Downloaded from hlayiso.com
NATIONAL
SENIOR CERTIFICATE
GRADE 12
SEPTEMBER 2014
HISTORY P2
MEMORANDUM
MARKS: 150
This memorandum consists of 21 pages.
Skip to contentAll 2014 papers _hlayiso.com_--eed60833-7a75-4958-a8dd-2cab09ac22e9/v1-97da7a9c61df59efec3c/card.webp)
%20(English)%20June%202014%20Possible%20Answer_hlayiso.com_--b6322558-818f-4c67-b34d-309f2eecce06/v1-516fc3f0fe13d1c37148/card.webp)
_hlayiso.com_--9b4b0c56-0d1c-480b-8ab5-b260d75b5222/v1-68278b92259dd5d25a89/card.webp)

%20(English)%20June%202014%20QP_hlayiso.com_--50718c3c-2599-4d0c-91fe-dbc300d11e58/v1-2cba073e02f6397fc362/card.webp)

View all



%202024%20Question%20Paper%20X05_hlayiso.com_--7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5/v1-5ae80cf63fec0975a316/card.webp)

History Grade 12 Paper 2 Eastern Cape Mock 2014 Memo
Grade 12 History Paper 2 memorandum from the Eastern Cape Mock Exam 2014, 21 pages. Read online or download the free PDF.
History · Grade 12 · Eastern Cape Mock Exam · 2014. Memorandum, 21 pages. Read online or download the PDF.
- Subject
- History
- Grade
- Grade 12
- Document type
- Memorandum
- Year
- 2014
- Exam period
- Eastern Cape Mock Exam
- Paper
- 2
- Curriculum
- CAPS
- Pages
- 21
- File size
- 469.4 KB
Free to read online, no sign-up needed
Loading document…
Loading document…
1 of 21
This exam
Eastern Cape Mock Exam 2014
Questions in this paper
Document textSearch extracted text and jump to a page.
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
2 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
1. SOURCE BASED QUESTIONS
1.1 The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based
questions:
COGNITVE HISTORICAL SKILLS WEIGHTING
LEVELS OF
QUESTIONS
LEVEL 1 Extract evidence from sources
(L1) Selection and organisation of relevant 30%
information from sources (15)
Define historical concepts/terms
LEVEL 2 Interpretation of evidence from sources
(L2) Explain information gathered from 40%
sources (20)
Analyse evidence from sources
LEVEL 3 Interpret and evaluate evidence from the
(L3) sources
Engage with sources to determine its
30%
usefulness, reliability, bias and limitations (15)
Compare and contrast interpretations and
perspectives presented in sources and
draw independent conclusions
1.2 The following information below indicates how to source-based
questions are assessed:
In the marking of source-based questions, credit needs to be given to
any other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or
examples.
In the allocation of marks, emphasis should be placed on how the
requirements of the question have been addressed.
In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that
need to be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated
in italics.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 3
2. ESSAY QUESTIONS
2.1 The essay questions require candidates to:
Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner.
They need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so
that they are able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an
effective argument to answer the question posed. It is essential that an
essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of evidence
and a conclusion.
2.2 Marking of essays questions
Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by
the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion
than those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific
essay.
When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should
be credited for any other relevant answer.
2.3 Global assessment of the essay
The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the
teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the
component parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer
an individual opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an
argument. The learners will not be required to simply regurgitate ‘facts’ in
order to achieve a high mark. This approach discourages learners from
preparing ‘model’ answers and reproducing them without taking into account
the specific requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the essay
credits learners’ opinion supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike
content-based marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the
emphasis is on the following:
The construction of argument
The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such
argument
The learner’s interpretation of the question
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
2.4 Assessment procedures of the essay
2.4.1 Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing essays.
2.4.2 During the first reading of the extended writing, ticks need to be
awarded for a relevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in
memorandum) each of the main points/aspects that is properly
contextualised (also indicated by bullets in the memorandum) and a
relevant conclusion (indicated by a bullet in the memorandum) e.g. in
an answer where there are 5 main points there will be 7 ticks.
