Downloaded from hlayiso.com
NATIONAL
SENIOR CERTIFICATE
GRADE 12
SEPTEMBER 2020
HISTORY P1
ADDENDUM
This addendum consists of 14 pages.
Skip to contentAll 2020 papers 





View all


%202024%20Question%20Paper%20X05_hlayiso.com_--7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5/v1-5ae80cf63fec0975a316/card.webp)

%20Memo_hlayiso.com_--4fe0001f-11e9-414e-be30-45108ea0ae86/v1-2b5a2c0ac74d623b88fe/card.webp)
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Mock 2020 Addendum (Eng)
Grade 12 History Paper 1 addendum from the Eastern Cape Mock Exam 2020 (English), 14 pages. Read online or get the free PDF download.
History · Grade 12 · Eastern Cape Mock Exam · 2020 · English. Addendum, 14 pages. Read online or download the PDF.
- Subject
- History
- Grade
- Grade 12
- Language
- English
- Document type
- Addendum
- Year
- 2020
- Exam period
- Eastern Cape Mock Exam
- Paper
- 1
- Curriculum
- CAPS
- Pages
- 14
- File size
- 634.5 KB
Free to read online, no sign-up needed
Loading document…
Loading document…
1 of 14
This exam
Eastern Cape Mock Exam 2020
- Paper 1Question paper · EngQuestion paper · AfrQuestion paperQuestion paper · SesothoAddendum · EngAddendum · AfrAddendumAddendum · SesothoMemo · EngMemo · Afr
- Paper 2Question paper · EngQuestion paper · AfrQuestion paper · isiXhosaQuestion paper · SesothoAddendum · EngAddendum · AfrAddendum · isiXhosaAddendum · SesothoMemo · EngMemo · Afr
Questions in this paper
Document textSearch extracted text and jump to a page.
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
2 HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)
QUESTION 1: HOW DID THE DEPLOYMENT OF MISSILES TO CUBA CONTRIBUTE
TO COLD WAR TENSIONS BETWEEN THE SOVIET UNION AND THE
UNITED STATES IN THE 1960s?
SOURCE 1A
This source is an extract from a Soviet statement on a potential Cuban attack by the
United States (11 September 1962).
The Government of the U.S.S.R. deems it necessary to draw the attention of the
governments of all countries and world opinion to the provocations the United States
Government is now staging, provocations which might plunge the world into the disaster
of a universal world war with the use of thermonuclear weapons. War-minded
reactionary elements of the United States have long since been conducting an unbridled
(unchecked) propaganda campaign against the Cuban Republic, calling for an attack on
Cuba, an attack on Soviet ships carrying the necessary commodities and food to the
Cuban people, in one word, calling for war.
The President of the United States asked Congress to permit the call-up of 150 000
reservists to the armed forces of the United States … Such a step by the United States
Government cannot be assessed otherwise than a screen for aggressive plans and
intentions of the United States itself and will inevitably lead to aggravating the
international atmosphere.
… We do not hide from the world public that we really are supplying Cuba with industrial
equipment and goods which are helping to strengthen her economy and raise the well-
being of the Cuban people. … It will be recalled that a certain amount of armaments is
also being shipped from the Soviet Union to Cuba at the request of the Cuban
government in connection with the threats by aggressive imperialist circles. The Cuban
statesmen also requested the Soviet Government to send to Cuba Soviet military
specialists, technicians who would train the Cubans in handling up-to-date weapons,
because up-to-date weapons now call for high skill and much knowledge. It is but natural
that Cuba does not yet have such specialists. The armaments and military equipment
sent to Cuba are designed exclusively for defensive purposes and the President of the
United States and the American military just as the military of any country know what
means of defence are. How can these means threaten the United States?
[From http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/precrisis.htm. Accessed on 21 November 2019.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020) HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) 3
SOURCE 1B
The following source is a map that the USA published to indicate the impact of the
nuclear missiles in Cuba.
[From https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/cuban-missile-crisis?mediatype=photography&phrase
=cuban%20missile%20crisis&sort=mostpopular. Accessed on 15 December 2019.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
4 HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)
SOURCE 1C
This source is an extract from President John F. Kennedy’s speech to the nation on
radio and television about the Soviet missiles in Cuba on October 22, 1962.
