Downloaded from hlayiso.com
GRAAD 12
NATIONAL
SENIOR CERTIFICATE
GRADE 12
HISTORY P1
FEBRUARY/MARCH 2012
ADDENDUM
This addendum consists of 12 pages.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Skip to contentAll 2012 papers 


%20(English)%20June%202012%20Addendum_hlayiso.com_--4713681a-ef87-4170-b236-9a03661aecef/v1-2be4d6a4742c74e0c0e7/card.webp)


View all





History Grade 12 P1 NSC Supplementary 2012 Addendum (Eng)
Grade 12 History Paper 1 addendum from the NSC Supplementary 2012 (English), 12 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download.
History · Grade 12 · NSC Supplementary · 2012. Addendum, 12 pages. Read online or download the PDF.
- Subject
- History
- Grade
- Grade 12
- Document type
- Addendum
- Year
- 2012
- Exam period
- NSC Supplementary
- Paper
- 1
- Curriculum
- CAPS
- Pages
- 12
- File size
- 1.7 MB
Free to read online, no sign-up needed
Loading document…
Loading document…
1 of 12
This exam
NSC Supplementary 2012
- Paper 1Question paperAddendumMemo
- Paper 2Question paper
Questions in this paper
Document textSearch extracted text and jump to a page.
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 2 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
QUESTION 1: WHY DID THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA) AND THE
UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS (USSR) BECOME
INVOLVED IN THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS?
SOURCE 1A
The source below focuses on Khrushchev's (President of the Soviet Union) reasons to
deploy nuclear missiles in Cuba.
Taken from The Cuban Missile Crises: A National Security Archive Document Reader.
(http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/cuba mis cri/declass.htm)
… What motivated the Soviets to deploy nuclear weapons in Cuba? The declassified
record shows that US officials were well aware that their deployment of Jupiter missiles
near Soviet borders in Turkey and Italy in 1959 would be deeply resented (feel bitter)
by Soviet officials; even President Eisenhower noted that it would be a 'provocative'
(offensive) step comparable to the deployment of Soviet missiles in 'Mexico or Cuba'. A
declassified military history of the Jupiter system reveals that the rockets became
operational in April 1962 … and that contributed to Khrushchev's proposal to deploy
nuclear missiles in Cuba.
SOURCE 1B
This article focuses on the reaction of John F Kennedy (President of the USA) and how
he dealt with the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Taken from The New York Times, 23 October 1962.
October 23, 1962
US Imposes Arms Blockade on Cuba on Finding Offensive Missiles Sites –
Kennedy Ready for Soviet Showdown
Special to The New York Times
Washington, October 22 – President Kennedy imposed a naval and air 'quarantine'
(blockade) tonight on the offensive military equipment to Cuba.
In a speech of extraordinary (unusual) gravity, he told the American people that the
Soviet Union, contrary to promises, was building offensive missiles and bomber bases
in Cuba. He said the bases could handle missiles carrying nuclear warheads up to
2 000 miles.
Thus a critical moment in the Cold War was at hand tonight. The President had
decided on a direct confrontation with and challenge to the power of the Soviet Union.
Two aspects of the speech were notable. One was the direct thrust (push) at the Soviet
Union as the party responsible for the crisis. President Kennedy treated Cuba and the
government of Premier Fidel Castro as a mere pawn (puppet) in Moscow's hands and
drew the issue as one with the Soviet government … The President made it clear that
this country would not stop short of military action to end what he called 'clandestine
(secret) reckless and provocative (offensive) threat to world peace'. … He called on
Premier Khrushchev to withdraw the missiles from Cuba and so 'move the world back
from the abyss (depth) of destruction'.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 3 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
SOURCE 1C
This cartoon, drawn in 20 October 1962, shows Khrushchev and Kennedy involved in a
game of arm-wrestling. It was over the deployment of missiles in Cuba.
Taken from Essential Modern World History by S Waugh.
USA USSR
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 4 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
QUESTION 2: HOW DID JULIUS NYERERE'S POLICY OF AFRICAN SOCIALISM
TRANSFORM TANZANIA AFTER INDEPENDENCE?
SOURCE 2A
This source consists of a written and a visual source about African socialism in
Tanzania.
WRITTEN SOURCE: This is an extract taken from Thinkers on Education by
Y Kassam. (www.infed.org/thinkers/et-nye.html)
Within the [Arusha] Declaration there was a commitment to raising basic living
standards. The socialism Nyerere believed in was 'people-centered'. Humaneness in
its fullest sense rather than wealth creation must come first. Societies become better
places through the development of people rather than increasing production.