2.4.3 The following additional symbols can also be used:
introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly
contextualised
Wrong statement
Irrelevant statement
Repetition R
Analysis A√
Interpretation I√
2.5 The Matrix
2.5.1 Use of analytical matrix in the marking of essay
In the marking of essays, with reference to page 5, the given criteria
shown in the matrix should be used. In assessing the extended
writing note should be taken of both the content and presentation. At
the point of intersection of the content and presentation based on the
seven competency levels, a mark should be awarded.
(a) The first reading of essay will be to determine to what extent the main
aspects have been covered and to allocate the content level (on the
matrix).
C LEVEL 4
(b) The second reading of essay will relate to the level (on the matrix) of
presentation.
C LEVEL 4
P LEVEL 5
(c) Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.
C LEVEL 4
30 – 33
P LEVEL 5
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 5
MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY: TOTAL MARKS: 50
LEVEL 7 LEVEL 6 LEVEL 5 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1
Very well planned Very well planned Well planned and Planned and Shows some Attempts to Little or no attempt
PRESENTATION and structured and structured structure an to structure the
structured essay. constructed an evidence of a
essay. Good essay. Developed a Attempts to argument. planned and answer. Largely essay.
synthesis of relevant line of descriptive or some
develop a clear Evidence used to constructed
information. argument. attempt at
Developed an argument. some extent to argument. developing a line of
Evidence used to
original, well defend the Conclusion drawn support the line of Attempts to sustain argument. No
balanced and argument. from the evidence argument. a line of argument. attempt to draw a
independent line Attempts to draw to support the line Conclusions Conclusions not conclusion.
of argument with an independent of argument. reached based on clearly supported
the use of conclusion from
evidence. by evidence.
evidence and the evidence to
sustained and support the line of
defended the argument.
argument
CONTENT throughout.
Independent
conclusion is
drawn from
evidence to
support the line of
argument.
LEVEL 7
Question has been
fully answered.
47–50 43–46
Content selection
fully relevant to line
of argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has been
answered. Content 43–46 40–42 38–39
selection relevant to
a line of argument.
LEVEL 5
Question answered
to a great extent. 38–39 36–37 34–35 30–33 28–29
Content adequately
covered and relevant.
LEVEL 4
Question
recognisable in
answer. 30–33 28–29 26–27
Some omissions or
irrelevant content
selection.
LEVEL 3
Content selection
does not relate to the
question, but does 20–23
not answer it, or does 26–27 24–25
not always
relate to the
question. Omissions
in coverage.
LEVEL 2
Question
inadequately 20–23 18–19 14–17
addressed. Sparse
content.
LEVEL 1
Question
inadequately
14–17 0–3
addressed or not at
all. Inadequate or
irrelevant content.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS
QUESTION 1: WHAT ROLE DID STEVE BIKO PLAY IN SOUTH AFRICA’S
LIBERATION STRUGGLE IN THE 1970s?
1.1 1.1.1 [Explain historical concepts from Source 1A – L1]
(a) When people are treated unfairly and their freedom is
limited.
People are denied their basic human rights.
Any other relevant explanation. (1 x 2) (2)
(b) A philosophy based on the belief that liberation for blacks
would be attained if they remove the shackles of their
inferiority.
Any other relevant explanation. (1 x 2) (2)
1.1.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
ANC
PAC (2 x 1) (2)
1.1.3 [Interpretation of information from Source 1A – L2]
All non-white people should unite and fight against apartheid.
Biko wanted to make the people aware that all non-whites are
being oppressed in South Africa.
Appeal to black people to join the BCM in their fight against
apartheid.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
1.1.4 [Extraction of information from Source 1A – L1]
“We must unite ourselves and respond as a strong force”
“BC made an effort to go beyond its narrow student base”
“Black people – workers, students, teachers, the unemployed
– all gathered in the hall”
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 1) (2)
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 7
1.2 1.2.1 [Interpretation of information from Source 1B – L2]
To uplift black communities.
Blacks to help each other.
Create employment.
To become self-reliant.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
1.2.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
Zimele Trust Fund
Ginsberg Educational Trust (2 x 1) (2)
1.2.3 [Interpretation of information from Source 1B – L1]
● Zanempilo Clinic (1 x 1) (1)
1.2.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1B – L2]
Apartheid government was against the BCM.