Good evening, my fellow citizens. This Government, as promised, has maintained the
closest surveillance of the Soviet military build-up on the island of Cuba. Within the past
week, unmistakable evidence has established the fact that a series of offensive missile
sites is now in preparation on that imprisoned island. The purpose of these bases can
be none other than to provide a nuclear strike capability against the Western
Hemisphere.
The characteristics of these new missile sites indicate two distinct types of installations.
Several of them include medium range ballistic missiles, capable of carrying a nuclear
warhead for a distance of more than 1 000 nautical miles. Each of these missiles, in
short, is capable of striking Washington, D.C., the Panama Canal, Cape Canaveral,
Mexico City, or any other city in the south-eastern part of the United States, in Central
America, or in the Caribbean area.
To halt this offensive build-up, a strict quarantine on all offensive military equipment
under shipment to Cuba is being initiated. All ships of any kind bound for Cuba from
whatever nation or port will, if found to contain cargoes of offensive weapons, be turned
back ... We are not at this time, however, denying the necessities of life as the Soviets
attempted to do in their Berlin Blockade of 1948.
[From https://spartacus-educational.com. Accessed on 16 December 2019.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020) HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) 5
SOURCE 1D
This source is a translation of a telegram from Khrushchev to Kennedy sent from the
Embassy in the Soviet Union to the Department of State, Moscow, October 26, 1962.
Let us therefore show statesmanlike wisdom. I propose we, for our part, will declare that
our ships, bound for Cuba, are not carrying any armaments. You would declare that the
United States will not invade Cuba with its forces and will not support any sort of forces
which might intend to carry out an invasion of Cuba. Then the necessity for the presence
of our military specialists in Cuba would disappear.
Mr President, I appeal to you to weigh well what the aggressive, piratical actions, which
you have declared the USA intends to carry out in international waters, would lead to.
You yourself know that any sensible man simply cannot agree with this, cannot
recognise your right to such actions.
If you did this as the first step towards the unleashing of war, well then, it is evident that
nothing else is left to us but to accept this challenge of yours. If, however, you have not
lost your self-control and sensibly conceive what this might lead to, then, Mr President,
we and you ought not now to pull on the ends of the rope in which you have tied the
knot of war, because the more the two of us pull, the tighter that knot will be tied.
And a moment may come when that knot will be tied so tight that even he who tied it will
not have the strength to untie it, and then it will be necessary to cut that knot. And what
that would mean is not for me to explain to you, because you yourself understand
perfectly of what terrible forces our countries dispose.
Consequently, if there is no intention to tighten that knot and thereby to doom the world
to the catastrophe of thermonuclear war, then let us not only relax the forces pulling on
the ends of the rope, let us take measures to untie that knot. We are ready for this.
[From https://microsites.jfklibrary.org/cmc/oct26/doc4.html. Accessed on 16 December 2019.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
6 HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)
QUESTION 2: WHY DID FOREIGN POWERS BECOME INVOLVED IN THE ANGOLAN
WAR OF INDEPENDENCE?
SOURCE 2A
This source explains the power struggles that erupted after Angola became independent
in 1974.
Three main military movements had been fighting for Angolan independence since the
1960s. The Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) was a Marxist
organisation centred in the capital, Luanda, and led by Agostinho Neto. The National
Front for the Liberation of Angola (FNLA) led by Holden Roberto, was based in the north
of the country and had strong ties to the US ally (friend), Mobutu Sese Seko, in
neighbouring Zaire. The National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA),
an offshoot of the FNLA, was by Jonas Savimbi and supported by the country’s largest
ethnic group, the Ovimbundu.
Following the Portuguese coup (revolution), these three revolutionaries met with
representatives of the new Portuguese government in January 1975 and signed the
Alvor Agreement that granted Angolan independence and provided for a three-way
power sharing government. However, trust quickly broke down among the three groups,