The policy met with significant political resistance especially when people were forced
into rural communes. Nearly 10 million peasants were moved and many were
effectively forced to give up their land. The idea of collective farming was less attractive
to many peasants. Productivity went down. However, the focus on human development
and self-reliance did bring some success in other areas notably in health, education
and in political identity.
Nyerere set out his vision in Education for Self-Reliance. Education had to work for the
common good, foster cooperation and promote equality. Further, it had to address the
realities of life in Tanzania.
VISUAL SOURCE: This photograph shows Tanzanian women cleaning a
communal plot of land.
Taken from Africa Since 1940 by F Cooper.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 5 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
SOURCE 2B
This source consists of two statements about Nyerere's policy of African socialism.
STATEMENT 1: This statement was made by Julius Nyerere.
Adapted by G Mwakikagile in his book Tanzania under Mwalimu Nyerere.
I really think I ran the most successful single-party system on the continent. You might
not even call it a party. It was a single huge nationalist movement … I don't believe that
our country would be where it is now if we had a multiplicity of parties, which would
have become tribal and caused us a lot of problems.
We took over a country with 85% of its adults illiterate. The British ruled us for 43
years. When I stepped down, there was 91% literacy and nearly every child was in
school. We trained thousands of engineers, doctors and teachers.
STATEMENT 2: This statement was made by J Atkin published in In Motion
Magazine in December 1999.
When Nyerere felt the members of Parliament, all elected from the single party,
Tanganyikan African National Union (TANU) were out of touch with the people, he
made them walk the two hundred miles through the countryside to the annual party
meeting in Mwanza. Hot and dusty, they stayed with the people in the villages, re-
experiencing the real conditions in the country, not those of the city and the educated
civil-service class. A class called in West Africa, the Wa-Benzi (people of the Mercedes
Benz). How they must have hated it!
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 6 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
QUESTION 3: WHAT ROLE DID THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT PLAY IN
BRINGING ABOUT CHANGE IN THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA (USA) DURING THE 1960s?
SOURCE 3A
Below is an excerpt from Speeches that Changed the World on the Civil Rights
Movement.
It appeared in The Star newspaper, 21 April 2011.
In the late '50s and '60s, when America was burning as it wrestled with its collective
conscience over racial discrimination, a young Baptist minister stepped to the fore to
lead the struggle for equality. The man was Dr Martin Luther King Jr, an eloquent (well-
spoken), mesmerising (captivating) preacher driven to rid his country of racial
discrimination.
He was thrust into the international spotlight when he led the bus boycott in the town of
Montgomery, Alabama. It was sparked after black factory worker Rosa Parks was
arrested for refusing to give up her seat in a section of a bus reserved for whites. The
boycott motivated the US Supreme Court to outlaw racial segregation on public
transport. This was a victory for Martin Luther King Jr and his lieutenants in the South
Christian Leadership Conference.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 7 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
SOURCE 3B
The source below consists of a written and visual source. It focuses on the actions of
the Civil Rights Movement.
WRITTEN SOURCE: The following extract is part of the letter Martin Luther King
Jr wrote while he was in jail in Birmingham.
Taken from For the Record: A Documentary History of America Volume Two by
DE Shi.
We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God-given rights.
The nations of Asia and Africa are moving with jet-like speed toward the goal of
political independence, and we still creep at horse and buggy pace toward the
gaining of a cup of coffee at a lunch counter. Perhaps it is easy for those who have
never felt the stinging dark of segregation to say, 'Wait.' But when you have seen
vicious mobs lynch (hang) your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters
and brothers at whim (as you wish); when you have seen hate-filled policemen curse,
kick and even kill your brothers and sisters … then you will understand why we find it
difficult to wait.
VISUAL SOURCE: This is a photograph showing an African-American
demonstrator being attacked by police dogs in Birmingham, Alabama, 1963.
Taken from Race Relations in the USA Since 1900 by V Sanders, et al.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 8 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
SOURCE 3C
The source below consists of two extracts on the Civil Rights Movement and reaction
to it.