Apartheid saw BC as a threat to their existence.
BC challenged apartheid government to end apartheid
Apartheid government not prepared to share power
Apartheid government not prepared to relinquish power to
blacks.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
1.3 1.3.1 [Extraction of information from Source 1C – L1]
Be proud
Assert yourself
Be self-reliant
Any other relevant response. (3 x 1) (3)
1.3.2 [Interpretation and analysis of evidence from Source 1C – L3]
JUSTIFIED
Both Mandela and Biko were black
Both Mandela and Biko fought against apartheid.
Biko and the BC filled the vacuum left by the banned ANC.
Biko and the BC kept the struggle alive during the
banishment of the ANC.
Any other relevant response.
NOT JUSTIFIED
Mandela is subjective.
Mandela did not know Biko very well.
Mandela was in prison during the 1970s.
BC did not remove apartheid immediately.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
1.3.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
He mobilised the youth into action against apartheid.
The formation of the BCM filled the political vacuum in
South Africa.
Biko initiated the formation of student organisations to
oppose Apartheid.
He motivated blacks not to fear and remove the feeling of
inferiority.
Biko played a key role in dismantling apartheid.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
1.3.4 [Interpretation of information from Source 1C – L2]
To stand up and fight against oppression.
Mental emancipation
To break the chains of oppression against apartheid.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
1.3.5 [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from Source 1C – L3]
Candidates should take a stance and indicate whether they
AGREE or DISAGREE and motivate their answer.
AGREE
Apartheid was an evil system.
Apartheid led to black servitude.
Both Mandela and Biko condemned apartheid.
Biko’s Black Consciousness contributed to the demise of
apartheid.
Any other relevant response.
DISAGREE
Internal and external pressures in the 1980s led to the fall of
apartheid.
Collapse of communism forced both the ANC and NP to
negotiate a peaceful settlement.
Biko and his BC brought no change in the 1970s.
The UDF and trade unions brought the apartheid government
to its knees.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 9
1.4 [Interpretation and evaluation of information from all the sources – L3]
Candidates may use the following points to answer the question.
BC kept the liberation struggle alive while the ANC was banned
(Source 1A)
BC united black people, students, teachers and workers to fight
against apartheid (Source 1A)
Apartheid discriminated against all blacks irrespective of tribes/race
(Source 1A)
Mobilised parents, workers and students to spread the ideas of BC
(Source 1B)
Self-help programs established by Biko and controlled by blacks
(Source 1B)
Mandela acknowledge Biko’s role in shaping the new South Africa
(Source 1C)
Biko’s emphasis on self-reliance united blacks (Source 1C)
Shows that the BC was feared by the NP
BC was seen as an extension of the aims of the ANC (Source 1C)
Shows that Biko was killed but his legacy lives on (Source 1C)
Poster shows that although he was killed his ideas lived on.
Any other relevant response. (8)
Use the following rubric to allocate marks.
LEVEL 1 Uses evidence in an elementary Marks: 0 – 2
manner, e.g. show little or no
understanding of the role of Biko in
the South African liberation struggle.
Uses evidence partially to report on
topic or cannot report on topic.
LEVEL 2 Evidence is mostly relevant and relates Marks: 3 – 5
to a great extent to the topic, e.g.
shows an understanding of the role
of Biko in the South African liberation
struggle.
Uses evidence in a very basic manner.
LEVEL 3 Uses relevant evidence, e.g. Marks: 6 – 8
demonstrates a thorough
understanding of the role of Biko in
the South African liberation struggle.
Evidence relates well to the topic.
Uses evidence very effectively in an
organised paragraph that shows an
understanding of the topic. [50]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
QUESTION 2: TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION
COMMISSION (TRC) SUCCESSFUL IN DEALING WITH SOUTH
AFRICA’S DIVIDED PAST?
2.1 2.1.1 [Explanation of historical concepts from Source 2A – L1]
(a) Racial segregation
Discrimination of people on the basis of their colour, race
and gender.
Separation of races politically, economically or socially.
Any other relevant explanation. (Any 1 x 2) (2)
(b) Is the granting of official pardon for people that committed
politically related offences.