and the country descended (fell) into civil war as each vied (competed) for sole (total)
power.
The crisis in Angola developed into a Cold War battleground as the superpowers and
their allies delivered military assistance to their preferred clients. The United States
supplied aid and training for both the FNLA and UNITA while troops from Zaire assisted
Holden Roberto and his fighters. China also sent military instructors to train the FNLA.
During the summer of 1975, the Soviet-supported MPLA was able to consolidate power
in Luanda and oust the U.S.-supported FNLA from the capital, but the FNLA continued
to attack.
[From https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/angola. Accessed on 05 April 2020.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020) HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) 7
SOURCE 2B
The source below outlines the reasons for South Africa’s involvement in Angola during
the 1970s.
SA’s first intervention of Angola seems to have resulted from the need to secure and
protect its own interests. The government was severely anti-communist at this time, as
the notion of the ‘total national strategy’ against the ‘total onslaught’ of communism
became the all-encompassing factor that determined foreign policy. SA’s détente politics
toward Africa at this time was pursued rather successfully prior to the Angolan
intervention in order to establish buffer zones, which would hopefully protect SA from the
increasing communist threat. In addition, SA was becoming increasingly worried about
this possible threat as the USSR and Cuba were enlarging their support to the MPLA
after the coup in Portugal in 1974. The concentration of SWAPO insurgents on the
southern Angola border furthermore endangered SA’s interests in SWA, as SWAPO was
one of the MPLA’s biggest African allies. Both the MPLA and SWAPO were seen as
Soviet proxies during the Cold War.
In addition, SA was pressured by some in the international community to get involved in
Angola for the first time. The USA, like SA, was also strongly anti-communist and
supported SA’s initial involvement to some extent. France also had concerns. SA also
saw its limited initial involvement as an opportunity to establish a less hostile government
in Angola, than what was already established in Mozambique. The FNLA, UNITA and
several African and international actors such as Zaire and even Zambia made similar
requests. South Africa decided that it would be in its own as well as the region’s best
interest to intervene in the Angolan conflict.
[From South Africa’s Intervention in Angola: Before Cuito Cuanavale and Thereafter
file:///E:/Angola%202/labuschagne_south_2009.pdf. Accessed on 05 April 2020.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
8 HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)
SOURCE 2C
The extract below indicates how the United States of America supported UNITA during
the Angolan Civil War.
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) made its first major weapons shipment to the
FNLA in July 1975. Thus, like the Russians and Chinese, the United States was giving
aid to one side of Angolan Civil War on a level far greater than it had ever provided
during the struggle against Portuguese colonialism.
The United States was directly involved in the civil war to a marked (noticeable) degree.
In addition to training Angolan combat units, US personnel did considerable flying
between Zaire and Congo carrying out reconnaissance (investigation) and supply
missions, and the CIA spent over a million dollars on an ambitious mercenary (hired
soldiers) programme. Several reports appeared in the US press stating that many
American guerrillas were fighting in Angola against the MPLA from ‘scores’ to ‘300’ and
that many others were recruited and trained in the United States to join them. But John
Stockwell, the head of CIA’s Angola task force, puts the number of American
mercenaries who actually made it to Angola at only 24. The CIA was also directly
financing the arming of British mercenaries (fighting in Angola).
Subsequently (later) the Secretary of the State, Henry Kissinger, informed the Senate
that ‘the CIA is not involved’ in the recruitment of mercenaries for Angola. … Through
recruited journalists representing major news service, the Agency (CIA) was able to
generate international coverage of false reports for Soviet advisers in Angola. One CIA
story, announced to the press by UNITA, was that 20 Russians and 35 Cubans had
been captured. Another fabrication (lie) concerned alleged rapes committed by Cuban
soldiers in Angola; this was elaborated to include their capture, trial and execution …
