 pages per research topic) Relevant 2.1 Designs of sand stone building and Dutch gable roofs 2 and usable 2.2 Designs of small railway platforms for a 1065 mm gauge railway track 2 research 2.3 The requirements and layouts of a small coffee shop 2 on: 2.4 Sizes of parking bays and the layout designs for parking lots 2 Evidence that the research has been used 1 Bibliography/List of sources included 1 TOTAL 10 3. Freehand drawings of THREE possible design solutions Assess ALL the required building features and fixtures included 2 Final mark for each solution each Correct presentation of ALL building features and fixtures 2 freehand Railway platform correctly indicated in relation to building Solution 1 10 1 solution The relative scale/size of all features/fixtures to each other 2 as Solution 2 10 Labels and notes (2) + Dimensions (2) (2 + 2 = 4) 4 follows: Area correctly calculated and clearly presented 2 Solution 3 10 Design: Effective utilisation of space and functionality 2 Subtotal = 15 ÷ 1,5 = TOTAL 15 (1 = 1 ; 2 = 1 ; 3 = 2 ; 4 = 3 ; 5 = 3 ; 6 = 4 ; 7 = 5 ; 8 = 5 ; 9 = 6 ; 10 = 7 ; 11 = 7 ; 12 = 8 ; 13 = 9 ; 14 = 9 ; 15 = 10) 4. Selecting the best freehand solution (This must be a separate presentation) Table created for an easily understandable presentation of the selection process 2 Using at least TEN requirements and specifications as criteria for the evaluation 2 Relevant and comprehensive reasons (evaluating and comparing) 2 A rating scale to score each solution, i.e. a mark allocation of each criterion 2 A comprehensive summary of the reasons for the selected solution 2 TOTAL 10 5. Working drawings and a pictorial drawing of selected solution Drawing sheet preparation Appropriately sized drawing sheets 1 Borders on all the drawing sheets of working drawings 2 Appropriate and complete civil title panel on the first working drawing (5.1) 7 NOTE: Use the 7-mark simplified rubric on page 45 of the EGD CAPS. TOTAL 10 5.1 Detailed layout drawings of the selected proposed solution 5.1.1 Floor plan Correlation with selected freehand solution and the selection process summary 2 ALL internal and external walls and the roofline 2 ALL doors and windows 2 ALL sanitary, kitchen and other permanent fixtures 2 ALL electrical fittings and the wiring detail 2 Waste-water disposal systems (sewerage) 2 Titles, labels and notes 2 Suitable scale selected and indicated correctly 1 Dimensions 2 Cutting plane (1) + ALL hatching detail (1) + North point (1) (1 + 1 + 1 = 3) 3 Subtotal = 20 ÷ 2 = TOTAL 10 Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 16 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC Page 2 of 2 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND CHECKLIST FOR THE 2017 EGD CIVIL PAT 5.1.2 Sectional elevation of the railway building Foundation and walls with door(s) and window(s) included 2 Roof 2 Railway platform 2 Labels and notes 2 Suitable scale selected and indicated correctly 1 Dimensions 2 Section correct according to the indicated cutting plane(s) 2 ALL hatching detail 2 Subtotal = 15 ÷ 1,5 = TOTAL 10 (1 = 1 ; 2 = 1 ; 3 = 2 ; 4 = 3 ; 5 = 3 ; 6 = 4 ; 7 = 5 ; 8 = 5 ; 9 = 6 ; 10 = 7 ; 11 = 7 ; 12 = 8 ; 13 = 9 ; 14 = 9 ; 15 = 10) 5.1.3 TWO elevations, showing the front view and a side view Relevant views, which include sewerage, selected/shown 1 Door and window detail 2 Walls and ALL other external features 2 Roof detail including rainwater items 2 Waste-water disposal system (sewerage) 2 Drawn to same scale as the floor plan 1 TOTAL 10 5.2 Detailed site plan ALL relevant site detail/features, e.g. railway track, building lines, natural features etc. 2 The new railway platform, station building and parking lot 2 ALL services, sewerage and drainage connections as well as electrical supply 2 Suitable scale selected and indicated correctly 1 Dimensions, reference dimension, corner heights, labels and notes 2 North point 1 TOTAL 10 5.3 Detailed two-point perspective drawing of the railway station building Evidence of views/drawings and construction/method used for the drawing 1 Correct orientation of views and the correct HL high, i.e. as seen from the railway 2 platform 2-point perspective drawing/answer (Use 7-mark rubric on page 45 of the EGD CAPS) 7 TOTAL 10 6. Continuous self-evaluation and the meeting of deadlines Checklist(s) of continuous self-evaluation of the entire process (mark out of 10 ÷ 2) 5 The meeting of ALL the deadlines during the development (mark out of 10 ÷ 2) 5 TOTAL 10 7. Presentation of the complete PAT file/portfolio Cover page 1 Index 1 Summative assessment sheet and declaration 1 Correct sequencing of ALL presentation