Any other relevant explanation. (Any 1 x 2) (2)
2.1.2 [Extraction of information from Source 2A – L1]
To bring to light the causes and nature of gross human
violations.
Granting of amnesty
Disclosure of all relevant facts related to acts of violence.
Restoring human and civil dignity
Recommending reparation/amnesty.
Any other relevant response. (Any 4 x 1) (4)
2.1.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
Much hatred/mistrust existed between different races.
To make the new dispensation work in South Africa
To prevent further violence that has plagued South Africa for
years.
To secure the survival of the new democracy.
Any other relevant response. (Any 1 x 2) (2)
2.1.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
Victim-friendly: Allowed them to find closure and an
opportunity to forgive.
OR
Perpetrator-friendly: They were not jailed for their
actions/they were granted amnesty. (1 x 2) (2)
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 11
2.2 2.2.1 [Extraction of information from Source 2B – L1]
● To seek amnesty. (1 x 1) (1)
2.2.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
Victims were allowed to tell their perpetrators how the
atrocities affected them.
The perpetrators got a chance to tell their stories.
The perpetrator applied for amnesty.
The victims’ families forgave the perpetrators.
The victims’ families received compensation.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
2.2.3 [Interpretation of information from Source 2B – L2]
Restorative justice – bent on repairing the harm caused by
political crimes
Retributive justice – bent on punishment for crimes
committed (2 x 2) (4)
2.2.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
Some did not reveal the full detail of their atrocities.
Some refused to testify before the TRC.
Some perpetrators showed no remorse for the crimes they
committed.
They favoured retributive justice system.
Any other relevant response. (Any 1 x 2) (2)
2.2.5 [Extraction of information from Source 2B – L1]
Mxenges
Seremanes
Khulumani group (Any 3 x 1) (3)
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
12 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
2.2.6 [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from Source 2B – L3]
Candidates should take a stance and motivate their answer.
JUSTIFIED
People must be punished for their crimes.
Perpetrators cannot get away with murder.
Victims could not be denied justice.
Perpetrators held responsible for their crimes.
Any other relevant response.
NOT JUSTIFIED
Did not understand the aims of the TRC.
Aimed at repairing the damage caused by Apartheid
Attempted to restore human rights’ culture.
Any relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
2.3 2.3.1 [Interpretation of information from Source 2C – L2]
P.W. Botha not interested in the aims of the TRC
P.W. Botha refused to disclose human rights abuses during
his term of office.
P.W. refused to appear before the TRC.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
2.3.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
Archbishop Desmond Tutu (1 x 2) (2)
2.3.3 [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from Source 2C – L2]
They felt that the TRC was a witch hunt against them.
Some agents felt that they only carried out orders.
The TRC focused only on crimes committed by apartheid
agents.
P.W. Botha maintained, “I did nothing wrong”.
Any other relevant response. (Any 1 x 2) (2)
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 13
2.3.4 [Engage with sources to determine its usefulness, reliability,
bias and limitations from Source 2C – L3]
RELIABLE
It shows that P.W. Botha refused to testify before the TRC
The TRC had no legal power to force someone to testify.
It was not a court of law.
Message can be corroborated with other sources.
Any other relevant response.
NOT RELIABLE
It only shows one person but there were others who also
refused to testify.
Secondary source.
It’s the perception of Shapiro on the TRC.
Does not show the reasons for P.W.’s refusal to appear.
TRC was a voluntary process.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
2.4 [Interpretation and evaluation of information from all sources – L3]
Candidates should focus on the following in their response.
SUCCESS
Brought reconciliation between whites/Blacks (Source 2A)
Eradicated hatred between blacks and whites
Aim: - forgiving without forgetting
- restorative justice to enhance unity
- restorative justice to enhance human rights (Source 2A)
Amnesty given to those who told their stories (Source 2B)
Victims forgiven them/find disclosure (Source 2B)
Victims compensated
Many people testified (small fry) – (Source 2C)
Leaders of major parties missed out on the opportunity to enhance
racial unity by refusing to testify (Source 2C)
Ensured the survival of the new democracy
Any other relevant response
FAILURE
Did not bring unity amongst blacks and whites (Source 2B)
Reparation could not replace a human life.