[From http://williamblum.org/chapters/killing-hope/angola. Accessed on 7 March 2020.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020) HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) 9
SOURCE 2D
This poster depicts President Agostinho Neto and Fidel Castro after Angolan
independence celebrations.
[From https://mrdivis.wordpress.com/2016/12/02/remembering-fidel-castros-impact-in-southern-africa/.
Accessed on 7 March 2020.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
10 HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)
QUESTION 3: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE BLACK POWER MOVEMENT
ON AFRICAN AMERICANS IN THE 1960s?
SOURCE 3A
The extract below outlines Stokely Carmichael’s explanation regarding the philosophy
of Black Power.
The Black Power Movement grew out of the Civil Rights Movement that had steadily
gained momentum through the 1950s and 1960s. Although not a formal movement, the
Black Power Movement marked a turning point in black-white relations in the United
States and in how blacks saw themselves. The movement was hailed (welcomed) by
some as a positive and proactive force aimed at helping blacks achieve full equality with
whites, but it was reviled (hated) by others as a militant, sometimes violent faction whose
primary goal was to drive a wedge (division) between whites and blacks. In truth, the
Black Power Movement was a complex event that took place at a time when society and
culture were being transformed throughout the United States, and its legacy reflects that
complexity.
Blacks still faced lower wages than whites, higher crime rates in their neighbourhoods,
and unspoken but palpable (deep) racial discrimination. Young blacks in particular saw
the Civil Rights Movement as too mainstream to generate real social change. What they
wanted was something that would accelerate (quicken) the process and give blacks the
same opportunities as whites, not just socially but also economically and politically.
Perhaps more important, they felt that the Civil Rights Movement was based more on
white perceptions of civil rights than black perceptions.
By the mid-1960s, dissatisfaction with the pace of change was growing among blacks.
The term 'black power' had been around since the 1950s, but it was Stokely Carmichael,
head of the Student Non-violent Co-ordinating Committee (SNCC), who popularised the
term in 1966.
[From http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/sociology-and-social-
reform/socialreform/black-power-movement. Accessed on 18 November 2019.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020) HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) 11
SOURCE 3B
The source below explains the reasons why the Black Panther Party launched their
breakfast programme.
In 1969, a group of children sat down to a free breakfast before school. On the menu:
chocolate milk, eggs, meat, cereal and fresh oranges. The scene wouldn’t be out of
place in a school cafeteria these days – but the federal government wasn’t providing the
food. Instead, breakfast was served thanks to the Black Panther Party.
At the time, the militant Black Nationalist party was vilified (criticised) in the news media
and feared by those intimidated by its message of black power and its commitment to
ending police brutality and subjugation (suppression) of black Americans. But for
students eating breakfast, the Black Panther’s politics were less interesting than the
meals they were providing.
“The children, many of whom had never eaten breakfast before the Panthers started
their program,’’ The Sun reporter wrote, “think the Panthers are ‘groovy’ and ‘very nice’
for doing this for them.’’
The program may have been groovy, but its purpose was to fuel revolution by
encouraging black people’s survival. From 1969 through the early 1970s, the Black
Panthers’ Free Breakfast for School Children Program fed tens of thousands of hungry
kids. … School officials immediately reported results in kids who had free breakfast
before school. “The school principal came down and told us how different the children
were’’, Ruth Beckford, a parishioner who helped with the program, said later. “They
weren’t falling asleep in class, they weren’t crying with stomach cramps.’’ … Food wasn’t
the only part of the BPP’s social programs; they expanded to cover everything from free
medical clinics to community ambulance services and legal clinics.
[From //www.hist.com/news/free-school-breakfast-black-panther-party. Accessed on 07 March 2020.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
12 HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)
SOURCE 3C
This photograph shows members of the Philadelphia Black Panthers organisation,
serving breakfast to children.