requirements 1 Name and numbering on ALL the presentation requirements 1 General impression of file/portfolio, e.g. binding, appearance etc. (mark out of 10 ÷ 2) 5 TOTAL 10 Assessment of drawing methods, drawing skills and presentation a Freehand drawings Freehand drawing methods and skills (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 Neatness, line work/line quality and printing (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 b Instrument drawings Use of drawing instruments, drawing methods and skills (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 Neatness, line work/line quality and printing (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 c CAD drawings Competence displayed in using a CAD system/program (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 Layout and correctness of the drawings presentation (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 17 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC 7. PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT TASK 2 (PAT 2) A mechanical design project Scenario You are employed as a draughtsperson by a drafting firm that specialises in providing design services on DRIVE and CONTROL SYSTEMS for BICYCLES and SMALL-CAPACITY MOTORCYCLES/SCOOTERS. You are tasked with investigating and analysing the design features of an existing drive or control system for a bicycle or a motorcycle/scooter with an engine capacity of 125 cc or less, and to come up with new or improved ideas. The improvement(s) to the drive or control system could be one or more of the following: • To improve efficiency • To strengthen its current design • To simplify its application The PAT requires the following stages: • The first stage involves selecting/finding a suitable drive or control system on a bicycle or motorcycles/scooters, which must include mechanical parts/ components and movement as part of its operation/function. NOTE: The selected drive or control system should be one that is on a bicycle or motorcycle/scooter that is already available to you. Evidence of the selected bicycle or motorcycle/scooter must be provided in the form of detailed photographs. • The second stage involves the dismantling of the selected drive or control system so that all the mechanisms and parts/components can be revealed, investigated and measured. A comprehensive set of detailed photographs of the selected drive or control system before dismantling and of each individual part/component after the dismantling, must be taken. • The third stage involves the identification of ONE of the main parts/components or a combination of parts/components of the selected drive or control system which could be improved, modified or redesigned in some way. This will necessitate the application of the design process, as stipulated by the presentation requirements for this PAT. Requirements and specifications of the selected drive or control system: • The drive or control system must be from a bicycle or of a motorcycle/ scooter with an engine capacity of 125 cc or less. • The drive or control system must be an assembly consisting of a minimum of FOUR different mechanical parts/components, e.g. part of or the entire chain drive system, part of or the entire gearbox and drive shaft system, the brake system, the gear change system etc., that includes mechanical movement as part of its operation/function. • The drive or control system, or a comprehensive set of detailed photographs thereof if it is still in use on the bicycle or motorcycle/shooter, must be submitted as part of the PAT presentation. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 18 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC • Your teacher must approve the drive or control in order to ensure that it meets all the requirements and that a PAT of an appropriate higher-order Grade 12 complexity can be produced. PHASE 1: Presentation requirements 1. Identify the primary and secondary problem(s) and formulate a comprehensive design brief. Include the following as part of the design brief: • Your own comprehensive list of specifications for the selected drive or control system • Your own list of constraints for the selected drive or control system • A list of ALL the presentation requirements of the PAT together with a management plan for the development of the PAT 2. Conduct your own research on the following: • All the materials used for ALL the parts/components of the selected drive or control system • Specific design features and/or function (purpose) of each individual part/component of the selected drive or control system • In-depth research of the