EXTRACT 1: The following is part of the famous 'I have a dream' speech
delivered by Martin Luther King Jr.
Taken from 20th Century Leaders by P Chrisp.
In 1963, King led a huge march for equal rights in Washington, DC. With a massive
crowd of over 250 000 followers, King marched on the state capital and delivered his
now famous 'I have a dream' speech, calling for equal treatment for all Americans. As a
result of the march and the speech, the citizens of the nation began to put growing
pressure on the presidential administration of John F Kennedy, encouraging the
President to push for civil rights laws to pass through Congress and become
recognised on a national level.
'… I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face difficulties of today and
tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. I
have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its
creed (statement of belief). We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are
created equal. I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of
former slaves and the sons of former slave-owners will be able to sit down together at
the table of brotherhood …'
EXTRACT 2: This extract focuses on the growing disagreement over the Civil
Rights Movement.
Taken from the history magazine Hindsight.
Despite the civil rights acts, the reality of US life remained that African Americans were
overwhelmingly poorer than whites and they were much less likely to find employment.
Their children were poorly educated in underfunded schools. Consequently, a new
movement appeared, influenced by younger and more militant blacks who argued that
the civil rights acts had done very little to end racism or discrimination in the areas
where it was most needed. Prominent among them was Malcolm X, who pointed out
that, although segregation was illegal in the north of the country, blacks were still often
the targets of racial discrimination.
Organisations such as the Black Panthers argued against a strategy of peaceful civil
disobedience and called, instead, for all-out war against white America. Growing racial
tension erupted into terrible violence across the USA in 1965.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 9 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
QUESTION 4: HOW DID THE PHILOSOPHY OF BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS
INFLUENCE THE SOWETO UPRISING OF 1976?
SOURCE 4A
This extract focuses on the language policy of the Department of Bantu Education.
Taken from South African History Online (SAHO) The Youth Struggle.
(www.sahistory.org.za/pages/governance_projects/june16/june16.htm)
The issue that caused massive discontent (dissatisfaction) and made resentment
(anger) boil over into the 1976 uprising was a decree (law) issued by the Bantu
Education Department. The Deputy Minister Andries Treurnicht sent instructions to the
school boards, inspectors and principals to the effect that Afrikaans should be put on
an equal basis with English and had to be used as a medium of instruction in all
schools. These instructions drew immediate negative reaction from various quarters of
the community. The first body to react was the Tswana School Board, which comprised
school boards from Meadowlands, Dobsonville and other areas in Soweto. The
minutes of the meeting of the Tswana School Board held on 20 January 1976 read:
'The circuit inspector told the Board that the Secretary for Bantu Education has stated
that all direct taxes paid by the black population of South Africa are being sent to the
various homelands for educational purposes there … In urban areas the education of a
black child is being paid for by the white population, that is English- and Afrikaans-
speaking groups. Therefore the Secretary for the Bantu Education has the
responsibility of satisfying the English- and Afrikaans-speaking people. Consequently,
as the only way of satisfying both groups, the medium of instruction in all schools shall
be on a 50-50 basis ... In future, if schools teach through a medium not prescribed by
the Department for a particular subject, examination question papers will only be set in
the medium with no option of the other language.'
The students initially organised themselves into local cultural groups and youth clubs
until the formation of an action committee on 13 June 1976, which was later renamed
the Soweto Student Representative Council (SSRC). They were influenced by national
organisations such as the Black Peoples' Convention (BPC), South African Student
Organisations (SASO) and by the Black Consciousness philosophy. They rejected the
idea of being taught in the language of the oppressor.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 10 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
SOURCE 4B
This source is a commemorative poster of Steve Biko.
Taken from Biko – The Quest for a True Humanity.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 11 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
SOURCE 4C
The source below consists of two extracts on the Soweto Uprising.