[From https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/inside-the-black-panthers-photographer-stephen-
shames/16/. Accessed on 21 November 2019.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
(EC/SEPTEMBER 2020) HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) 13
SOURCE 3D
The source below is an extract of an article written by Mary Philips called Power of the
First-person narrative: Ericka Huggins and the Black Panther Party.
Born Ericka Cozette Jenkins on January 5, 1948, in Washington, DC, Huggins joined
the BPP in 1967 in Los Angeles. As a college student at Lincoln University in
Pennsylvania, she was involved in the Black Student Congress (BSC), a campus
organisation, despite the fact that the BSC was resistant to female membership: “They
didn’t appreciate women joining the Black Student Congress as it was called then but
they did let me join” (Interview by the author, July 20, 2011). In college, she read a
Ramparts magazine article on charges against Huey P. Newton for the murder of an
Oakland police officer.
Moved by the inhumane treatment of Newton after his arrest, Huggins mentioned the
picture in that Ramparts magazine article showed Huey without a shirt strapped to a
hospital gurney, with a bullet wound in his stomach. The white police officer was
obviously guarding the camera. Inspired by the image and the story, she and her lover,
John Huggins, decided to leave school, move to California, and join the BPP. She later
married Huggins and they had a daughter, Mai.
In the BPP, Ericka Huggins served in many capacities, including working as editor of
the BPP newspaper, The Black Panther, also known as The Black Panther
Intercommunal News Service. When her husband was murdered by COINTELPRO
agents, Huggins moved to her hometown and opened a BPP branch in New Haven,
Connecticut. After her arrest, trial, and release in 1971, she served as director of the
BPP’s Oakland Community School (OCS), maintaining its daily affairs from 1973 to
1981. She co-wrote the curriculum as well as grants for the school, in addition to
supervising and managing staff members. While serving as director, she travelled the
country delivering presentations on the school’s pedagogy.
[From https://www.erickahuggins.com/resources. Accessed on 21 November 2019.]
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Downloaded from hlayiso.com
14 HISTORY P1 (ADDENDUM) (EC/SEPTEMBER 2020)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Visual sources and other historical evidence were taken from the following:
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/precrisis.htm
https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/cuban-missile-
crisis?mediatype=photography&phrase =cuban%20missile%20crisis&sort=mostpopula
https://spartacus-educational.com.
https://microsites.jfklibrary.org/cmc/oct26/doc4.html
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/angola
South Africa’s Intervention in Angola: Before Cuito Cuanavale and Thereafter
file:///E:/Angola%202/labuschagne_south_2009.pdf.
http://williamblum.org/chapters/killing-hope/angola
https://mrdivis.wordpress.com/2016/12/02/remembering-fidel-castros-impact-in-
southern-africa/.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/sociology-and-social-
reform/socialreform/black-power-movement
www.hist.com/news/free-school-breakfast-black-panther-party.
https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/inside-the-black-panthers-photographer-stephen-
shames/16/.
https://www.erickahuggins.com/resources
Copyright reserved Please turn over
Study this subject
Recommended for this subject

Question paper
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Mock 2022 QP (Eng)

Question paper
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Mock 2021 QP (Eng)

Question paper
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Mock 2019 QP (Eng)

Question paper
History Grade 12 P1 Eastern Cape Mock 2018 QP (Eng)

Addendum
History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2019 Addendum (Eng)

Addendum
History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape Mock 2018 Addendum (Eng)
More from Grade 12 History

Study guide
Workguide Case Study Strategies

Memorandum
History Grade 12 Paper 2 North West Mock 2025 Memo

Memorandum
History Grade 12 Paper 1 NSC June 2025 Memo (English)
%202024%20Question%20Paper%20X05_hlayiso.com_--7b41ec15-3856-4a67-a9db-cedd424e51c5/v1-5ae80cf63fec0975a316/card.webp)
Question paper
History Grade 12 P1 Gauteng Prelim 2024 Question Paper (Eng)

Question paper
History Grade 12 P2 Eastern Cape June 2023 QP (Eng)
%20Memo_hlayiso.com_--4fe0001f-11e9-414e-be30-45108ea0ae86/v1-2b5a2c0ac74d623b88fe/card.webp)
Memorandum