Skip to content

Engineering Graphics and Design Grade 12 P2 2024 Errata

ErrataEngineering Graphics and DesignGrade 1220245 pages

Grade 12 Engineering Graphics and Design Paper 2 errata from the Eastern Cape Prelim Exam 2024, 5 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download.

Free to read online, no sign-up needed

Loading document…

Loading document…

Document textSearch extracted text and jump to a page.
Downloaded from hlayiso.com CHIEF DIRECTORATE: EXAMINATIONS AND ASSESSMENT Steve Vukile Tshwete Complex, Zone 6 Zwelitsha, 5608, Private Bag X0032, Bhisho, 5605 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA: Enquiries: Mrs P. Japtha Tel: 040 602 7031 . Fax : 040 608 7026. E-mail: Penny.Japtha@ecdoe.gov.za Website: www.ecdoe.gov.za TO: DISTRICT HEADS OF EXAMINATIONS PRINCIPALS OF SCHOOLS IN THE FET BAND FROM: (A) CES: ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT AND ITEM BANK MANAGEMENT MRS P. JAPHTA SUBJECT: ERRATA – ENGINEERING GRAPHICS AND DESIGN P2, 10 SEPTEMBER 2024 DATE: 12 SEPTEMBER 2024 ERRATA: ENGINEERING GRAPHICS AND DESIGN P2 (MARKING GUIDELINE) The Engineering Graphics and Design Paper 2 was administered on the 10th of September 2024. Following a moderation discussion on the 11th of September 2024, it was identified that certain marking guidelines contained measurement deviations. It is important to note that these deviations did not negatively impact the candidates, as they occurred solely within the marking guidelines. This amendment, prepared in collaboration with the Examiner and Moderator, addresses the identified discrepancies in the marking guidelines. It ensures that candidates are not unfairly disadvantaged by these deviations. The standardized corrections outlined in this amendment must be implemented across the province to maintain fairness and consistency in the evaluation process.
Downloaded from hlayiso.com Question 2.1 (Mechanisms): The question in reference was deemed fair, and the deviation identified did not adversely impact the candidates. The specified measurement from point A to -P on the slotted link should be 25 mm, as clearly indicated in the question paper. However, it has been observed that this measurement is incorrectly represented in the current marking guidelines. Attached is the revised marking guideline, reflecting the correct measurement (page 3). Question 3 (Isometric): The question was determined to be fair, and the deviations identified did not have a significant impact on the candidates’ performance. However, there are three deviations in the marking guideline that require adjustments to ensure accuracy and consistency with the question paper. 1. Deviation in measurement of the midpoint of the half hexagon The length must be adjusted to 62 mm, as specified in the question paper. 2. Deviation in the length of the half hexagon at the back of the figure. The correct measurement, as stated in the question paper, is 28 mm.
Downloaded from hlayiso.com 3. Omission of a corner in the marking guideline. A corner that is present in the figure is not represented in the marking guideline. The following adjustments should be applied: e Allocate half a mark for the inclusion of the corner. e Allocate half a mark for the two front lines of the web connecting the base to the bracket. Attached is the revised marking guideline, reflecting the correct measurements (page 4).
Downloaded from hlayiso.com Engineering Graphics and Design / P2 NSC EC / September 2024 * CIRCLE DIVISIONS * CONSTRUCTIONS AC «CURVE QUALITY TOTAL 2. CONSTRUCTION OF DIAGRAM alynn QUESTION 2.1: LOCI (MECHANISM) ASSESSMENT CRITERIA GIVEN 6 n CONSTRUCTION OF DIAGRAM | 6 o CONSTRUCTION OF LOCI 6 TOTAL | 18 ‘Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com We request that this must be brought to the attention of all educators marking this paper and sincerely apologise for the inconvenience. Yours in quality education. 13 September 2024 Mrs P. E. Japhta DATE

Study this subject

More from Grade 12 Engineering Graphics and Design

View all