Some wanted retributive justice (Source 2B)
Perpetrators must be punished for their crimes
Leaders of major political parties did not appear before the TRC
P.W. Botha refused to testify, “I did nothing wrong”(Source 2C)
F.W. De Klerk said it was a “witch hunt” against whites.
IFP who committed lots of political crimes refused to testify.
The ANC said that TRC tried to criminalise the liberation struggle.
Any other relevant response. (8)
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
14 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
Use the following rubric to assess this paragraph.
LEVEL 1 Uses evidence in an elementary manner, e.g. Marks: 0 – 2
show little or no understanding whether
the TRC was a success or failure.
Uses evidence partially to report on topic or
cannot report on topic.
LEVEL 2 Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a Marks: 3 – 5
great extent to the topic, e.g. shows an
understanding whether the TRC was a
success or a failure.
Uses evidence in a very basic manner.
LEVEL 3 Uses relevant evidence, e.g. shows a Marks: 6 – 8
thorough understanding of whether the
TRC was a success or a failure.
Evidence relates well to the topic
Uses evidence very effectively in an
organised paragraph that shows an
understanding of the topic. [50]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 15
QUESTION 3: WHAT IMPACT DID OF GLOBALISATION HAVE ON AFRICA
AFTER 1989?
3.1 3.1.1 [Explanation of historical concept from Source 3A – L1]
Movement of people, information, investments, goods and
services around the world.
People and countries become increasingly interconnected –
politically, economically and culturally.
Any other relevant explanation (Any 1 x 2) (2)
3.1.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
The growth of large companies (1 x 2) (2)
3.1.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
They are more profitable than smaller ones.
They accounted for 17% of world trade.
200 transnational corporations now dominate 32% of world
trade (Any 2 x 1) (2)
3.1.4 [Interpretation of information from Source 3A – L2]
Advanced technology in travel made distance irrelevant
Internet made news and information move quickly around the
world
Disappearance of borders – few trade barriers
Greater movement and migration of people in search of jobs
Any other relevant response. (Any 1 x 2) (2)
3.1.5 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1]
Coca Cola ● McDonald’s ● Lilly
Camel ● Microsoft ● Pepsi
Playboy ● Apple ● Shell
Nike ● IBM ● EXXOX
Any other relevant answer. (Any 4 x 1) (4)
3.1.6 [Interpretation and evaluation of evidence from Source 3A L3]
Both sources mention large companies.
The written source shows that large companies produce
goods in bulk and the visual source shows these big famous
companies.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
16 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
3.1.7 [Engage with sources to determine its usefulness, reliability, bias and
limitations from Source 3A – L3]
Large companies control the US.
Large companies control US policies.
Shows that the designer is against multi-national organisations
that not only control the US but also the world.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
3.2 3.2.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1]
Collapse of the USSR
Collapse of communism (2 x 1) (2)
3.2.2 [Interpretation of information from Source 3B – L2]
They forced African countries to adopt democracy.
They set conditions for African states.
They forced African countries to privatise state enterprises.
They wanted less trade union activity.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
3.2.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3B – L2]
LESSER EXTENT
Globalisation widens the gap between rich and poor.
Underdeveloped and developing African countries are
subjected to a set of pre-conditions for aid.
African countries were forced to privatise state enterprises.
African countries cannot compete with prices from the North.
Western culture spread into African countries – Africa losing
their culture.
Aid lead to more debt.
Any other relevant response.
GREATER EXTENT
Africa countries can sell their products overseas.
African skilled labour can migrate in search of a better living.
Created an international job market.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
3.3 3.3.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3C – L1]
Governments fear they will withdraw their business and
relocate. (1 x 1) (1)
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 17
3.3.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
Low taxes on profit.
Relaxation of labour laws.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
3.3.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3C – L1]
● Northern Hemisphere (1 x 1) (1)
3.4 3.4.1 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2]
South Africa’s economy is small in relation to other BRICS
countries.
South Africa’s contribution to BRICS would be limited.
South Africa will not be influential in world economics
Any other relevant response. (Any 1 x 2) (2)
3.4.2 [Interpretation of information from Source 3C – L2]
To discuss/promote common interest.
These countries made up a sizeable chunk of the world’s
population and economy.