design, components/parts and mechanical movement (working) of at least TWO other models or makes of drive or control systems that are similar to the drive or control system that you have selected. NOTE: - The research must be relevant and usable. - Evidence of ALL the research conducted and the relevant resource material used must be presented as proof that the required research had been done. The first two research requirements will be primarily hands-on investigative research, which can be presented by using the comprehensive set of detailed photographs taken during the second stage, with labels and/or notes indicating the material and the function of each part/component. The evidence of the other TWO drive or control systems may be in the form of a comprehensive set of pictures and/or photographs together with explanatory labels and notes of each. - There must be clear evidence that the research was used. - Include a list of ALL references (sources). 3. Generate THREE sets of neat detailed self-explanatory freehand drawings that will clearly show THREE different possible improvements, modifications or re-designs to the identified main part(s)/component(s) of the selected drive or control system. Each set of freehand drawings must consist of relevant self-explanatory orthographic views and an isometric drawing(s) that must show dimensions, labels and explanatory notes, as well as the correct presentation of ALL the features. Include a short narrative explanation of the possible improvement, modification or re-design. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 19 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC NOTE: - ALL the features should be drawn proportionally the same size. Grid/Graph paper should therefore be used. - These drawings must provide clear evidence that a high level of competency has been attained in freehand drawings as one of the required EGD drawing methods. - All the drawings must comply with the SANS 10111 Guidelines. 4. Select the best improvement/modification/re-design which demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the design brief within the context of the requirements of the task and the specifications and constraints. Create a table and use at least EIGHT criteria to evaluate and compare the possible design solutions of the THREE freehand drawings. Include a comprehensive summary of the reasons for the solution selected PHASE 2: Presentation requirements 5. Present the selected drive or control system and the selected improvement/ modification/re-design as a set of working drawings and a pictorial drawing (5.1, 5.2 and 5.3) that adhere to the following: • All the drawings must be presented on appropriately sized drawing sheets, correctly set up with borders. Only the first working drawing (5.1) has to be set up with an appropriate and complete mechanical title block. • The drawings must provide clear evidence that a high level of competency had been attained in the following TWO required EGD drawing methods: o Instrument drawings o CAD (Computer-aided Drawing/Design) NOTE: - ONE working drawing (i.e. 5.1 or 5.2) must be prepared as an instrument drawing and the other using a CAD system. - The isometric drawing (5.3) may be prepared either as an instrument drawing or by using a CAD system. - Schools that do not have CAD facilities must prepare all the required drawings (5.1, 5.2 and 5.3) as instrument drawings. • All drawings must comply with the SANS (SABS) 10111 Guidelines. 5.1 Draw an assembly drawing of the selected drive or control system clearly showing all the parts before any improvements, modifications or re-designs have been effected. The drawing must show a minimum of FOUR appropriate orthographic views drawn to a suitable scale. The views must include: 5.1.1 The front view 5.1.2 A second primary view 5.1.3 Any TWO other secondary views NOTE: TWO of the views must be sectioned or contain types of section. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 20 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC The following must be included: • Scale • Dimensions • Labels and notes • Cutting planes • ALL hatching detail 5.2 Draw a detailed drawing of the identified main part(s)/component(s) of the selected drive or control system, clearly showing the selected improvement/modification/re-design. The drawing must show a minimum of THREE appropriate orthographic views drawn to a suitable scale. The views must include: 5.2.1 The front view 5.2.2 Any TWO other views NOTE: ONE of the views must be sectioned or contain a type of section. The following must be included: • A comprehensive list of explanatory labels and notes • Relevant welding and/or machining symbols • Scale • Dimensions • Cutting plane(s) • ALL hatching detail 5.3 Draw a detailed isometric drawing of the selected drive or control system or of the improved, modified or re-designed main part(s)/component(s) of the drive or control system, to a suitable scale. Evidence of the following must be shown: • All views/drawings used to produce the drawing • The constructions/methods used to produce the drawing NOTE: - Include relevant labels and notes. - A copy of the isometric drawing, which may contain artistic features, should be used as the picture for the cover page of the PAT file/portfolio. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 21 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC PHASE 3: Presentation requirements Create a PAT file/portfolio containing: • A complete cover page • An index • The 2017 SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SHEET (see page 26) • The completed DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY (see page 27) Present the following Phase 1 and Phase 2 presentation requirements in the PAT file/portfolio after the DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY: • ALL the design brief requirements • The evidence of ALL the relevant resource material used for the required research • The THREE freehand drawings of THREE possible design solutions • ALL the evidence of the selection of the best solution • ALL the required working drawings (5.1 and 5.2) and the pictorial drawing (5.3) • Provide clear evidence in the form of (a) checklist(s), continuous self- evaluation of the entire process and the meeting of all the deadlines during the development of the PAT. NOTE: Include the following on each page of each presentation requirement: - Clear numbering according to the numbers of the presentation requirements - Your (the learner's) name - The date of completion and submission Assessment criteria and checklist for the 2017 EGD Mechanical PAT • The SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SHEET on page 26 of the EGD PAT document must be used to indicate the final totals out of 10 for each assessment criterion. • The contribution of each aspect of the PAT is as follows: - The design process, i.e. presentation requirements numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7, will contribute 25 marks to the final PAT mark out of 100 - The working drawings and a pictorial drawing, i.e. presentation requirement number 5, will contribute 50 marks to the final PAT mark out of 100 - Drawing methods, drawing skills and presentation, which should be assessed according to ANNEXURE A, will contribute 25 marks to the final PAT mark out of 100. Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 22 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC Page 1 of 2 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND CHECKLIST FOR THE 2017 EGD MECHANICAL PAT 1 mark level 0 No evidence/not done or not correct/complete/compliant/achieved/very poor descriptive 1 All evidence shown/correct/complete/compliant/achieved/clear Own notes/ Suggested Checked 0 No evidence/not done/very poor mark 2 mark level 1 Evidence shown but not correct/complete/compliant/achieved/average allocation Comments descriptive 2 All evidence shown/correct/complete/compliant/achieved/clear/very good 1 Design Brief 1.1 Identifying the primary problem and secondary problems in own words 2 1.2 Formulating of a design brief in own words 2 1.3 Creating a comprehensive list of the specifications for the selected jack and task 2 1.4 List of constraints for the selected jack and/or task 2 1.5 List of the entire process together with a management plan 2 TOTAL 10 2 Research (This should be restricted to a maximum of THREE A4 or TWO A3 pages per research topic) Relevant 2.1 Materials used for the parts/components of the selected system 2 and usable 2.2 Design features and/or function (purpose) of each individual part 2 research 2.3.1 The design and mechanism (working) of another system No. 1 2 on: 2.3.2 The design and mechanism (working) of another system No. 2 2 Clear evidence that the research was used 1 Sources included 1 TOTAL 10 3 Freehand drawings of THREE possible design solutions Assess Relevant orthographic views 2 Final mark for each solution each Isometric drawing 2 freehand Correct presentation of ALL the features 2 Solution 1 10 solution The relative size of all features and fixtures to each other 2 as follow: Labels and explanatory notes 2 Dimensioning 2 Solution 2 10 Narrative of improvement, modification or redesign 2 Functionality of improvement, modification or redesign 