EXTRACT 1: This is a statement by Khotso Seatlholo – a student and member of
the Soweto Students Representative Council, 29 October 1976.
Taken from www.sahistory.org.za/classroom/education-350years/timeline/1970s.
html.
In a statement on behalf of the Soweto Students Representative Council (SSRC),
Khotso Seatlholo says, 'We have the full right to stand up and reject the whole system
of apartheid. We cannot accept it as our fathers did. We are not carbon copies of our
fathers. Where they failed, we will succeed. The mistakes they made will never be
repeated. They carried the struggle up to where they could. We are very grateful to
them. But now the struggle is ours. The ball of liberation is in our hands. The black
student will stand up fearlessly and take arms against a political system ... We shall
rise up and destroy a political ideology that is designed to keep us in a perpetual
[continuous] state of oppression and subservience (obedience).'
EXTRACT 2: This extract focuses on Jimmy Kruger's viewpoint of the role of the
police during the Soweto Uprising.
Taken from SOWETO – A History: Based on the Video Documentary, Soweto: A
History by P Bonner et al.
Jimmy Kruger, the Minister of Justice and Police, told an emotionally charged gathering
in Parliament that the government had 'not expected anything like this to happen' and
could have done nothing to avoid the crisis. He simply blamed the 'riots' on 'agitators'
who were polarising (separating) the races in South Africa' and emphatically (definitely)
denied that the police provoked the violence.
'Many of the so-called grievances are far-fetched. I have not found any grievances that
would indicate that the Bantu Administration has flopped on the job. My first task is to
rid South Africa of the thugs on the streets … The police conducted themselves with
the greatest measure of patience in the face of the greatest measure of provocation
(make worse). The police did everything in their power to bring the students under
control and were eventually forced to fire warning shots over their heads.'
A police colonel who was at the scene, however, contradicted Kruger saying that 'We
fired into them – it's no use firing over their heads'.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
History/P1 12 DBE/Feb.–Mar. 2012
NSC – Addendum
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Visual sources and other historical evidence were taken from the following:
Atkin, J. 1999. In Motion Magazine – Julius Nyerere (Washington; Portland)
Bonner et al. Soweto – A History (Cape Town; Longman)
Chrisp, P. 2002. 20th Century Leaders (Great Britain; White Thompson Publishers)
Cooper, F. 2002. Africa Since 1940 – The Past of the Present (Cambridge University
Press)
Fairclough, A. 1990. Makers of the 20th Century (Great Britain; Macdonald Publishers)
Govender, SP et al. 2006. New Generation History Grade 12 (Pinetown; New
Generation Publishing Enterprises)
Graves, F et al. 2006. Moments in History (Cape Town; Juta Gariep)
Hindsight – History Magazine. 2002. (London)
http://www.googlebooks.com
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/cuba mis cri/declass.htm
Kassam, Y. 1995. Thinkers on Education – Julius Nyerere (Paris; UNESCO
Publishing)
Lane, P. 1978. The USA in the Twentieth Century Leadership vol. 10 (London;
Batsford)
Mwakhikagile, G. 2006. Tanzania under Mwalimu Nyerere (New African Press; Dar es
Salaam)
The New York Times, 23 October 1962
Sanders, V et al. 1990. Race Relations in the USA Since 1900 (Washington; Harper)
Shi, DE et al. 1999. For the Record: A Documentary History of America Volume Two
(Washington; WW Norton)
Smith, N. 2000. The USA 1917–1980 (Oxford; Oxford University Press)
Steve Biko Foundation. 2007. Biko – The Quest for a True Humanity
The Star, 21 April 2011
Waugh, S. 2001. Essential Modern World History (Italy; Canale)
www. infed.org/thinkers/et-nye.html
www.sahistory.org.za/classroom/education-350years/timeline/1970s.html
www.sahistory.org.za/pages/governance_projects/june16/june16.htm
Copyright reserved
Study this subject
Recommended for this subject

Addendum
History Grade 12 P1 NSC November 2012 Addendum (English)

Question paper
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Mock 2012 QP (Afr)

Question paper
History Grade 12 P1 NSC Supplementary 2014 QP (Eng)
%20(English)%20June%202012%20Addendum_hlayiso.com_--4713681a-ef87-4170-b236-9a03661aecef/v1-2be4d6a4742c74e0c0e7/card.webp)
Addendum
History Grade 12 Paper 2 NSC June 2012 Addendum (English)

Addendum
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Mock 2022 Addendum (Eng)

Addendum
History Grade 12 Paper 1 NSC June 2022 Addendum (English)
More from Grade 12 History

Study guide
Workguide Case Study Strategies

Memorandum
History Grade 12 Paper 2 North West Mock 2025 Memo

Memorandum
History Grade 12 Paper 1 NSC June 2025 Memo (English)

Memorandum
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape June 2024 Memo (Afrikaans)

Memorandum
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Prelim 2024 Memo (Afr)

Question paper