It includes the continents outside the Northern Hemisphere
who control the globalisation process.
Non-Western countries can play a role in the global economy.
Want to establish a South-South development bank.
To increase global influence.
Any other relevant response. (Any 2 x 2) (4)
3.5 [Interpretation and evaluation of information from all the sources – L3]
Candidates should include the following points to answer the question.
POSITIVE IMPACT
Accumulates wealth
Accumulates power
TNC accumulates wealth and power (Source 3A)
Seeks new investment opportunities (Source 3B)
Lowering of tariffs/trade barriers (Source 3C)
Creates jobs
Extends skills/education
New trends in fashion culture/ideas/technology (Source 3A)
Any other relevant response.
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
18 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
NEGATIVE IMPACT
Dividing factor
Northern Hemisphere controls 80% of global wealth (Source 3A)
Rich is getting richer, poor getting poorer
In one way led to the spread of western culture (Source 3A)
TNC influences/dominates local political and economic policies
(Source 3B)
TNC’s favours countries with less trade union activities
Globalisation operates in the interest of businesses and not in the
interest of people (Source 3B)
African continent by and large do not share in the wealth of
globalisation (Source 3C)
Millions are not connected to the internet
IMF/World Bank/WTO set strict rules for financial aid (Source 3C).
Financial aid reinforces poverty and unemployment in Africa.
Any other relevant response. (8)
Use the following rubric to allocate a mark.
Uses evidence in an elementary manner, Marks: 0 – 2
e.g. shows little or no understanding of
LEVEL 1 the impact of globalisation on Africa.
Uses evidence partially to report on the
topic or cannot report on topic.
Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a Marks: 3 – 5
great extent to the topic, e.g. shows an
LEVEL 2 understanding of the impact of
globalisation on Africa.
Uses evidence in a very basic manner.
Uses relevant evidence, e. g. Marks: 6 – 8
demonstrates a thorough understanding
of the impact of globalisation on Africa.
LEVEL 3
Uses evidence very effectively in an
organised paragraph that shows an
understanding of the topic. [50]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 19
SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS
Answer at least ONE essay question and not more than TWO from this section.
QUESTION 4: CIVIL RESISTANCE IN SOUTH AFRICA: 1970s TO 1980s
SYNOPSIS
Candidates should take a stance and discuss how internal unrest in South Africa
succeeded in dismantling apartheid during the 1980s.
MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their response.
INTRODUCTION: Candidates should indicate to what extent the internal
resistance succeeded in dismantling apartheid.
ELABORATION
Botha’s total strategy
Tri-cameral parliament created by P.W. Botha
‘Coloured’ and ‘Indians’ represented but excluded blacks
Africans were seen to have political rights in the so-called homelands
Reaction of anti-apartheid movements
The UDF was a non-racial alliance that was launched in 1983
The UDF launched a massive nationwide campaign to persuade Coloureds
and Indians not to participate in the elections for the Houses of
Representatives and Delegates
Civil society protest against the Tri-cameral parliament showed that the
majority of South Africans opposed the new structure.
Freedom marches/strikes/school, rent and consumer boycotts
Civil protest – role of civic organisations/‘bread and butter issues’
Wanted to improve the quality of life of township residence
Protest against poor services by boycotts – refuses to pay rent
Role of SACC (South African Council of Churches)
Prominent in fighting for social justice and challenged the apartheid laws
Stand up for the poor and oppressed
Role of trade unions – fought for the rights of black workers
Role of students COSAS (Congress of South African Students)
Was to co-ordinate student activities in different regions
Unite students and fight for the demands of students
AZASO (Azanian Student Organisation) and COSAS organised school oycotts,
stay-aways, consumer boycotts and self-defence structures against the
apartheid security forces
Mass Democratic Movement (MDM) formed when UDF was banned
Defiance campaign against segregation
1989 – “year of mass action”
End conscription campaign
Any other relevant response.
Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion. [50]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
20 HISTORY P2 (SEPTEMBER 2014)
QUESTION 5: THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY IN SOUTH AFRICA AND
COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST
SYNOPSIS
Candidates should take a stance regarding the statement and discuss how conflicts
disturbed negotiations and the path to a new South Africa.
MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their response
INTRODUCTION: Candidates should agree or disagree with the line of argument
to support their answer with relevant examples
ELABORATION
Release of Mandela
Process of negotiations and reform
Talks between major stakeholders begin
Groote Schuur Minute
Pretoria Minute
Violence – Boipatong, Natal and PWV
COSAG group and Freedom Alliance
Codesa 1 and 2
Bisho massacre
Assassination of Chris Hani
AWP storming the World Trade Centre
Bophuthatswana coup
Record of understanding
Interim constitution and Bill of Rights
Multi-party negotiation process – Sunset clause
1994 elections
New constitution
Any other relevant response.
Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion. [50]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(SEPTEMBER 2014) HISTORY P2 21
QUESTION 6: THE END OF THE COLD WAR AND A NEW WORLD
ORDER 1989 TO THE PRESENT
SYNOPSIS
Candidates must discuss how the collapse of communism and the USSR paved
the way for negotiations between the ANC and the apartheid government after
1989.
MAIN ASPECTS
Candidates should include the following aspects in their response.
INTRODUCTION: Candidates can give some background on the situation in
both the USSR and South Africa in the 1980s or any other
relevant introduction.
ELABORATION
Gorbachev’s reforms and the collapse of the Soviet Union
Perestroika and Glasnost
Reform communism, but not dismantle it
Resulted in protests and demonstrations
Boris Yeltsin – held multi-party elections
This allowed for the break – up of the Soviet Union – 1989 – 1992
International events and the collapse of the Soviet Union
Star War race with USA in the 1980s
Economically weak
War in Afghanistan
Forced Gorbachev to implement reforms
USSR weak in the 1980s to enforce discipline on satellite states
Fall of Berlin Wall – indicated to Soviet bloc states that they could now
determine their own fate
Revolts: Czechoslovakia, Romania, Lithuania and Poland
Soviet satellites followed the example of the Eastern bloc states
Direct cause of disintegration of the Soviet empire
De Klerk’s policies and the release of Mandela
Botha steps down and is replaced by De Klerk in 1989
De Klerk release Mandela
Unban the ANC and PAC
International events that forced De Klerk to release Mandela
Increasing external pressure and opposition to apartheid
Collapse of communism
Loss of America as an ally
Defeat of South Africa at Cuito Cuanavale and withdrawal of South African
forces from Angola and Namibia
Independence of Namibia
All of the above forced De Klerk to order the release of Mandela and
unban the ANC, PAC and SACP
Any other relevant response.
Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion [50]
GRANDTOTAL: 150
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Study this subject
Recommended for this subject
_hlayiso.com_--eed60833-7a75-4958-a8dd-2cab09ac22e9/v1-97da7a9c61df59efec3c/card.webp)
Question paper
History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2014 QP (Afr)
%20(English)%20June%202014%20Possible%20Answer_hlayiso.com_--b6322558-818f-4c67-b34d-309f2eecce06/v1-516fc3f0fe13d1c37148/card.webp)
Memorandum
History Grade 12 Paper 2 NSC June 2014 Memo (English)
_hlayiso.com_--9b4b0c56-0d1c-480b-8ab5-b260d75b5222/v1-68278b92259dd5d25a89/card.webp)
Memorandum
History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2015 Memo (Afrikaans)

Question paper
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Mock 2014 QP (Afr)
%20(English)%20June%202014%20QP_hlayiso.com_--50718c3c-2599-4d0c-91fe-dbc300d11e58/v1-2cba073e02f6397fc362/card.webp)
Question paper
History Grade 12 P2 NSC June 2014 Question Paper (English)

Addendum
History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2023 Addendum (Eng)
More from Grade 12 History

Study guide
Workguide Case Study Strategies

Addendum
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Prelim 2024 Addendum (Afr)

Addendum
History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Prelim 2024 Addendum (Afr)

Question paper
History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Prelim 2024 QP (Afr)
%202024%20Question%20Paper%20X05_hlayiso.com_--7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5/v1-5ae80cf63fec0975a316/card.webp)
Question paper
History Grade 12 P1 Gauteng Prelim 2024 Question Paper (Eng)

Addendum