1 (Use 7-mark rubric on page 45 of the EGD CAPS) Subtotal = 15 ÷ 1,5 = TOTAL 10 Solution 3 10 (1 = 1 ; 2 = 1 ; 3 = 2 ; 4 = 3 ; 5 = 3 ; 6 = 4 ; 7 = 5 ; 8 = 5 ; 9 = 6 ; 10 = 7 ; 11 = 7 ; 12 = 8 ; 13 = 9 ; 14 = 9 ; 15 = 10) 4 Selecting the best freehand solution (This must be a separate presentation) Appropriate and easily understandable presentation of the selection process 2 Using the requirements and specifications as criteria for the evaluation 2 Relevant and comprehensive reasons (evaluating and comparing) 2 A rating scale to score each solution, i.e. a mark allocation of each criteria 2 A summary of the reasons for the selected solution(s) 2 TOTAL 10 5 Working drawings and a pictorial drawing of selected drive/control system and solution Drawing sheet preparation Appropriately sized drawing sheets 1 Borders on all the drawing sheets of working drawings and pictorial drawing 2 Appropriate and complete mechanical title block on the first working drawing (5.1) 7 (Use 7-mark rubric on page 45 of the EGD CAPS) TOTAL 10 5.1 Assembly drawing of the selected drive/control system, before any improvements/modifications/redesigns 5.1.1 Front view before any changes ALL the parts included and drawn correctly according to actual drive/control 2 system All hatching detail or, if not sectioned, ALL external features 2 ALL bolts and nuts and other fastening methods correct in ALL FOUR views 2 Labels and notes for ALL FOUR views 2 Projection symbol 1 Suitable scale selected and indicated correctly for ALL FOUR views 1 TOTAL 10 Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 23 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC Page 2 of 2 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND CHECKLIST FOR THE 2017 EGD MECHANICAL PAT 5.1.2 Second primary (main) view before any changes ALL the parts included and drawn correctly according to actual drive/control 2 system All hatching detail or, if not sectioned, external features 2 Dimensions for ALL FOUR views 2 ALL centre lines on ALL FOUR views 2 ALL FOUR views drawn correctly in third-angle orthographic projection 2 TOTAL 10 5.1.3 TWO other secondary views before any changes Appropriate secondary views selected 2 ALL the parts included and drawn correctly according to actual drive/control 2 system All hatching detail or, if not sectioned, external features 2 TWO views sectioned or contain types of section 2 Correct cutting planes for the TWO sectional views and/or types of sections 2 TOTAL 10 5.2 Detailed drawing of the selected improvement/modification/redesign of the main part(s)/component(s) Appropriate view selected as the front view and is drawn correctly 2 TWO other relevant views selected and drawn correctly 2 Improvement/modification/re-design correlates with selected freehand solution 2 Comprehensive list of explanatory labels and notes 2 Dimensions 2 ONE view sectioned, or contain types of section, and drawn correctly 2 Cutting plane(s) 1 ALL hatching detail 2 Relevant welding symbols and/or machining symbols and/or tolerances 2 Projection symbol 1 Suitable scale selected and indicated correctly 1 Drawing is in third-angle orthographic projection 1 Subtotal = 20 ÷ 2 = TOTAL 10 5.3 Detailed isometric drawing Suitable scale selected and indicated correctly 1 Evidence of views/drawings and construction/method used for the drawing 2 Isometric drawing/answer (Use 7-mark rubric on page 45 of the EGD CAPS) 7 TOTAL 10 6 Continuous self-evaluation and the meeting of deadlines Checklist(s) of continuous self-evaluation of the entire process (mark out of 10 ÷ 2) 5 The meeting of ALL the deadlines during the development (mark out of 10 ÷ 2) 5 TOTAL 10 7 Presentation of the complete PAT file/portfolio Cover page 1 Index 1 Summative assessment sheet and declaration 1 Correct sequencing of ALL presentation requirements 1 Name and numbering on ALL the presentation requirements 1 General impression of file/portfolio, e.g. binding, appearance etc. (mark out of 10 ÷ 2) 5 TOTAL 10 Assessment of drawing methods, drawing skills and presentation a Freehand drawings Freehand drawing methods and skills (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 Neatness, line work/line quality and printing (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 b Instrument drawings Use of drawing instruments, drawing methods and skills (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 Neatness, line work/line quality and printing (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 c CAD drawings Competence displayed in using a CAD system/program (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 Layout and correctness of the drawings presentation (See ANNEXURE A on page 23) 10 Copyright reserved Please turn over

Engineering Graphics and Design Downloaded from hlayiso.com 24 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC 8. ANNEXURE A: RUBRIC FOR ASSESSING DRAWING METHODS, DRAWING SKILLS AND PRESENTATION LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MARK ALLOCATION 100% 99%–90% 89%–80% 79%–70% 69%–60% 59%–50% 49%–40% 39%–30% 29%–20% 19%–1% 0% The drawings display The drawings display poor The drawings display very Freehand drawings correct freehand drawing The drawings display excellent drawing The drawings display satisfactory drawing methods and skills poor drawing methods and METHODS methods and skills as methods and skills and the method drawing methods and skills and the and there is little to no skills and no method was AND SKILLS well as the method used to used to ensure outstanding proportion method used to ensure satisfactory evidence of the method used used to ensure correct ensure good proportion and size. proportion and size. which resulted in poor proportion. and size proportion and size. Drawings are very neat and all line Drawings are untidy with Final drawing presentation is neat and Drawings are neat and line work/line The line work/line quality, work/line quality, printing and inconsistent line work/line there is consistency of line work/line quality, printing and dimensioning are printing and dimensioning dimensioning are outstanding and quality, printing and quality, printing and dimensioning generally good and mostly consistent. are unacceptable. consistent. dimensioning. The drawings display poor use The drawings display an The drawings display the The drawings display the correct use of The drawings display the correct use of Pencil instrument of drawing instruments and a incorrect use of drawing METHODS correct use of drawing drawing instruments and an drawing instruments and a satisfactory poor and incorrect application instruments with incorrect AND SKILLS instruments, drawing outstanding application of drawing and mostly correct application of of drawing methods and applications of drawing methods and skills. methods and skills. drawing methods and skills. skills. methods and skills. drawings Drawings are very neat and all line Drawings are untidy and the The final drawing presentation is neat and Drawings are neat and the line work/line The line work/line quality, work/line quality, printing and line work/line quality, there is consistency of line work/line quality, printing and dimensioning are printing and dimensioning dimensioning are outstanding and printing and dimensioning quality, printing and dimensioning generally good and mostly consistent. are unacceptable. consistent. are inconsistent. METHODS The level of competence Displays a satisfactory level of skills, Displays a poor level of skills, Shows little to no skills, Displays a high level of skills, knowledge CAD drawings AND displayed in using a knowledge and ability in using a CAD knowledge and ability in using knowledge or ability in using and ability in using a CAD system SKILLS CAD system system a CAD system a CAD system The layout of the drawings is The layout of the final drawing is correct The layout of the drawings is correct and The layout of the drawings is acceptable very poor and the line work, The layout, line work, and the line work, printing and the line work, printing and and the line work, printing and printing and dimensioning are printing and dimensioning dimensioning is compliant dimensioning are compliant dimensioning are mostly compliant not compliant and are unacceptable. and consistent and consistent and consistent inconsistent Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 25 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC 9. A SIMPLIFIED RUBRIC FOR THE VERIFICATION AND ALLOCATION OF MARKS NOTE: • The final mark out of 10 of each assessment criterion, i.e. the overall level of achievement according to the presentation requirement, must be verified according to this rubric. • This rubric must also be used to allocate marks for all aspects of the assessment criteria which require a mark out of 10. • The concept of 'benchmarking', i.e. the identification of and allocation of marks for the best example(s) for each assessment criterion, should be applied when assessing the PATs. VERIFICATION AND MARK ALLOCATION GENERAL DESCRIPTION FOR MARK ±% MARK INDICATOR ALL/MORE than ALL the REQUIREMENTS are met. - PERFECT - Error free 100% 10 ALL (ALMOST ALL) the REQUIREMENTS are met. Very few - OUTSTANDING - errors 90% + 9 ALMOST ALL (MOST OF) the REQUIREMENTS are met. Few errors 80% + 8 - VERY GOOD - The REQUIREMENTS are met SUBSTANTIALLY. - GOOD - 70% + 7 Some errors The REQUIREMENTS are met ADEQUATELY. - SATISFACTORY - 60% + 6 The REQUIREMENTS are met MODERATELY. - ACCEPTABLE - 50% + 5 Many errors ONLY SOME of the REQUIREMENTS are met. - UNACCEPTABLE - 40% + 4 VERY FEW of the REQUIREMENTS are met. 30% + - NOT ACHIEVED - Mostly wrong Only a few correct 3 features 29% and 2 The REQUIREMENTS are NOT met. Completely LESS - VERY POOR - wrong Something done incorrectly/poorly 1 No work Nothing to NOT DONE! handed in! mark! 0 Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 26 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC 10. PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT TASK 2017: SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SHEET PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT TASK 2017 SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT SHEET SCHOOL: …………………………………………………………………………..………………………………… NAME OF LEARNER: …………………………………………………………..................................................... (SURNAME AND INITIALS) EXAMINATION NUMBER: ………………………………………………………………………………………….. PART B: Working and PART A: Design Process Drawing competency and skill pictorial drawings CRITERIA MARK CRITERIA MARK CRITERIA MARK A design brief All drawing sheets are appropriately The drawings display demonstrating a clear set up with a border and an correct freehand Freehand drawings METHOD understanding of the appropriate title block/panel. drawing methods 1 scenario with a list of and skills and the Assess each view's accuracy and correctness according View 1 ANNEXURE A the specifications and method used to 5.1.1 constraints ensure proportion PAT 1: Plan and size PAT 2: Front view Evidence of relevant The final drawing and usable research presentation is neat and 2 Orthographic drawings with the inclusion of View 2 there is consistency of line a source to the selected solution, the stipulated requirements and EGD 5.1.2 PAT 1: Section work/line quality, printing PAT 2: 2nd main and dimensioning 1st THREE freehand Solution view The drawings display Pencil instrument the correct use of METHOD 2nd View 3 drawings of detailed 3 Solution drawing 5.1.3 PAT 1: 2 elevations instruments, drawing principals drawing methods possible solutions rd PAT 2: 2 secondary 3 and skills drawings: ANNEXURE A views Solution PAT 1: The final drawing Site plan presentation is neat and Selecting the final/best 5.2 there is consistency of line solution which PAT 2: work/line quality, printing 4 demonstrates a clear Detailed drawing and dimensioning understanding of the The level of METHOD Pictorial drawing design brief competence CAD drawings The correct drawing displayed in using a ANNEXURE A method and the presentation of the CAD system Clear evidence of continuous self- 5.3 drawing The layout of the final 6 evaluation and the PAT 1: 2-point drawing is correct and the meeting of deadlines perspective line work, printing and of all the requirements PAT 2: Isometric dimensioning is compliant and consistent The presentation of the TOTAL without CAD 7 complete PAT file/portfolio TOTAL with CAD CALCULATION without Criteria Total Criteria Total CAD CALCULATION CALCULATION CALCULATION with CAD Teacher's TOTAL Teacher's TOTAL Teacher's TOTAL TOTAL: A / 25 TOTAL: B / 50 TOTAL: C / 25 Moderated TOTAL Moderated TOTAL Moderated TOTAL TOTAL: A / 25 TOTAL: B / 50 TOTAL: C / 25 ASSESSOR: MODERATOR: TEACHER'S TOTAL: A+B+C= / 100 Initial Initial MODERATED TOTAL: A+B+C= / 100 Copyright reserved Please turn over

Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design 27 DBE/PAT 2017 NSC 11. DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY To be submitted with each learner's practical assessment task portfolio NAME OF THE SCHOOL: ……………………………………………………………………................ NAME OF LEARNER: ………………………………………………………........................................ (SURNAME AND INITIALS) EXAMINATION NUMBER: ………………………………………….…………………… I hereby declare that all the contents of the practical assessment task submitted by myself for assessment is my own original work and has not been plagiarised, copied from someone else or previously submitted for assessment. _________________________ ___/___/2017 SIGNATURE OF CANDIDATE DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) NAME OF TEACHER: ……………………………………………………………………….…………… (SURNAME AND INITIALS) As far as I know, the above declaration by the candidate is true and I accept that the PAT offered is his/her own work. _______________________ ___/___/2017 SIGNATURE OF TEACHER DATE (DD/MM/YYYY) SCHOOL STAMP Copyright reserved